Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (6) : 885-891     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00885
Regular Articles |
The relationship between numerosity cognition and density cognition
LIU Wei1; WANG Miao1; ZHANG Zhi-jun2; ZHAO Ya-jun3
(1 School of Education, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming 650504, China) (2 Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China) (3 College of Sociology and Psychology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041, China)
Download: PDF(352 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

The relationship between density and numerosity cognition is a crucial question in numerosity research fields which could decide the existence of an independent mechanism in numerosity cognition. However, improvements are necessary for the discussion about the relationship in previous studies. Firstly, experimental studies should be more efficient in discriminating the density and numerosity processes. Secondly, related perspectives should be more comprehensive in demonstrating the relationship and mechanisms underlying these two processes. Thirdly, the cognitive models based on the existed theories should pay more attention on their theoretical meaning. In this review, these issues will be further discussed. Feature researches should discuss the probability on integrating the processing of numerosity based on the processing of density. Based on the discussion, a framework which integrated numerosity and density processing would be suggested.

Keywords numerosity cognition      density cognition      object representation      cognitive model     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Zhi-jun, E-mail: zjzhang@zju.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 15 June 2016
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIU Wei
WANG Miao
ZHANG Zhi-jun
ZHAO Ya-jun
Cite this article:   
LIU Wei,WANG Miao,ZHANG Zhi-jun, et al. The relationship between numerosity cognition and density cognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 885-891.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00885     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2016/V24/I6/885
[1] NI Long;LIU Ye;FU Xiaolan. The Role of Manipulability in Object Representation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 625-639.
[2] YANG Xiangdong. Toward A Principled Structure Analysis Method of Algebra Story Problems for Item Generation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(3): 558-570.
[3] ZHANG Yingrui;LI Tao. The Cognitive and Neuroscience Mechanism of Rejection Sensitivity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(11): 1939-1948.
[4] YANG Li-Zhu;DU Wen-Xuan;SHEN Yue. A Review on the Integrative Cognitive Model of Trait Anger and Reactive Aggression[J]. , 2011, 19(9): 1249-1258.
[5] Du Jianzheng;Li Ming. CLARION: A Integrated Model in Studying the Relationship between Implicit and Explicit Skill Learning[J]. , 2006, 14(06): 844-850.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech