Please wait a minute...
   2012, Vol. 20 Issue (7) : 1012-1022     DOI:
研究前沿 |
The Mechanisms and Influential Factors of the Tradeoff Between Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control
XU Lei;TANG Dan-Dan;CHEN An-Tao
(School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)
Download: PDF(259 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  The study of proactive and reactive control provides an important new insight into cognitive control. Proactive control serves to prevent interference before it occurs by actively maintaining goal-related information, whereas reactive control can resolve interference after its onset by reactivating goal-related information. There is a tradeoff between these two kinds of control to optimize task performance. Several paradigms, such as AX-CPT, combined with ERP/fMRI techniques, have been utilized to investigate proactive and reactive control, revealing the temporal dynamics and location of brain activity (e.g., lateral PFC) under proactive versus reactive control. The tradeoff between these two controls can be influenced by physical development (e.g., age), cognitive factors (e.g., fluid intelligence, expectation, training), non-cognitive factors (e.g., emotion, motivation). Further researches should integrate with the study of conflict control and focus more on the computational and neural mechanisms behind such a tradeoff.
Keywords cognitive control      proactive control      reactive control      tradeoff     
Corresponding Authors: CHEN An-Tao   
Issue Date: 15 July 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
XU Lei
TANG Dan-Dan
CHEN An-Tao
Cite this article:   
XU Lei,TANG Dan-Dan,CHEN An-Tao. The Mechanisms and Influential Factors of the Tradeoff Between Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control[J]. , 2012, 20(7): 1012-1022.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2012/V20/I7/1012
[1] WANG Qiang; ZHANG Enmao. The Methods and Neural Basis of Reducing Decision-making Impulsivity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 101-109.
[2] LV Xiaokang; WANG Xinjian; FU Xiaoting. Why Poverty Impedes Decision Performance? Three Psychological Explanations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(11): 1823-1828.
[3] LIU Xun;NAN Weizhi;WANG Kai;LI Qi. Modular Organization of Cognitive Control[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(12): 2091-2102.
[4] LIU Pei-Duo;YANG Wen-Jing;TIAN Xia;CHEN An-Tao. An Overview of Current Studies about the Conflict Adaptation Effect[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 532-541.
[5] LU Qin-Qin;DAI Shu-Fen;GU Kai;ZUO Yang-Fan;YU Ping. The Role of Cortical and Subcortical Motor Areas in the Cognitive Control of Movement[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(11): 1794-1802.
[6] JIANG Jun|CHEN An-Tao|ZHANG Wei-Wei|ZHANG Qing-Lin. Cognitive Control Triggered by Unconscious Information and Its Neutral Mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(10): 1573-1584.
[7] TIAN Xue-Hong;YANG Qun;ZHANG De-Xuan;ZHANG Ye. A Theory on the Mechanism Underlying Moral Intuitions[J]. , 2011, 19(10): 1426-1433.
[8] CHEN An-Tao. A Cognitive Neuroscience Study for Artifact Category Learning[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 18-27.
[9] LIAO Cheng-Ju; FENG Zheng-Zhi. Mechanism of Affective and Cognitive-Control Brain Regions in Depression[J]. , 2010, 18(02): 282-287.
[10] ZHAO Jun-Hua;MO Lei. Cognitive Control in Bilingual Lexical Access[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008, 16(06): 874-879.
[11] Zhu Xiangru;Liu Chang. A Brief Review of Conflict Monitoring Theory[J]. , 2005, 13(06): 767-773.
[12] Li Xiaoming, Fu Xiaolan. Decision Behavior in Emotional Tradeoff Difficulties[J]. , 2004, 12(06): 801-801~808.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech