procedural justice, trust in authority, cognitive trust, affective trust, acceptance of public policy," />  procedural justice, trust in authority, cognitive trust, affective trust, acceptance of public policy,"/>  procedural justice, trust in authority, cognitive trust, affective trust, acceptance of public policy,"/> Procedural justice and trust in authority: A mechanism for acceptance of public policy
Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (8) : 1147-1158     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01147
Conceptual Framework |
Procedural justice and trust in authority: A mechanism for acceptance of public policy
WU Xuanna
(Beijing Key Lab of Learning and Cognition, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100037, China)
Download: PDF(574 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

China is in a period of social transformation and social change, and social risk is increasing. One important characterization is that group events frequently occur. It hints that people do not accept public policy. If formulation and implementation of public policy does not fully consider public acceptability, it is likely to constitute a new social risk, threatening social stability. Therefore, how to effectively improve public acceptance of public policy has become a major problem that should be solved in our country. The objectives of this study are to establish a model of acceptance of public policy and satisfaction with government with the impact of procedural justice, outcome favorability and trust in authority (cognitive trust and affective trust) and to effectively enhance the acceptance of the policy. Through scenario, experiment, and cross-sectional survey, this study tries to investigate the interaction between procedural justice and outcome favorability on acceptance of public policy and satisfaction with government, and the boundary effect of trust in authority on this mechanism, on the basis of which to further analyze the moderation of cognitive trust and affective trust on the relationship between acceptance of policy, satisfaction with government and their factors. The results can be used to improve public satisfaction with the policy, and to provide a scientific basis for government policy.

Keywords font-family: "Times New Roman"      layout-grid-mode: line      color: black      letter-spacing: 0.2pt      mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt      mso-fareast-font-family: 方正书宋_GBK      mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt      mso-ansi-language: EN-US      mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN       procedural justice')" href="#">mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"> procedural justice      trust in authority      cognitive trust      affective trust      acceptance of public policy     
Corresponding Authors: WU Xuanna, E-mail: wuxn@cnu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 15 August 2016
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WU Xuanna
Cite this article:   
WU Xuanna. Procedural justice and trust in authority: A mechanism for acceptance of public policy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1147-1158.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01147     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2016/V24/I8/1147
[1] ZHANG Quan; CHEN Zheng; WANG Weiwen; DENG Huihua. Temporal characteristics of change in HPA activity among PTSD patients[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 536-546.
[2] LI Yan; YANG Baiyin. Idea implementation: The trend of innovation research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 643-653.
[3] ZHANG Shuwei;XU Zhiguo;XU Yan. Social Justice and Political Trust: The Mechanism of Cooperation with Government[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 588-595.
[4] ZHANG Qi;Wang Er-Ping. The Effects of Political Trust on Public Attitudes and Cooperative Behaviors in Social Dilemma[J]. , 2010, 18(10): 1620-1627.
[5] .
Theoretical Models of Multisensory Cues Integration
[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 659-666.
[6] DANG Cai-Ping; LIU Chang. Recent Development in the Study of the Relationship between General Intelligence and Working Memory[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 683-690.
[7] CHEN Li-Jun;WANG Hong;FAN Hui-Yong. The Other Side of Change Perception: Change Blindness[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 645-652.
[8] LI Yan-Chen; ZHOU Ting-Rui; ZHOU Xiu. Theoretical Models of Multisensory Cues Integration……WEN Xiao-Hui, LIU Qiang, SUN Hong-Jin, et al.(666)
Construal Level Theory: From Temporal Distance to Psychological Distanc
[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 667-677.
[9]

MA Xiao-Li;YANG Bin;ZHONG Xiang;SONG Yan

. The Neural Mechanism of Perceptual Learning[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 653-658.
[10] CHEN Ya-Lin; LIU Chang. Choking Under Pressure Relate to Working Memory[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 691-698.
[11] LIU Li-Hong;ZHANG Ji-Jia;CUI Zhan-Ling. The Researches and Theories on Verbal Overshadowing Effect[J]. , 2009, 17(02): 308-313.
[12] J. Bruce Overmier
. Basic and Applied Psychology Contribute to A Harmonious Society[J]. , 2008, 16(05): 673-678.
[13] Xu Xingyuan;Cai Houde. Brain Mechanism of Developmental Stuttering[J]. , 2007, 15(02): 326-332.
[14] Yang Jing;YU Lin. Issues on WebCounseling and Its Current Applications[J]. , 2007, 15(01): 140-145.
[15] Guo Xiuyan,Zhu Lei;Wei Zhichao. Artificial Neural Network Model about Implicit Learning[J]. , 2006, 14(06): 837-843.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech