Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (9) : 1478-1484     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01478
Regular Articles |
Factors affecting the effectiveness of inter-group apology
AI Juan
(Department of Psychology, Tian Jin University of Commerce, TianJin 300134, China)
Download: PDF(369 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Factors affecting the effectiveness of inter-group apology are manifold. For perpetrator groups, an effective inter-group apology needs to include admitting mistakes, taking responsibility, expressing regret, making commitments, etc. in verbal expressions. Simultaneously, perpetrator groups should consider behavior strategies of the inter-group apology, as well as the impact from the internal motivation behind the apology on their verbal expressions and behaviors. For victim groups, the effectiveness of the perpetrator- group’s apology lies in the fact that the apology itself eases the fury, meets the victim group’s psychological needs for self-esteem and expectations, and meanwhile is subject to the moderation of perceptual degree of sincere apology. Additionally, an inter-group apology will also be affected by the quality of inter-group relations, the degree of conflict, cultural beliefs, and other external factors. In future studies, it should be attempted to integrate the process mechanisms of group apology, to enrich the inspection indexes of the effectiveness of group apology, and to allow apologies to play an active role in the area of social life.

Keywords apology      inter-group apology      group damage      inter-group relationship     
Corresponding Authors: AI Juan, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 15 September 2016
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
AI Juan
Cite this article:   
AI Juan. Factors affecting the effectiveness of inter-group apology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1478-1484.
URL:     OR
[1] YUAN Bo, DONG Yue, LI Weiqiang.  The trust repair effect of apology: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1103-1113.
[2] AI Juan. Extended inter-group contact: Viewpoints, mechanisms and future researches[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 836-843.
[3] WU Haiyan; WANG Ling; YU Chengfu; LIANG Qin; YANG Caofen; LIU Xin. Apology: A Relationship Remedial Behavior for the Offence[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 711-720.
[4] SHI Wei;YAN Xian-Yang;LIU Jie
. Emotional Reactions to Historical Injustice Events: Collective Guilt[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 224-232.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech