Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (8) : 1282-1293     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01282
Regular Articles |
Swift Trust in Temporary Organizations: Conceptualization, Antecedents and Consequences
XIAO Yuchun; LI Weiyang
(1 School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China) (2 Hangzhou Steam Turbine Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310022, China)
Download: PDF(292 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Swift trust is a new field about trust research that suits temporary organizations characterized as swiftly formed, short-termed and complex. The concentration of swift trust on recognition, action and roles rather than on personalities, interpersonal forms and feelings in dyadic networking as traditional trust does is helpful to manage the issues of vulnerability, uncertainty, risk and expectations of temporary organizations. The article summarized the antecedents of swift trust which includes trust disposition, category and prototype, and role after introducing the concepts and measuring instruments of swift trust. Then the influences of swift trust on both the temporary team and the temporary system levels were analyzed. Future studies should make further researches on the affective factors, the measuring instruments and dimensions, the reciprocal effects between swift trust and leadership, the distrust in swift trust, and the dynamic development of swift trust.

Keywords swift trust      temporary organization      risk      virtual team     
Corresponding Authors: XIAO Yuchun; LI Weiyang   
Issue Date: 15 August 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Weiyang
XIAO Yuchun
Cite this article:   
LI Weiyang,XIAO Yuchun. Swift Trust in Temporary Organizations: Conceptualization, Antecedents and Consequences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(8): 1282-1293.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01282     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I8/1282
[1] WANG Xinjian, ZHANG Huijuan, WU Di, LV Xiaokang.  Cultural influences on individual risk perception: Cultural cognition theory’s explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1251-1260.
[2] ZHONG Yiping, ZHAN Youlong, LI Jin, FAN Wei.  Study on the mechanism and intervention of moral decision: Effects of self-relevance and risk level[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1093-1102.
[3] XIANG Peng; GENG Liuna; ZHOU Kexin; CHENG Xiao. Adverse effects and theoretical frameworks of air pollution: An environmental psychology perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 691-700.
[4] SONG Yunqiang; XU Ruiheng; XING Cai. Risk-sensitivity theory: Need motivates risky decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 486-499.
[5] LI Kai; GUO Yongyu; YANG Shenlong. Public risk perception of terror attacks[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 358-369.
[6] Sun Jingwei; Li Jian; Zhang Hang . Humans represent visuo-spatial probability distribution as k-means clusters[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 41-.
[7] YANG Qun; LI Yu; SUN Delin; LEE Tatia M. C.. The effects of stress on risky and social decision making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 974-984.
[8] LI Aimei; TAN Lei; SUN Hailong; Xiong Guanxing; Pan Jiyang. The effect of sleep deprivation on risky choice: A dual-process models approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 804-814.
[9] LU Jingyi; WANG Yue. The effect of psychological insecurity on risk preference[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 676-683.
[10] LI Xiao-Ming; HE Ping; LIU Lin-Ying. Red graphical effect in risk avoidance behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 351-355.
[11] HUANG Wenqiang; YANG Shasha; YU Ping. Neural mechanisms of risky decision-making based on rodent research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1767-1779.
[12] GU Ruolei; SHI Yuanyuan; YANG Jing; SHI Jing; CAI Huajian. The Influence of Anxiety on Social Decision Behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 547-553.
[13] LIU Yan; GU Chuanhua. Interpersonal Sensitivity: From Social Cognition to Psychological Risk Factor[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 489-495.
[14] ZHANG Fenghua; ZHANG Yuting; XIANG Ling; HU Zhujing. The Cognitive and Neural Mechanism of Ambiguity Decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 364-374.
[15] LI Bin; XU Fuming; WANG Wei; ZHANG Hui; LUO Hanbing. Decision Making Processing and Individual Differences: The Perspective of Fuzzy-trace Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 316-324.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech