Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (1) : 26-41     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00026
Meta-Analysis |
How do autism spectrum disorders process human face? A meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies
HAO Yanbin; WANG Fuxing; XIE Heping; AN Jing; WANG Yuxin; LIU Huashan
Hubei Human Development and Mental Health Key Laboratory; School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
Download: PDF(798 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Aberrant eye gaze is one of important indicators for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) according to previous studies. Recent eye tracking studies yield inconsistent findings on whether ASD may pay less attention towards the mouth region compared with typical development (TD) participants. In this study, a meta-analysis is conducted with fixation durations on both eyes and mouth regions as dependent variables. Twenty-seven eligible ASD eye-tracking studies were included in the current study. As a result, 43 independent effect sizes containing 1,343 participants are computed in the eye-related meta-analysis, and 36 independent effect sizes containing 1,112 participants in the mouth-related meta-analysis are analyzed. The results revealed that individuals with ASD fixated significantly shorter on the eye region than the TD (d = −0.75). However, no significant difference was found on fixation duration of the mouth region between two groups (d = −0.29). The moderator analysis indicated that age (d children = −0.89, d adult = −0.04) and face inversion (d upright = −0.79, d inverted = 0.31) moderated eye-related fixation duration. In addition, age (d children = 0.40, d adult = −0.56), verbal IQ (d match = 0.63, d no match = −0.62), nonverbal IQ (d match = 0.27, d no match= −0.51), the severity of autism (d high function = 0.43, d low function = −0.65), and task types (d free view = −0.48, d discrimination task = 0.90) moderated the effect of experimental manipulation on the mouth-related fixation duration. These findings suggest that fixation duration on the eye region is a potential indicator of ASD but the mouth region may not be.
Keywords 自闭症谱系障碍者      眼动      面孔加工      元分析      眼睛     
ZTFLH:  R395  
Corresponding Authors: WANG Fuxing, E-mail: fxwang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn; LIU Huashan, E-mail: hsliupsycho@263.net    
Issue Date: 28 November 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HAO Yanbin
WANG Fuxing
XIE Heping
AN Jing
WANG Yuxin
LIU Huashan
Cite this article:   
HAO Yanbin,WANG Fuxing,XIE Heping, et al. How do autism spectrum disorders process human face? A meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 26-41.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00026     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I1/26
[1] JING Wei, LIU Ziqin.  The diminished attention to eye in the face processing of individuals with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 476-487.
[2] ZHANG Xinyue, YU Lin.  The early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Subjective cognitive impairment?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 488-495.
[3] YAN Bo, FAN Fumin, YU Feng.  The application of kinesthetic empathy intervention in dance/movement therapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 496-502.
[4] WU Cai-Zhi, CHEN Yan, SUN Qi-Wu, YU Li-Xia, JIANG Guang-Rong.  Psychological autopsy and its application in suicide research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 503-517.
[5] LIN Yiqi, WANG Xi, PENG Kaiping, NI Shiguang.  Virtual reality technology in the psychological treatment for autism spectrum disorders: An systematic review[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 518-526.
[6] ZHOU Shegang, ZHANG Xiaoyuan.  Selecting the best treatment: Client-treatment match[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 294-305.
[7] . The Application of Kinesthetic Empathy Intervention in Dance Movement Therapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 0, (): 0-0.
[8] LAI Lizu, REN Zhihong, TAO Rong.  A meta-analysis on Co-Rumination[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 42-55.
[9] JIE Jing, ZHUANG Mengdi, LUO Pinchao, ZHENG Xifu.  Hot topics on the research in empathy from the perspective of neuroscience[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(11): 1922-1931.
[10] PAN Dong-ni, LI Xue-bing.  Working memory training in mental disorders[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(9): 1527-1543.
[11] WANG Hailu, LIU Xinghua.  Specific influence of Open Monitoring Meditation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1337-1348.
[12] PANG Zhuo-Yue, XI Ju-Zhe, ZUO Zhi-Hong.  A knowledge-mapping analysis of U.S. research on treatments for children and adolescents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1182-1196.
[13] SHE Zhuang, JIANG Guangrong, SUN Qi-wu, SHI Yanwei.  Formal feedback in psychotherapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1197-1207.
[14] ZHAO Na, MA Min, XIN Ziqiang.  Mental mechanism and the influencing factors of meaning in life[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1003-1011.
[15] ZHAO Guo-Qiu;WANG Yong-Guang;WANG Yi-Qiang; CAO Ri-Fang;FU Su-Fen
. Psychological Crisis Intervention in Disasters: Comment on Psychiatric View[J]. , 2009, 17(03): 489-494.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech