Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (12) : 2129-2140     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02129
Regular Articles |
The interaction between exogenous attention and multisensory integration
Xing PENG1,Ruosong CHANG1,2,Guiqin REN1(),Aijun WANG3,Xiaoyu TANG1,2()
1. School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University
2. Liaoning Collaborative Innovation Center of Children and Adolescents Healthy Personality Assessment and Cultivation, Dalian 116029, China
3. Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
Download: PDF(719 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

The interaction between exogenous attention and multisensory integration is a complex and controversial topic, which has been debated for a long time. In order to explain the interaction mechanism between them, here we summarized two parts based on previous researches. First, exogenous attention can modulate multisensory integration in a bottom-up manner, including three hypotheses as spatial uncertainty, sensory sensitivity and the differences in unimodal signal strength. Second, multisensory integration can also modulate exogenous attention. On one hand, stimuli from multiple sense modalities can be automatically integrated in a bottom-up manner. The integrated multisensory events can capture attention more efficiently compared to unimodal events, even under quite complex circumstances. On the other hand, integrated multisensory events exert top-down control on attentional capture via multisensory signal templates that are stored in the brain.

Keywords multisensory integration      exogenous attention      top-down      bottom-up      endogenous attention     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Guiqin REN,Xiaoyu TANG     E-mail: ajwang@suda.edu.cn;2006@163.com
Issue Date: 30 October 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Xing PENG
Ruosong CHANG
Guiqin REN
Aijun WANG
Xiaoyu TANG
Cite this article:   
Xing PENG,Ruosong CHANG,Guiqin REN, et al. The interaction between exogenous attention and multisensory integration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(12): 2129-2140.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02129     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I12/2129
  
  
  
1 刘强, 胡中华, 赵光, 陶维东, 张庆林, 孙弘进 . ( 2010). 通道估计可靠性先验知识在早期的知觉加工阶段影响多感觉信息整合. 心理学报, 42( 2), 227-234.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201002007
2 王慧媛, 隋洁, 张明 . ( 2016). 线索靶子关联和搜索策略对注意捕获的作用——来自意义线索的证据. 心理学报, 48( 7), 783-793.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/201607/669596293.html
3 王慧媛, 张明, 隋洁 . ( 2014). 线索靶子关联和搜索策略对注意捕获的作用. 心理学报, 46( 2), 185-195.
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XLXB201402005.htm
4 Ansorge, U., &Becker, S.I . ( 2013). Contingent capture in cueing: The role of color search templates and cue-target color relations. Psychological Research, 78( 2), 209-221.
pmid: 23807453 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23807453
5 Atchley P., Jones S. E., & Hoffman L . ( 2003). Visual marking: A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65( 5), 667-677.
pmid: 12956576 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12956576
6 Barrett, D. J.K., &Katrin, K . ( 2012). Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues. Experimental Brain Research, 222( 1-2), 11-20.
pmid: 22975896 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-25502-002
7 Busse L., Katzner S., & Treue S . ( 2008). Temporal dynamics of neuronal modulation during exogenous and endogenous shifts of visual attention in macaque area MT. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105( 42), 16380-16385.
pmid: 18922778 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2571002
8 Callan A., Callan D., & Ando H . ( 2015). An fMRI study of the ventriloquism effect. Cerebral Cortex, 25( 11), 4248-4258.
pmid: 4816779 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4816779/
9 Calvert, G.A., &Thesen, T . ( 2004). Multisensory integration: Methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 98( 1-3), 191-205.
pmid: 15477032 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15477032
10 Carrasco, M. ( 2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51( 13), 1484-1525.
11 Chamberland C., Hodgetts H. M., Vallières B. R., Vachon F., & Tremblay S . ( 2016). Pip and pop: When auditory alarms facilitate visual change detection in dynamic settings. Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Meeting , 60( 1), 284-288.
url: http://intl-pro.sagepub.com/content/60/1/284.abstract
12 Chen K., Zhou B., Chen S., He S., & Zhou W . ( 2013). Olfaction spontaneously highlights visual saliency map. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280( 1768), 20131729.
pmid: 23945694 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23945694
13 Chica A. B., Bartolomeo P., & LupiÁñez J . ( 2013). Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 237( 1), 107-123.
pmid: 23000534 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432812006134
14 Chica, A.B., &LupiÁñez, J . ( 2009). Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: An inhibition of return study. Brain Research, 1278, 75-85.
pmid: 19374885 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19374885
15 De Meo R., Murray M. M., Clarke S., & Matusz P. J . ( 2015). Top-down control and early multisensory processes: Chicken vs. egg. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 9( 17).
pmid: 4347447 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25784863
16 Degerman A., Rinne T., Salmi J., Salonen O., & Alho K . ( 2006). Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with fMRI. Brain Research, 1077( 1), 123-134.
pmid: 16515772 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2006-03660-006
17 Donohue S. E., Green J. J., & Woldorff M. G . ( 2015). The effects of attention on the temporal integration of multisensory stimuli. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 9, 32.
pmid: 4407588 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4407588
18 Fairhall, &Macaluso . ( 2009). Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites. European Journal of Neuroscience, 29( 6), 1247-1257.
pmid: 19302160 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19302160
19 Fetsch C. R., Pouget A., Deangelis G. C., & Angelaki D. E . ( 2011). Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration. Nature Neuroscience, 15( 1), 146-154.
pmid: 22101645 url: http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v15/n1/abs/nn.2983.html
20 Folk C., Berenato A., & Wyble B . ( 2014). Semantic priming produces contingent attentional capture by conceptual content. Journal of Vision, 14( 10), 318.
21 Folk, C.L., &Remington, R . ( 1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 24( 3), 847-858.
pmid: 9627420 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/9627420
22 Gao Y. L., Li Q., Yang W. P., Yang J. J., Tang X. Y., & Wu J. L . ( 2014). Effects of ipsilateral and bilateral auditory stimuli on audiovisual integration: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 25( 9), 668-675.
pmid: 24780895 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/24780895
23 Giard, M., &Peronnet, F . ( 1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11( 5), 473-490.
24 Goller, F., &Ansorge, U . ( 2015). There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77( 5), 1574-1584.
pmid: 25832193 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25832193
25 Goodhew S. C., Kendall W., Ferber S., & Pratt J . ( 2014). Setting semantics: Conceptual set can determine the physical properties that capture attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 76( 6), 1577-1589.
pmid: 24824982 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24824982
26 Henderickx D., Maetens K., & Soetens E . ( 2012). The involvement of bottom-up saliency processing in endogenous inhibition of return. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 74( 2), 285-299.
pmid: 22038667 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22038667
27 Ho C., Santangelo V., & Spence C . ( 2009). Multisensory warning signals: When spatial correspondence matters. Experimental Brain Research. 195( 2), 261-272.
pmid: 19381621 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19381621
28 Hopfinger, J.B., &West, V.M . ( 2006). Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing. NeuroImage, 31( 2), 774-789.
pmid: 16490366 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16490366
29 Koelewijn T., Bronkhorst A., & Theeuwes J . ( 2010). Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: A review of audiovisual studies. Acta Psychologica, 134( 3), 372-384.
pmid: 20427031 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20427031
30 Kok P., Jehee J. F. M ., & de Lange, F. P. ( 2012). Less is more: Expectation sharpens representations in the primary visual cortex. Neuron, 75( 2), 265-270.
pmid: 22841311 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22841311
31 Krause H., Schneider T. R., Engel A. K., & Senkowski D . ( 2012). Capture of visual attention interferes with multisensory speech processing. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 67.
pmid: 23325222 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3434358/
32 Lamy, D.F., &Árni, K . ( 2013). Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A review. Journal of Vision, 13( 3), 14-14.
pmid: 23818660 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23818660
33 Lavie, N. ( 2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9( 2), 75-82.
pmid: 15668100 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2005-02129-007
34 Li Q., Wu J., & Touge T . ( 2010). Audiovisual interaction enhances auditory detection in late stage: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 21( 3), 173-178.
pmid: 20065887 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20065887
35 Li Q., Yang H., Sun F., & Wu J . ( 2015). Spatiotemporal relationships among audiovisual stimuli modulate auditory facilitation of visual target discrimination. Perception, 44( 3), 232-242.
pmid: 26562250 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26562250
36 Li Q., Yu H., Wu Y., & Gao N . ( 2016). The spatial reliability of task-irrelevant sounds modulates bimodal audiovisual integration: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 629, 149-154.
pmid: 27392755 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27392755
37 Luck, S.J., &Hillyard, S.A . ( 1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20( 5), 1000-1014.
pmid: 7964526 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/7964526
38 Macaluso E., Noppeney U., Talsma D., Vercillo T., Hartcher-O’Brien J., & Adam R . ( 2016). The curious incident of attention in multisensory integration: Bottom- up vs. top-down. Multisensory Research, 29( 6), 557-583.
39 Mahoney J. R., Verghese J., Dumas K., Wang C., & Holtzer R . ( 2012). The effect of multisensory cues on attention in aging. Brain Research, 1472, 63-73.
pmid: 3592377 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22820295
40 Martín-ArÉvalo E., Chica A. B., & LupiÁñez J . ( 2015). No single electrophysiological marker for facilitation and inhibition of return: A review. Behavioural Brain Research, 300, 1-10.
pmid: 26643119 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26643119
41 Mast F., Frings C., & Spence C . ( 2015). Multisensory top-down sets: Evidence for contingent crossmodal capture. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77( 6), 1970-1985.
url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25944449
42 Mast F., Frings C., & Spence C . ( 2017). Crossmodal attentional control sets between vision and audition. Acta Psychologica, 178, 41-47.
pmid: 28575705 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28575705
43 Matusz, P.J., &Eimer, M . ( 2011). Multisensory enhancement of attentional capture in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18( 5), 904-909.
pmid: 21748418 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21748418
44 Matusz, P.J., &Eimer, M . ( 2013). Top-down control of audiovisual search by bimodal search templates. Psychophysiology, 50( 10), 996-1009.
pmid: 23834379 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23834379
45 Meredith M. A., Nemitz J. W., & Stein B. E . ( 1987). Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors. Journal of Neuroscience, 7( 10), 3215-3229.
pmid: 3668625 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3668625
46 Miller, J. ( 2016). Statistical facilitation and the redundant signals effect: What are race and coactivation models? Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 78( 2), 516-519.
pmid: 26555650 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-015-1017-z
47 Mishler, A Neider, M., . ( 2016). Evidence for the redundant signals effect in detection of categorical targets Journal of Vision, 16( 12), 1024.
48 Mozolic J. L., Hugenschmidt C. E., Peiffer A. M., & Laurienti P. J . ( 2008). Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration. Experimental Brain Research, 184( 1), 39-52.
pmid: 17684735 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/reference/XREF?id=10.1007/s00221-007-1080-3
49 Murray M. M., Thelen A., Thut G., Romei V., Martuzzi R., & Matusz P. J . ( 2016). The multisensory function of the human primary visual cortex. Neuropsychologia, 83, 161-169.
pmid: 26275965 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26275965
50 Ngo, M.K., &Spence, C . ( 2012). Facilitating masked visual target identification with auditory oddball stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 221( 2), 129-136.
pmid: 22760584 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-012-3153-1
51 Otto T. U., Dassy B., & Mamassian P . ( 2013). Principles of multisensory behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 33( 17), 7463-7474.
pmid: 23616552 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23616552/
52 Pluta S. R., Rowland B. A., Stanford T. R., & Stein B. E . ( 2011). Alterations to multisensory and unisensory integration by stimulus competition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106( 6), 3091-3101.
url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234087/
53 Posner, M.I., &Cohen, Y . ( 1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, 32, 531-556.
54 Santangelo V., Fagioli S., & Macaluso E . ( 2010). The costs of monitoring simultaneously two sensory modalities decrease when dividing attention in space. NeuroImage, 49( 3), 2717-2727.
pmid: 19878728 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381190901132X
55 Santangelo, V., &Spence, C . ( 2007). Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33( 6), 1311-1321.
pmid: 18085945 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/18085945
56 Santangelo V., Van der Lubbe, R. H., Belardinelli M. O., & Postma A . ( 2006). Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: A comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms. Experimental Brain Research, 173( 1), 40-48.
pmid: 16489435 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/16489435
57 Santangelo V., Van der Lubbe, R. H., Belardinelli M. O., & Postma A . ( 2008). Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues. Experimental Brain Research, 185( 2), 269-277.
pmid: 17909764 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-007-1151-5
58 Senkowski D., Saint-Amour D., Gruber T., & Foxe J. J . ( 2008). Look who's talking: The deployment of visuo- spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions. NeuroImage, 43( 2), 379-387.
pmid: 18678262 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811908007933
59 Senkowski D., Saint-Amour D., Höfle M., & Foxe J. J . ( 2011). Multisensory interactions in early evoked brain activity follow the principle of inverse effectiveness. NeuroImage, 56( 4), 2200-2208.
pmid: 21497200 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811911003697
60 Slagter H. A., Prinssen S., Reteig L. C., & Mazaheri A . ( 2016). Facilitation and inhibition in attention: Functional dissociation of pre-stimulus alpha activity, P1, and N1 components. NeuroImage, 125( 6), 25-35.
pmid: 26436713 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811915008800
61 Soto-Faraco S., Navarra J., & Alsius A . ( 2004). Assessing automaticity in audiovisual speech integration: Evidence from the speeded classification task. Cognition, 92( 3), B13-B23.
pmid: 15019556 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027703002105
62 Spence, C. ( 2010). Crossmodal spatial attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191( 1), 182-200.
63 Spence, C. ( 2013). Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1296( 1), 31-49.
pmid: 23710729 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23710729
64 Spence, C., &Santangelo, V . ( 2009). Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues: A review. Hearing research, 258( 1-2), 134-142.
pmid: 18488658 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/PBR.15.2.398
65 Stein, B.E., &Stanford, T.R . ( 2008). Multisensory integration: Current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9( 4), 255-266.
pmid: 18354398 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354398
66 Stevenson R. A., Fister J. K., Barnett Z. P., Nidiffer A. R., & Wallace M. T . ( 2012). Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance. Experimental Brain Research, 219( 1), 121-137.
pmid: 3526341 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526341/
67 Talsma D., Doty T. J., & Woldorff M. G . ( 2007). Selective attention and audiovisual integration: Is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? Cerebral cortex, 17( 3), 679-690.
pmid: 16707740 url: http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/3/679.full
68 Talsma D., Senkowski D., Soto-Faraco S., & Woldorff M. G . ( 2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14( 9), 400-410.
pmid: 20675182 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3306770/
69 Talsma, D., &Woldorff, M . ( 2005). Selective attention and multisensory integration: Multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17( 7), 1098-1114.
pmid: 16102239 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/16102239
70 Tang X. Y., Wu J. L., & Shen Y . ( 2016). The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 61, 208-224.
pmid: 26546734 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4753360/
71 Tiippana, K. ( 2014). What is the McGurk effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 5( 4), 725.
pmid: 25071686 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4091305/
72 Van der Burg E., Olivers C. N. L., Bronkhorst A. W., & Theeuwes J . ( 2008 b). Audiovisual events capture attention: Evidence from temporal order judgments. Journal of Vision, 8( 5), 1-10.
73 Van der Burg E., Olivers C. N. L., Bronkhorst A. W., & Theeuwes J . ( 2008 a). Pip and pop: Nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34( 5), 1053-1065.
pmid: 18823194 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18823194
74 Van der Burg E., Olivers C. N. L., Bronkhorst A. W., & Theeuwes J . ( 2009). Poke and pop: Tactile-visual synchrony increases visual saliency. Neuroscience Letters, 450( 1), 60-64.
pmid: 19013216 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19013216
75 Van Der Burg E., Olivers C. N. L., & Theeuwes J . ( 2012). The attentional window modulates capture by audiovisual events. PloS One, 7( 7), e39137.
pmid: 3393717 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3393717/
76 Van der Burg E., Talsma D., Olivers C. N. L., Hickey C., & Theeuwes J . ( 2011). Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects. NeuroImage, 55( 3), 1208-1218.
pmid: 21195781 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21195781
77 Van der Stoep N., Spence C., Nijboer T. C. W ., & Van der Stigchel, S. ( 2015). On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement. Acta Psychologica, 162, 20-28.
pmid: 26436587 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26436587
78 Van der Stoep N., Van der Stigchel S ., & Nijboer, T. C. W. ( 2015). Erratum to: Exogenous spatial attention decreases audiovisual integration. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77( 2), 464-482.
79 Van der Stoep N., Van der Stigchel S., Nijboer T. C., & Spence C . ( 2016). Visually induced inhibition of return affects the integration of auditory and visual Information. Perception, 46( 1), 6-17.
pmid: 27484341 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27484341
80 Vroomen J., Bertelson P., & De Gelder B . ( 2001). The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 63( 4), 651-659.
url: http://xueshurefer.baidu.com/nopagerefer?id=4f15bde6e87ae49fa56a50ff6cdb8b27
81 Wu J. L., Li Q., Bai O., & Touge T . ( 2009). Multisensory interactions elicited by audiovisual stimuli presented peripherally in a visual attention task: A behavioral and event-related potential study in humans. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 26( 6), 407-413.
pmid: 19952565 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19952565
82 Wu J. L., Yang J. J., Yu Y. H., Li Q., Nakamura N., Shen Y., .. Abe K . ( 2012). Delayed audiovisual integration of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease compared with normal aged controls. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 32( 2), 317-328.
pmid: 3746512 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1552526011009125
[1] ZHAO Peiqiong, CHEN Wei, ZHANG Jing, PING Xianjie. The rubber hand illusion (RHI): The experimental paradigm of sense of ownership and its application[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 37-50.
[2] PAN Li, HUANG Xiting.  Influencing factors and thought of temporal order perception[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 614-624.
[3] Hao WANG,Zhigang YANG. Face pareidolia and its neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 1952-1960.
[4] Xiaoxiao LUO,Guanlan KANG,Xiaolin ZHOU. The influential factors and neural mechanisms of McGurk effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 1935-1951.
[5] Ian Max Andolina; Wei Wang; Stewart Shipp. Ghost in the Machine: Trans-saccadic Modulation of Figure–ground Segmentation in the Thalamus[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 29-.
[6] Hui Xu; Chaoyi Qin; Yunxian Bai; Zheng Tan; Yali Pan; Yanyan Li; Wenjing Zhou; Tao Zhang; Liang Wang. Lateral prefrontal cortex triggers bistable perception switching using human intracranial EEG[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 24-.
[7] SONG Juan; LV Yong. Influence of Top-down Modulation on Automatic Process in Masked Priming[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(5): 766-773.
[8] ZHOU Aibao; ZHANG Yanchi; LIU Peiru; YIN Yulong; ZHANG Fen. Who am I ? ——Enfacement Illusion Based on Interpersonal Multisensory Stimulation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 159-167.
[9] PAN Lu; QIAN Xiuying. Rhythm Perception and Interactions between Different Sensory Channels[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(11): 1910-1919.
[10] YUAN Xiang-Yong;HUANG Xi-Ting. Temporal Recalibration in Multisensory Integration[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 692-700.
[11] LIU Jian-Gang;TIAN Jie;Kang LEE. The Study of Neural Mechanism of Top-down Letter Processing Based on fMRI[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 159-165.
[12] ZHANG Liang;SUN Xiang-Hong;ZHANG Kan. The Multisensory Integration of Emotional Information[J]. , 2009, 17(06): 1133-1138.
[13] .
Theoretical Models of Multisensory Cues Integration
[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 659-666.
[14] Wu Yan;Sui Guangyuan;Cao Xiaohua. ERP Studies of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention[J]. , 2007, 15(01): 71-77.
[15] Chu Hengqing,Zhou Xiaolin. Attentional Capture and Top-down Processes[J]. , 2004, 12(05): 680-687.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech