Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2020, Vol. 28 Issue (8) : 1246-1255     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01246
Conceptual Framework |
The negative effects and underlying mechanisms of unethical pro-organizational behavior
WANG Taolin1, ZHANG Yong2, ZHOU Hao1, ZHANG Junwei3
1College of Business, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China;
2School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China;
3College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Download: PDF(555 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  In recent times, various tragedies caused by unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB)—that is, unethical behavior with the intention to potentially benefit the organization, but harm the interests of external stakeholders instead—are proliferating. The existing studies on UPB predominately focus on identifying its antecedents and pro-organizational aspects, ignoring its potential negative outcomes. Given this theoretical gap, the negative effects of UPB from a multilevel perspective are explored. First, the effect of UPB on exhaustion is explored; the moderating effect of moral identity and mediating effect of guilt are examined as well. Second, a firm-level UPB definition is created, and its negative effect on the firm’s long-term performance as well as the mediating role of corporation reputation are examined. Finally, the influence of the firm’s and employees’ UPB on customers' voluntary performance is analyzed, as well as the mediating effect of customer identification on the company and the moderating role of the perceived corporation agent role of employees. The results of this project will not only enrich the theoretical study related to UPB, but also help to discourage the practice or escalation of this kind of unethical behavior.
Keywords unethical pro-organizational behavior      emotional exhaustion      long-term firm performance      customer voluntary performance     
PACS:  B849:C93  
Issue Date: 28 June 2020
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Taolin
ZHANG Yong
ZHOU Hao
ZHANG Junwei
Cite this article:   
WANG Taolin,ZHANG Yong,ZHOU Hao, et al. The negative effects and underlying mechanisms of unethical pro-organizational behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(8): 1246-1255.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01246     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2020/V28/I8/1246
[1] 陈默, 梁建. (2017). 高绩效要求与亲组织不道德行为: 基于社会认知理论的视角.心理学报, 49(1), 94-105.
[2] 郭亿馨, 苏勇, 吉祥熙. (2018). 员工未来关注与不道德亲组织行为: 一个中介-调节模型的构建与检验.中国人力资源开发, 35(2), 30-40.
[3] 何美贤, 罗建河. (2016). 企业声誉对消费者情感依恋和顾客公民行为的影响机制——基于顾客-企业认同视角.中国流通经济, 30(4), 108-114.
[4] 李根强. (2016). 伦理型领导、组织认同与员工亲组织非伦理行为: 特质调节焦点的调节作用.科学学与科学技术管理, 37(12), 125-135.
[5] 林英晖, 程垦. (2016). 领导-部属交换与员工亲组织非伦理行为:差序格局视角.管理科学, 29(5), 57-70.
[6] 林英晖, 程垦. (2017). 差序式领导与员工亲组织非伦理行为:圈内人和圈外人视角.管理科学, 30(3), 35-50.
[7] 罗帆, 徐瑞华. (2017). 高承诺人力资源管理实践对亲组织非伦理行为的影响——组织支持感的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用.中国人力资源开发, 34(10), 28-38.
[8] 马红宇, 唐汉瑛, 张南, 史燕伟, 张晶. (2019). 资源保存理论. 见李超平, 徐世勇 (编), 管理与组织研究常用的60个理论 (pp. 73-82). 北京:北京大学出版社.
[9] 孙春玲, 姬玉, 许芝卫. (2018). 心理授权对工程项目团队不道德亲组织行为的影响研究——基于组织惯例的调节作用.中国软科学, 32(4), 160-169.
[10] 孙永波, 丁沂昕, 邓春平. (2018). 关怀型伦理环境对员工亲组织非伦理行为的影响——基于医药企业的调查.中国劳动关系学院学报, 32(4), 97-109.
[11] 王桃林, 龙立荣, 张军伟, 张勇. (2019). 类亲情交换对工作家庭冲突的作用研究.管理评论, 31(2), 180-189.
[12] 王晓辰, 高欣洁, 李清. (2018). 亲组织非伦理行为对员工职业发展的影响: 一个跨层的被调节中介.心理科学, 41(3), 646-652.
[13] 谢洪明, 刘常勇, 陈春辉. (2006). 市场导向与组织绩效的关系:组织学习与创新的影响——珠三角地区企业的实证研究.管理世界, (2), 80-94.
[14] 徐金发, 刘靓. (2004). 企业声誉定义及测量研究综述.外国经济与管理, 26(9), 25-30.
[15] 徐琳, 王济干, 樊传浩. (2018). 授权型领导对员工亲组织非伦理行为的影响: 一个链式中介模型.科学学与科学技术管理, 39(6), 109-121.
[16] 张永军, 张鹏程, 赵君. (2017). 家长式领导对员工亲组织非伦理行为的影响:基于传统性的调节效应.南开管理评论, 20(2), 169-179.
[17] 赵红丹, 周君. (2017). 企业伪善、道德推脱与亲组织非伦理行为:有调节的中介效应.外国经济与管理, 39(1), 15-28.
[18] 钟熙, 王甜, 罗淏元, 宋铁波. (2018). 上下级关系与亲组织非伦理行为: 基于组织认同与自我牺牲型领导的作用.科学学与科学技术管理, 39(6), 122-135.
[19] Ahearne M., Bhattacharya C. B., & Gruen T. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of customer-company identification: Expanding the role of relationship marketing.Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 574-585.
[20] Aquino, K., & Reed, A. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440.
