Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2018, Vol. 50 Issue (2): 226-234    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00226
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 帖子主题特征对虚拟社区知识分享行为的影响: 旁观者效应的视角
 黄 凤1;  丁 倩2;  魏 华2;  洪建中3
 (1合肥工业大学党委学生工作部, 合肥 230009) (2信阳师范学院教育科学学院, 信阳 464000) (3华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079)
 Effects of post thematic characteristics on knowledge sharing in the virtual community: The bystander effect perspective
 HUANG Feng1; DING Qian2; WEI Hua2; HONG Jianzhong3
 (1 Department of Students' Affairs, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China) (2 College of Education Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China) (3 School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
全文: PDF(374 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  虚拟社区中存在着明显的不平等现象——90%的用户不参与知识分享, 这可能与虚拟社区知识分享中的旁观者效应有关。本研究通过3个情境实验探究了虚拟社区知识分享中存在的旁观者效应以及帖子主题特征的调节作用。结果发现, 虚拟社区知识分享中存在旁观者效应, 且帖子主题的紧急程度和具体程度对旁观者效应起调节作用。即旁观者人数较多时, 个体的知识分享数量显著少于只有1个或不存在旁观者的情境; 而在帖子主题比较具体的情况下, 旁观者人数对个体知识分享数量的作用不再显著; 在帖子主题比较紧急的情况下, 旁观者人数对个体知识分享数量的作用则出现反转。研究结果表明, 虚拟社区知识分享中存在旁观者效应, 通过操纵帖子主题的紧急性和具体性可以在一定程度上缓解甚至改变该旁观者效应。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黄凤
丁倩
魏华
洪建中
关键词 虚拟社区 知识分享数量 旁观者效应 帖子主题特征    
Abstract: One of the major challenges in fostering a virtual community is the supply of knowledge, more specifically, the willingness and behavior to share knowledge with other members. Most virtual communities exhibited the participation inequality phenomenon that 90% of users were lurkers who never contributed, 9% contributed a little, and 1% contributed most of the messages (Nielsen, 2006). The bystander effect — the influence of the lurkers on other virtual community users’ knowledge sharing behavior, however, is very common but under-investigated. We proposed that the bystander effect would hinder knowledge sharing in virtual communities. Moreover, it was hypothesized that the bystander effect would decrease when the level of emergency and concreteness of posts thematic in virtual communities increased. Three situational experiments were conducted to examine the hypotheses. Experiment 1 studied the bystander effect on knowledge sharing in virtual communities using a one-factor between-subjects design. One-hundred twenty-one university students participated in the experiment. Experiment 2 examined the moderation effect of the emergency of posts thematic. A total of 177 university students participated in an experiment with a 2 (Number of bystanders: 1 vs. 54) × 2 (Emergency level of posts thematic: urgent vs. not urgent) between-subjects design. Experiment 3 examined the moderation effect of the concreteness of posts thematic. A total of 136 university students participated in an experiment with a 2 (Number of bystanders: 1 vs. 54) × 2 (Concreteness level of posts thematic: concrete vs. not concrete) between-subjects design. The results of these three experiments provided support for our hypothesis: (1) There was a bystander effect in the virtual community knowledge sharing: participants in the fewer-bystander (0 or 1) condition shared more knowledge in the virtual community than the more-bystander (14 or 54) condition. (2) Experiment 2 and Experiment 3 indicated that the bystander effect could be relieved or even reversed if the posts thematic appeared to be urgent or concrete. In the non-urgent or non-concrete condition, the classic bystander effect was found. Participants in the 1-bystander condition shared knowledge significantly more than participants in the 54-bystander condition. But when the posts thematic were made to be urgent, the bystander effect was reversed: Participants in the 1-bystander condition posted fewer messages than in the 54-bystander condition (Experiment 2). Similarly, when the posts thematic were made concrete, the bystander effect was relieved: In the 1-bystander condition, participants shared the same quantity of knowledge as in the 54-bystander condition (Experiment 3). The theoretical contributions and managerial implications of our findings were discussed. First, we broadened the understanding of bystander effect in virtual community knowledge sharing, which supports the social influence model and the non-linear relationship between the number of bystanders and knowledge sharing behaviors. Second, we demonstrated that changing the emergency and the concreteness of posts thematic could effectively change the bystander effect in virtual community knowledge sharing. This was an empirical evidence for the arousal: cost-reward model and the social influence theory. Third, results offered critical insights for managers. To change participation inequality and promote knowledge sharing, it is advised that managers should undo displaying the number of lurkers and ask users to concretely describe their questions with details in virtual community.
Key words virtual community    knowledge sharing    bystander effect    post thematic characteristics
     出版日期: 2017-12-26
ZTFLH:     
  B849: C91  
基金资助: 信阳师范学院‘南湖学者奖励计划’青年项目(Nanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars of XYNU), 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费重大培育项目(CCNU14Z02004), 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(CCNU15A060142)。
通讯作者: 丁倩, E-mail: psydingqian@163.com; 洪建中, E-mail: jhong@mail.ccnu.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
黄凤, 丁倩, 魏华, 洪建中.  帖子主题特征对虚拟社区知识分享行为的影响: 旁观者效应的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(2): 226-234.
HUANG Feng, DING Qian, WEI Hua, HONG Jianzhong.  Effects of post thematic characteristics on knowledge sharing in the virtual community: The bystander effect perspective. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 226-234.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00226      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2018/V50/I2/226
[1] 张积家, 陈栩茜, 尤宁, 王斌.  颜色词的语用关系影响颜色认知[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 390-399.
[2] 叶婉青, 李晓彤, 王大华.  年人对夫妻间负性事件的认知性情绪调节策略及其与婚姻满意度的关系:交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 426-435.
[3] 刘雁伶, 陈军, 沈友田, 胡竹菁.  频率树类型和提问方式 对因果强度估计模式的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 400-412.
[4] 韩尚锋, 李 玥, 刘燊, 徐强, 谭群, 张林. 美在观察者眼中:陌生面孔吸引力评价中 的晕轮效应与泛化效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 363-376.
[5] 程亚华, 王健, 伍新春.  小学低年级儿童汉语语素意识在阅读理解中的 作用:字词阅读流畅性的中介效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 413-425.
[6] 张燕, 曹慧敏, 郑元杰, 任衍具.  自上而下的目标调节奖赏联结干扰子 的注意定向和脱离[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 377-389.
[7] 叶浩生, 麻彦坤, 杨文登.  身体与认知表征:见解与分歧[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 462-472.
[8] 张勇, 刘海全, 王明旋, 青 平.  挑战性压力和阻断性压力对员工创造力的影响:自我效能的中介效应与组织公平的调节效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 450-461.
[9] 王冠, 周霈, 张凯莉, 王沛.  知觉负荷对面孔多重社会范畴加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 270-282.
[10] 任志洪, 张雅文, 江光荣.  正念冥想对焦虑症状的干预: 效果及其影响因素元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 283-305.
[11] 付超, 张振, 何金洲, 黄四林, 仇剑崟, 王益文.  普遍信任博弈决策的动态过程 ——来自脑电时频分析的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 317-326.
[12] 朱瑜, 吕阳, 王雁飞, 王丽璇.  教练型领导如何影响员工创新? 跨层次被调节的中介效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 327-336.
[13] 宫秀双, 蒋晶.  撞衫对消费者产品处置意向的 影响及其心理机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 337-348.
[14] 李巧, 刘凤军.  模糊产品展示对产品态度的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 349-357.
[15] 杨青青, 胡娜, 陈旭, 牛娟, 翟晶.  恋人亲密情景下的回避型与安全型 依恋个体情绪调节电生理差异[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 306-316.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn