Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2017, Vol. 25 Issue (1) : 1-11     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00001
Conceptual Framework |
The influence of temporal reference on inaction inertia of green innovative consumption
WANG Caiyu1; LEI Li2; WU Bo3
(1 Department of Psychology, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China) (2 Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China) (3.Business School, Tianjin University of Finance & Economics, Tianjin 300222, China)
Download: PDF(516 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

In the face of serious environmental problems and strict environmental regulations, more and more enterprises begin to implement green innovation strategy. But the market shares of green innovative products have not increased significantly over the past decade. Hence, it becomes the responsibility to explore the psychological barriers to buy green innovative products. Inaction inertia means that consumers have positive attitude but have no action. Why does this happen? According to the construal level theory, we hold that, relative to the future long-term purchase, consumers tended to be more conservative and pay more attention to realistic value in the near future, which lead to higher perceived risk of green innovative product and delay purchase. Based on the above concept, this project intended to start from the perspective of temporal reference, revealed the forms, process and mechanism of inaction inertia, so as to provided new strategies for market intervention.

Keywords construal level theory      time distance      green innovative consumption      inaction inertia     
Corresponding Authors: LEI Li, E-mail: WANG Caiyu, E-mail:    
Issue Date: 15 January 2017
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
WANG Caiyu
Cite this article:   
WANG Caiyu,LEI Li,WU Bo. The influence of temporal reference on inaction inertia of green innovative consumption[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 1-11.
URL:     OR
[1] LI Ming-Hui, RAO Li-Lin.  Moral judgment from construal level theory perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1423-1430.
[2] ZHANG Yue; XIN Ziqiang. Priming research in social psychology: Approaches and challenges[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 844-854.
[3] DENG Ying; XU Fu-Ming; LI Ou; SHI Yan-Wei; LIU Cheng-Hao. The framing effect on social preferences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 622-632.
[4] ZHANG Hongwei;LI Ye. Moral Behavior under Two Kinds of Moral Self-regulation Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1178-1187.
[5] LIU Cuicui;CHEN Bin;LIU Leixin;YUAN Xianxue;WANG Zuojun. Does Standers-by Always See More Than Gamesters?A Review on the Self-other Decision Making Differences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 879-885.
[6] LI Xiaoming;ZHOU Qiao. The Moderation Role of the Number of Missed Option in Producing Inaction Inertia[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 205-210.
[7] YAN Jin;LOU Chunhua. Decision-making under Ethical Temptation: How Construal Level Theory May Help[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(11): 2047-2056.
[8] LI Xiao-Ming;LI Xiao-Lin. Inaction Inertia: Causes, Conditions and Application[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 584-591.
[9] LI Yan-Chen; ZHOU Ting-Rui; ZHOU Xiu. Theoretical Models of Multisensory Cues Integration……WEN Xiao-Hui, LIU Qiang, SUN Hong-Jin, et al.(666)
Construal Level Theory: From Temporal Distance to Psychological Distanc
[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 667-677.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech