Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2020, Vol. 28 Issue (1) : 150-160     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00150
Regular Articles |
The human factors of the take-over process in conditional automated driving based on cognitive mechanism
MA Shu,ZHANG Wei,SHI Jinlei,YANG Zhen()
Psychology Department, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Download: PDF(633 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Automated driving can largely reduce modern traffic problems and improve driving comfort. During conditional automated driving (Level 3), drivers are allowed to engage in non-driving related tasks but need to take over the vehicle timely once the system reached its limitation. In this critical process, drivers have to shift their attention and acquire situational awareness in order to take over successfully. Existing studies have shown that take-over requests, non-driving related tasks, driving situations and driver-related factors were all critical factors in the take-over process. In the future, we can investigate the cognitive mechanism of the influence of various factors on the take-over process and explore possible interactions between these factors.

Keywords automated driving      take-over process      attention      situation awareness     
ZTFLH:  B849: U471  
Corresponding Authors: Zhen YANG     E-mail: yangzhen@zstu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 21 November 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Shu MA
Wei ZHANG
Jinlei SHI
Zhen YANG
Cite this article:   
Shu MA,Wei ZHANG,Jinlei SHI, et al. The human factors of the take-over process in conditional automated driving based on cognitive mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(1): 150-160.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00150     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2020/V28/I1/150
  
1 克里斯托弗D·威肯斯, 贾斯廷G·霍兰兹, 西蒙·班伯里, 雷杰·帕拉休拉曼 . (2014). 工程心理学与人的作业 (张侃主译). 北京: 机械工业出版社.
2 周荣刚 . (2017). (2014). 驾驶中移动电话的使用: 基于自我调整行为的研究视角. 心理科学进展, 22(8), 1328-1337.
3 Bazilinskyy, P., & de Winter,J. C.F . ( 2015). Auditory interfaces in automated driving: An international survey. Peer J Computer Science,1, e13.
4 Bazilinskyy P. & Winter J. C.F, . ( 2017). Analyzing crowdsourced ratings of speech-based take-over requests for automated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 64, 56-64.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.001
5 Bazilinskyy P., Petermeijer S. M., Petrovych V., Dodou D .,& de Winter, J. C. F. ( 2018). Take-over requests in highly automated driving: A crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 56, 82-98.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.04.001
6 Beattie D., Baillie L., & Halvey M . ( 2015). A comparison of artificial driving sounds for automated vehicles.In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing( pp. 451-462). New York, NY, USA: Association Computing Machinery.
7 Begg ,D.( 2014). A 2050 vision for London: What are the implications of driverless transport? Retrieved from
url: https://trid.trb.org/view/1319762.
8 Belz S. M., Robinson G. S., & Casali J. G . ( 1999). A new class of auditory warning signals for complex systems: Auditory icons. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41( 4), 608-618.
9 Borojeni S. S., Chuang L., Heuten W., & Boll S . ( 2016). Assisting drivers with ambient take-over requests in highly automated driving.In P. Green, S. Boll, G. Burnett, J. Gabbard, & S. Osswald (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(pp. 237-244). New York, NY, USA: Assoc Computing Machinery.
10 Bueno M., Dogan E., Selem F. H., Monacelli E., Boverie S., & Guillaume A . ( 2016). How different mental workload levels affect the take-over control after automated driving. In 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)(pp. 2040-2045). New York, NY, USA: IEEE.
11 Choi, J. K., &Ji , Y. G . ( 2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31( 10), 692-702.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
12 Clark H., McLaughlin A. C., Williams B., & Feng J . ( 2017). Performance in takeover and characteristics of non-driving related tasks during highly automated driving in younger and older drivers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting(pp. 37-41). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
13 de Winter, J. C. F., Happee R., Martens M. H., & Stanton N. A . ( 2014). Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,27, 196-217.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=23805373
14 Endsley , M.( 1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37( 1), 32-64.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
15 Eriksson A., Banks V. A., & Stanton N. A . ( 2017). Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 102, 227-234.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ent Analysis
16 Forster Y., Naujoks F., Neukum A., & Huestegge L . ( 2017). Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 109, 18-28.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ent Analysis
17 Gold C., Berisha I., & Bengler K . ( 2015). Utilization of drivetime-performing non-driving related tasks while driving highly automated. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting(pp. 1666-1670).Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
18 Gold C., Damb?ck D., Lorenz L., & Bengler K . ( 2013). “Take over!” how long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 1938-1942). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
19 Gold C., K?rber M., Hohenberger C., Lechner D., & Bengler K . ( 2015). Trust in automation—before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. . In T. Ahram, W. Karwowski, & D. Schmorrow (Eds.),In Procedia Manufacturing 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE) and the Affiliated Conferences (Vol.3, pp.3025-3032).Amsterdam: Elsevier.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ Ahram, W. Karwowski,
20 Gold C., K?rber M., Lechner D., & Bengler K . ( 2016). Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of traffic density. Human Factors, 58( 4), 642-652.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720816634226
21 Gugerty L.J . ( 1997). Situation awareness during driving: Explicit and implicit knowledge in dynamic spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 3( 1), 42-66.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.3.1.42
22 Ito T., Takata A., & Oosawa K. ( 2016. Time required for take-over from automated to manual driving (No.2016-01- 0158). SAE Technical Paper Series. Retrieved from .
url: http://papers.sae.org/2016-01-0158
23 Jamson A. H., Merat N., Carsten O. M., & Lai F. C . ( 2013). Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 30, 116-125.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.008
24 Kiefer R. J., Flannagan C. A., & Jerome C. J . ( 2006). Time-to-collision judgments under realistic driving conditions. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48( 2), 334-345.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872006777724499
25 K?rber M., Gold C., Lechner D., & Bengler K . ( 2016). The influence of age on the take-over of vehicle control in highly automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 39, 19-32.
url: http://dx.doi.org/portation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology
26 K?rber M., Prasch L., & Bengler K . ( 2018). Why do I have to drive now? Post hoc explanations of takeover requests. Human factors, 60( 3), 305-323.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720817747730
27 Kyriakidis M., Happee R ., & de Winter, J. C. F. ( 2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127-140.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
28 Langlois ,S., &Soualmi B. , (2016). Augmented reality versus classical HUD to take over from automated driving: An aid to smooth reactions and to anticipate maneuvers. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)(pp.1571-1578). New York, NY: IEEE.
29 Lorenz L., Kerschbaum P., & Schumann J . ( 2014). Designing take-over scenarios for automated driving: How does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 1681-1685). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
30 Lu Z., Coster X .,& de Winter, J. C. F. ( 2017). How much time do drivers need to obtain situation awareness? A laboratory-based study of automated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 60, 293-304.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.003
31 Meng ,F., &Spence C. , ( 2015). Tactile warning signals for in-vehicle systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 75, 333-346.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ent Analysis
32 Miller D., Sun A., Johns M., Ive H., Sirkin D., Aich S., & Ju W . ( 2015). Distraction becomes engagement in automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting(pp. 1676-1680). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
33 Mok B. K. J., Johns M., Lee K. J., Miller D., Sirkin D., Ive P., & Ju W . ( 2015). Emergency, automation off: Unstructured transition timing for distracted drivers of automated vehicles. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (pp. 2458-2464). New York, NY: IEEE.
34 Naujoks F., Forster, Y, Wiedemann K., & Neukum A . ( 2017). A human-machine interface for cooperative highly automated driving. In N. A. Stanton, S. Landry, G. DiBucchianico, & A. Vallicelli (Eds.), Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Vol. 484: Advanced in Intelligent System and Computing(pp.585-595). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ A. Stanton, S. Landry, G. DiBucchianico,
35 Neubauer C., Matthews G., & Saxby D . ( 2012). The effects of cell phone use and automation on driver performance and subjective state in simulated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 1987-1991).Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics.
36 Parasuraman R., &Riley V. , ( 1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39( 2), 230-253.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886
37 Petermeijer S. M., Bazilinskyy P., Bengler K ., & de Winter, J. C. F.( 2017). Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional tors to get the driver back into the loop. Applied Ergonomics, 62, 204-215.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.023
38 Petermeijer S. M., Cieler S ., & de Winter, J. C. F. ( 2017). Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take- over requests in the driver seat. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 99, 218-227.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ent Analysis
39 Petermeijer S. M., de Winter, J. C. F., & Bengler K. J . ( 2016). Vibrotactile displays: A survey with a view on highly automated driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17( 4), 897-907.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2494873
40 Petermeijer S. M., Doubek F ., & de Winter, J. C. F.( 2017). Driver response times to auditory, visual, and tactile take-over requests: A simulator study with 101 participants. In A. Basu, W. Pedrycz, & X. Zabuli (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)(pp.1505-1510). Banff, Canada: IEEE.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ Basu, W. Pedrycz,
41 Petermeijer S. M., Hornberger P., Ganotis I., de Winter, J. C. F., & Bengler K. J . ( 2017). The design of a vibrotactile seat for conveying take-over requests in automated driving. In N. A. Stanton (Eds.),Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing(pp. 618-630). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
42 Politis I., Brewster S., & Pollick F . ( 2015). Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(pp. 3-10). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
43 Prewett M. S., Elliott L. R., Walvoord A. G., & Coovert M. D . ( 2012). A meta-analysis of vibrotactile and visual information displays for improving task performance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetic Part C: Applications and Reviews,42(1), 123-132.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=24718228
44 Radlmayr J., Gold C., Lorenz L., Farid M., & Bengler K . ( 2014). How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting(pp. 2063-2067). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics.
45 SAE International . ( 2016). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (Standard No.J3016). Retrieved from
url: https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/j3016_201609.
46 Samuel S., Borowsky A., Zilberstein S., & Fisher D. L . ( 2016). Minimum time to situation awareness in scenarios involving transfer of control from an automated driving suite. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2602( 1), 115-120.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2602-14
47 Scott ,J., Gray R. ( 2008). A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving. Human Factors, 50( 2), 264-275.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872008X250674
48 Summala H., Lamble D., Laakso M . ( 1998). Driving experience and perception of the lead car’s braking when looking at in-car targets. Accident Analys is & Prevention, 30( 4), 401-407.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ent Analys is
49 Telpaz A., Rhindress B., Zelman I., & Tsimhoni O . ( 2015). Haptic seat for automated driving: Preparing the driver to take control effectively. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications-Automotive UI ’15(pp. 23-30). Nottingham, UK: ACM.
50 Vlakveld W., van Nes N., de Bruin J., Vissers L .,& van der Kroft, M. ( 2018). Situation awareness increases when drivers have more time to take over the wheel in a Level 3 automated car: A simulator study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 917-929.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.025
51 Wan J.Y., &Wu C.X, . ( 2018 a). The effects of lead time of take-over request and non-driving tasks on taking-over control of automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48( 6), 582-591.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2844251
52 , Wan J.Y., &Wu C.X, . (2018b). The effects of vibration patterns of take-over request and non-driving tasks on taking-over control of automated vehicles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34( 11), 987-998.
53 Wang W.H . ( 2001). Driving behavior shaping model in road traffic system. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 10( 3), 331-336.
54 Wege C., Will S., & Victor T . ( 2013). Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings - A naturalistic driving study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 58( 3), 259-270.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ent Analysis
55 Wickens C.D . ( 2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50( 3), 449-455.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394
56 Wiedemann K., Naujoks F., W?rle J., Kenntner-Mabiala R., Kaussner Y., Neukum A . ( 2018). Effect of different alcohol levels on take-over performance in conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 115, 89-97.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ent Analysis
57 Wintersberger P., von Sawitzky T., Frison A. K., & Riener A . ( 2017). Traffic augmentation as a means to increase trust in automated driving systems.In Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter: Towards the Mediterranean(p. 17). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
58 Wright T. J., Samuel S., Borowsky A., Zilberstein S., & Fisher D. L . ( 2016). Experienced drivers are quicker to achieve situation awareness than inexperienced drivers in situations of transfer of control within a level 3 autonomous environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting(pp. 270-273). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
59 Zeeb K., Buchner A., & Schrauf M . ( 2015). What determines the take-over time? an integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 78, 212-221.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ent Analysis
60 Zeeb K., Buchner A., & Schrauf M . ( 2016). Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 92, 230-239.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ent Analysis
[1] HE Qi, WANG Haiying. The effects of meditation on attention[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(2): 284-293.
[2] LI Taian,ZHANG Yu,LI Jie. The application of multiple object tracking in the evaluation and training of different populations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1585-1595.
[3] CHEN ShengDong,CHEN YongQiang,GAO Wei,LUO Li,YANG JieMin,YUAN JiaJin. The automaticity in cognitive processing: From dichotomy to gradual view[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1556-1563.
[4] YUAN Luyi,CHANG Ruosong,MA Jinfei. Why does a driver can not see a critical event on the road?Interaction between “bottom-up” and “top-down” processing mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 557-570.
[5] WANG Shaorui,CHEN Hong. Why trying to lose weight brings fat? Psychological mechanisms and influencing factors of overeating among restrained eaters[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 322-328.
[6] JI Yuzhu,BI Hongyan. The noise exclusion deficit in developmental dyslexia[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 201-208.
[7] LIU Haining,LIU Xiaoqian,LIU Haihong,LI Feng,HAN Buxin. The mechanism of positivity effect in elderly’s emotional attention[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(12): 2064-2076.
[8] WEI Liuqing,ZHANG Xuemin. The neural mechanism of multiple object tracking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(12): 2007-2018.
[9] JIANG Jingqi,WANG Haoyu,QIAN Mingyi. Dynamic attention bias in social anxiety[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(11): 1887-1895.
[10] WEI Hua,ZHOU Renlai. The current status and controversy of inhibitory control deficits in anxiety: A perspective from attentional control theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(11): 1853-1862.
[11] CHE Jingshang,SUN Hailong,XIAO Chenjie,LI Aimei. Why information overload damages decisions? An explanation based on limited cognitive resources[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(10): 1758-1768.
[12] ZHAO Jing. Skills of visual attention span in developmental dyslexia[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 20-26.
[13] Yangzhuo LI, Xucheng YANG, Hong GAO, Xiangping GAO. The role of working memory representation in visual search: The perspective of non-target template[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1608-1616.
[14] Huan HUANG,Bo LIU,Chenchen ZHOU,Ming JI. Mechanisms of commission errors in aftereffects of completed intentions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1600-1607.
[15] Heping XIE,Ji PENG,Zongkui ZHOU. Attention guidance and cognitive processing: The educational effects of eye movement modeling examples[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1404-1416.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech