Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
从效应量应有的性质看中介效应量的合理性
温忠麟1;范息涛2;叶宝娟3;陈宇帅1
(1华南师范大学心理应用研究中心/心理学院, 广州 510631) (2澳门大学, 澳门)
(3江西师范大学心理学院, 南昌 330022)
Characteristics of an effect size and appropriateness of mediation effect size measures revisited
WEN Zhonglin1; FAN Xitao2; YE Baojuan3; CHEN Yushuai1
(1 Center for Studies of Psychological Application/School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
(2
University of Macau, Macau, China) (3 School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)
全文: PDF(397 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

效应量的作用有两个方面, 一是弥补了统计检验的不足, 二是使得效应有可比性。结合统计显著性和效应量, 才能得出适当的统计结论。效应量应当具有一些基本性质, 包括与测量单位无关、单调性、不受样本容量的影响。国际上流行的中介效应量κ平方就是因为缺乏单调性而引发质疑和研究, 从而被彻底终结了其作为中介效应量的合法性。R平方型中介效应量同样有缺乏单调性的问题。文末讨论了如何报告中介效应量以及有待研究的问题。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
温忠麟
范息涛
叶宝娟
陈宇帅
关键词 中介效应间接效应效应量κ平方    
Abstract

Since Preacher and Kelley (2011) proposed kappa-squared (k2) as a mediation effect size measure, it has become popular in mediation analyses, as shown by its appearance in research literature (e.g., Athay, 2012; Field, 2013). Furthermore, a special on-line calculator for computing kappa-squared also became available, making its use in research practice very convenient. Unfortunately, Wen and Fan (2015) recently demonstrated both logically and mathematically that kappa-squared has fatal flaws in its definition and calculation, which should put an end to its use in mediation analysis. This article evaluates the appropriateness of the current mediation effect size measures, based on the considerations of the expected characteristics of an effect size.

Effect size plays at least two roles in research practice. First, it provides supplemental information that compensates for the limitation of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). Second, it makes the research findings comparable across studies in which different measures may have been used. For example, in the context of difference analysis involving two groups, the mean group difference is often the quantity of our research interest. When statistically “significant” difference is revealed by NHST, we are informed that the difference between the two group means is statistically different beyond what would be expected as a result of sampling error; but we are not entirely clear about how large the difference is. Primarily for this reason, it has been advocated that an effect size measure be used to supplement the statistical NHST (Fan & Konold, 2010; Wilkinson & the Task Force on Statistical Inference, 1999). Why can’t we directly report the effect (such as the mean group difference) that represents the original quantity of interest? It turns out that the original quantity (e.g., mean group difference) is usually not comparable across studies because different measures across the studies usually have different and arbitrary measurement scales (e.g., 5-point difference on two different tests may have very different meanings). Because of these difficulties, an effect size is often constructed as a scale-free index to represent the original quantity of interest. When the NHST result is supplemented by an effect size, it is more likely that both statistical and practical meanings of an analysis finding can be better understood and conveyed.

To serve its purpose, an effect size should have some basic characteristics, including being scale-free, being monotonic with respect to the effect that it represents, and being independent of sample size. It was the lack of monotonicity that kappa-squared was called into question by Wen and Fan (2015). They showed that the problem of kappa-squared is due to (1) the improper calculation of the maximum possible value of the indirect effect, and (2) mathematically, the maximum possible indirect effect is infinity, implying that the definition of kappa-squared is mathematically incorrect.

Several R2-type effect size measures for mediation effect have been proposed, such as De Heus’s (2012) , MacKinnon’s (2008) ,  and . But all these measures are not monotonic with respect to the mediation effect. Lachowicz’s (2015)  is obviously a monotonically increasing function of the mediation effect in absolute value. However, it is more difficult to understand and explain than the original mediation effect ab itself.

The traditional mediation effect size  (the ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect) is not perfect as a mediation effect size by itself. But when accompanied by the total effect and indirect effect in standardized form, it is meaningful for a basic mediation model where the indirect effect ab and the direct effect  have the same sign. For inconsistent mediation models where the indirect effect ab and the direct effect  have opposite signs,  is not appropriate as a mediation effect size measure, and what is a suitable effect size in this situation is still an issue to be addressed in future research.

Key wordsmediation effect    indirect effect    effect size    kappa-squared
收稿日期: 2015-03-03      出版日期: 2016-04-25
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金(31271116, 31400909)和教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC190029)资助。

通讯作者: 温忠麟, E-mail: wenzl@scnu.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
温忠麟;范息涛;叶宝娟;陈宇帅. 从效应量应有的性质看中介效应量的合理性[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00435.
WEN Zhonglin; FAN Xitao; YE Baojuan; CHEN Yushuai. Characteristics of an effect size and appropriateness of mediation effect size measures revisited. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 435-443.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00435      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2016/V48/I4/435
[1] 王 燕, 林镇超, 侯博文, 孙时进.  生命史权衡的内在机制:动机控制策略的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 783-793.
[2] 温红博;梁凯丽;刘先伟. 家庭环境对中学生阅读能力的影响:阅读投入、阅读兴趣的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 248-257.
[3] 刘俊升;周颖;李丹;陈欣银. 儿童中期和青春期早期独处偏好与心理适应之关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 1004-1012.
[4] 田录梅;张文新;陈光辉. 父母支持、友谊质量对孤独感和抑郁的影响:检验一个间接效应模型[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2): 238-251.
[5] 刘红云;骆方;张玉;张丹慧. 因变量为等级变量的中介效应分析[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(12): 1431-1442.
[6] 任皓;温忠麟;陈启山;叶宝娟. 工作团队领导心理资本对成员组织公民行为的影响机制:多层次模型[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(1): 82-93.
[7] 隋杨;王辉;岳旖旎;Fred Luthans. 变革型领导对员工绩效和满意度的影响:心理资本的中介作用及程序公平的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(9): 1217-1230.
[8] 梁宗保,张光珍,陈会昌,张萍. 父母元情绪理念、情绪表达与儿童社会能力的关系[J]. , 2012, 44(2): 199-210.
[9] 方杰;张敏强. 中介效应的点估计和区间估计:乘积分布法、非参数Bootstrap和MCMC法[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(10): 1408-1420.
[10] 辛自强,郭素然,池丽萍. 青少年自尊与攻击的关系:中介变量和调节变量的作用[J]. , 2007, 39(05): 845-851.
[11] 温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰. 有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J]. , 2006, 38(03): 448-452.
[12] 刘惠军,郭德俊,李宏利,高培霞. 成就目标定向、测验焦虑与工作记忆的关系[J]. , 2006, 38(02): 254-261.
[13] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷. 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J]. , 2005, 37(02): 268-274.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn