Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 18-35.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0018
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Chao, WANG Yanyun, FU Junjun, ZHAO Xin()
Published:
2025-01-25
Online:
2024-11-20
Contact:
ZHAO Xin, E-mail: MA Chao, WANG Yanyun, FU Junjun, ZHAO Xin. (2025). The impact of different types of academic stress on subcomponents of executive function in high school students of different grades. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 57(1), 18-35.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0018
Grade | Total | Male | Female | Age (M ± SD, years) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 10 | 325 | 159 | 166 | 15.87 ± 0.57 |
Grade 11 | 335 | 143 | 192 | 16.68 ± 0.61 |
Grade 12 | 325 | 154 | 171 | 17.70 ± 0.67 |
Total | 985 | 456 | 529 | 16.75 ± 0.97 |
Table 1 Demographic variables of the participants
Grade | Total | Male | Female | Age (M ± SD, years) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 10 | 325 | 159 | 166 | 15.87 ± 0.57 |
Grade 11 | 335 | 143 | 192 | 16.68 ± 0.61 |
Grade 12 | 325 | 154 | 171 | 17.70 ± 0.67 |
Total | 985 | 456 | 529 | 16.75 ± 0.97 |
Assessment | Grade 10 (n = 325) | Grade 11 (n = 335) | Grade 12 (n = 325) | F(2,982) | η2p | post-hoc comparisons | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||||
Academic stress | |||||||||
parental stress | 17.13 | 4.75 | 18.06 | 5.02 | 19.28 | 5.66 | 13.67*** | 0.03 | Grade 12 > Grade 11 > Grade 10 |
self-imposed stress | 18.41 | 4.70 | 21.04 | 4.96 | 22.34 | 4.93 | 54.92*** | 0.10 | Grade 12 > Grade 11 > Grade 10 |
teacher stress | 13.65 | 4.07 | 15.14 | 4.68 | 17.78 | 4.94 | 67.50*** | 0.12 | Grade 12 > Grade 11 > Grade 10 |
social stress | 12.44 | 3.26 | 11.75 | 3.04 | 10.66 | 2.45 | 33.25*** | 0.06 | Grade 12 < Grade 11 < Grade 10 |
total academic stress | 61.63 | 10.77 | 65.99 | 10.68 | 70.05 | 10.11 | 52.04*** | 0.10 | Grade 12 > Grade 11 > Grade 10 |
Interference Inhibition | |||||||||
Stroop interference effect(ms) | 34.53 | 55.59 | 27.07 | 53.72 | 20.19 | 53.74 | 5.66** | 0.01 | Grade 12<Grade 10 |
Response Inhibition | |||||||||
NOGO accuracy rate | 0.91 | 0.08 | 0.94 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 0.04 | 25.56*** | 0.06 | Grade 12>Grade 11>Grade 10 |
Working Memory Updating | |||||||||
Updating 750 accuracy rate | 0.80 | 0.13 | 0.80 | 0.12 | 0.82 | 0.11 | 3.21* | 0.01 | Grade 12>Grade 11=Grade 10 |
Updating 1750 accuracy rate | 0.86 | 0.09 | 0.86 | 0.10 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 7.73*** | 0.01 | Grade 12>Grade 11=Grade 10 |
Working Memory Span | |||||||||
Digital forward span | 8.15 | 2.29 | 8.34 | 2.05 | 8.84 | 2.13 | 8.90*** | 0.02 | Grade 12>Grade 11=Grade 10 |
Digital backward span | 6.47 | 1.81 | 7.18 | 1.88 | 7.88 | 1.83 | 48.19*** | 0.09 | Grade 12>Grade 11>Grade 10 |
Attention Switching | |||||||||
switching cost(ms) | 275.51 | 197.27 | 242.05 | 200.08 | 211.91 | 210.02 | 8.02*** | 0.02 | Grade 12=Grade 11<Grade 10 |
Table 2 Mean values, standard deviations, and results of variance analysis for academic stress and executive function tasks among high school students
Assessment | Grade 10 (n = 325) | Grade 11 (n = 335) | Grade 12 (n = 325) | F(2,982) | η2p | post-hoc comparisons | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||||
Academic stress | |||||||||
parental stress | 17.13 | 4.75 | 18.06 | 5.02 | 19.28 | 5.66 | 13.67*** | 0.03 | Grade 12 > Grade 11 > Grade 10 |
self-imposed stress | 18.41 | 4.70 | 21.04 | 4.96 | 22.34 | 4.93 | 54.92*** | 0.10 | Grade 12 > Grade 11 > Grade 10 |
teacher stress | 13.65 | 4.07 | 15.14 | 4.68 | 17.78 | 4.94 | 67.50*** | 0.12 | Grade 12 > Grade 11 > Grade 10 |
social stress | 12.44 | 3.26 | 11.75 | 3.04 | 10.66 | 2.45 | 33.25*** | 0.06 | Grade 12 < Grade 11 < Grade 10 |
total academic stress | 61.63 | 10.77 | 65.99 | 10.68 | 70.05 | 10.11 | 52.04*** | 0.10 | Grade 12 > Grade 11 > Grade 10 |
Interference Inhibition | |||||||||
Stroop interference effect(ms) | 34.53 | 55.59 | 27.07 | 53.72 | 20.19 | 53.74 | 5.66** | 0.01 | Grade 12<Grade 10 |
Response Inhibition | |||||||||
NOGO accuracy rate | 0.91 | 0.08 | 0.94 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 0.04 | 25.56*** | 0.06 | Grade 12>Grade 11>Grade 10 |
Working Memory Updating | |||||||||
Updating 750 accuracy rate | 0.80 | 0.13 | 0.80 | 0.12 | 0.82 | 0.11 | 3.21* | 0.01 | Grade 12>Grade 11=Grade 10 |
Updating 1750 accuracy rate | 0.86 | 0.09 | 0.86 | 0.10 | 0.88 | 0.09 | 7.73*** | 0.01 | Grade 12>Grade 11=Grade 10 |
Working Memory Span | |||||||||
Digital forward span | 8.15 | 2.29 | 8.34 | 2.05 | 8.84 | 2.13 | 8.90*** | 0.02 | Grade 12>Grade 11=Grade 10 |
Digital backward span | 6.47 | 1.81 | 7.18 | 1.88 | 7.88 | 1.83 | 48.19*** | 0.09 | Grade 12>Grade 11>Grade 10 |
Attention Switching | |||||||||
switching cost(ms) | 275.51 | 197.27 | 242.05 | 200.08 | 211.91 | 210.02 | 8.02*** | 0.02 | Grade 12=Grade 11<Grade 10 |
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1 | ||||||||||
2. Age | -0.09** | 1 | |||||||||
3. parental stress | -0.01 | 0.13*** | 1 | ||||||||
4. self-imposed stress | 0.08** | 0.23*** | 0.08** | 1 | |||||||
5. teacher stress | 0.03 | 0.28*** | 0.35*** | 0.05 | 1 | ||||||
6. social stress | 0.03 | -0.23*** | 0.18*** | 0.05 | 0.13*** | 1 | |||||
7. Interference Inhibition | -0.05 | 0.08* | -0.17*** | 0.15*** | -0.11*** | -0.16*** | 1 | ||||
8. Response Inhibition | 0.11*** | 0.15*** | -0.11** | 0.13*** | -0.06 | -0.26*** | 0.06* | 1 | |||
9. Working Memory Updating | 0.16*** | 0.05 | -0.24*** | 0.11*** | -0.20*** | -0.06 | 0.10** | 0.27*** | 1 | ||
10. Working Memory Span | 0.04 | 0.18*** | -0.12*** | -0.03 | -0.05 | -0.08* | 0.07* | 0.15*** | 0.17*** | 1 | |
11. Attention switching | -0.10** | 0.16*** | -0.10** | 0.10** | -0.09** | -0.05 | 0.06* | 0.02 | -0.01 | 0.12*** | 1 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis between different types of academic stress and subcomponents of executive function among high school students from Grade 10 to Grade 12 (N = 985)
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1 | ||||||||||
2. Age | -0.09** | 1 | |||||||||
3. parental stress | -0.01 | 0.13*** | 1 | ||||||||
4. self-imposed stress | 0.08** | 0.23*** | 0.08** | 1 | |||||||
5. teacher stress | 0.03 | 0.28*** | 0.35*** | 0.05 | 1 | ||||||
6. social stress | 0.03 | -0.23*** | 0.18*** | 0.05 | 0.13*** | 1 | |||||
7. Interference Inhibition | -0.05 | 0.08* | -0.17*** | 0.15*** | -0.11*** | -0.16*** | 1 | ||||
8. Response Inhibition | 0.11*** | 0.15*** | -0.11** | 0.13*** | -0.06 | -0.26*** | 0.06* | 1 | |||
9. Working Memory Updating | 0.16*** | 0.05 | -0.24*** | 0.11*** | -0.20*** | -0.06 | 0.10** | 0.27*** | 1 | ||
10. Working Memory Span | 0.04 | 0.18*** | -0.12*** | -0.03 | -0.05 | -0.08* | 0.07* | 0.15*** | 0.17*** | 1 | |
11. Attention switching | -0.10** | 0.16*** | -0.10** | 0.10** | -0.09** | -0.05 | 0.06* | 0.02 | -0.01 | 0.12*** | 1 |
Figure 2. Structural equation modeling of the relationships between different types of academic stress and executive function components among high school students from Grade 10 to Grade 12. Note: All path coefficients in the model are standardized. Single-headed straight arrows indicate predictive relationships, while double-headed curved arrows represent correlational relationships. Solid lines denote significant regression paths, and dashed lines represent non-significant regression paths. Only paths with significant correlation coefficients for the independent variables are presented in the figure. The same applies below.
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1 | ||||||||||
2. Age | -0.12* | 1 | |||||||||
3. Parental stress | -0.06 | 0.01 | 1 | ||||||||
4. Self-imposed Stress | 0.12* | -0.03 | 0.26*** | 1 | |||||||
5. Teacher Stress | 0.05 | -0.10 | 0.21*** | 0.14* | 1 | ||||||
6. Social Stress | 0.03 | -0.08 | 0.29*** | 0.15** | 0.21*** | 1 | |||||
7. Interference Inhibition | -0.03 | 0.04 | -0.20*** | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.23*** | 1 | ||||
8. Response Inhibition | 0.13* | -0.04 | -0.12* | -0.05 | -0.02 | -0.27*** | 0.04 | 1 | |||
9. Working Memory Updating | 0.22*** | -0.05 | -0.06 | -0.03 | -0.10 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.28*** | 1 | ||
10. Working Memory Span | 0.01 | -0.04 | -0.04 | -0.01 | -0.06 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.13* | 0.14* | 1 | |
11. Attention Switching | -0.06 | 0.13* | -0.04 | 0.01 | -0.10 | -0.07 | 0.10 | 0.02 | -0.03 | 0.14* | 1 |
Table 4 Correlation analysis between different types of academic stress and executive function subcomponents among first-year high school students (n = 325)
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1 | ||||||||||
2. Age | -0.12* | 1 | |||||||||
3. Parental stress | -0.06 | 0.01 | 1 | ||||||||
4. Self-imposed Stress | 0.12* | -0.03 | 0.26*** | 1 | |||||||
5. Teacher Stress | 0.05 | -0.10 | 0.21*** | 0.14* | 1 | ||||||
6. Social Stress | 0.03 | -0.08 | 0.29*** | 0.15** | 0.21*** | 1 | |||||
7. Interference Inhibition | -0.03 | 0.04 | -0.20*** | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.23*** | 1 | ||||
8. Response Inhibition | 0.13* | -0.04 | -0.12* | -0.05 | -0.02 | -0.27*** | 0.04 | 1 | |||
9. Working Memory Updating | 0.22*** | -0.05 | -0.06 | -0.03 | -0.10 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.28*** | 1 | ||
10. Working Memory Span | 0.01 | -0.04 | -0.04 | -0.01 | -0.06 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.13* | 0.14* | 1 | |
11. Attention Switching | -0.06 | 0.13* | -0.04 | 0.01 | -0.10 | -0.07 | 0.10 | 0.02 | -0.03 | 0.14* | 1 |
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1 | ||||||||||
2. Age | -0.23*** | 1 | |||||||||
3. Parental Stress | -0.03 | -0.02 | 1 | ||||||||
4. Self-imposed Stress | 0.12* | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1 | |||||||
5. Teacher Stress | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.30*** | -0.06 | 1 | ||||||
6. Social Stress | -0.01 | -0.07 | 0.25*** | 0.08 | 0.32*** | 1 | |||||
7. Interference Inhibition | 0.00 | 0.04 | -0.20*** | 0.18** | -0.15** | -0.12* | 1 | ||||
8. Response Inhibition | 0.15** | -0.14* | -0.14** | 0.12* | -0.34*** | -0.25*** | 0.04 | 1 | |||
9. Working Memory Updating | 0.17** | -0.11* | -0.36*** | 0.12* | -0.37*** | -0.13* | 0.11* | 0.25*** | 1 | ||
10. Working Memory Span | 0.03 | 0.02 | -0.29*** | -0.15** | -0.12* | -0.04 | 0.09 | 0.12* | 0.16** | 1 | |
11. Attention switching | -0.09 | 0.13* | -0.06 | -0.01 | -0.08 | 0.05 | 0.05 | -0.03 | -0.07 | 0.05 | 1 |
Table 5 Correlation analysis between different types of academic stress and executive function subcomponents among second-year high school students (n = 335)
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1 | ||||||||||
2. Age | -0.23*** | 1 | |||||||||
3. Parental Stress | -0.03 | -0.02 | 1 | ||||||||
4. Self-imposed Stress | 0.12* | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1 | |||||||
5. Teacher Stress | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.30*** | -0.06 | 1 | ||||||
6. Social Stress | -0.01 | -0.07 | 0.25*** | 0.08 | 0.32*** | 1 | |||||
7. Interference Inhibition | 0.00 | 0.04 | -0.20*** | 0.18** | -0.15** | -0.12* | 1 | ||||
8. Response Inhibition | 0.15** | -0.14* | -0.14** | 0.12* | -0.34*** | -0.25*** | 0.04 | 1 | |||
9. Working Memory Updating | 0.17** | -0.11* | -0.36*** | 0.12* | -0.37*** | -0.13* | 0.11* | 0.25*** | 1 | ||
10. Working Memory Span | 0.03 | 0.02 | -0.29*** | -0.15** | -0.12* | -0.04 | 0.09 | 0.12* | 0.16** | 1 | |
11. Attention switching | -0.09 | 0.13* | -0.06 | -0.01 | -0.08 | 0.05 | 0.05 | -0.03 | -0.07 | 0.05 | 1 |
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1 | ||||||||||
2. Age | -0.10 | 1 | |||||||||
3. Parental Stress | 0.05 | 0.01 | 1 | ||||||||
4. Self-imposed Stress | 0.00 | -0.03 | -0.17** | 1 | |||||||
5. Teacher Stress | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.42*** | -0.238** | 1 | ||||||
6. Social Stress | 0.10 | -0.04 | 0.16** | 0.18** | 0.16** | 1 | |||||
7. Interference Inhibition | -0.13* | -0.10 | -0.17** | 0.15** | -0.32*** | -0.03 | 1 | ||||
8. Response Inhibition | 0.06 | 0.03 | -0.26*** | 0.25*** | -0.19** | -0.06 | 0.05 | 1 | |||
9. Working Memory Updating | 0.07 | 0.03 | -0.36*** | 0.19** | -0.29*** | 0.03 | 0.15** | 0.25*** | 1 | ||
10. Working Memory Span | 0.07 | 0.01 | -0.16** | -0.15** | -0.25*** | -0.06 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.15** | 1 | |
11. Attention Switching | -0.15** | 0.05 | -0.25*** | 0.19** | -0.24*** | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 1 |
Table 6 Correlation analysis between different types of academic stress and executive function subcomponents among third-year high school students (n = 325)
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1 | ||||||||||
2. Age | -0.10 | 1 | |||||||||
3. Parental Stress | 0.05 | 0.01 | 1 | ||||||||
4. Self-imposed Stress | 0.00 | -0.03 | -0.17** | 1 | |||||||
5. Teacher Stress | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.42*** | -0.238** | 1 | ||||||
6. Social Stress | 0.10 | -0.04 | 0.16** | 0.18** | 0.16** | 1 | |||||
7. Interference Inhibition | -0.13* | -0.10 | -0.17** | 0.15** | -0.32*** | -0.03 | 1 | ||||
8. Response Inhibition | 0.06 | 0.03 | -0.26*** | 0.25*** | -0.19** | -0.06 | 0.05 | 1 | |||
9. Working Memory Updating | 0.07 | 0.03 | -0.36*** | 0.19** | -0.29*** | 0.03 | 0.15** | 0.25*** | 1 | ||
10. Working Memory Span | 0.07 | 0.01 | -0.16** | -0.15** | -0.25*** | -0.06 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.15** | 1 | |
11. Attention Switching | -0.15** | 0.05 | -0.25*** | 0.19** | -0.24*** | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 1 |
Figure 3. Structural equation model of the relationship between different types of academic stress and executive function components in first-year high school students.
Figure 4. Structural equation modeling of the relationships between different types of academic stress and executive function components in second-year high school students.
Figure 5. Structural equation model exploring the relationships between different types of academic stress and executive function components in third-year high school students.
[1] |
Alexander J. K., Hillier A., Smith R. M., Tivarus M. E., & Beversdorf D. Q. (2007). Beta-adrenergic modulation of cognitive flexibility during stress. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(3), 468-478.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.468 pmid: 17335395 |
[2] | Anderson V., Northam E., & Wrennall J. (2018). Developmental neuropsychology: A clinical approach. Routledge. |
[3] | Arsenio W. F., & Loria S. (2014). Coping with negative emotions: Connections with adolescents’ academic performance and stress. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 175(1-2), 76-90. |
[4] | Bandura A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. |
[5] | Bandura A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729-735. |
[6] |
Bantin T., Stevens S., Gerlach A. L., & Hermann C. (2016). What does the facial dot-probe task tell us about attentional processes in social anxiety? A systematic review. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 40-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.04.009 pmid: 26042381 |
[7] |
Beilock S. L., & Carr T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: Working memory and “choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science, 16(2), 101-105.
pmid: 15686575 |
[8] | Beilock S. L., Kulp C. A., Holt L. E., & Carr T. H. (2004). More on the fragility of performance: Choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 584-600. |
[9] |
Bernier A., Carlson S. M., & Whipple N. (2010). From external regulation to self‐regulation: Early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child Development, 81(1), 326-339.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01397.x pmid: 20331670 |
[10] | Blair C. (2010). Stress and the Development of Self- Regulation in Context. Child Development Perspectives, 43(3), 181-188. |
[11] | Bronfenbrenner U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742. |
[12] | Cumming M. M., Smith S. W., & O'Brien K. (2019). Perceived stress, executive function, perceived stress regulation, and behavioral outcomes of adolescents with and without significant behavior problems. Psychology in the Schools, 56(9), 1359-1380. |
[13] |
De Raedt R., & Hooley J. M. (2016). The role of expectancy and proactive control in stress regulation: A neurocognitive framework for regulation expectation. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 45-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.005 pmid: 27064551 |
[14] | Deb S., Strodl E., & Sun H. (2015). Academic stress, parental pressure, anxiety and mental health among Indian high school students. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 5(1), 26-34. |
[15] |
Diamond A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 pmid: 23020641 |
[16] |
Dierolf A. M., Fechtner J., Böhnke R., Wolf O. T., & Naumann E. (2017). Influence of acute stress on response inhibition in healthy men: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 54(5), 684-695.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12826 pmid: 28168718 |
[17] |
Dierolf A. M., Schoofs D., Hessas E. M., Falkenstein M., Otto T., Paul M.,... Wolf O. T. (2018). Good to be stressed? Improved response inhibition and error processing after acute stress in young and older men. Neuropsychologia, 119, 434-447.
doi: S0028-3932(18)30517-7 pmid: 30171874 |
[18] |
Duckworth A. L., & Seligman M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x pmid: 16313657 |
[19] | Eccles J. S., & Roeser R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225-241. |
[20] | Eysenck M. W., & Derakshan N. (2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 955-960. |
[21] |
Fujii Y., Kitagawa N., Shimizu Y., Mitsui N., Toyomaki A., Hashimoto N.,... Kusumi I. (2013). Severity of generalized social anxiety disorder correlates with low executive functioning. Neuroscience Letters, 543, 42-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.059 pmid: 23562516 |
[22] | Gagnon S. A., & Wagner A. D. (2016). Acute stress and episodic memory retrieval:neurobiological mechanisms and behavioral consequences. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369(1), 55-75. |
[23] | Gao H., Wang X., Huang M., & Qi M. (2022). Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 22(3), 533-541. |
[24] | Girotti M., Adler S. M., Bulin S. E., Fucich E. A., Paredes D., & Morilak D. A. (2018). Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 85, 161-179. |
[25] |
Groeneveld M. G., Savas M., van Rossum E. F., & Vermeer H. J. (2020). Children’s hair cortisol as a biomarker of stress at school: a follow-up study. Stress, 23(5), 590-596.
doi: 10.1080/10253890.2020.1725467 pmid: 32013649 |
[26] | Hamre B., Hatfield B., Pianta R., & Jamil F. (2014). Evidence for general and domain‐specific elements of teacher-child interactions: Associations with preschool children's development. Child Development, 85(3), 1257-1274. |
[27] | Hennessey E. M. P., Kepinska O., Haft S. L., Chan M., Sunshine I., Jones C.,... Hoeft F. (2020). Hair cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone concentrations: Associations with executive function in early childhood. Biological Psychology, 155, 107946. |
[28] | Himi S. A., Bühner M., & Hilbert S. (2021). Advancing the understanding of the factor structure of executive functioning. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 16. |
[29] |
Isralowitz R. E., & Hong O. T. (1990). Singapore youth: The impact of social status on perceptions of adolescent problems. Adolescence, 25(98), 357-362.
pmid: 2375263 |
[30] | Jagiello T., Belcher J., Neelakandan A., Boyd K., & Wuthrich V. M. (2024). Academic Stress Interventions in High Schools: A Systematic Literature Review. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 1-34. |
[31] | Jiang Z., Jia X., Tao R., & Dördüncü H. (2022). COVID-19: A source of stress and depression among university students and poor academic performance. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 898556. |
[32] | Jun S., & Choi E. (2015). Academic stress and Internet addiction from general strain theory framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 282-287. |
[33] | Knauft K., Waldron A., Mathur M., & Kalia V. (2021). Perceived chronic stress influences the effect of acute stress on cognitive flexibility. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 23629. |
[34] | Lal K. (2014). Academic stress among adolescent in relation to intelligence and demographic factors. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 5(1), 123-129. |
[35] | Lazarus R. S. (1990). Theory-based stress measurement. Psychological Inquiry, 1(1), 3-13. |
[36] | Lazarus R. S., & Folkman S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company. |
[37] | LeBlanc V. R. (2009). The effects of acute stress on performance: Implications for health professions education. Academic Medicine, 84(10), S25-S33. |
[38] |
Lee M. T., Wong B. P., Chow B. W. Y., & McBride-Chang C. (2006). Predictors of suicide ideation and depression in Hong Kong adolescents: Perceptions of academic and family climates. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 36(1), 82-96.
pmid: 16676629 |
[39] | Li Y., Wang Y., Ren Z., Gao M., Liu Q., Qiu C., & Zhang W. (2020). The influence of environmental pressure on Internet Use Disorder in adolescents: The potential mediating role of cognitive function. Addictive Behaviors, 101, 105976. |
[40] |
Lin L., Zhang J., Wang P., Bai X., Sun X., & Zhang L. (2020). Perceived control moderates the impact of academic stress on the attention process of working memory in male college students. Stress, 23(3), 256-264.
doi: 10.1080/10253890.2019.1669557 pmid: 31532278 |
[41] | Liu Q., Liu Y., Leng X., Han J., Xia F., & Chen H. (2020). Impact of Chronic Stress on Attention Control: Evidence from Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Analyses. Neuroscience Bulletin, 36, 1395-1410. |
[42] | Liu Y. (2015). The longitudinal relationship between Chinese high school students' academic stress and academic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 123-126. |
[43] | Liu Y., & Lu Z. (2012). Chinese high school students' academic stress and depressive symptoms: Gender and school climate as moderators. Stress and Health, 28(4), 340-346. |
[44] |
Lloyd J., Bond F. W., & Flaxman P. E. (2017). Work-related self-efficacy as a moderator of the impact of a worksite stress management training intervention: Intrinsic work motivation as a higher order condition of effect. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(1), 115-127.
doi: 10.1037/ocp0000026 pmid: 27054501 |
[45] | Luo Y., Cui Z., Zou P., Wang K., Lin Z., He J., & Wang J. (2020). Mental health problems and associated factors in Chinese high school students in Henan province: A cross- sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5944. |
[46] | Ma S., & Li Y. (2023). The impact between self-control on academic performance among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 1497-1501. |
[47] |
Mather M., & Sutherland M. R. (2011). Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 114-133.
doi: 10.1177/1745691611400234 pmid: 21660127 |
[48] |
McEwen B. S., & Morrison J. H. (2013). The brain on stress: vulnerability and plasticity of the prefrontal cortex over the life course. Neuron, 79(1), 16-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.028 pmid: 23849196 |
[49] | Medyasari L. T., & Dewi N. R. (2021). The measurement of self-efficacy students in mathematics lesson tenth students of senior high school. In Journal of physics: Conference series (Vol. 1918, No. 4, p. 042128). IOP Publishing. |
[50] |
Miyake A., Friedman N. P., Emerson M. J., Witzki A. H., Howerter A., & Wager T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100.
doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 pmid: 10945922 |
[51] | Mothes L., Kristensen C. H., Oliveira R. G., de Lima Argimon I. I., Fonseca R. P., & Irigaray T. Q. (2017). Stressful events and executive functioning in adolescents with and without history of grade repetition. Universitas Psychologica, 16(4), 139-150. |
[52] |
Mychasiuk R., Muhammad A., & Kolb B. (2016). Chronic stress induces persistent changes in global DNA methylation and gene expression in the medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and hippocampus. Neuroscience, 322, 489-499.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.053 pmid: 26946265 |
[53] | Nguyen L., Murphy K., & Andrews G. (2019). Cognitive and neural plasticity in old age: A systematic review of evidence from executive functions cognitive training. Ageing Research Reviews, 53, 100912. |
[54] |
Oei N. Y., Everaerd W. T., Elzinga B. M., van Well S., & Bermond B. (2006). Psychosocial stress impairs working memory at high loads: An association with cortisol levels and memory retrieval. Stress, 9(3), 133-141.
pmid: 17035163 |
[55] | Organisation For Economic Cooperation And Development (OECD). (2017). Overview: Students’ well-being. In PISA 2015 results (Volume III): Students’ well-being (pp. 37-57). Paris, France: Author. |
[56] | Park S. H., & Kim Y. (2018). Ways of coping with excessive academic stress among Korean adolescents during leisure time. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(1), 1505397. |
[57] |
Plessow F., Fischer R., Kirschbaum C., & Goschke T. (2011). Inflexibly focused under stress: Acute psychosocial stress increases shielding of action goals at the expense of reduced cognitive flexibility with increasing time lag to the stressor. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3218-3227.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00024 pmid: 21452940 |
[58] | Pontes A., Coelho V., Peixoto C., Meira L., & Azevedo H. (2024). Academic stress and anxiety among portuguese students: The role of perceived social support and self-management. Education Sciences, 14(2), 119. |
[59] |
Potter J. L., Wade S. L., Walz N. C., Cassedy A., Stevens M. H., Yeates K. O., & Taylor H. G. (2011). Parenting style is related to executive dysfunction after brain injury in children. Rehabilitation Psychology, 56(4), 351-358.
doi: 10.1037/a0025445 pmid: 21928918 |
[60] | Putwain D. W., Jansen in de Wal J., & van Alphen T. (2023). Academic buoyancy: Overcoming test anxiety and setbacks. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 42. |
[61] | Qi M., Gao H., & Liu G. (2017). Effect of acute psychological stress on response inhibition: An event- related potential study. Behavioural Brain Research, 323, 32-37. |
[62] | Quach A. S., Epstein N. B., Riley P. J., Falconier M. K., & Fang X. (2015). Effects of parental warmth and academic pressure on anxiety and depression symptoms in Chinese adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 106-116. |
[63] |
Quinn M. E., & Joormann J. (2015). Control when it counts: Change in executive control under stress predicts depression symptoms. Emotion, 15(4), 522-530.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000089 pmid: 26098731 |
[64] |
Rahdar A., & Galván A. (2014). The cognitive and neurobiological effects of daily stress in adolescents. NeuroImage, 92, 267-273.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.007 pmid: 24553284 |
[65] |
Reising M. M., Bettis A. H., Dunbar J. P., Watson K. H., Gruhn M., Hoskinson K. R., & Compas B. E. (2018). Stress, coping, executive function, and brain activation in adolescent offspring of depressed and nondepressed mothers. Child Neuropsychology, 24(5), 638-656.
doi: 10.1080/09297049.2017.1307950 pmid: 28349772 |
[66] | Rosenthal R., & Jacobson L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teachers' expectations and pupils' intellectual development. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. |
[67] | Roskam I., Stievenart M., Meunier J. C., & Noël M. P. (2014). The development of children’s inhibition: Does parenting matter? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 122, 166-182. |
[68] |
Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 pmid: 11392867 |
[69] |
Sänger J., Bechtold L., Schoofs D., Blaszkewicz M., & Wascher E. (2014). The influence of acute stress on attention mechanisms and its electrophysiological correlates. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 353.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00353 pmid: 25346669 |
[70] | Sasikumar N., & Bapitha R. (2019). Examination stress and academic achievement in English of Ninth Standard students in Pudukottai Educational District. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 654-659. |
[71] |
Schoofs D., Preuß D., & Wolf O. T. (2008). Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an n-back paradigm. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33(5), 643-653.
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.02.004 pmid: 18359168 |
[72] | Schunk D. H., & Pajares F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). Academic Press. |
[73] |
Schwabe L., Höffken O., Tegenthoff M., & Wolf O. T. (2013). Stress-induced enhancement of response inhibition depends on mineralocorticoid receptor activation. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(10), 2319-2326.
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.05.001 pmid: 23831264 |
[74] | Selye H. (1977). Stress without distress. School Guidance Worker, 32(5), 5-13. |
[75] |
Shansky R. M., & Lipps J. (2013). Stress-induced cognitive dysfunction: hormone-neurotransmitter interactions in the prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 123.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00123 pmid: 23576971 |
[76] | Shields G. S., Sazma M. A., & Yonelinas A. P. (2016). The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: A meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 651-668. |
[77] | Singh B., & Rathee I. (2013). A study of stress level among senior secondary school students in relation to their gender and type of school. Academic Discourse, 2(2), 98-102. |
[78] | Sosic-Vasic Z., Kröner J., Schneider S., Vasic N., & Spitzer M. (2017). The association between parenting behavior and executive functioning in children and young adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 233409. |
[79] |
Starcke K., Wiesen C., Trotzke P., & Brand M. (2016). Effects of acute laboratory stress on executive functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 461.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00461 pmid: 27065926 |
[80] |
Steinberg L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005 pmid: 15668099 |
[81] | Tan J. B., & Yates S. (2011). Academic expectations as sources of stress in Asian students. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 389-407. |
[82] | Tangney J. P., Boone A. L., & Baumeister R. F. (2018). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. In Self-regulation and self-control (pp. 173-212). Routledge. |
[83] |
Tsai N., Eccles J. S., & Jaeggi S. M. (2019). Stress and executive control: Mechanisms, moderators, and malleability. Brain and Cognition, 133, 54-59.
doi: S0278-2626(18)30170-2 pmid: 30396706 |
[84] |
Vandenbroucke L., Spilt J., Verschueren K., & Baeyens D. (2017). Keeping the spirits up: The effect of teachers’ and parents’ emotional support on children’s working memory performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 512.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00512 pmid: 28421026 |
[85] | Veyis F., Seçer İ., & Ulas S. (2019). An investigation of the mediator role of school burnout between academic stress and academic motivation. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 8(4), 46-53. |
[86] |
Vinski M. T., & Watter S. (2013). Being a grump only makes things worse: A transactional account of acute stress on mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 730.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00730 pmid: 24273520 |
[87] | Vogel S., & Schwabe L. (2016). Learning and memory under stress: Implications for the classroom. NPJ Science of Learning, 1(1), 1-10. |
[88] | Wang S., Xie H., Huang J., & Liang L. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between teacher-child interaction and children’s executive function. Current Psychology, 42(21), 17539-17559. |
[89] |
Williams P. G., Suchy Y., & Rau H. K. (2009). Individual differences in executive functioning: Implications for stress regulation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37(2), 126-140.
doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9100-0 pmid: 19381748 |
[90] | Wolff M., Enge S., Kräplin A., Krönke K. M., Bühringer G., Smolka M. N., & Goschke T. (2021). Chronic stress, executive functioning, and real‐life self‐control: An experience sampling study. Journal of Personality, 89(3), 402-421. |
[91] | Wong J., Salili F., Ho S. Y., Mak K. H., Lai M. K., & Lam T. H. (2005). The perceptions of adolescents, parents and teachers on the same adolescent health issues. School Psychology International, 26(3), 371-384. |
[92] | Xiao J. (2002). Determinants of salary growth in Shenzhen, China: An analysis of formal education, on-the-job training, and adult education with a three-level model. Economics of Education Review, 21(6), 557-577. |
[93] |
Xin M., Xing J., Pengfei W., Houru L., Mengcheng W., & Hong Z. (2018). Online activities, prevalence of Internet addiction and risk factors related to family and school among adolescents in China. Addictive behaviors reports, 7, 14-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.10.003 pmid: 29450251 |
[94] | Xu J. J., Cao J. F., Cui L. Z., & Zhu P. (2010). Preliminary compilation of study stress questionnaire for middle school students. Chinese Journal of School Health, 31(1), 68-69. |
[95] | Yerkes R. M., & Dodson J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology & Psychology, 18, 459-482. |
[96] | Yuan Q. (2022). Academic stress predicts negative emotions and academic performances: The role of mindset in moderation process. In 2022 3rd International Conference on Mental Health, Education and Human Development (MHEHD 2022) (pp. 91-98). Atlantis Press. |
[97] | Zahodne L. B., Nowinski C. J., Gershon R. C., & Manly J. J. (2015). Self-efficacy buffers the relationship between educational disadvantage and executive functioning. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 21(4), 297-304. |
[98] | Zhao X., Chen L., & Maes J. H. (2018). Training and transfer effects of response inhibition training in children and adults. Developmental Science, 21(1), e12511. |
[99] | Zhao X., Wang Y., & Maes J. H. (2022). The effect of working memory capacity and training on intertemporal decision making in children from low-socioeconomic- status families. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 216, 105347. |
[100] | Zhou X., Bambling M., Bai X., & Edirippulige S. (2023). Chinese school adolescents’ stress experience and coping strategies: A qualitative study. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 1-15. |
[101] |
Zhu X. L., & Zhao X. (2023). Role of executive function in mathematical ability of children in different grades. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(5), 696-710.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00696 |
[1] | ZHU Xiaoliang, ZHAO Xin. Role of executive function in mathematical ability of children in different grades [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(5): 696-710. |
[2] | ZHANG Hang, WANG Ting, FENG Xiaohui, WEI Yiping, ZHANG Jijia. Effect of bronze drum training on rhythm perception and executive function of Zhuang drummers [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(11): 1762-1779. |
[3] | CUI Liying, BU Weiwei, GAO Quanli, WU Qin, HUANG Yao, HAN Xianguo, LUO Junlong. Development of discriminatory perception of junior high school students and influence on the cooperative behaviour of internal and external groups [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(3): 259-269. |
[4] | ZHANG Qing, WANG Zhengyan. The interplay of maternal sensitivity and infant temperament and attention in predicting toddlers’ executive function: A two-year longitudinal study [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2022, 54(2): 141-153. |
[5] | GAI XiaoSong, XU Jie, YAN Yan, WANG Yuan, XIE XiaoChun. Exergame can improve children’s executive function: The role of physical intensity and cognitive engagement [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(5): 505-514. |
[6] | SUN Qiwu, WU Caizhi, YU Lixia, WANG Weixin, SHEN Guocheng. Progress feedback and its effects on working alliance and treatment outcomes [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2021, 53(4): 349-361. |
[7] | ZHAO Xin, LI Hongli, JIN Ge, LI Shifeng, ZHOU Aibao, LIANG Wenjia, GUO Hongxia, CAI Yaya. Effects of phonological memory and central executive function on decoding, language comprehension of children in different grades [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 469-484. |
[8] | WANG Yuan, LI Ke, GAI Xiaosong, CAO Yifei. Training and transfer effects of response inhibition training with online feedback on adolescents and adults’ executive function [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(10): 1212-1223. |
[9] | WANG Ting,ZHI Fengying,LU Yutong,ZHANG Jijia. Effect of Dong Chorus on the executive function of Dong high school students [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(9): 1040-1056. |
[10] | LI Quan, SONG Yanan, LIAN Bin, FENG Tingyong. Mindfulness training can improve 3-and 4-year-old children’s attention and executive function [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 324-336. |
[11] | Shufen XING,Qianqian LI,Xin GAO,Yuanyuan MA,Rui FU. Differential influence of sleep time parameters on preschoolers’ executive function [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1269-1281. |
[12] | YANG Haibo; ZHAO Xin; WANG Yang; ZHANG Lei; WANG Ruimeng; ZHANG Yi; WANG Li. The emotional specificity of executive function defects of earthquake PTSD teenagers [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 643-652. |
[13] | WANG Ting, WANG Dan, ZHANG Jijia, CUI Jianai. Effects of “each speaks their own dialect” phenomenon on the executive function of Jingpo students [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(11): 1392-1403. |
[14] |
CHEN Shuai.
The influence of team faultlines on team performance: Mediating effect of team transactive memory system
[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(1): 84-94.
|
[15] | ZHANG Guohua;DAI Bibing;LEI Li. The Development of Pathological Internet Use and Its Relationship with Self-Esteem among Junior High School Students: The Moderating Role of Classmate Relationship [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(12): 1345-1354. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||