The relationship between musical training and inhibitory control: An ERPs study

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01365

Abstract

Abstract:

Inhibitory control, a fundamental component of executive function, refers to the ability to control one’s attention and suppress internal and external interferences effectively to achieve the setting targets. It plays a crucial role in allowing us to adapt to the environment and serves as a basis of other cognitive functions, such as reasoning, planning and learning. Moreover, several psychiatric disorders, such as addictions, attention deficit hyperactivity and obsessive-compulsive disorder have been shown to involve deficits in inhibitory control. Thus, establishing ways in which inhibitory control can be improved constitutes an important issue for psychologists and medical scientists. In recent years, musical training has been suggested to be associated with improved executive functions, such as inhibitory control. However, the overall findings in these studies have been mixed. While some studies indicated a positive relationship between musical training and inhibitory control, other studies showed no facilitative effect of musical training. Importantly, however, inhibitory control is not a single function, but can be divided into response inhibition and interference control. Previous studies that assessed the relationship between musical training and inhibitory control failed to investigate these two separate components within the same experiment. Furthermore, its underlying neural mechanism remains elusive. Based on these considerations, the present study aimed to examine the relationship between musical training and inhibitory control through the Go/No-go (response inhibition) and Stroop (interference control) tasks by using the event-related potentials (ERPs).
Experiments were carried out in an acoustically and electrically shielded room, and lasted approximately 40 minutes. In the Go/No-go task, participants had to press a keyboard button in response to white shapes (Go trials, 75%), while they had to inhibit responding to purple shapes (No-go trials, 25%). Each stimulus was presented for 500 ms with an interstimulus interval of 1000 ms. The experiment consisted of 320 trials, which were presented in a random order. The performance was evaluated using a Signal Detection approach by calculating perceptual sensitivity via: d’ = z(No-go hit rate) - z(Go false alarm rate). Higher d’ values indicate better response inhibition. In the Stroop task, participants were presented with Chinese color words (red, green, blue, yellow), printed in different colors. Stimuli were divided into word-color consistent trails (congruent, 50%) and word-color inconsistent trails (incongruent, 50%). A stimulus was presented for 1000 ms with a random interstimulus interval of 1000~1500 ms. Participants had to name the color in which the word was presented without paying attention to the word’s meaning. The experiment consisted of 240 trials, presented in a random order. The difference between accuracy in the congruent and the incongruent conditions is referred to as the Stroop interference effect. Smaller effects are indicative of better interference control. The experimental sequence was balanced between participants.
The behavioral results showed that the music group had a smaller interference effect than the control group in the Stroop task, while both groups performed similarly in the Go/No-go task. As for the ERP results, in Go/No-go task, the amplitudes of the N2 (N2d) and P3 difference waves, contrasting No-go and Go trials, were larger in music group than in control group. In the Stroop task, the amplitude of the N450 (N450d) difference wave, contrasting congruent and incongruent trials, were also larger in music group than in control group. However, the amplitude of the SP (SPd) difference wave, which serves as an index of conflict resolution, was similar between the two groups.
The aim of the present study was to explore the influence of music training on the cognitive and neural mechanisms governing inhibitory control. The present results supported the hypothesis that individuals that received music training had stronger conflict monitoring and motor inhibition abilities when completing the response inhibition task, as well as a better conflict monitoring ability when completing the interference control task. This indicates a potential association between music training and inhibitory control.

Key words: music training, inhibitory control, response inhibition, interference control

CHEN Jiejia, ZHOU Yi, CHEN Jie. (2020). The relationship between musical training and inhibitory control: An ERPs study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(12), 1365-1376.

Figures/Tables 7

References 51

[1]	Arthur, W., & Day, D. V. (1994). Development of a short form for the raven advanced progressive matrices test. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 54(2), 394-403.
[2]	Badzakova-Trajkov, G., Barnett, K. J., Waldie, K. E., & Kirk, I. J. (2009). An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: The role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution. Brain Research, 1253, 139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.069 URL
[3]	Baumeister, S., Hohmann, S., Wolf, I., Plichta, M. M., Rechtsteiner, S., Zangl, M., ... Brandeis, D. (2014). Sequential inhibitory control processes assessed through simultaneous EEG-fMRI. NeuroImage, 94, 349-359. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.023 URL
[4]	Bialystok, E., & Depape, A.-M. (2009). Musical expertise, bilingualism, and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 565-574. URL pmid: 19331508
[5]	Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1-38. URL pmid: 18400922
[6]	Carter, C. S., & van, Veen, V. (2007). Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 367-379.
[7]	Chen, J., Liu, L., Wang, R., & Shen, H. Z. (2017). The effect of musical training on executive functions. Advances in Psychological Science, 25(11), 1854-1864. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01854 URL
[8]	Cheng, K. S., Chang, Y. F., Han, R. P. S., & Lee, P. F. (2017). Enhanced conflict monitoring via a short-duration, video-assisted deep breathing in healthy young adults: An event-related potential approach through the Go/NoGo paradigm. PeerJ, 5, e3857. URL pmid: 29018605
[9]	Corrigall, K. A., Schellenberg, E. G., & Misura, N. M. (2013). Music training, cognition, and personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 222. URL pmid: 23641225
[10]	Di Russo, F., Taddei, F., Apnile, T., & Spinelli, D. (2006). Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers. Neuroscience Letters, 408(2), 113-118. URL pmid: 17018246
[11]	Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 URL
[12]	Donkers, F. C. L., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (2004). The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 165-176. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.005 URL
[13]	Enriquez-Geppert, S., Konrad, C., Pantev, C., & Huster, R. J. (2010). Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task. NeuroImage, 51(2), 877-887. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.043 URL
[14]	Fauvel, B., Groussard, M., Chételat, G., Fouquet, M., Landeau, B., Eustache, F., ... Platel, H. (2014). Morphological brain plasticity induced by musical expertise is accompanied by modulation of functional connectivity at rest. NeuroImage, 90, 179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.065 URL
[15]	Gajewski, P. D., & Falkenstein, M. (2015). Long-term habitual physical activity is associated with lower distractibility in a Stroop interference task in aging: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Brain and Cognition, 98, 87-101. URL pmid: 26160263
[16]	Gao, Q. F., Jia, G., Zhao, J., & Zhang, D. D. (2019). Inhibitory Control in Excessive Social Networking Users: Evidence From an Event-Related Potential-Based Go-Nogo Task. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01810 URL
[17]	Guan, M., Liao, Y., Ren, H., Wang, X., Yang, Q., Liu, X., & Wang, W. (2015). Impaired response inhibition in juvenile delinquents with antisocial personality characteristics: A preliminary ERP study in a Go/Nogo task. Neuroscience Letters, 603, 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.06.062 URL
[18]	Holmes, A. J., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2008). Response conflict and frontocingulate dysfunction in unmedicated participants with major depression. Neuropsychologia, 46(12), 2904-2913. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.028 URL
[19]	James, C. E., Oechslin, M. S., van de Ville, D., Hauert, C. A., Descloux, C., & Lazeyras, F. (2014). Musical training intensity yields opposite effects on grey matter density in cognitive versus sensorimotor networks. Brain Structure and Function, 219(1), 353-366. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0504-z URL
[20]	Jaschke, A. C., Honing, H., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2018). Longitudinal Analysis of Music Education on Executive Functions in Primary School Children. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 103. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00103 URL
[21]	Jonkman, L. M. (2006). The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood; a Go/Nogo ERP study. Brain Research, 1097(1), 181-193. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.064 URL
[22]	Joret, M.-E., Germeys, F., & Gidron, Y. (2016). Cognitive inhibitory control in children following early childhood music education. Musicae Scientiae, 21(3), 303-315. doi: 10.1177/1029864916655477 URL
[23]	Lansbergen, M. M., van Hell, E., & Kenemans, J. L. (2007). Impulsivity and conflict in the Stroop task: An ERP study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21(1), 33-50. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803.21.1.33 URL
[24]	Larson, M. J., Clayson, P. E., & Clawson, A. (2014). Making sense of all the conflict: A theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 93(3), 283-297. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.007 URL
[25]	Larson, M. J., Kaufman, D. A. S., & Perlstein, W. M. (2009). Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 663-670. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.013 URL
[26]	Li, C. S., Morgan, P. T., Matuskey, D., Abdelghany, O., Luo, X., Chang, J. L., …Malison, R. (2010). Biological markers of the effects of intravenous methylphenidate on improving inhibitory control in cocaine-dependent patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107( 32), 14455-14459.
[27]	Liu, P. D., Yang, W. J., Tian, X., & Chen, A.T. (2017). An Overview of Current Studies about the Conflict Adaptation Effect. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(4), 532-541. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.00532 URL
[28]	MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a Century of Research on the Stroop Effect: An Integrative Review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203. URL pmid: 2034749
[29]	McNeely, H. E., West, R., Christensen, B. K., & Alain, C. (2003). Neurophysiological evidence for disturbances of conflict processing in patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 679-688. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.679 URL
[30]	Moreno, S., Bialystok, E., Barac, R., Schellenberg, E. G., Cepeda, N. J., & Chau, T. (2011). Short-Term Music Training Enhances Verbal Intelligence and Executive Function. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1425-1433. URL pmid: 21969312
[31]	Moreno, S., Wodniecka, Z., Tays, W., Alain, C., & Bialystok, E. (2014). Inhibitory control in bilinguals and musicians: Event related potential (ERP) evidence for experience- specific effects. PLOS ONE, 9(4), e94169. URL pmid: 24743321
[32]	Munakata, Y., Herd, S. A., Chatham, C. H., Depue, B. E., Banich, M. T., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2011). A unified framework for inhibitory control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 453-459. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.07.011 URL
[33]	Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(1), 17-26.
[34]	Okada, B. M. (2016). Musical training and executive functions (Unpublised master’s thesis). University of Maryland, College Park.
[35]	Okada, B. M., & Slevc, L. R. (2017). Music training: Contributions to Executive Function. In M. F. Bunting, J. M. Novick, M. R. Dougherty, & R. W. Engle (Eds.), An Integrative Approach to Cognitive and Working Memory Training: Perspectives from Psychology, Neuroscience, and Human Development (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[36]	Pandey, A. K., Kamarajan, C., Tang, Y., Chorlian, D. B., Roopesh, B. N., Manz, N., ... Porjesz, B. (2012). Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: An ERP/ sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task. Biological Psychology, 89(1), 170-182. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.009 URL
[37]	Pliszka, S. R., Liotti, M., Bailey, B. Y., Perez III, R., Glahn, D., & Semrud-Clikeman, M. (2007). Electrophysiological effects of stimulant treatment on inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 17(3), 356-366. URL pmid: 17630869
[38]	Sachs, M., Kaplan, J., der Sarkissian, A., & Habibi, A. (2017). Increased engagement of the cognitive control network associated with music training in children during an fMRI Stroop task. PLoS One, 12(10), e0187254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187254 URL
[39]	Seinfeld, S., Figueroa, H., Ortiz-Gil, J., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2013). Effects of music learning and piano practice on cognitive function, mood and quality of life in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 810. URL pmid: 24198804
[40]	Simmonds, D. J., Pekar, J. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2008). Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks, demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task- dependent. Neuropsychologia, 46(1), 224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.015 URL
[41]	Slevc, L. R., Davey, N. S., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2016). Tuning the mind: Exploring the connections between musical ability and executive functions. Cognition, 152, 199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.017 URL pmid: 27107499
[42]	Smith, J. L., Jamadar, S., Provost, A. L., & Michie, P. T. (2013). Motor and non-motor inhibition in the Go/NoGo task: An ERP and fMRI study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(3), 244-253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.07.185 URL pmid: 22885679
[43]	Smith, J. L., Johnstone, S. J., & Barry, R. J. (2008). Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: The P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(3), 704-714. URL pmid: 18164657
[44]	Smith, J. L., Smith, E. A., Provost, A. L., & Heathcote, A. (2010). Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75(3), 217-226. URL pmid: 19951723
[45]	Travis, F., Harung, H. S., & Lagrosen, Y. (2011). Moral development, executive functioning, peak experiences and brain patterns in professional and amateur classical musicians: Interpreted in light of a Unified Theory of Performance. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1256-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.020 URL pmid: 21507681
[46]	West, R. (2004). The effects of aging on controlled attention and conflict processing in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(1), 103-113. URL pmid: 15006040
[47]	West, R., & Alain, C. (2000a). Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the stroop task. Brain Research, 873(1), 102-111. URL pmid: 10915815
[48]	West, R., & Alain, C. (2000b). Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 179-189. URL pmid: 10731768
[49]	West, R., Jakubek, K., Wymbs, N., Perry, M., & Moore, K. (2005). Neural correlates of conflict processing. Experimental Brain Research, 167(1), 38-48. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2366-y URL pmid: 16082533
[50]	Zhang, Z. H., Han, M., Zhang, F., & Li, W.J. (2020). Musical training improves rhythm integrative processing of classical Chinese poem. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(7), 847-860. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00847 URL
[51]	Zuk, J., Benjamin, C., Kenyon, A., & Gaab, N. (2014). Behavioral and neural correlates of executive functioning in musicians and non-musicians. PLoS One, 9(6), e99868. URL pmid: 24937544