[21] Baumeister R. F., Stillwell A. M., & Heatherton T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach.Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 243-267.
[22] Bettencourt, L. A. (1997). Customer voluntary performance: Customers as partners in service delivery.Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 383-406.
[23] Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies.Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76-88.
[24] Borucki, C. C., & Burke, M. J. (1999). An examination of service-related antecedents to retail store performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 943-962.
[25] Bove L. L., Pervan S. J., Beatty S. E., & Shiu E. (2009). Service worker role in encouraging customer organizational citizenship behaviors.Journal of Business Research, 62(7), 698-705.
[26] Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses.Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84.
[27] Castille C. M., Buckner J. E., & Thoroughgood C. N. (2016). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between Machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior.Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 919-930.
[28] Chen M., Chen C. C., & Sheldon O. J. (2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1082-1096.
[29] Effelsberg, D., & Solga, M. (2015). Transformational leaders' in-group versus out-group orientation: Testing the link between leaders' organizational identification, their willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior, and follower-perceived transformational leadership.Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 581-590.
[30] Effelsberg D., Solga M., & Gurt J. (2014). Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation.Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 81-93.
[31] Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development.Annual Review of Psychology, 51(51), 665-697.
[32] Eisenberger R., Karagonlar G., Stinglhamber F., Neves P., Becker T. E., Gonzalez-Morales M. G., & Steiger-Mueller M. (2010). Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment.Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1085-1103.
[33] Fehr R., Welsh D., Yam K. C., Baer M., Wei W., & Vaulont M. (2019). The role of moral decoupling in the causes and consequences of unethical pro-organizational behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 153, 27-40.
[34] Folkes, V. S., & Kamins, M. A. (1999). Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243-259.
[35] Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
[36] Gotsi, M., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corporate reputation management: “Living the brand”.Management Decision, 39(2), 99-104.
[37] Graham K. A., Ziegert J. C., & Capitano J. (2015). The effect of leadership style, framing, and promotion regulatory focus on unethical pro-organizational behavior.Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 423-436.
[38] Halbesleben J. R. B., Neveu J. P., Paustian-Underdahl S. C., & Westman M. (2014). Getting to the "cor": Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory.Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334-1364.
[39] Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
[40] Hobfoll S. E., Halbesleben J., Neveu J. P., & Westman M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences.Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103-128.
[41] Ilie, A. (2012). Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors: Antecedents and Boundary Conditions (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Tampa: University of South Florida.
[42] Kelman, H. C., & Baron, R. M. (1974). Moral and hedonic dissonance: A functional analysis of the relationship between discrepant action and attitude change. In S. Himmelfarb, A. H. Eagly (Eds.), Readings in Attitude Change(pp. 558-575). New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons.
[43] Kong, D. T. (2016). The pathway to unethical pro-organizational behavior: Organizational identification as a joint function of work passion and trait mindfulness.Personality and Individual Differences, 93(4), 86-91.
[44] Kulik B. W., O’Fallon M. J., & Salimath M. S. (2008). Do competitive environments lead to the rise and spread of unethical behavior? Parallels from Enron.Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 703-723.
[45] Lam, C. F., & Mayer, D. M. (2014). When do employees speak up for their customers? A model of voice in a customer service context.Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 637-666.
[46] Lee A., Schwarz G., Newman A., & Legood A. (2017). Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior.Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 109-126.
[47] Liao, H., & Chuang, A. (2004). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes.Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 41-58.
[48] Maslach, C. (1976). Burned-out.Human Behavior, 5(9), 16-22.
[49] Matherne III, C. F., & Litchfield, S. R. (2012). Investigating the relationship between affective commitment and unethical pro-organizational behaviors: The role of moral identity.Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(5), 35-46.
[50] Miao Q., Newman A., Yu J., & Xu L. (2013). The relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear effects?.Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 641-653.
[51] Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance.Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
[52] Shirom, A. (1989). Burnout in work organizations. In Cooper, C. L. Robertson, I. T (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology(pp. 25-48). New York, United States: Wiley.
[53] Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors.Organization Science, 22(3), 621-640.
[54] Umphress E. E., Bingham J. B., & Mitchell M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769-780.
[55] Wang T., Long L., Zhang Y., & He W. (2019). A social exchange perspective of employee-organization relationships and employee unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of individual moral identity.Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 473-489.
[56] Wu, H. (2009). Transformational leadership and outcomes: Roles of supervisor's organizational Embodiment (Unpublished master’ s thesis). Delaware Newark: The University of Delaware.
[57] Wu, W. Y., & Tsai, C. H. (2007). The empirical study of CRM: Consumer-company identification and purchase intention in the direct selling industry.International Journal of Commerce & Management, 17(3), 194-210.
[58] Xu, T., & Lv, Z. (2018). HPWS and unethical pro-organizational behavior: A moderated mediation model.Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(3), 265-278.
[1] Ken CHENG, Yinghui LIN. Unethical pro-organizational behavior: A motivational perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 1111-1122.
[2] Haixia WANG, Huiyuan JIA, Hailong SUN, Aimei LI. Constant connectivity attenuates autonomy: Mechanism and consequences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(11): 1802-1811.
[3] Xiaochen WANG, Xinjie GAO, Panbo GUO. A multi-level integrated model of unethical pro-organizational behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1111-1120.
[4] LI Aimei;HUA Tao;GAO Wen. The Characteristics-Process-Consequences Theoretical Frame of Abusive Supervision[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(11): 1901-1912.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech