Please wait a minute...
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
(青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 华中师范大学心理学院,
湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室, 武汉 430079)
The Developmental Patterns of Working Alliance in Counseling: Relationships to Therapeutic Outcomes
ZHU Xu; HU Yue; JIANG Guangrong
(Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education; School of Psychology, Central China Normal University; Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079, China)
全文: PDF(436 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

为了探索工作同盟在咨询过程中的发展模式, 采用Stiles等(2004)提出的4个变化特征参数(shape-of-change parameters)对30个个案的工作同盟在咨询过程中的发展变化进行描述。聚类分析的结果显示有3类工作同盟的发展模式, 分别是线性增长、线性下降和二次增长模式。不过, 3种发展模式、4个变化特征参数及同盟的破裂?修复片段对咨询效果均没有影响。比较咨询效果不同的当事人在工作同盟发展模式上的差异, 发现同一个发展模式对于不同的个案可能有着不同的含义, 咨询师在早期对同盟关系的处理与调控对咨询效果有着重要的影响。

E-mail Alert
关键词 工作同盟发展模式效果心理咨询    


Working alliance in counseling has been a highly attended research area for several decades. Although a positive relationship between working alliance and counseling outcome has been well established, little do we know how working alliance functions in counseling process. Studying the development of working alliance would contribute to this understanding. Some theories have focused on describing developmental patterns of working alliance based on existing research findings, such as the U-shaped model and the rupture-repair episodes model. However, empirical effort has failed to show significant effect of these hypothesized developmental patterns on counseling outcomes. This naturalistic study aimed at exploring the developmental patterns of working alliance as emerged in counseling sessions and examining the relationship between these patterns and therapeutic outcomes.
The participants included 30 clients from 4 university counseling centers, 10 males and 20 females, with the number of sessions ranging from 4 to11, M = 6.53, SD = 2.03, Mdn = 6. By the time of data collection, all of the clients had finished their therapies. There were 20 therapists in the study, 3 males and 17 females, with professional experience from 1 to 22 years. They rated their therapeutic orientations using a 5-point Likert scale, which resulted in the strength of endorsement, from high to low, on person-centered, cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic approaches. Each therapist offered 1 to 3 cases respectively. Clients filled out measurements of working alliance and depression symptoms after each session. Four shape-of-change parameters (Stiles et al., 2004) were used to describe the developmental patterns of working alliance in the counseling process of these 30 cases.

Results from the cluster analysis revealed three developmental patterns, labeled as linear increase, linear decrease, and quadratic increase. However, none of these developmental patterns had significant effects on the counseling outcomes. Then, correlations between the four shape-of-change parameters (i.e., indicators of developmental patterns) and outcomes were tested, but none of the correlations was significant either. It was also found that the rupture-repair episodes defined in terms of various criteria could not differentiate good outcomes from poor ones. Notably, the levels of working alliance were still found to predict outcomes. In order to explore the reasons why the developmental patterns had no relationship with outcomes, we conducted case studies comparing the working alliance developmental patterns in cases with good or poor outcomes. Results showed that the same developmental patterns emerged in both types of cases, but these pattern may have different meanings for different clients. It appeared that therapists’ regulations of working alliance in early sessions may have great influence on therapeutic outcomes.

Key wordsworking alliance    developmental patterns    outcomes    counseling
收稿日期: 2014-12-29      出版日期: 2015-10-25


通讯作者: 江光荣, E-mail:   
朱旭;胡岳;江光荣. 心理咨询中工作同盟的发展模式与咨询效果[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01279.
ZHU Xu; HU Yue; JIANG Guangrong. The Developmental Patterns of Working Alliance in Counseling: Relationships to Therapeutic Outcomes. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(10): 1279-1287.
链接本文:      或
[1] 龚少英, 上官晨雨, 翟奎虎, 郭雅薇.  情绪设计对多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 771-782.
[2] 任志洪; 李献云; 赵陵波; 余香莲; 李政汉; 赖丽足; 阮怡君; 江光荣. 抑郁症网络化自助干预的效果及作用机制 ——以汉化MoodGYM为例[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 818-832.
[3] 谢和平;王福兴;周宗奎;吴鹏. 多媒体学习中线索效应的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 540-555.
[4] 张博;黎坚;徐楚;李一茗. 11~14岁超常儿童与普通儿童问题解决能力的发展比较[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(12): 1823-1834.
[5] 朱旭,江光荣. 当事人眼里的工作同盟:质的分析[J]. , 2011, 43(04): 420-431.
[6] 张红霞,张益. 国别属性重要吗?代言人与广告效果关系研究的新视角[J]. , 2010, 42(02): 304-316.
[7] 席洁,姜薇,张林军,舒华. 汉语语音范畴性知觉及其发展[J]. , 2009, 41(07): 572-579.
[8] 景怀斌. 儒家思想对于现代心理咨询的启示[J]. , 2007, 39(02): 371-380.
[9] 王詠,马谋超,雷莉,丁夏齐. 网络旗帜广告的记忆效果[J]. , 2003, 35(06): 830-834.
[10] 韩玉昌,任桂琴. 小学一年级数学新教材插图效果的眼动研究[J]. , 2003, 35(06): 818-822.
[11] 郭春彦,朱滢,王全珍. 差数显著性t检验与元分析方法的模拟对比[J]. , 2002, 34(02): 46-50.
[12] 李敏,陈琦. 小学几何教学中计算机不同应用模式的比较[J]. , 2000, 32(01): 75-81.
[13] 刘儒德. 论有关计算机辅助教学效果的研究[J]. , 1998, 30(01): 113-120.
[14] 郭春彦,朱滢. 差数显著性t检验与元分析的对比研究[J]. , 1997, 29(04): 436-442.
[15] 郭春彦,朱滢,李斌. 传统统计方法面临的挑战:元分析方法[J]. , 1997, 29(02): 130-136.
Full text



版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持