Inhibitory control	Control group M (SD)	Music group M (SD)	F (1,44)	p
Go/No-go
Behavior
Go accuracy	99.35 (1.72)	99.83 (0.65)	1.55	0.22
No-go accuracy	96.22 (4.40)	96.00 (3.93)	0.03	0.86
ERP
Go N2	2.72 (3.33)	7.85 (4.51)	19.24	0.001***
No-go N2	1.69 (3.62)	5.27 (5.55)	6.69	0.013*
Go P3	6.49 (3.62)	11.83 (4.76)	18.37	0.001***
No-go P3	8.05 (4.12)	15.27 (5.98)	22.70	0.001***
Stroop
Behavior
Congruent accuracy	89.30 (7.89)	93.26 (5.11)	4.07	0.05*
Incongruent accuracy	75.70 (12.91)	84.48 (8.64)	7.36	0.01**
Congruent reaction time	636.48 (41.50)	584.39 (61.18)	11.42	0.002**
Incongruent reaction time	700.90 (42.88)	657.93 (70.24)	6.27	0.016*
ERP
Congruent N450	1.20 (3.00)	4.13 (5.13)	5.62	0.022*
Incongruent N450	0.41 (2.55)	2.29 (4.19)	3.39	0.07
Congruent SP	-5.08 (3.26)	-4.84 (4.40)	0.04	0.84
Incongruent SP	-3.54 (3.14)	-3.49 (3.88)	0.003	0.96

Inhibitory control	Control group M (SD)	Music group M (SD)	F (1,44)	p
Go/No-go
Behavior
Go accuracy	99.35 (1.72)	99.83 (0.65)	1.55	0.22
No-go accuracy	96.22 (4.40)	96.00 (3.93)	0.03	0.86
ERP
Go N2	2.72 (3.33)	7.85 (4.51)	19.24	0.001***
No-go N2	1.69 (3.62)	5.27 (5.55)	6.69	0.013*
Go P3	6.49 (3.62)	11.83 (4.76)	18.37	0.001***
No-go P3	8.05 (4.12)	15.27 (5.98)	22.70	0.001***
Stroop
Behavior
Congruent accuracy	89.30 (7.89)	93.26 (5.11)	4.07	0.05*
Incongruent accuracy	75.70 (12.91)	84.48 (8.64)	7.36	0.01**
Congruent reaction time	636.48 (41.50)	584.39 (61.18)	11.42	0.002**
Incongruent reaction time	700.90 (42.88)	657.93 (70.24)	6.27	0.016*
ERP
Congruent N450	1.20 (3.00)	4.13 (5.13)	5.62	0.022*
Incongruent N450	0.41 (2.55)	2.29 (4.19)	3.39	0.07
Congruent SP	-5.08 (3.26)	-4.84 (4.40)	0.04	0.84
Incongruent SP	-3.54 (3.14)	-3.49 (3.88)	0.003	0.96