Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2015, Vol. 23 Issue (2) : 303-315     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00303
Regular Articles |
Making A Decision vs. Sticking to A Decision: A Comparison of Intertemporal Choice and Delay of Gratification
REN Tian-Hong1; HU Zhi-Shan2; SUN Hong-Yue3; LIU Yang1; LI Shu1
(1 Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China) (2 Hangzhou Preschool Teachers College, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou 310012, China) (3 College of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200235, China)
Download: PDF(337 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Making and sticking to a decision are two important stages in decision behavior. Intertemporal choice stems from economic research on the process of adults choosing among outcomes at different points in time, whereas delay of gratification comes from psychological research on childhood persistence, in which children had to resist the temptation of the sooner but smaller reward to obtain the later but larger reward. Both studies relate to time and focus on individual impulsiveness and self-control, although from different perspectives. Nonetheless, the two areas are rarely compared systematically. The article addresses this issue and compares their methods as well as their cognitive and neural mechanisms. The article provides scientific theoretical foundations for the collaborative development of both areas to facilitate the practice of foresight.

Keywords intertemporal choice      delay of gratification      choose      persist     
Corresponding Authors: LI Shu, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 14 February 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
REN Tian-Hong
HU Zhi-Shan
SUN Hong-Yue
LIU Yang
LI Shu
Cite this article:   
REN Tian-Hong,HU Zhi-Shan,SUN Hong-Yue, et al. Making A Decision vs. Sticking to A Decision: A Comparison of Intertemporal Choice and Delay of Gratification[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 303-315.
URL:     OR
[1] ZHANG Shunmin; FENG Tinyong. Neural mechanisms and gene of procrastination based on a behavior-brain-gene perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 393-403.
[2] LI Aimei; SUN Hailong; Xiong Guanxing; WANG Xiaotian; LI Bin. The effect and cognitive mechanism of “time poverty” on intertemporal choice and proactive behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 874-884.
[3] SUN Hong-Yue; JIANG Cheng-Ming. Is intertemporal choice alternative-based or attribute-based?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 431-437.
[4] PENG Juan;FENG Tingyong. Intervention Program and Neural Mechanisms for Intertemporal Choice in Addicts[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(5): 810-821.
[5] FU Mei;WANG Qiang. The Neural Basis of Intertemporal Choice: Evidences from Voxel-Based Morphometry and Diffusion Tensor Imaging[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 659-667.
[6] LIN Zhumei;ZHU Liqi;CHEN Zhe. The Effects of Blood Lead on Child Development and Its Characteristics[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(1): 77-85.
[7] WANG Zhong-Jun;LIU Yun-Juan;YUAN De-Yong. Vocational Delay of Gratification[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 705-714.
[8] HE Jia-Mei. The Characteristic of Temporal Discounting on Age in Neural and Behavioral Views[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(10): 1585-1592.
[9] LIANG Zhu-Yuan;LIU Huan. Exploring the Nature of Intertemporal Choice[J]. , 2011, 19(7): 959-966.
[10] QU Bin;CHEN Xu;XIONG Qian;YANG Jian-Xia. Processing Mechanisms of Object Persistence[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 673-681.
[11] SUN Yan. The Intertemporal Choice Under Risk: A Research Proposal[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 28-34.
[12] JIang Huaibin. Theory of Object File: Past, Present and Future[J]. , 2008, 16(02): 222-227.
[14] Chen Weimin, Sang Biao. AN OVERVIEW OF RESEARCHES ON SELF-CONTROL IN CHILDREN[J]. , 2002, 10(01): 65-70.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech