Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2017, Vol. 49 Issue (8): 1072-1079    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01072
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 中国人三重自我建构加工中的相对优先性: 来自ERP的证据
 王 沛1;  陈庆伟2;  唐晓晨1;  罗俊龙1;  谈晨皓1;  高凡1
 (1上海师范大学教育学院心理系, 上海 200234) (2华南师范大学心理学院, 广州 510631)
 The situational primacy of Chinese individual self, relational self, collective self: Evidence from ERP
 WANG Pei1; CHEN Qingwei2; TANG Xiaochen1; LUO Junlong1; TAN Chenhao1; GAO Fan1
 (1 Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China.) (2 School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
全文: PDF(4449 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  借助事件相关电位技术, 采用启动范式的变式探讨了中国人三重自我建构的加工特点。结果发现, 具体哪种自我建构占据加工优势取决于具体的加工阶段:早期加工阶段集体自我占加工优势; 晚期加工阶段个体自我占加工优势; 而在N2成分上, 三种自我建构加工优势相当。该结果在一定程度上支持了情境性假设, 拓展了三重自我建构理论的研究, 为该领域的理论争论提供了新的认知神经科学证据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王沛
陈庆伟
唐晓晨
罗俊龙
谈晨皓
高凡
关键词  自我 三重自我建构理论 个体自我 关系自我 集体自我    
Abstract: Self has always been the hot topic in various fields. The tripartite model of self-construal has been the dominating theory at present. According to the tripartite model of self-construal, self is divided into individual self, relational self and collective self based on the relationship between self and others. As to the primacy of individual self, relational self and collective self, different scholars hold different opinions. They proposed four hypotheses as to this issue: individual self primacy hypothesis, relational self primacy hypothesis, collective self primacy hypothesis and situational primacy hypothesis. Each hypothesis has its own behavioral and neuroscience evidence. However, more and more evidence support the individual self primacy hypothesis recently. The present study employed the variant of priming paradigm for the first time to explore the processing of Chinese individual self, relational self and collective self with ERP. We employed 3 (Reference Target: self, familiar other form same country, familiar other from other country) ×3 (Reference Level: individual self, relational self, collective self) within-subject design. 19 paid volunteers participated in this study. Participants were asked to watch the center of the screen where would present a series of word pairs. The prime word and the target word are both names which were collected by the pilot questionnaire. Each trial consisted of the following sequence of events. A prime word was presented for 1000~1200 ms randomized, followed by a 250~350 ms randomized fixation cross, after which a blank screen came for 250~350 ms randomized. After that, a target word came about and lasted until the participants responded. If there was no response, then the target word would disappear after 2000 ms. The inter-trial interval (ITI) was 1000 ms long. There are 1000 trials in total, and participants could have a break after 200 trials. The participants were asked to indicate whether the prime and the target referred to the same person, whether they belonged to the same family, or whether they were from the same country. If the answer was yes, then press the “Consistent” key, otherwise press the “Inconsistent” key. Behavioral results showed that RT of individual self was significantly shorter than that of relational self and collective self and RT of relational self was significantly shorter than that of collective self when the reference target was self. ERPs results indicated that which self became the primary one depended on the specific processing stage. In the early (P2) stage, collective self became the primary one. In the late (P3) stage, individual self turned to be the primary one. In terms of N2, there was no difference as to primacy among them. The results support the situational primacy hypothesis. The present study expands the studies of tripartite model of self-construal and provides the cognitive neuroscience evidence for the debate of primacy. Future studies should be done from different perspective to support situational primacy hypothesis.
Key words self    tripartite model of self-construal    individual self    relational self    collective self
收稿日期: 2014-08-10      出版日期: 2017-06-25
ZTFLH:     
  B849:C91  
  B845  
基金资助: 2012年度国家社科基金重点项目“中国人自我与人际认知的特征:心理与脑科学的整合研究” (12AZD117)资助。
通讯作者: 王沛, E-mail: wangpei1970@163.com; 陈庆伟, E-mail: 52cqw@163.com; 唐晓晨, E-mail: tangxc@shnu.edu.cn     E-mail: E-mail: wangpei1970@163.com; E-mail: 52cqw@163.com; E-mail: tangxc@shnu.edu.cn
引用本文:   
王沛, 陈庆伟, 唐晓晨, 罗俊龙, 谈晨皓, 高凡.  中国人三重自我建构加工中的相对优先性: 来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1072-1079.
WANG Pei, CHEN Qingwei, TANG Xiaochen, LUO Junlong, TAN Chenhao, GAO Fan.  The situational primacy of Chinese individual self, relational self, collective self: Evidence from ERP. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1072-1079.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01072      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2017/V49/I8/1072
[1] 王海忠, 范孝雯, 欧阳建颖.  消费者自我构念、独特性需求与 品牌标识形状偏好[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1113-1124.
[2] 杨红升,黄希庭. 中国人的群体参照记忆效应[J]. 心理学报, 2007, 39(02): 235-241.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn