Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (7) : 1103-1111     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01103
Research Methods |
On the Methodological Issues of Studies on Positivity Effect
BI Dandan;HAN Buxin
(1 Research Center on Aging Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China) (2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China)
Download: PDF(242 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

From perspectives of time perception and motivation, Socioemotional Selectivity Theory postulated that older adults’ processing of emotional stimuli is positively affected. In comparison with young adults, older adults tend to prefer positive stimuli and avoid negative stimuli. Nevertheless, results of current empirical studies with regards to this positivity effect were inconsistent. Previous literatures on positivity effect showed concerns for four methodological issues. This included 1) the inconsistence between studies regarding the between-group differences (e.g., between two or three groups), 2) the cross-cultural generalizability of the results, and considered that 3) the multiplicity of emotional stimuli, categorization, and mode of presentation were the main reasons for the differences among previous literature, and future research on the positivity effect would require differentiation of the constructs of “emotional bias” and “emotional effect”. Future research on positivity effect can be improved through expanding the age range of participants, validating results based on cross-cultural and cross-region comparison, and improving the ecological validity of stimuli.

Keywords socioemotional selectivity theory      positivity effect      cross-culture      emotional stimuli     
Corresponding Authors: HAN Buxin   
Issue Date: 15 July 2014
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
BI Dandan
HAN Buxin
Cite this article:   
BI Dandan,HAN Buxin. On the Methodological Issues of Studies on Positivity Effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1103-1111.
URL:     OR
[1] MAMAT Marhaba, LI Ye, WANG Hui.  Narcissistic leader versus humble leader: A perspective from cross-culture management[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1375-1386.
[2] LI Zhanxing; ZHU Liqi. Moral Emotion Judgment and Attribution: Development and Contributing Factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 990-999.
[3] AO Lingmin;LV Houchao;PANG Xue. Poignancy: Conception, Measurement and Related Studies Review[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(9): 1643-1650.
[4] GONG Xian-Min,WANG Da-Hua. The Elderly’s Positivity Effect in Emotional Memory and Its Underlying Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(9): 1411-1418.
[5] XU Si-An;ZHENG Xue. The Cognitive Style of Ethnic Minorities[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(8): 1207-1211.
[6] ZHANG Hai-Zhong;JIANG Yong-Zhi;ZHAO Wen-Jin;AN Gui-Hua;ZHANG Xiao-Long;HU Zhi-Jun;ZHANG Wan-Li. A Theoretical Exploration and Empirical Research of the Regional Cross-culture Psychology of China[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(8): 1229-1236.
[7] AO Ling-Min;LV Hou-Chao;HUANG Xi-Ting. An Overview of Socioemotional Selectivity Theory[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 217-223.
[8] WU LIN;XING Xiao-Li. Positivity Effect in Attention and Memory: Paradox of Aging and the Perspective from Socioemotional Selectivity Theory[J]. , 2009, 17(02): 362-369.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech