ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1501-1517 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01501

研究报告

自闭特质对疼痛共情的影响:疼痛负性情绪和认知的中介作用

张文芸1,2, 卓诗维1, 郑倩倩1, 关颖琳1, 彭微微,1

1深圳大学心理学院, 深圳 518060

2深圳市光明区楼村小学, 深圳 518106

Autistic traits influence pain empathy: The mediation role of pain-related negative emotion and cognition

ZHANG Wenyun1,2, ZHUO Shiwei1, ZHENG Qianqian1, GUAN Yinglin1, PENG Weiwei,1

1School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518060, China

2LouCun Primary school, Guangming District, Shenzhen 518106, China

通讯作者: 彭微微, E-mail:ww.peng0923@gmail.com

收稿日期: 2022-08-23  

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(32271105)
深圳市基础研究面上项目(JCYJ20190808154413592)
广东省“脑科学与类脑研究”重大科技专项:自闭症诊疗方法研究(2018B030335001)

Received: 2022-08-23  

摘要

已有研究提示自闭症个体的疼痛共情缺陷可能源于自身疼痛的异常。鉴于高自闭特质与自闭症的相似性, 本研究分别通过实验范式和问卷调查评估了状态和特质共情, 旨在刻画自闭特质、自身疼痛与共情之间的联系。在假双人疼痛共情范式中, 高自闭特质个体在目睹他人接受疼痛时P2响应更强, 不愉悦度评分更高, 且部分源于对疼痛的高恐惧水平。问卷调查结果发现, 自闭特质水平越高, 在共情特质量表的观点采择维度得分越低, 而个人痛苦维度得分越高, 其中疼痛恐惧和灾难化中介了自闭特质与个人痛苦之间的联系。因此, 高自闭特质个体表现出高水平的状态和特质情绪共情, 且部分源于对疼痛存在更为负面的情绪和认知。这支持从自身疼痛异常的角度去理解高自闭特质和自闭症群体的共情等社会功能障碍, 为临床治疗和干预提供了潜在的靶点。

关键词: 自闭特质; 疼痛共情; 疼痛恐惧; 疼痛灾难化; 事件相关电位

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are typically characterized by impaired social interactions that are thought to be related to deficits in empathy. While cognitive empathy deficit in ASD is widely recognized, it remains controversial whether individuals with ASD have a deficiency in emotional empathy. According to the shared representation theory, psychological and neuronal mechanisms involved in the personal experience of an emotional or somatosensory state are also engaged while empathizing with other individuals in those states. It suggests that the deficits of empathy seen in the ASD population could arise from the atypical experience of first-hand pain. Mild, subclinical forms of the characteristics associated with ASD are referred to as autistic traits. Individuals with high autistic traits exhibit sensory, emotional, and social behaviors similar to those with ASD. Given the relationship between pain empathy and first-hand pain as well as the similarity between autistic traits and ASD, the present study tested the hypothesis that autistic traits in the general population would influence pain empathic responses, which could be contributed by first-hand pain-related profiles.

In Experiment 1, we adopted an ecological pain empathy paradigm and compared behavioral and neural activity between individuals with high scores on the Autism-Spectrum Quotient Test (HAQ, with high autistic traits) and those with low scores (LAQ, with low autistic traits). During the pain empathy paradigm, the participants either perceived the painful electrical stimuli themselves or witnessed the delivery of painful electrical stimuli to their partners in certain and uncertain contexts. When perceiving pain themselves, behavioral and brain responses were comparable between HAQ and LAQ groups. When witnessing others in pain, participants in the HAQ group had greater amplitudes of the P2 component on the event-related potentials and reported higher ratings of unpleasantness than those in the LAQ group. The between-group differences in the behavioral and neural responses related to pain empathy were not moderated by certainty of the context (certain or uncertain). Mediation analysis further revealed that the between-group differences in the unpleasantness elicited by witnessing others’ pain could be contributed by the greater fear of pain while anticipating the upcoming painful stimuli.

In Experiment 2, the relationship among autistic traits, pain-related profiles, and trait empathy was assessed in randomly recruited participants. We found that autistic trait levels were negatively correlated with scores on the perspective-taking subscale of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and positively correlated with the personal distress subscale. Importantly, pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing mediated the link between autistic traits and personal distress.

Data from Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that autistic traits heighten emotional empathy, which can be explained by the negative emotion and cognition toward pain. Given the similarities between individuals with high autistic traits and ASD, this finding may help to expand the biological mechanisms underlying ASD, such as explaining empathy deficits or other social difficulties seen in the ASD from the perspective of atypical pain-related profiles. Future studies should combine multiple modalities of painful stimulations and multidimensional pain assessments to comprehensively characterize pain-related profiles among individuals with high autistic traits or ASD, and establish linkage between pain-related profiles and empathy or social deficits. This understanding has the potential to provide targets for clinical interventions and treatments of ASD.

Keywords: autistic traits; pain empathy; pain-related fear; pain catastrophizing; event-related potentials

PDF (1584KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

张文芸, 卓诗维, 郑倩倩, 关颖琳, 彭微微. 自闭特质对疼痛共情的影响:疼痛负性情绪和认知的中介作用. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1501-1517 doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01501

ZHANG Wenyun, ZHUO Shiwei, ZHENG Qianqian, GUAN Yinglin, PENG Weiwei. Autistic traits influence pain empathy: The mediation role of pain-related negative emotion and cognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2023, 55(9): 1501-1517 doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01501

1 引言

根据第五版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, DSM-5), 自闭症谱系障碍(Autism Spectrum Disorder, ASD)被定义为一种以“社会沟通和社会交往缺陷”和“重复刻板的行为和兴趣模式”为两大核心症状的神经发育障碍(American Psychiatric Association, 2013)。自闭特质是与ASD相关的行为、人格和认知特征集合(Sucksmith et al., 2011)。自闭特质在ASD和普通人群中均广泛存在, 只是严重性存在量化差异(Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Skinner et al., 2001)。高自闭特质群体的身心健康和社会功能问题不容忽视: 与低自闭特质个体相比, 高自闭特质个体存在更多的心理困扰和更高的自杀风险(Dow et al., 2021; Pelton & Cassidy, 2017), 社交技能相对较差, 参与人际互动的动机更弱, 亲社会行为更少(Austin, 2005; Cetinoglu & Aras, 2022; Kloosterman et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2019)。双胞胎研究发现, 基因遗传特征解释了自闭特质水平变异的36%~87% (Constantino & Todd, 2003; Ronald et al., 2008), 且ASD个体家庭成员的自闭特质水平显著高于普通对照组(Pickles et al., 2000; Piven et al., 1997), 这提示自闭特质与ASD可能存在共享的基因表征。除了遗传模式上的高相似性, 高自闭特质与ASD个体在情绪、认知和行为等多方面也表现出相似性(Gökçen et al., 2014; Kunihira et al., 2006; Takahashi et al., 2013), 如更多的焦虑、较差的认知灵活性和贫乏的社交技能等。鉴于自闭特质和ASD的高相似性, 自闭特质研究不仅能促进理解ASD的生物学机制和开发干预策略, 还有助于改善高自闭特质群体的心理健康和社会功能。

共情(Empathy)是指个体对他人情绪和想法的感受及理解(Singer & Lamm, 2009), 在人际交往和亲社会行为中发挥着重要作用(Decety & Jackson, 2006; Jackson et al., 2005)。共情主要涉及情绪和认知两个成分, 其中情绪共情(Emotional Empathy)是对他人情绪和状态的感知和分享; 认知共情(Cognitive Empathy)使我们能够准确理解他人想法, 包括观点采择和心理理论能力(Decety & Lamm, 2006; Decety & Svetlova, 2012)。Baron-Cohen (2010)认为共情缺陷可能是ASD个体社会性特征障碍的主要诱因之一。以往研究较为一致地发现, ASD个体的认知共情存在缺陷(Song et al., 2019; Ziermans et al., 2019), 而在情绪共情上的研究结果充满争议。部分研究发现ASD个体表现出更强的情绪共情(Capps et al., 1993; Rogers et al., 2007), 例如Gu等人(2015)发现相比控制组, ASD组在观看躯体疼痛图片时(如刀切到手指等), 皮肤电反应更为强烈, 且前脑岛的激活更强。相反, 有研究发现ASD个体表现出更弱的情绪共情(Minio-Paluello et al., 2009), 如在观看他人讲述自身痛苦经历的视频录像后, ASD组报告了更低的不愉悦度评分(Santiesteban et al., 2021)。还有研究则支持ASD和普通个体在情绪共情上没有显著差异(Bird et al., 2010; Blair, 1999), 如在多维度共情任务中, ASD组对痛苦情境图片的唤起程度以及图片中主人公的同情关心程度评分均与对照组无显著差异(Dziobek et al., 2008)。因此, 尽管ASD个体存在共情缺陷的观点得到了广泛的认可, 有关共情缺陷的具体表现却有不同的观点, ASD个体在情绪共情上的异常及其机制有待进一步研究。

神经影像学研究表明, 个体在亲身经历疼痛和目睹他人疼痛时会激活相似的神经表征, 包括前脑岛、前中扣带回皮层和初级感觉皮层等(Lamm et al., 2011)。除了相似的神经表征外, 当普通个体的疼痛敏感性受药理学或非药理学操纵而升高或降低时, 其对他人遭受疼痛刺激的疼痛评分和脑响应也随之升高或降低(Mischkowski et al., 2016; Rütgen, Seidel, Riečanský & Lamm, 2015; Rütgen, Seidel, Silani et al., 2015), 例如服用了对乙酰氨基酚(一种止痛药)的被试不仅自身的疼痛敏感性降低, 对他人承受的痛苦也更不敏感, 说明止痛药在抑制自身躯体疼痛的同时, 也抑制了对他人痛苦的感知, 进而减少了共情体验(Mischkowski et al., 2016)。先天性疼痛不敏感的病人由于生理原因(体内缺乏疼痛受体), 自身没有体验过疼痛, 也较难对他人的疼痛感同身受(Danziger et al., 2009; Danziger et al., 2006)。这些研究结果均支持了共情的共享神经表征模型(Shared-representation Model of Empathy), 即个体对他人共情与自我感知有相似的心理和神经表征(Decety & Jackson, 2004; Jackson et al., 2005)。鉴于自身疼痛与疼痛共情的联系, ASD个体的疼痛共情缺陷可能源于自身疼痛异常。已有研究探讨了ASD个体的疼痛异常, 然而研究结果存在较大的异质性(Moore, 2015)。有的研究发现ASD个体对疼痛反应过度(Rattaz et al., 2013), 有的则发现ASD个体对疼痛反应不足或反应正常(Fründt et al., 2017; 李晋 等, 2015)。最新的一项元分析研究系统考察了ASD和普通个体在疼痛敏感性上的差异(张文芸 等, 2021), 结果发现ASD个体在压力疼痛和现实医疗疼痛上的高敏感性。

目前仅有两个研究探讨了ASD个体自身疼痛和疼痛共情之间的联系(Chen et al., 2017; Fan et al., 2014)。Fan等人(2014)发现ASD个体对自身疼痛表现出高敏感性(低压力疼痛阈限); 在观看他人处于疼痛情境的图片时, ASD个体在初级/次级躯体感觉皮层的激活更强, 而前中扣带回, 前脑岛等情绪共情相关脑区的激活更弱, 且对他人疼痛的不愉悦度评分更低; 自身疼痛敏感性介导了疼痛共情相关的初级/次级躯体感觉皮层响应和不愉悦度评分的关系。研究者认为这可能是由于ASD个体自身疼痛感知的高敏感性, 在被动观看他人疼痛时躯体感觉皮层的感觉运动共振响应会增强, ASD个体倾向于通过注意回避的方式来避免自身陷入过度的情感痛苦, 从而表现为情绪共情脑区的激活反而较弱, 以及较低的不愉悦度评分。Chen等人(2017)的研究同样发现了相比发展障碍组和控制组, ASD组的压力疼痛阈限更低, 对他人疼痛的不愉悦度评分更低, 且压力疼痛阈限和对他人疼痛的不愉悦度评分显著正相关, 这进一步支持了ASD疼痛共情的异常可能源于自身疼痛感知异常的观点。以上两个研究通过压力疼痛阈限评估了疼痛的感觉维度, 并建立了在ASD群体中疼痛感觉维度异常与疼痛共情异常的联系。然而, 疼痛是一种多维的主观体验, 不仅包括感觉层面(如对伤害性刺激的性质、位置和强度信息的辨别), 还包括情绪(如疼痛相关的恐惧和焦虑)和认知(如疼痛相关的灾难化和预期)等多个层面(Tracey, 2011; Wiech et al., 2008)。ASD个体疼痛相关的情绪和认知维度与疼痛共情的联系还有待研究。

ASD个体的认知和行为特征限制了对研究方法的选择, 例如普遍存在的言语和认知等障碍, 开展相关研究工作难度较大, 导致ASD相关研究被试样本量小, 结果可重复性低, 异质性高; 与ASD个体相比, 高自闭特质个体更能容忍结构化的测试环境, 完成更复杂的实验任务。为此, 本研究以高自闭特质群体为研究对象, 从状态和特质两个层面考察自闭特质对共情的影响。其中, 状态共情(State Empathy)是指由当下的相关情境所诱发的一种即时且暂时性的共情状态, 强调共情者与被共情者在暂时性的交互过程中所产生的共情状态(Davis, 1980); 特质共情(Trait Empathy)是一种相对稳定的人格特质, 指个体对他人情绪、疼痛等感受产生共情的一种普遍能力(Decety & Moriguchi, 2007)。实验1将以高低自闭特质被试为研究对象, 采用假双人范式, 刻画高低自闭特质组在亲身经历和目睹他人接受疼痛时的行为反应和事件相关电位(Event-related Potentials, ERPs)响应, 考察自闭特质是如何通过影响自身疼痛从而进一步影响对他人的状态共情反应。实验2将随机招募健康成年被试, 采用问卷调查方法, 考察普通人群中自闭特质、疼痛相关特质以及共情特质之间的联系, 检验疼痛相关特质在自闭特质与共情特质联系中的中介作用。

先前疼痛共情的ERP研究表明, 额顶叶N1、P2和N2成分更多地反映了早期加工过程, 与自下而上的情绪分享有关; 顶枕叶P3和LPP成分更多地反映了晚期加工过程, 与自上而下的认知评估有关(Cheng et al., 2014; Decety, 2011; Fan & Han, 2008; Sessa et al., 2014)。Fan等人(2014)的研究发现, 当要求被试判断图片材料为疼痛或非疼痛时, ASD组在加工疼痛和非疼痛图片刺激的N2响应上存在显著差异, 而在对照组上没有观察到这种差异, 这可能说明了ASD个体在疼痛共情的早期自动化加工阶段(如对他人疼痛的感知、情绪分享)的神经响应增强。鉴于高自闭特质和ASD群体的相似性, 本研究对实验结果提出假设1:相对于低自闭特质个体, 高自闭特质个体在特质和状态情绪共情上更强, 表现在特质共情量表的情绪共情维度得分更高, 在目睹他人接受疼痛时诱发更强的早期ERP响应(如N1和P2成分); 高自闭特质个体在特质和状态认知共情上更弱, 表现在特质共情量表的认知共情维度得分更低, 在目睹他人接受疼痛时诱发更弱的晚期ERP响应(如P3成分)。根据共情的共享表征理论, 个体对他人疼痛的共情反应部分依赖于自身疼痛的心理和神经表征。为此, 我们进一步提出假设2:自闭特质对疼痛共情的影响可能源于自身疼痛的改变, 即自身疼痛的特质或状态可以解释高自闭特质人群的疼痛共情表现。

2 实验1:高低自闭特质个体对他人疼痛共情的差异

2.1 方法

2.1.1 被试

依据已有的自闭特质研究(Dunn et al., 2016; Li et al., 2020; Meng et al., 2017; Meng et al., 2019; Peled-Avron & Shamay-Tsoory, 2017), 首先采用自闭商数量表(Autism-Spectrum Quotient, AQ)中文版(Liu, 2008)测查了1131名大学生的自闭特质, 根据AQ总分的分布情况(M ± SE = 20.08 ± 0.17), 按照前、后10%划分为低自闭特质组(LAQ; AQ ≤ 13)和高自闭特质组(HAQ; AQ ≥ 27), 然后从中随机招募一部分被试参加后续实验。根据G-Power软件(Faul et al., 2007)计算样本量, 使用中等的效果量(η2p = 0.25), 期望的功效值(1 - β = 0.80)以及显著性水平(α = 0.05), 计算需要被试总样本量不少于24人。最终, 参加实验的LAQ组的被试数量为30名(男性16名; 年龄:20.77 ± 0.34岁), HAQ组被试数量为30名(男性15名; 年龄:21.30 ± 0.31岁)。所有被试均为右利手, 视力或矫正后视力正常, 且不存在急性、慢性疼痛或当前使用任何药物的医疗状况, 无精神病史。所有被试在实验前均被告知了实验程序, 并签署了知情同意书, 实验程序经深圳大学伦理委员会批准(PN-2021-022)。

2.1.2 量表施测

被试到达实验室后先进行量表填写, 其中AQ量表用于评估自闭特质, 疼痛特质量表(疼痛敏感性量表、疼痛恐惧量表和疼痛灾难化量表)用于评估疼痛相关的感知、情绪和认知, 以及人际反应指针量表用于评估共情特质。

AQ量表包含50条目, 涵盖了主要的自闭症状和行为模式, 分为5个维度:注意转换、社交技能、言语交流、细节注意和想象力。采用0~1级计分, 其中正向计分题选择“完全同意”或者“部分同意”计1分, 选择“部分不同意”或者“完全不同意”不计分, 反向题则相反。AQ总分分布在0~50分之间, 总分越高, 代表个体的自闭特质越高。本研究中, 该量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.91。

疼痛敏感性量表(Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire, PSQ, Quan et al., 2018; Ruscheweyh et al., 2009)包含17条目, 涵盖了日常生活中常见的疼痛类型, 分为2个维度:轻度疼痛和中度疼痛。采用0~10级计分, 0代表“无痛”, 10表示“极度疼痛”。PSQ总分越高, 代表个体的疼痛敏感性越高。本研究中, 该量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.90。

疼痛恐惧量表(Fear of Pain Questionnaire, FPQ, McNeil & Rainwater, 1998; Yang et al., 2013)包含30条目, 用来评估个体的疼痛相关恐惧水平, 分为3个维度:轻微疼痛、严重疼痛和医疗疼痛。采用0~4级计分, 0代表“一点也不恐惧”, 4表示“极度恐惧”。FPQ总分越高, 代表个体的疼痛恐惧水平越高。本研究中, 该量表的Cronbach's α系数为 0.90。

疼痛灾难化量表(Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PCS, Sullivan et al., 1995; Yap et al., 2008)包含13条目, 用来评估个体关于疼痛的情感和认知态度, 分为3个维度:反复思虑、夸大和无助。采用0~4级计分, 0代表“从来没有”, 4代表“总是如此”。PCS总分越高, 代表个体的疼痛灾难化水平越高。本研究中该量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.92。

人际反应指针量表(Interpersonal Reactivity Index, IRI, Davis, 1983; Siu & Shek, 2005)包含22条目, 从共情的认知和情绪两个方面评估个体的特质共情能力, 分为4个维度:观点采择(Perspective Taking, PT)、个人痛苦(Personal Distress, PD)、共情关心(Empathic Concern, EC)和想象(Fantasy, FS)。采用0~4级计分, 0代表“不恰当”, 4代表“很恰当”。其中, 观点采择和想象维度被认为测量的是认知共情, 个人痛苦和共情关心被认为测量的是情绪共情。本研究中, 该量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.71。

2.1.3 疼痛刺激强度的校准

疼痛刺激由一台恒压电刺激仪产生(DS7A, Hertfordshire, UK)。正式实验前, 被试需进行两轮的刺激响应曲线测量, 用于确定实验中所用的疼痛刺激强度。在被试左手无名指上戴上一对指环电极, 一系列电流刺激通过指环电极传递给被试。每个刺激由若干个快速连续的恒流方波脉冲组成, 电刺激的起始电流强度为0.5 mA, 步长为0.5 mA, 刺激间隔为4000~6000 ms, 脉宽为0.5 ms。每个刺激结束之后, 被试对体验到的疼痛强度进行评分, 评分范围为0~10, 0代表“没有疼痛”, 10代表“极度疼痛”。两轮测量的间隔为3分钟左右。根据平均的刺激响应曲线, 确定能够诱发疼痛评分为6分的刺激强度(Yao et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2019), 用于正式实验中的疼痛刺激。

2.1.4 实验设计

本实验为2 (组别:LAQ组, HAQ组) × 2 (疼痛对象:自身, 他人) × 2 (确定性:确定, 不确定)三因素混合设计, 其中组别为被试间变量, 疼痛对象和确定性为被试内变量。

2.1.5 实验任务

被试到达实验室后, 被告知将与一名搭档(实际为假被试, 由一名固定女主试扮演) (Cui et al., 2015; Peng et al., 2019; Rütgen, Seidel, Riečanský & Lamm, 2015)一起进行双人实验。如图1A所示, 被试在完成疼痛校准之后, 与假被试搭档坐在同一房间内相邻但以屏风相隔的两张桌子前, 开始正式的实验任务。

图1

图1   假双人疼痛共情范式流程图


实验包含4个block, 每个block包含40个试次。正式实验开始前有5个练习试次以帮助被试熟悉实验流程。实验过程中, 被试左手无名指戴上一对指环电极。在指导语阶段, 告知被试整个实验过程中双方接受电刺激的比例均为50%。具体实验流程如图1B所示:首先屏幕中央会出现“+”注视点, 随后出现形为箭头的提示线索, 箭头方向预示接下来的疼痛的接受对象(左箭头:自身接受疼痛; 右箭头:他人接受疼痛; 上箭头:随机一方接受疼痛; 三种箭头的比例分别为:25%, 25%, 50%)。提示线索消失4 ± 1 s后, 疼痛刺激给出, 刺激结束后要求被试对自身体验到的不愉悦度进行按键评分(范围为0~10, 0代表“没有任何不愉悦”, 10代表“极度不愉悦”)。在每个block结束后, 被试评价看到三种不同类型箭头时的恐惧程度(评分范围为0~10, 0代表“没有任何恐惧感觉”, 10代表“极度恐惧”)。每两个block之间休息3~5分钟。实验过程中, 采用E-prime 3.0记录被试的行为数据, 并全程记录被试脑电。

2.1.6 脑电数据采集与分析

采用德国Brain Products公司的ERP记录系统, 按国际10-20系统扩展的64导电极帽记录被试的脑电活动情况。记录时参考电极位于FCz点上, 接地电极位于AFz点上。滤波带通为0.01~100 Hz, 采样频率为1000 Hz, 电极与头皮间的阻抗小于10 kΩ。

EEG数据的预处理和分析采用MATLAB R2016b和EEGLAB 14.1.2工具包(Delorme & Makeig, 2004)。离线分析时, 将参考转换为双侧乳突平均值作为参考, 滤波带通为0.2~30 Hz。分析时程截取疼痛刺激呈现前500 ms至呈现后1000 ms, 并以刺激呈现前500 ms作为基线。对有严重伪迹干扰的试次进行手动排除, 眼动伪迹通过独立成分分析算法进行校正。

当自身接受疼痛刺激, 分析疼痛诱发的N1和P2成分; 当目睹他人接受疼痛刺激, 分析疼痛共情诱发的P2和P3成分。根据波形图, 地形图以及相关文献选取电极点和时间窗用于计算ERP成分的平均波幅(Liao et al., 2018; Peng et al., 2019)。在自身接受疼痛条件下, N1成分测量的电极点为C1、Cz、C2和FCz, 时间窗为110~140 ms; P2成分测量的电极点为C1、Cz、C2和CPz, 时间窗为270~ 300 ms。在他人接受疼痛条件下, P2成分测量的电极点为C1、Cz、C2和FCz, 时间窗为220~250 ms; P3成分测量的电极点为CP1、CPz、CP2和Pz, 时间窗为400~550 ms。

2.1.7 统计分析

采用SPSS 22.0及其插件PROCESS 3.2 (Hayes, 2012)进行统计分析。使用独立样本t检验或卡方检验比较LAQ和HAQ组在性别、年龄、使用的刺激强度以及量表得分上的差异, 并采用了错误发现率法(False Discovery Rate, FDR)进行多重比较矫正。疼痛共情任务中的行为数据有预期阶段被试的疼痛恐惧水平评分, 以及疼痛阶段的不愉悦度评分。对疼痛恐惧水平评分进行2 (组别:LAQ组, HAQ组) × 3 (线索类型:自身, 他人, 不确定)的二因素重复测量方差分析, 对不愉悦度评分进行2 (组别:LAQ组, HAQ组) × 2 (疼痛对象:自身, 他人) × 2 (确定性:确定, 不确定)的三因素重复测量方差分析。对自身疼痛和他人疼痛诱发ERP成分的平均波幅, 分别进行2 (组别:LAQ组, HAQ组) × 2 (确定性:确定, 不确定)的二因素重复测量方差分析。若重复测量方差分析球形检验不通过则采用Greenhouse-Geisser法矫正。统计结果中进一步的两两比较均采用Bonferroni法进行矫正。中介分析采用偏差校正bootstrap方法。Bootstrap次数设置为5000次, 如果bootstrap 95%的置信区间不包含0, 则说明参数估计值显著; 反之, 则说明参数估计值不显著(Preacher & Hayes, 2008)。

2.2 结果

2.2.1 人口学变量和量表结果

表1所示, LAQ组和HAQ组被试在性别和年龄上无显著差异。实验中用于诱发疼痛的电刺激强度无显著组间差异。在疼痛敏感性量表和疼痛恐惧量表得分上, LAQ组和HAQ组无显著差异。在疼痛灾难化量表得分上, HAQ组的PCS量表总分显著高于LAQ组(t(58) = -3.39, p < 0.001), 表明HAQ组对疼痛存在更多的负面情绪和认知。在人际反应指针量表得分上, HAQ组的观点采择维度分数低于LAQ组(边缘显著) (t(58) = 2.35, p = 0.060), 表明HAQ组的认知共情能力更弱; HAQ组的个人痛苦维度分数显著高于LAQ组(t(58) = -5.33, p < 0.001), 表明HAQ组的情绪共情能力更强; 在共情关心和想象维度上的得分不存在显著组间差异。

表1   LAQ组和HAQ组被试的人口学变量和量表统计结果(M ± SE)

变量LAQ组
(n = 30)
HAQ组
(n = 30)
统计指标
t58 / χ2p
性别(男/女)16/1415/150.070.796
年龄20.77 ± 0.3421.30 ± 0.31-1.160.458
自闭特质10.73 ± 0.3530.53 ± 0.54-30.81<0.001
电刺激强度(mA)4.34 ± 0.374.18 ± 0.300.340.812
疼痛敏感性5.45 ± 0.235.73 ± 0.23-0.860.618
疼痛恐惧80.13 ± 2.4682.53 ± 2.82-0.640.721
疼痛灾难化24.83 ± 1.4832.87 ± 1.85-3.39<0.001
人际反应指针量表
观点采择13.47 ± 0.4811.87 ± 0.492.350.060
个人痛苦8.57 ± 0.6213.67 ± 0.73-5.33<0.001
同情关心12.77 ± 0.4113.57 ± 0.40-1.410.361
想象12.57 ± 0.4112.93 ± 0.58-0.520.744

注:LAQ:低自闭特质; HAQ:高自闭特质; n:样本量; 显著性水平(p < 0.05), 加粗表示显著。

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.2.2 行为数据

预期阶段的疼痛恐惧评分如图2A所示。线索类型的主效应显著, F(2, 57) = 30.43, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.52。事后检验结果显示, 对不确定对象疼痛线索的恐惧水平显著大于自身疼痛线索(3.09 ± 0.31 vs. 2.70 ± 0.29, p < 0.001), 对自身疼痛线索的恐惧水平显著高于他人疼痛线索(2.70 ± 0.29 vs. 1.34 ± 0.18, p < 0.001); 组别的主效应显著(F(1, 58) = 63.90, p = 0.014, η2p = 0.10), 即HAQ组对疼痛线索的恐惧水平显著高于LAQ组(2.97 ± 0.33 vs. 1.78 ± 0.33)。线索类型和组别的交互作用不显著。

图2

图2   假双人疼痛共情任务中的行为学结果

注:LAQ:低自闭特质; HAQ:高自闭特质; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001。


疼痛体验阶段的不愉悦度评分如图2B所示。疼痛对象的主效应显著(F(1, 58) = 41.68, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.42), 即自身疼痛的不愉悦度评分显著大于他人疼痛(3.89 ± 0.27 vs. 2.08 ± 0.22)。组别的主效应显著(F(1, 58) = 7.28, p = 0.009, η2p = 0.11), 即HAQ组的不愉悦度评分显著大于LAQ组(3.53 ± 0.29 vs. 2.44 ± 0.29)。疼痛对象和确定性的交互作用显著, F(1, 58) = 15.18, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.21。简单效应分析发现, 当目睹他人疼痛时, 不确定情境下的不愉悦度评分显著大于确定情境下的评分(2.16 ± 0.25 vs. 1.99 ± 0.23, p = 0.001); 当自身接受疼痛时, 不愉悦度评分在不确定和确定情境无显著差异(3.86 ± 0.28 vs. 3.92 ± 0.27, p = 0.157)。疼痛对象和组别的交互作用边缘显著, F(1, 58) = 3.06, p = 0.086, η2p = 0.05。简单效应分析发现, 面对他人疼痛时HAQ组的不愉悦度评分均显著高于LAQ组(2.81 ± 0.35 vs. 1.34 ± 0.27, p = 0.002), 而在面对自身疼痛时两组的不愉悦程度无显著差异(4.25 ± 0.43 vs. 3.53 ± 0.33, p = 0.184)。其它主效应和交互效应均不显著。

HAQ组对疼痛线索的恐惧均显著高于LAQ组, 面对他人疼痛时HAQ组的不愉悦度评分均显著高于LAQ组。采用中介分析探索了自闭特质、预期阶段线索诱发的疼痛恐惧、以及面对他人疼痛诱发的不愉悦之间的联系。如图3所示, 预期阶段疼痛恐惧中介了LAQ组和HAQ组在目睹他人疼痛时的不愉悦度评分差异。在这个中介模型中, 自闭特质(LAQ组和HAQ组)是预测因子, 线索诱发的疼痛恐惧是中介因子(自身疼痛, 他人疼痛和不确定条件的均值), 他人疼痛不愉悦度评分(确定和不确定条件的均值)是结果因子。Bootstrap中介效应检验显示, 总效应显著(c = 0.40, SE = 0.12, 95%CI = [0.16,0.64]), 直接效应显著(c′ = 0.29, SE = 0.12, 95%CI = [0.05,0.53]), 间接效应显著(a×b = 0.11, SE = 0.06, 95%CI = [0.01,0.25])。这说明线索诱发的疼痛恐惧在自闭特质与疼痛情绪共情之间起到了部分中介作用。

图3

图3   自闭特质对情绪共情的影响:疼痛恐惧的中介作用

注:LAQ:低自闭特质; HAQ:高自闭特质; 图中路径系数均为标准化回归系数; *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01。


2.2.3 电生理数据

自身疼痛和目睹他人疼痛诱发的ERP波形图和地形图如图4所示。当自身接受疼痛时, 对疼痛诱发的N1和P2成分的波幅进行二因素方差分析。对于N1成分, 主效应和交互作用均不显著(所有p > 0.05)。对于P2成分, 确定性的主效应显著(F(1, 58) = 5.19, p = 0.026, η2p = 0.08), 即不确定的情境下诱发的P2波幅显著大于确定的情境(20.37 ± 1.22 μV vs. 19.27 ± 1.16 μV, 图4 B)。组别的主效应, 组别与确定性的交互作用不显著(所有p > 0.05)。

图4

图4   自身接受疼痛和目睹他人接受疼痛诱发的ERP波形图、地形图和平均波幅

注:在波形图中, 红色虚线代表HAQ组在确定的情境(HAQ-Cer), 红色实线代表HAQ组在不确定的情境(HAQ-Uncer), 黑色虚线代表LAQ组在确定的情境(LAQ-Cer), 黑色实线代表低LAQ组不确定的情境(LAQ-Uncer); 白色突出显示的电极点为该成分纳入分析的电极点。平均波幅差异性检验结果如柱形图所示, 用M ± SE表示柱形图中的数据。Cer:确定; Uncer:不确定; *: p < 0.05; ***: p < 0.001。


当目睹他人接受疼痛时, 对疼痛共情诱发的P2和P3成分的波幅进行二因素方差分析。对于P2成分, 组别的主效应显著(F(1, 58) = 4.39, p = 0.041, η2p = 0.07), 即HAQ组在目睹他人疼痛时的P2波幅显著大于LAQ组(5.68 ± 0.74 μV vs. 3.50 ± 0.74 μV, 图4 D)。确定性的主效应边缘显著(F(1, 58) = 3.85, p = 0.054, η2p = 0.06), 即不确定的情境下诱发的P2波幅大于确定的情境(4.92 ± 0.58 μV vs. 4.25 ± 0.54 μV)。组别与确定性的交互作用不显著(p > 0.05)。对于P3成分, 确定性的主效应显著(F(1, 58) = 103.45, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.64), 即不确定的情境下的P3波幅显著大于确定的情境(10.71 ± 0.80 μV vs. 5.62 ± 0.61 μV 图4 D)。组别的主效应, 组别与确定性的交互作用均不显著。

2.2.4 相关分析

在目睹他人疼痛时, HAQ组的P2的波幅显著大于LAQ组, 且不愉悦度评分显著高于LAQ组。进一步采用斯皮尔曼相关分析探索目睹他人疼痛诱发的P2响应与不愉悦程度之间的联系。如图5所示, HAQ组在目睹他人疼痛时P2的波幅与不愉悦度评分显著正相关, r(28) = 0.43, p = 0.017。然而, 在LAQ组, 目睹他人疼痛诱发的P2波幅和不愉悦度评分的相关不显著, r(28) = -0.23, p = 0.229。

图5

图5   目睹他人疼痛诱发P2波幅与不愉悦度评分的相关散点图

注:LAQ:低自闭特质; HAQ:高自闭特质。* p < 0.05。


3 实验2:自闭特质、疼痛和共情特质的联系

3.1 方法

3.1.1 被试

根据G-Power软件计算样本量, 参考以往探讨自闭特质和共情相关性的研究(Zhang et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2019), 实验2设定相关系数绝对值为0.20, 期望的功效值(1 - β = 0.80)以及显著性水平(α = 0.05), 计算需要被试样本量不少于193人。最终实验2招募了381名健康大学生被试(男性202名; 年龄:20.95 ± 0.12岁)填写量表。所有被试不存在急性、慢性疼痛或当前使用任何药物的医疗状况, 无精神病史。

3.1.2 数据采集与分析

被试来到实验室后填写一系列的问卷量表, 包括AQ量表, 疼痛特质量表(疼痛敏感性量表、疼痛恐惧量表和疼痛灾难化量表), 以及人际反应指针量表。

采用SPSS 22.0和AMOS 24.0进行描述统计、相关分析和结构方程模型分析。使用皮尔逊相关分析检验自闭特质、疼痛特质和共情特质的关系, 并对p值采用FDR进行多重比较矫正。在结构方程模型分析中, χ2/df、GFI、AGFI、CFI、NFI和RMSEA表示模型的拟合指数:(1) χ2/df上限应小于2; (2) GFI和AGFI下限应大于0.90; (3) CFI和NFI下限应大于0.95; (4) RMSEA上限应小于0.06 (Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 2016)。采用偏差校正bootstrap方法检验中介效应的显著性。Bootstrap次数设置为5000次, 如果bootstrap 95%的置信区间不包含0, 则说明参数估计值显著; 反之, 则说明参数估计值不显著(Preacher & Hayes, 2008)。

3.2 结果

3.2.1 共同方法偏差检验

本实验所有变量都采用自陈报告法收集数据, 可能会出现共同方法偏差问题。采用 Harman单因素检验进行检验, 将所有变量的项目进行未旋转的主成分因素分析。结果显示, 第一个因子解释的变异量为11.03%, 小于40%的临界值。这表明本实验的数据不存在严重的共同方法偏差。

3.2.2 描述性统计与相关分析

表2列出了各变量的平均数、标准误及变量间的相关系数。皮尔逊相关分析发现, 在自闭特质和疼痛特质的关系上, 自闭特质和疼痛敏感性、疼痛恐惧不存在相关关系; 自闭特质和疼痛灾难化显著正相关(r(379) = 0.19, p < 0.001), 即自闭特质水平越高的个体, 对疼痛存在更强的负性情绪和认知。在自闭特质和共情特质的关系上, 自闭特质与观点采择显著负相关, r(379) = -0.19, p < 0.001; 自闭特质与个人痛苦显著正相关, r(379) = 0.27, p < 0.001; 自闭特质与共情关心和想象维度不存在相关关系。这说明高自闭特质个体在共情时表现出较弱的观点采择能力和较强的个人痛苦。此外, 在疼痛特质和共情特质的关系上, 疼痛相关的认知和特质情绪共情显著正相关, 即个体的疼痛灾难化水平越高, 人际反应指针量表的个人痛苦维度得分越高, r(379) = 0.47, p < 0.001; 疼痛相关的情绪和特质情绪共情显著正相关, 即个体的疼痛恐惧水平越高, 人际反应指针量表的个人痛苦维度得分越高(r(379) = 0.25, p < 0.001), 即疼痛灾难化和疼痛恐惧水平越高的个体, 共情时越容易陷入个人痛苦。

表2   各研究变量的描述统计结果及相关矩阵

变量MSE1234567
1. AQ19.650.29-
2. PSQ4.530.07-0.02-
3. PCS20.630.530.19***0.19***-
4. FPQ69.290.820.040.53***0.39***-
5. IRI-PT13.180.17-0.19***0.020.060.02-
6. IRI-PD10.360.200.27***0.16**0.47***0.25***-0.01-
7. IRI-EC15.910.19-0.10-0.010.010.050.28***0.08-
8. IRI-FS15.860.21-0.07-0.080.15**0.040.36***0.19***0.29***

注:M:平均值; SE:标准误; AQ:自闭商数量表; PSQ:疼痛敏感性量表; PCS:疼痛灾难化量表; FPQ:疼痛恐惧量表; IRI-PT:人际反应指针量表观点采择维度; IRI-PD:人际反应指针量表个人痛苦维度; IRI-EC:人际反应指针量表共情关心维度; IRI-FS:人际反应指针量表想象维度; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001。

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


3.2.3 中介分析

在相关分析的基础上, 我们进一步测试了疼痛负性情绪和认知是否中介了自闭特质和个人痛苦之间的联系。以自闭特质为预测因子, 个人痛苦为结果因子, 疼痛负性情绪和认知为中介因子(荷载因子为疼痛恐惧和疼痛灾难化)。构建的结构方程模型如图6所示, 相关的因子载荷均大于0.4。模型拟合指标如下:χ2/df = 1.604 (p = 0.205), GFI = 0.998, AGFI = 0.979, CFI = 0.997, NFI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.040, 说明模型的拟合度较好。结果显示, 总效应显著(c = 0.27, SE = 0.05, 95%CI = [0.17,0.36], p < 0.001), 直接效应显著(c′ = 0.16, SE = 0.05, 95%CI = [0.07,0.25], p = 0.002), 间接效应显著(a×b = 0.11, SE = 0.04, 95%CI = [0.05,0.19], p < 0.001)。这说明疼痛负性情绪和认知在自闭特质对情绪共情的影响中起到了部分中介作用。

图6

图6   自闭特质对情绪共情的影响:疼痛负性情绪和认知的中介作用

注:图中路径系数均为标准化回归系数; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001。


4 讨论

本研究结合假双人疼痛共情实验范式和问卷调查, 考察了自闭特质、自身疼痛与共情的联系。在假双人疼痛共情实验范式中, HAQ个体在目睹他人接受疼痛时P2响应更强, 不愉悦度评分更高, 且部分源于对疼痛的高恐惧水平。问卷调查结果发现, 自闭特质水平越高, 在共情特质量表的观点采择维度得分越低, 而个人痛苦维度得分越高, 其中疼痛恐惧和灾难化中介了自闭特质与个人痛苦之间的联系。因此, 来自状态共情和特质共情的研究结果均支持高自闭特质与高情绪共情有关, 且部分源于高自闭特质个体对疼痛存在更为负面的情绪和认知。

实验1采用“拟自闭症”研究(Robinson et al., 2011; 关荐 等, 2015), 筛选普通人群中的高低自闭特质个体, 结合行为和ERP技术, 探究高低自闭特质个体在状态共情上的差异。在实验范式上, 本研究通过呈现线索刺激, 提示被试将亲身经历或目睹同伴(假被试)接受疼痛刺激, 并要求被试评价疼痛预期和感受阶段的情绪反应, 这可以实现在较为自然的情境下来刻画疼痛共情加工特点。当要求被试对即将到来的疼痛刺激进行评分时, HAQ组被试报告了更高的疼痛恐惧, 且与疼痛对象无关, 这说明HAQ组对疼痛存在更为负面的情绪反应。当亲身经历疼痛时, HAQ和LAQ组在疼痛诱发响应上无显著差异, 包括与感觉辨别有关的N1成分与情绪动机相关的P2成分, 且行为层面的不愉悦度评分也无显著差异。这主要是因为两组被试接受的疼痛刺激强度是经过个性化校准的, 也就是说实验中的疼痛刺激强度均可诱发中等强度的疼痛体验(评分为6/10)。当目睹他人接受疼痛时, 不管是确定还是不确定的情境, HAQ组的疼痛共情诱发P2响应显著强于LAQ组, 不愉悦度评分也更高。共情诱发的P3响应在HAQ和LAQ组无显著差异, 这提示自闭特质不能显著地影响疼痛共情的晚期认知评价过程。与此相似地, Fan等人(2014)采用躯体疼痛图片诱发共情反应, 发现当要求被试判断图片材料为疼痛或非疼痛时, ASD组和控制组在ERP的晚期成分(如LPP成分)上没有显著差异, 这提示ASD个体在疼痛共情的晚期认知评价加工阶段表现出与普通个体相似的神经响应。然而, 元分析结果表明ASD个体的认知共情显著弱于普通个体(Song et al., 2019), 其中认知共情的评估主要采用眼神读心任务(Baron-Cohen et al., 2015; Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill et al., 2001; Murray et al., 2017; Ponnet et al., 2004)、多维度共情任务(Dziobek et al., 2008; Mul et al., 2018)和情绪辨别任务(Eyuboglu et al., 2018; Zuluaga Valencia et al., 2018)。这些研究结果的差异性可能是因为不同的研究采用了不同的共情评估范式。目睹他人疼痛诱发的P2响应与早期、自下而上的情绪唤起和分享过程有关, 而P3成分更多地与晚期、自上而下的认知评价过程有关(Cheng et al., 2014; Decety, 2011; Fan & Han, 2008; Sessa et al., 2014)。其中, P2成分被认为主要产生于中扣带回皮层(Mobascher et al., 2009; Perchet et al., 2008), 该脑区被认为主要编码了疼痛的情感维度(Baumgärtner et al., 2006)。因此, HAQ组被试在面对他人疼痛时, 有更强的情绪唤起, 体验到更多的个人痛苦, 即存在更强的情绪共情反应。相关分析发现, 对于HAQ组被试, 共情诱发的P2响应越大, 个人不愉悦度评分越高, 这一结果支持了P2响应可以反映共情有关的情绪唤起。鉴于HAQ组被试对即将到来的疼痛的恐惧程度以及面对他人疼痛的个人不愉悦度均强于LAQ组被试, 进一步的中介分析揭示了自闭特质通过增强了对疼痛的恐惧水平, 从而进一步增强疼痛共情的个人痛苦程度。这为自闭特质、疼痛相关的负性情绪与情绪共情之间的联系提供了证据, 并强调了疼痛负性情绪在自闭特质影响情绪共情中所发挥的作用。

先前研究发现ASD个体的不确定性容忍度低(Chamberlain et al., 2013; Neil et al., 2016), 例如Vasa等人(2018)对比57名7~16岁ASD儿童与 32名典型发展儿童发现, 无论是父母报告还是自我报告, ASD儿童的不确定性容忍度均极其显著的低于典型发展儿童。为此, 本研究在实验设计时引入了确定性这一变量。结果发现确定性会影响面对他人疼痛的不愉悦度评分、P2和P3响应(确定性主效应显著), 即不确定情境下的他人疼痛会诱发更高的不愉悦度评分, 以及更强的P2和P3响应, 然而自闭特质对共情的影响与确定性无关(确定性与组别的交互作用不显著)。目前还尚未有研究探讨ASD群体的疼痛和共情异常是否与确定性有关。未来研究可以在ASD群体的疼痛和共情研究中引入确定性这一变量, 进一步验证本研究的结果。

实验2通过问卷调查来考察随机招募的普通人群中自闭特质、疼痛与共情特质之间的联系。在共情特质量表中, 观点采择维度考察个体理解且同时具有他人在真实生活中的心理或观点的倾向性, 被认为反映认知共情; 个人痛苦维度考察个体面对他人处于困境或压力情境时产生的自我中心式反应, 被认为反映情绪共情(Davis, 1983)。研究结果发现, 高自闭特质在面对他人痛苦时表现出较低的观点采择能力和较强的个体痛苦。因此, 在普通人群中, 高自闭特质与较差的认知共情能力和较强的情绪共情能力有关, 进一步支持了实验1中自闭特质与状态性情绪共情之间的联系(即HAQ个体在面对他人疼痛时表现出更为强烈的个人痛苦和情绪唤起)。在疼痛特质量表上, 疼痛恐惧和疼痛灾难化程度与共情特质的个人痛苦维度显著正相关, 且自闭特质和疼痛灾难化程度呈现正相关。鉴于自闭特质、疼痛负性情绪和认知以及共情特质的联系, 结构方程模型揭示了疼痛负性情绪和认知在自闭特质提高特质情绪共情中的中介作用, 进一步验证了实验1中的研究发现。在认知共情上, 本研究结果表明高自闭特质个体在特质和状态认知共情上存在不同的表现:在特质共情上, 自闭特质与认知共情呈现负相关, 即高自闭特质个体表现出更弱的认知共情能力; 在状态共情上, 高、低自闭特质个体在在目睹他人接受疼痛时诱发的P3成分无显著差异, 提示了自闭特质不会显著影响状态性的认知共情。与本研究相似地, 有研究报告了特质和状态共情的分离, 例如观察他人疼痛诱发的ERP响应均与共情特质量表得分无关(Galang et al., 2020; Li & Han, 2010); 目睹他人疼痛时双侧脑岛的激活与共情特质量表得分无显著关联(Jackson et al., 2005)。未来研究可以采用其他的共情评估范式, 如眼神读心任务和多维度共情任务, 进一步验证本研究的结果。

综合实验1和实验2的研究结果, 高自闭特质与更强烈的情绪共情有关, 即面对他人处于痛苦情景时呈现出更为强烈的自我中心式痛苦; 高自闭特质与更弱的认知共情有关, 即难以采择和理解他人的观点和想法。鉴于高自闭特质与ASD个体在感觉、情绪和认知等方面的高相似性, 本研究从亚临床的角度补充ASD人群共情缺陷的相关证据。以往研究表明:ASD个体普遍存在认知共情的缺陷(Song et al., 2019; Ziermans et al., 2019), 然而在情绪共情上结果分歧较大(Bird et al., 2010; Gu et al., 2015; Santiesteban et al., 2021)。例如, 有研究发现ASD个体能够自动模仿他人的面部情绪表情, 不存在情绪共情障碍(Oberman et al., 2009); 有研究发现在观看面部情绪表情图片时, ASD个体的皮电反应显著低于普通个体, 由此推断ASD个体的情绪共情能力较弱(Clark et al., 2008); 也有研究发现ASD个体对高兴和害怕表情的肌电反应显著强于对照组, 认为ASD个体存在情绪共情过度的情况(Magnée et al., 2007)。本研究结果提示高自闭特质和ASD群体可能并非系统性的共情受损, 而表现为较弱的认知共情和过度的情绪共情。其中, Fan等人(2014)认为过度的情绪共情可以部分解释ASD个体冷漠等外显社会行为表现:ASD个体在面对他人的痛苦时更容易引起过度的情绪共情, 因此倾向于通过注意回避的方式来进行避免, 故而外显出如冷漠、更少的亲社会行为等表现。因此, 在针对这些群体的共情干预上, 应该注意“扬长补短” (霍超 等, 2021), 关注其在不同维度的不同表现, 才能指导共情缺陷干预方案的精准制定, 提升共情干预效果。

在自身疼痛上, 高自闭特质个体在疼痛灾难化量表的得分更高, 且在任务中对疼痛线索的恐惧水平更高, 即存在更为负面的情绪和认知; 但自闭特质与疼痛的感觉维度没有显著的联系。这提示我们自闭特质和疼痛之间的联系可能是维度特异的, 高自闭特质个体仅在情感和认知维度上反应更为敏感。与此相似地, 元分析研究发现ASD个体在疼痛阈限上与对照组没有显著差异, 但受到刺激模态的调节作用, ASD组的压力疼痛阈限更低(更敏感); 在疼痛诱发生理反应上, ASD组对现实医疗疼痛的生理反应强于对照组(张文芸 等, 2021)。疼痛是一种多维的主观体验, 包括感觉、情感和认知等维度(Wiech et al., 2008)。疼痛阈限反映疼痛的感觉维度, 疼痛诱发生理反应往往反映疼痛的情绪和认知维度。因此, 元分析结果支持ASD个体在疼痛感觉维度上总体与普通个体无显著差异, 仅在情绪和认知维度上反应更为敏感。例如, ASD组在热痛阈限上和普通个体无显著差异, 但对于阈上热刺激的疼痛强度评分显著高于控制组, 且ASD组在疼痛焦虑量表和疼痛恐惧量表上的得分均显著高于控制组(Failla et al., 2020), 这支持了ASD群体在疼痛情感和认知维度的高敏感性。Gu等人(2018)对比了ASD 组和对照组在疼痛预期和加工阶段的神经响应, 结果发现, 在疼痛预期阶段, ASD 组在背侧和喙侧前扣带回的激活程度显著高于对照组, 而在疼痛加工阶段, 两组被试在疼痛相关脑区(如前扣带回和脑岛)的激活上无显著差异, 这说明ASD 个体可能在等待疼痛刺激时(预期阶段)存在更大程度的焦虑和恐惧。因此, 在自身疼痛上, 来自高自闭特质与ASD个体的研究结果存在相似性, 即高自闭特质和ASD个体对疼痛均存在更负面的情绪和认知方式。具体来说, 在面对实际疼痛或潜在疼痛时, 高自闭特质和ASD个体可能对疼痛的认知更负面, 在情感上存在更为焦虑和恐惧的反应倾向。鉴于高自闭特质和ASD群体对疼痛的反应倾向, 在现实医疗场景中(如打针或抽血等), 对待这些群体, 医务人员需要更加贴心和耐心, 如可以尝试事先跟其进行交流解释, 缓解他们的紧张恐惧情绪等。

来自状态共情和特质共情的研究结果均支持了疼痛相关的负性情绪和认知在自闭特质和情绪共情的联系中发挥着中介作用。高自闭特质个体在面对他人接受疼痛时报告更强的个人痛苦是由于自身对疼痛存在过度的负性情绪和认知。对疼痛相关信息的认知偏向矫正能有效缓解疼痛相关的负性情绪和认知(An et al., 2020; Elomaa et al., 2009; Sharpe et al., 2012; 杨周 等, 2016) 。例如, 接受注意偏向矫正训练的急性和慢性疼痛患者(被训练将注意资源分配到中性信息), 在6个月后的追踪研究中, 其焦虑敏感性和功能丧失程度均比控制组更低(Sharpe et al., 2012); 接受解释偏向矫正训练的慢性疼痛患者(被训练将疼痛相关信息解释为中性), 其疼痛相关的负性情绪程度更低(An et al., 2020)。还有研究发现认知行为疗法能有效降低慢性疼痛患者对运动的恐惧、疼痛焦虑和疼痛警觉水平, 降低疼痛对患者日常生活的干扰(Elomaa et al., 2009)。因此, 未来研究可以进一步考察认知偏向矫正训练和认知行为疗法是否能通过降低疼痛的负性情绪和认知从而有效改善高自闭特质和ASD个体的社交技能。高自闭特质群体在人群中数量庞大, 该群体的身心健康和社会功能问题同样不容忽视, 因此本研究结果有助于理解普通人群中高自闭特质群体的疼痛和共情问题及其积极干预措施的开发, 促进其身心健康和社会性功能发展。此外, 鉴于高自闭特质和ASD群体的相似性, 本研究从亚临床的角度补充ASD人群共情缺陷的相关证据, 提示从自身疼痛异常的角度去解释他们的共情和社会功能的障碍, 还为ASD人群社会功能的改善提供新思路。

然而, 来自ASD群体的研究主要支持了疼痛感觉维度的高敏感性可以解释ASD群体的情绪共情问题(Chen et al., 2017; Fan et al., 2014)。Fan等人(2014)、Chen等人(2017)结合心理物理疼痛测量和图片诱发共情范式探索了ASD个体自身疼痛和疼痛共情的关系, 结果发现ASD个体的压力疼痛阈限低于普通个体, 且和图片诱发范式中对他人疼痛的不愉悦度显著正相关, 这说明了ASD个体在疼痛的感觉维度的高敏感性一步导致了疼痛共情时的高情感唤起。来自普通个体的研究发现, 疼痛感觉维度的敏感性通过影响疼痛相关情绪和认知进而影响情绪共情能力(Ren et al., 2020); 高疼痛灾难化的个体倾向于夸大自身疼痛, 也倾向于高估他人的痛苦(Sullivan et al., 2006); Serbic等人(2020)还发现观察者自身的疼痛恐惧水平能够正向预测观看躯体疼痛图片时的疼痛共情水平。这些证据均支持了观察者自身疼痛相关情绪和认知对疼痛共情的影响。有一种可能的解释是高自闭特质和ASD群体是因为对自身疼痛的高敏感性, 包括在疼痛感觉、情绪和认知维度上的高敏感性, 导致了在面对他人疼痛时表现出更为强烈的情绪唤起和个人痛苦。未来研究有必要结合主体的主观报告、生理反应、电生理和神经影像技术等系统考察高自闭特质和ASD群体在不同层面的疼痛加工模式, 包括感觉、情感和认知等层面的差异及其神经机制, 构建自身疼痛加工异常与共情障碍之间的联系。

本研究存在几处不足和局限。首先, 本研究的被试为来自同一所高校的健康大学生, 智力水平正常, 然而实验中我们并未测查被试的智力水平和其他的基本心理特质, 无法完全排除智力水平等因素对实验结果的影响。未来研究可以在匹配高低自闭特质群体智力水平等因素的前提下, 进一步验证自闭特质对疼痛和共情的影响。其次, 本研究的假被试(被共情者)为同一位女性实验人员, 这是为了降低不同假被试对实验结果造成的影响。然而, 考虑到ASD患病率的性别差异, 自闭特质对共情的影响可能受到被共情者性别这一因素的调节。未来研究可以引入不同性别的假被试, 验证共情者和被共情者的性别一致性是否会影响本研究的结果。再次, 在疼痛刺激强度的选择上, 本研究仅采用能诱发中等强度疼痛的刺激, 无法揭示刺激强度对实验结果造成的影响。未来研究可以采用不同强度的疼痛刺激, 并引入非疼痛的刺激条件作为对照条件, 考察自闭特质对共情的影响是否是疼痛特异的。最后, 本研究的研究对象为高自闭特质群体, 其结果能否迁移到ASD群体还有待研究。鉴于自闭特质和ASD的在遗传、认知和行为模式上的相似性, 本研究结果能促进ASD生物学机制的理解和干预策略的开发。然而, 高自闭特质不等同于ASD (Sasson & Bottema-Beutel, 2022)。自闭特质被视为除大五人格之外独立的第六特质(Wakabayashi et al., 2006), 自闭特质并非与ASD特异相关, 如焦虑症和精神分裂症等非ASD群体往往也表现出较高的自闭特质(Barlati et al., 2019; Lau et al., 2014; Tonge et al., 2016)。未来研究应在ASD群体中进一步验证ASD症状、自身疼痛与疼痛共情之间的联系。

5 结论

本研究结合假双人疼痛共情范式和问卷调查, 探讨了自闭特质、疼痛和共情之间的联系。高自闭特质与更强烈的情绪共情有关, 即面对他人处于痛苦情境时表现出更强烈的个人痛苦, 且部分来源于自身对疼痛存在更为负面的情绪和认知。然而, 高自闭特质与更弱的认知共情有关, 即难以采择和理解他人的观点和想法。鉴于高自闭特质和ASD群体的相似性, 相关研究结果不仅能促进理解ASD的生物学机制和开发干预策略, 还有助于改善高自闭特质群体的心理健康和社会功能。如从自身疼痛异常的角度去解释高自闭特质和ASD群体的共情和社会功能的障碍。未来研究应该结合多种疼痛刺激模态和多维度疼痛评估系统刻画高自闭特质和ASD个体的疼痛加工特点, 建立疼痛反应类型与共情障碍等核心症状之间的特异性关系。

参考文献

American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5 Task Force. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (Vol. 5): American psychiatric association Washington, DC.

[本文引用: 1]

An J., Wang K.-S., Jung Y.-H., & Cho S. (2020).

Efficacy of interpretation bias modification in patients with chronic pain

The Journal of Pain, 21(5-6), 648-662

DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2019.10.005      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Austin E. J. (2005).

Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)

Personality and Individual Differences, 38(2), 451-460

DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.022      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Barlati S., Deste G., Gregorelli M., & Vita A. (2019).

Autistic traits in a sample of adult patients with schizophrenia: Prevalence and correlates

Psychological Medicine, 49(1), 140-148

DOI:10.1017/S0033291718000600      PMID:29554995      [本文引用: 1]

Schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are currently conceptualized as distinct disorders. However, the relationship between these two disorders has been revisited in recent years due to evidence that they share phenotypic and genotypic expressions. This study aimed to identify ASD traits in patients with schizophrenia, and to define their demographic, psychopathological, cognitive and functional correlates.Seventy-five schizophrenia patients (20 females, mean age 42 ± 12) were evaluated with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R). Participants were also assessed with clinical, neuropsychological, and psychosocial functioning measures.Of the 75 patients, 47 were negative to all the autism scales administered (ADOS-TOT-NEG), 21 patients were positive to the ADOS Language sub-domain (ADOS-L-POS), 21 patients were positive to the ADOS Reciprocal Social Interaction (RSI) sub-domain (ADOS-RSI-POS), 14 patients were positive to the ADOS Total scale (ADOS-TOT-POS), and nine patients were positive to the ADI-R scale (ADI-R-POS). Demographic (duration of illness), psychopathological (negative symptoms and general psychopathology), and cognitive (working memory and processing speed) differences emerged between schizophrenic patients with and without ASD traits, while no differences in psychosocial functioning were detected. Results of this study indicate the existence, in a sample of patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, of a distinct group of subjects with ASD features, characterized by specific symptomatological and cognitive profile.These findings may contribute to better characterize patients with schizophrenia in order to develop new procedures and therapeutic tools in a more personalized perspective.

Baron-Cohen S. (2010).

Empathizing, systemizing, and the extreme male brain theory of autism

Progress in Brain Research, 186, 167-175.

DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-53630-3.00011-7      PMID:21094892      [本文引用: 1]

Females in the general population on average have a stronger drive to empathize, and males in the general population on average have a stronger drive to systemize. Evidence related to these claims is reviewed. People with autism spectrum conditions have below average empathy alongside intact or even above average interest in systems. As such, they can be conceptualized as an extreme of the typical male brain.Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Baron-Cohen S., Bowen D. C., Holt R. J., Allison C., Auyeung B., Lombardo M. V., Smith P., & Lai M.-C. (2015).

The “reading the mind in the eyes” test: Complete absence of typical sex difference in -400 men and women with autism

PloS One, 10(8), e0136521.

[本文引用: 1]

Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Hill J., Raste Y., & Plumb I. (2001).

The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism

Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241-251

PMID:11280420      [本文引用: 1]

In 1997 in this Journal we published the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test, as a measure of adult "mentalising". Whilst that test succeeded in discriminating a group of adults with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA) from controls, it suffered from several psychometric problems. In this paper these limitations are rectified by revising the test. The Revised Eyes Test was administered to a group of adults with AS or HFA (N = 15) and again discriminated these from a large number of normal controls (N = 239) drawn from different samples. In both the clinical and control groups the Eyes Test was inversely correlated with the Autism Spectrum Quotient (the AQ), a measure of autistic traits in adults of normal intelligence. The Revised Eyes Test has improved power to detect subtle individual differences in social sensitivity.

Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Skinner R., Martin J., & Clubley E. (2001).

The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5-17.

DOI:10.1023/a:1005653411471      PMID:11439754      [本文引用: 1]

Currently there are no brief, self-administered instruments for measuring the degree to which an adult with normal intelligence has the traits associated with the autistic spectrum. In this paper, we report on a new instrument to assess this: the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Individuals score in the range 0-50. Four groups of subjects were assessed: Group 1: 58 adults with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA); Group 2: 174 randomly selected controls. Group 3: 840 students in Cambridge University; and Group 4: 16 winners of the UK Mathematics Olympiad. The adults with AS/HFA had a mean AQ score of 35.8 (SD = 6.5), significantly higher than Group 2 controls (M = 16.4, SD = 6.3). 80% of the adults with AS/HFA scored 32+, versus 2% of controls. Among the controls, men scored slightly but significantly higher than women. No women scored extremely highly (AQ score 34+) whereas 4% of men did so. Twice as many men (40%) as women (21%) scored at intermediate levels (AQ score 20+). Among the AS/HFA group, male and female scores did not differ significantly. The students in Cambridge University did not differ from the randomly selected control group, but scientists (including mathematicians) scored significantly higher than both humanities and social sciences students, confirming an earlier study that autistic conditions are associated with scientific skills. Within the sciences, mathematicians scored highest. This was replicated in Group 4, the Mathematics Olympiad winners scoring significantly higher than the male Cambridge humanities students. 6% of the student sample scored 32+ on the AQ. On interview, 11 out of 11 of these met three or more DSM-IV criteria for AS/HFA, and all were studying sciences/mathematics, and 7 of the 11 met threshold on these criteria. Test-retest and interrater reliability of the AQ was good. The AQ is thus a valuable instrument for rapidly quantifying where any given individual is situated on the continuum from autism to normality. Its potential for screening for autism spectrum conditions in adults of normal intelligence remains to be fully explored.

Baumgärtner U., Buchholz H.-G., Bellosevich A., Magerl W., Siessmeier T., Rolke R.,... Schreckenberger M. (2006).

High opiate receptor binding potential in the human lateral pain system

Neuroimage, 30(3), 692-699.

PMID:16337817      [本文引用: 1]

To determine how opiate receptor distribution is co-localized with the distribution of nociceptive areas in the human brain, eleven male healthy volunteers underwent one PET scan with the subtype-nonselective opioidergic radioligand [(18)F]fluoroethyl-diprenorphine under resting conditions. The binding potential (BP), a parameter for the regional cerebral opioid receptor availability, was computed using the occipital cortex as reference region. The following regions of interest (ROIs) were defined on individual MR images: thalamus, sensory motor strip (SI/MI area), frontal operculum, parietal operculum, anterior insular cortex, posterior insular cortex, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC; peri- and subgenual part of "classical ACC" only), midcingulate cortex (MCC, posterior part of "classical ACC"), putamen, caudate nucleus and the amygdala. BP for [(18)F]fluoroethyl-diprenorphine was lowest in the sensory motor strip (0.30). Highest BP was found in thalamus (1.36), basal ganglia (putamen 1.22, caudate 1.16) and amygdala (1.21). In the cingulate cortex, ACC (1.11) had higher BP than MCC (0.86). In the operculo-insular region, we found high BPs in all ROIs: anterior insula (1.16), posterior insula (1.05), frontal operculum (0.99) and parietal operculum (0.77). Factor analysis of interindividual variability of opiate receptor BP revealed four factors (95% explained variance): (1) operculo-insular areas, ACC, MCC and putamen, (2) amygdala and thalamus, (3) caudate and thalamus, (4) SI/MI and MCC. Nociceptive areas of the lateral pain system (frontoparietal operculum and insula) have opiate receptor BPs significantly higher than SI/MI, comparable to anterior and midcingulate areas of the medial pain system. These findings suggest that the cortical anti-nociceptive effects of opiates are not only mediated by ACC and MCC, but also by the operculo-insular cortex, if it can be assumed that opioid binding mediates anti-nociception in those structures.

Bird G., Silani G., Brindley R., White S., Frith U., & Singer T. (2010).

Empathic brain responses in insula are modulated by levels of alexithymia but not autism

Brain, 133(5), 1515-1525.

DOI:10.1093/brain/awq060      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Blair R. J. R. (1999).

Psychophysiological responsiveness to the distress of others in children with autism

Personality and Individual Differences, 26(3), 477-485.

DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00154-8      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Capps L., Kasari C., Yirmiya N., & Sigman M. (1993).

Parental perception of emotional expressiveness in children with autism

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 475-484.

PMID:8326050      [本文引用: 1]

Parents' perceptions of their children's emotional expressiveness, and possible bases for these perceptions, were investigated in a study comparing older, nonretarded autistic and normal children and in another study comparing young autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children. Both groups of autistic children were perceived as showing more negative emotion and less positive emotion than comparison children. In the younger sample, parental perceptions correlated with the children's attention and responsiveness to others' displays of emotion in 2 laboratory situations. Findings contradict the view that autism involves the "absence of emotional reaction" (American Psychiatric Association, 1987, p. 35).

Cetinoglu E., & Aras S. (2022).

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) Adolescent’s Version in Turkey: Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(7), 3260-3270.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-021-05257-5      [本文引用: 1]

Chamberlain P. D., Rodgers J., Crowley M. J., White S. E., Freeston M. H., & South M. (2013).

A potentiated startle study of uncertainty and contextual anxiety in adolescents diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder

Molecular Autism, 4(1), 1-11

DOI:10.1186/2040-2392-4-1      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Chen C., Hung A. Y., Fan Y. T., Tan S., Hong H., & Cheng Y. (2017).

Linkage between pain sensitivity and empathic response in adolescents with autism spectrum conditions and conduct disorder symptoms

Autism Research, 10(2), 267-275.

DOI:10.1002/aur.1653      PMID:27305862      [本文引用: 4]

Lack of empathy is one of the behavioral hallmarks in individuals with autism spectrum conditions (ASC) as well as youth with conduct disorder symptoms (CDS). Previous research has reliably documented considerable overlap between the perception of others' pain and first-hand experience of pain. However, the linkage between empathy for pain and sensitivity to physical pain needs to be empirically determined, particularly in individuals with empathy deficits. This study measured the pressure pain threshold, which indexes sensitization of peripheral nociceptors, and assessed subjective ratings of unpleasantness and pain intensity in response to empathy-eliciting stimuli depicting physical bodily injuries in three age- and sex-matched participant groups: ASC, CDS, and typically developing controls (TDC). The results indicated that the pain threshold was lowest in the ASC group and highest in the CDS group. The ASC group displayed lower ratings of unpleasantness and pain intensity than did the TDC and CDS groups. Within the ASC and CDS, pain intensity ratings were significantly correlated with unpleasantness ratings to others' pain. Moreover, the ASC significantly differed from the TDC in the correlation between pain threshold values and unpleasantness ratings. These findings may cast some light on the linkage between atypical low-level sensory functioning, for instance altered pain sensitivity, and high-level empathic processing. Autism Res 2017, 10: 267-275. © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cheng Y., Chen C., & Decety J. (2014).

An EEG/ERP investigation of the development of empathy in early and middle childhood

Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 160-169.

DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2014.08.012      PMID:25261920      [本文引用: 2]

Empathic arousal is the first ontogenetic building block of empathy to appear during infancy and early childhood. As development progresses, empathic arousal becomes associated with an increasing ability to differentiate between self and other, which is a critical aspect of mature empathetic ability (Decety and Jackson, 2004). This allows for better regulation of contagious distress and understanding others mental states. In the current study, we recorded electroencephalographic event-related potentials and mu suppression induced by short visual animations that depicted painful situations in 57 typically developing children aged between 3 and 9 years as well as 15 young adults. Results indicate that the difference wave of an early automatic component (N200), indexing empathic arousal, showed an age-related decrease in amplitude. In contrast, the difference wave of late-positive potentials (LPP), associated with cognitive appraisal, showed an age-related gain. Only early LPP was detected in children, whereas both early and late LPP were observed in adults. Furthermore, as compared with adults, children showed stronger mu suppression when viewing both painful and non-painful stimuli. These findings provide neurophysiological support for the development of empathy during childhood, as indicated by a gradual decrease in emotional arousal and an increase in cognitive appraisal with age. Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Clark T. F., Winkielman P., & McIntosh D. N. (2008).

Autism and the extraction of emotion from briefly presented facial expressions: Stumbling at the first step of empathy

Emotion, 8(6), 803-809.

DOI:10.1037/a0014124      PMID:19102591      [本文引用: 1]

Identification of other people's emotion from quickly presented stimuli, including facial expressions, is fundamental to many social processes, including rapid mimicry and empathy. This study examined extraction of valence from brief emotional expressions in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a condition characterized by impairments in understanding and sharing of emotions. Control participants were individuals with reading disability and typical individuals. Participants were shown images for durations in the range of microexpressions (15 ms and 30 ms), thus reducing the reliance on higher level cognitive skills. Participants detected whether (a) emotional faces were happy or angry, (b) neutral faces were male or female, and (c) neutral images were animals or objects. Individuals with ASD performed selectively worse on emotion extraction, with no group differences for gender or animal?object tasks. The emotion extraction deficit remains even when controlling for gender, verbal ability, and age and is not accounted for by speed-accuracy tradeoffs. The deficit in rapid emotional processing may contribute to ASD difficulties in mimicry, empathy, and related processes. The results highlight the role of rapid early emotion processing in adaptive social?emotional functioning.2008 APA, all rights reserved

Constantino J. N., & Todd R. D. (2003).

Autistic traits in the general population: A twin study

Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(5), 524-530

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.524      PMID:12742874      [本文引用: 1]

Recent research has indicated that autism is not a discrete disorder and that family members of autistic probands have an increased likelihood of exhibiting autistic symptoms with a wide range of severity, often below the threshold for a diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder.To examine the distribution and genetic structure of autistic traits in the general population using a newly established quantitative measure of autistic traits, the Social Responsiveness Scale (formerly known as the Social Reciprocity Scale).The sample consisted of 788 pairs of twins aged 7 to 15 years, randomly selected from the pool of participants in a large epidemiologic study (the Missouri Twin Study). One parent of each pair of twins completed the Social Responsiveness Scale on each child. The data were subjected to structural equation modeling.Autistic traits as measured by the Social Responsiveness Scale were continuously distributed and moderately to highly heritable. Levels of severity of autistic traits at or above the previously published mean for patients with pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified were found in 1.4% of boys and 0.3% of girls. Structural equation modeling revealed no evidence for the existence of sex-specific genetic influences, and suggested specific mechanisms by which females may be relatively protected from vulnerability to autistic traits.These data indicate that the social deficits characteristic of autism spectrum disorders are common. Given the continuous distribution of these traits, it may be arbitrary where cutoffs are made between research designations of being "affected" vs "unaffected" with a pervasive developmental disorder. The genes influencing autistic traits appear to be the same for boys and girls. Lower prevalence (and severity) of autistic traits in girls may be the result of increased sensitivity to early environmental influences that operate to promote social competency.

Cui F., Abdelgabar A.-R., Keysers C., & Gazzola V. (2015).

Responsibility modulates pain-matrix activation elicited by the expressions of others in pain

Neuroimage, 114, 371-378

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.034      PMID:25800210      [本文引用: 1]

Here we examine whether brain responses to dynamic facial expressions of pain are influenced by our responsibility for the observed pain. Participants played a flanker task with a confederate. Whenever either erred, the confederate was seen to receive a noxious shock. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that regions of the functionally localized pain-matrix of the participants (the anterior insula in particular) were activated most strongly when seeing the confederate receive a noxious shock when only the participant had erred (and hence had full responsibility). When both or only the confederate had erred (i.e. participant's shared or no responsibility), significantly weaker vicarious pain-matrix activations were measured. Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Danziger N., Faillenot I., & Peyron R. (2009).

Can we share a pain we never felt? Neural correlates of empathy in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain

Neuron, 61(2), 203-212.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.023      PMID:19186163      [本文引用: 1]

Theories of empathy differ regarding the relative contributions of automatic resonance and perspective taking in understanding others' emotions. Patients with the rare syndrome of congenital insensitivity to pain cannot rely on "mirror matching" (i.e., resonance) mechanisms to understand the pain of others. Nevertheless, they showed normal fMRI responses to observed pain in anterior mid-cingulate cortex and anterior insula, two key regions of the so-called "shared circuits" for self and other pain. In these patients (but not in healthy controls), empathy trait predicted ventromedial prefrontal responses to somatosensory representations of others' pain and posterior cingulate responses to emotional representations of others' pain. These findings underline the major role of midline structures in emotional perspective taking and understanding someone else's feeling despite the lack of any previous personal experience of it--an empathic challenge frequently raised during human social interactions.

Danziger N., Prkachin K. M., & Willer J.-C. (2006).

Is pain the price of empathy? The perception of others' pain in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain

Brain, 129(9), 2494-2507.

DOI:10.1093/brain/awl155      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Davis M. H. (1980).

A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(85).

[本文引用: 1]

Davis M. H. (1983).

Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Decety J. (2011).

Dissecting the neural mechanisms mediating empathy

Emotion Review, 3(1), 92-108.

DOI:10.1177/1754073910374662      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Empathy is thought to play a key role in motivating prosocial behavior, guiding our preferences and behavioral responses, and providing the affective and motivational base for moral development. While these abilities have traditionally been examined using behavioral methods, recent work in evolutionary biology, developmental and cognitive neuroscience has begun to shed light on the neural circuitry that instantiate them. The purpose of this article is to critically examine the current knowledge in the field of affective neuroscience and provide an integrative and comprehensive view of the computational mechanisms that underlie empathy. This framework is of general interest and relevance for theory as well as for assisting future research in the domains of affective developmental neuroscience and psychopathology.

Decety J., & Jackson P. L. (2004).

The functional architecture of human empathy

Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 406-412.

[本文引用: 1]

Decety J., & Jackson P. L. (2006).

A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy

Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 54-58.

DOI:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x      URL     [本文引用: 1]

In recent years, abundant evidence from behavioral and cognitive studies and functional-imaging experiments has indicated that individuals come to understand the emotional and affective states expressed by others with the help of the neural architecture that produces such states in themselves. Such a mechanism gives rise to shared representations, which constitutes one important aspect of empathy, although not the sole one. We suggest that other components, including people's ability to monitor and regulate cognitive and emotional processes to prevent confusion between self and other, are equally necessary parts of a functional model of empathy. We discuss data from recent functional-imaging studies in support of such a model and highlight the role of specific brain regions, notably the insula, the anterior cingulate cortex, and the right temporo-parietal region. Because this model assumes that empathy relies on dissociable information-processing mechanisms, it predicts a variety of structural or functional dysfunctions, depending on which mechanism is disrupted.

Decety J., & Lamm C. (2006).

Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience

The Scientific World Journal, 6, 1146-1163.

DOI:10.1100/tsw.2006.221      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Empathy is the ability to experience and understand what others feel without confusion between oneself and others. Knowing what someone else is feeling plays a fundamental role in interpersonal interactions. In this paper, we articulate evidence from social psychology and cognitive neuroscience, and argue that empathy involves both emotion sharing (bottom-up information processing) and executive control to regulate and modulate this experience (top-down information processing), underpinned by specific and interacting neural systems. Furthermore, awareness of a distinction between the experiences of the self and others constitutes a crucial aspect of empathy. We discuss data from recent behavioral and functional neuroimaging studies with an emphasis on the perception of pain in others, and highlight the role of different neural mechanisms that underpin the experience of empathy, including emotion sharing, perspective taking, and emotion regulation.

Decety J., & Moriguchi Y. (2007).

The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: Implications for intervention across different clinical conditions

BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 1, 22.

PMID:18021398      [本文引用: 1]

Empathy is a concept central to psychiatry, psychotherapy and clinical psychology. The construct of empathy involves not only the affective experience of the other person's actual or inferred emotional state but also some minimal recognition and understanding of another's emotional state. It is proposed, in the light of multiple levels of analysis including social psychology, cognitive neuroscience and clinical neuropsychology, a model of empathy that involves both bottom-up and top-down information processing underpinned by parallel and distributed computational mechanisms. The predictive validity of this model is explored with reference to clinical conditions. As many psychiatric conditions are associated with deficits or even lack of empathy, we discuss a limited number of these disorders including psychopathy/antisocial personality disorders, borderline and narcissistic personality disorders, autistic spectrum disorders, and alexithymia. We argue that future clinical investigations of empathy disorders can only be informative if behavioral, dispositional and biological factors are combined.

Decety J., & Svetlova M. (2012).

Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy

Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 1-24.

DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003      PMID:22682726      [本文引用: 1]

The ontogeny of human empathy is better understood with reference to the evolutionary history of the social brain. Empathy has deep evolutionary, biochemical, and neurological underpinnings. Even the most advanced forms of empathy in humans are built on more basic forms and remain connected to core mechanisms associated with affective communication, social attachment, and parental care. In this paper, we argue that it is essential to consider empathy within a neurodevelopmental framework that recognizes both the continuities and changes in socioemotional understanding from infancy to adulthood. We bring together neuroevolutionary and developmental perspectives on the information processing and neural mechanisms underlying empathy and caring, and show that they are grounded in multiple interacting systems and processes. Moreover, empathy in humans is assisted by other abstract and domain-general high-level cognitive abilities such as executive functions, mentalizing and language, as well as the ability to differentiate another's mental states from one's own, which expand the range of behaviors that can be driven by empathy.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Delorme A., & Makeig S. (2004).

EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis

Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9-21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009      PMID:15102499      [本文引用: 1]

We have developed a toolbox and graphic user interface, EEGLAB, running under the crossplatform MATLAB environment (The Mathworks, Inc.) for processing collections of single-trial and/or averaged EEG data of any number of channels. Available functions include EEG data, channel and event information importing, data visualization (scrolling, scalp map and dipole model plotting, plus multi-trial ERP-image plots), preprocessing (including artifact rejection, filtering, epoch selection, and averaging), independent component analysis (ICA) and time/frequency decompositions including channel and component cross-coherence supported by bootstrap statistical methods based on data resampling. EEGLAB functions are organized into three layers. Top-layer functions allow users to interact with the data through the graphic interface without needing to use MATLAB syntax. Menu options allow users to tune the behavior of EEGLAB to available memory. Middle-layer functions allow users to customize data processing using command history and interactive 'pop' functions. Experienced MATLAB users can use EEGLAB data structures and stand-alone signal processing functions to write custom and/or batch analysis scripts. Extensive function help and tutorial information are included. A 'plug-in' facility allows easy incorporation of new EEG modules into the main menu. EEGLAB is freely available (http://www.sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/) under the GNU public license for noncommercial use and open source development, together with sample data, user tutorial and extensive documentation.

Dow D., Morgan L., Hooker J. L., Michaels M. S., Joiner T. E., Woods J., & Wetherby A. M. (2021).

Anxiety, depression, and the interpersonal theory of suicide in a community sample of adults with autism spectrum disorder

Archives of Suicide Research, 25(2), 297-314.

DOI:10.1080/13811118.2019.1678537      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Dunn S. A., Freeth M., & Milne E. (2016).

Electrophysiological evidence of atypical spatial attention in those with a high level of self-reported autistic traits

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(6), 2199-2210.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-016-2751-3      PMID:26896373      [本文引用: 1]

Selective attention is atypical in individuals with autism spectrum conditions. Evidence suggests this is also the case for those with high levels of autistic traits. Here we investigated the neural basis of spatial attention in those with high and low levels of self-reported autistic traits via analysis of ERP deflections associated with covert attention, target selection and distractor suppression (the N2pc, NT and PD). Larger N2pc and smaller PD amplitude was observed in those with high levels of autistic traits. These data provide neural evidence for differences in spatial attention, specifically, reduced distractor suppression in those with high levels of autistic traits, and may provide insight into the experience of perceptual overload often reported by individuals on the autism spectrum.

Dziobek I., Rogers K., Fleck S., Bahnemann M., Heekeren H. R., Wolf O. T., & Convit A. (2008).

Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET)

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 464-473.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x      PMID:17990089      [本文引用: 2]

Empathy is a multidimensional construct consisting of cognitive (inferring mental states) and emotional (empathic concern) components. Despite a paucity of research, individuals on the autism spectrum are generally believed to lack empathy. In the current study we used a new, photo-based measure, the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET), to assess empathy multidimensionally in a group of 17 individuals with Asperger syndrome (AS) and 18 well-matched controls. Results suggested that while individuals with AS are impaired in cognitive empathy, they do not differ from controls in emotional empathy. Level of general emotional arousability and socially desirable answer tendencies did not differ between groups. Internal consistency of the MET's scales ranged from.71 to.92, and convergent and divergent validity were highly satisfactory.

Elomaa M. M., Williams A. C. D. C., & Kalso E. A. (2009).

Attention management as a treatment for chronic pain

European Journal of Pain, 13(10), 1062-1067.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.12.002      PMID:19144553      [本文引用: 2]

Attention management is often included in cognitive-behavioural treatments (CBT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of attention management strategies in the treatment for chronic pain. The present pilot study consisted of six weekly 90-min treatment sessions and was based on a CBT attention management manual describing techniques such as attention diversion, imagery and mindfulness exercises. The intended outcomes were reduction in pain-related anxiety and hypervigilance to pain and decrease in pain impact of everyday life, measured by self-report. Information was collected at baseline, pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 3 and 6 months follow-up. The results at the end of treatment, and at 3-month follow-up, show significant reductions in pain-related anxiety, hypervigilance and interference of pain (effect sizes 0.40-0.90). Reduction in pain-related interference and anxiety remained at the 6-month follow-up. The results indicate that attention control skills can be a useful method to reduce anxiety in the short term. Clinical implications of the results are discussed.

Eyuboglu M., Baykara B., & Eyuboglu D. (2018).

Broad autism phenotype: Theory of mind and empathy skills in unaffected siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder

Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 28(1), 36-42.

DOI:10.1080/24750573.2017.1379714      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Failla M. D., Gerdes M. B., Williams Z. J., Moore D. J., & Cascio C. J. (2020).

Increased pain sensitivity and pain-related anxiety in individuals with autism

Pain Reports, 5(6), e861.

[本文引用: 1]

Fan Y., & Han S. (2008).

Temporal dynamic of neural mechanisms involved in empathy for pain: An event-related brain potential study

Neuropsychologia, 46(1), 160-173.

PMID:17825852      [本文引用: 2]

Previous neuroimaging studies have identified a neural circuit that is involved in empathy for pain. However, the temporal dynamics of neural activities underlying empathic processes remains poorly understood. This was investigated in the current study by recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs) from healthy adults who were presented with pictures or cartoons of hands that were in painful or neutral situations. Subjects performed a pain judgment task that required attention to pain cues in the stimuli or a counting task that withdrew their attention from these cues. The ERP results showed early differentiation between painful and neutral stimuli over the frontal lobe at 140 ms after sensory stimulation. A long-latency empathic response was observed after 380 ms over the central-parietal regions and was more salient over the left than right hemispheres. The early and late empathic responses were, respectively, modulated by contextual reality of stimuli and by top-down attention to the pain cues. Moreover, the mean ERP amplitudes at 140-180 ms were correlated with subjective reports of the degree of perceived pain of others and of self-unpleasantness. The ERP results support a model of empathy for pain consisting of early emotional sharing and late cognitive evaluation.

Fan Y. T., Chen C., Chen S., Decety J., & Cheng Y. (2014).

Empathic arousal and social understanding in individuals with autism: Evidence from fMRI and ERP measurements

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), 1203-1213.

DOI:10.1093/scan/nst101      URL     [本文引用: 7]

Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.-G., & Buchner A. (2007).

G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193146      PMID:17695343      [本文引用: 1]

G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.

Fründt O., Grashorn W., Schöttle D., Peiker I., David N., Engel A. K.,... Bingel U. (2017).

Quantitative sensory testing in adults with autism spectrum disorders

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(4), 1183-1192.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-017-3041-4      PMID:28160223      [本文引用: 1]

Altered sensory perception has been found in patients with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and might be related to aberrant sensory perception thresholds. We used the well-established, standardized Quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain to investigate 13 somatosensory parameters including thermal and tactile detection and pain thresholds in 13 ASD adults and 13 matched healthy controls with normal IQ values. There were no group differences between somatosensory detection and pain thresholds. Two ASD patients showed paradoxical heat sensations and another two ASD subjects presented dynamic mechanical allodynia; somatosensory features that were absent in controls. These findings suggest that central mechanisms during complex stimulus integration rather than peripheral dysfunctions probably determine somatosensory alterations in ASD.

Galang C. M., Jenkins M., & Obhi S. S. (2020).

Exploring the effects of visual perspective on the ERP components of empathy for pain

Social Neuroscience, 15(2), 186-198.

DOI:10.1080/17470919.2019.1674686      PMID:31564225      [本文引用: 1]

Previous neurophysiological research suggests that there are event-related potential (ERP) components associated with empathy for pain: an early affective component (N2) and two late cognitive components (P3/LPP). The current study investigated whether and how the visual perspective from which a painful event is observed affects these ERP components. Participants viewed images of hands in pain vs. not in pain from a first-person or third-person perspective. We found that visual perspective influences the early and late components. In the early component (N2), there was a larger mean amplitude during observation of pain vs no-pain when images were shown from a first-person perspective. We suggest that this effect may be driven by misattributing the on-screen hand to oneself. For the late component (P3), we found a larger effect of pain on mean amplitudes in response to third-person relative to first-person images. We speculate that the P3 may reflect a later process that enables effective recognition of others' pain in the absence of misattribution. We discuss our results in relation to self- vs other-related processing by questioning whether these ERP components are truly indexing empathy (an other-directed process) or a simple misattribution of another's pain as one's own (a self-directed process).

Gökçen E., Petrides K. V., Hudry K., Frederickson N., & Smillie L. D. (2014).

Sub-threshold autism traits: The role of trait emotional intelligence and cognitive flexibility

British Journal of Psychology, 105(2), 187-199.

DOI:10.1111/bjop.12033      PMID:24754807      [本文引用: 1]

Theory and research suggests that features of autism are not restricted to individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), and that autism-like traits vary throughout the general population at lower severities. The present research first investigated the relationship of autism traits with trait emotional intelligence and empathy in a sample of 163 adults aged between 18 and 51 years (44% male). It then examined performance on a set of tasks assessing social cognition and cognitive flexibility in 69 participants with either high or low scores on ASD traits. Results confirm that there is pronounced variation within the general population relating to ASD traits, which reflect similar (though less severe) social-cognitive and emotional features to those observed in ASDs. © 2013 The British Psychological Society.

Gu X., Eilam-Stock T., Zhou T., Anagnostou E., Kolevzon A., Soorya L., Hof P. R., Friston K. J., & Fan J. (2015).

Autonomic and brain responses associated with empathy deficits in autism spectrum disorder

Human Brain Mapping, 36(9), 3323-3338.

DOI:10.1002/hbm.22840      PMID:25995134      [本文引用: 2]

Accumulating evidence suggests that autonomic signals and their cortical representations are closely linked to emotional processes, and that related abnormalities could lead to social deficits. Although socio-emotional impairments are a defining feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), empirical evidence directly supporting the link between autonomic, cortical, and socio-emotional abnormalities in ASD is still lacking. In this study, we examined autonomic arousal indexed by skin conductance responses (SCR), concurrent cortical responses measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging, and effective brain connectivity estimated by dynamic causal modeling in seventeen unmedicated high-functioning adults with ASD and seventeen matched controls while they performed an empathy-for-pain task. Compared to controls, adults with ASD showed enhanced SCR related to empathetic pain, along with increased neural activity in the anterior insular cortex, although their behavioral empathetic pain discriminability was reduced and overall SCR was decreased. ASD individuals also showed enhanced correlation between SCR and neural activities in the anterior insular cortex. Importantly, significant group differences in effective brain connectivity were limited to greater reduction in the negative intrinsic connectivity of the anterior insular cortex in the ASD group, indicating a failure in attenuating anterior insular responses to empathetic pain. These results suggest that aberrant interoceptive precision, as indexed by abnormalities in autonomic activity and its central representations, may underlie empathy deficits in ASD.© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Gu X., Zhou T. J., Anagnostou E., Soorya L., Kolevzon A., Hof P. R., & Fan J. (2018).

Heightened brain response to pain anticipation in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder

European Journal of Neuroscience, 47(6), 592-601.

DOI:10.1111/ejn.13598      PMID:28452081      [本文引用: 1]

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is marked by both socio-communicative difficulties and abnormalities in sensory processing. Much of the work on sensory deficits in ASD has focused on tactile sensations and the perceptual aspects of somatosensation, such as encoding of stimulus intensity and location. Although aberrant pain processing has often been noted in clinical observations of patients with ASD, it remains largely uninvestigated. Importantly, the neural mechanism underlying higher order cognitive aspects of pain processing such as pain anticipation also remains unknown. Here we examined both pain perception and anticipation in high-functioning adults with ASD and matched healthy controls (HC) using an anticipatory pain paradigm in combination with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and concurrent skin conductance response (SCR) recording. Participants were asked to choose a level of electrical stimulation that would feel moderately painful to them. Compared to HC group, ASD group chose a lower level of stimulation prior to fMRI. However, ASD participants showed greater activation in both rostral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex during the anticipation of stimulation, but not during stimulation delivery. There was no significant group difference in insular activation during either pain anticipation or perception. However, activity in the left anterior insula correlated with SCR during pain anticipation. Taken together, these results suggest that ASD is marked with aberrantly higher level of sensitivity to upcoming aversive stimuli, which may reflect abnormal attentional orientation to nociceptive signals and a failure in interoceptive inference.© 2017 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Guan J., & Zhao X. (2015).

Sub-threshold autistic traits in normal population: Its concept, structure and influencing factors

Advances in Psychological Science, 23(9), 1599-1607.

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01599      URL     [本文引用: 1]

[关荐, 赵旭东. (2015).

基于正常人群的阈下自闭特质: 概念、结构和影响因素

心理科学进展, 23(9), 1599-1607.]

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01599      [本文引用: 1]

阈下自闭特质是正常人群表现出来的, 自闭症谱系障碍(Autism Spectrum Disorder, ASD)阈限以下温和的社会性、交流能力损伤以及与ASD相关的人格和认知特征。其研究有助于ASD的干预及对ASD实质的更好理解。研究者用共情&ndash;系统化理论对其进行了理论解释。近来研究表明阈下自闭特质的结构与ASD核心行为维度类似, 且遗传、性别、认知风格等因素影响阈下自闭特质水平。未来研究应更有效地对阈下自闭特质进行评估, 并进一步探讨其可能存在的病理性质、与ASD的理论界限等问题。

Hayes A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. In: University of Kansas, KS.

[本文引用: 1]

Hu L.-T., & Bentler P. M. (1999).

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

Structural equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Huo C., Li Z., & Meng J. (2021).

Empathy interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: Giving full play to strengths or making up for weaknesses?

Advances in Psychological Science, 29(5), 849-863.

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00849      [本文引用: 1]

<p id="p00005"> Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a pervasive neurodevelopmental disorder. ASD individuals usually show persistent social communication barriers, social interaction barriers, and repetitive stereotyped behavior patterns in many situations. Furthermore, the empathy deficits in ASD individuals may be the main reason for their social interaction barriers. The mind-blindness hypothesis and the empathizing-systemizing theory explain their empathy deficits from two perspectives respectively, as well as put forward two different empathy intervention programs.<br>The mind-blindness hypothesis claimed that the empathy deficits in ASD individuals were mainly caused by the lack of theory of mind, indicating that they couldn’t understand others’ emotions and thoughts, which derived the empathy method of “making up for weaknesses” according to this characteristic. This category of intervention program advocated that the empathy deficits in ASD individuals should be directly intervened through corresponding empathic intervention programs to improve their empathic ability. The empathy method of “making up for weaknesses” mainly included the theory of mind (TOM) intervention, the perspective-taking intervention, the intervention of facial expression cognition, and so on. The empathy method of "making up for weaknesses" could improve the empathy ability of ASD individuals to some extent, but this category of intervention program required higher ability of ASD individuals. Additionally, it only could improve their skills related to the intervention contents instead of improving other aspects of their obstacles.<br>The empathizing-systemizing theory emphasized that although the lack of empathy ability of ASD individuals resulted in their social interaction deficits, their systematic capability was excellent, and even surpassed the general individuals, which derived the empathy method of “giving full play to strengths”. Based on the systematic strengths and interests of ASD individuals, the empathy method of "giving full play to strengths" proposed to increase their sense of self-efficacy and empathy by strengthening and encouraging them to do what they were good at, and thus improved their empathy ability. The method of “giving full play to strengths” mainly included the LEGO therapy, the serious games intervention, and the island-based intervention based on systemizing theory, and so on. The empathy method of “giving full play to strengths” emphasized that the advantages of systematic ability of ASD individuals should be used to make up for the weaknesses of their empathy deficits, so that ASD individuals could systematically accept empathy tasks and thus improve their empathy ability. However, the generalization and migration of such intervention programs have been questioned. In summary, the empathy method of "giving full play to strengths" provided a new idea for the intervention of empathy ability of ASD individuals.<br>The above two kinds of intervention programs had their own advantages and disadvantages. It is suggested that future interventions should not only take into full consideration to the diversity of each ASD individual, such as age, sex, severity of symptom and so on, but also pay more attention to the superior abilities of ASD individuals, carry out the multi-channel and multi-modality comprehensive interventions, as well as combine the island-based intervention based on systemizing theory with the “making up for weaknesses” and “giving full play to strengths” programs to formulate an individualized intervention plan for each ASD individual.</p>

[霍超, 李祚山, 孟景. (2021).

自闭症谱系障碍个体的共情干预:扬长还是补短?

心理科学进展, 29(5), 849-863.]

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00849      [本文引用: 1]

自闭症谱系障碍(autism spectrum disorders, ASD)个体的共情能力缺陷可能导致了他们的社会交往障碍, 因此有必要对ASD个体的共情能力进行干预。有研究者主张应该对ASD个体的共情缺陷进行直接干预, 由此衍生了共情“补短”法, 主要包括心理理论的干预、观点采择的干预、面部表情认知的干预等几种方法。另有一些研究者认为虽然ASD个体存在共情缺陷, 但他们同时也具备系统化能力优势, 应该通过ASD个体的优势能力来改善其共情能力, 由此衍生了共情“扬长”法, 主要包括乐高治疗、严肃游戏干预、基于系统化理论的孤岛能力辅助干预等几种方法。每种方法都存在优点和不足。最后就目前ASD个体共情干预领域存在的问题进行了反思与展望。

Jackson P. L., Meltzoff A. N., & Decety J. (2005).

How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy

Neuroimage, 24(3), 771-779.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006      PMID:15652312      [本文引用: 3]

To what extent do we share feelings with others? Neuroimaging investigations of the neural mechanisms involved in the perception of pain in others may cast light on one basic component of human empathy, the interpersonal sharing of affect. In this fMRI study, participants were shown a series of still photographs of hands and feet in situations that are likely to cause pain, and a matched set of control photographs without any painful events. They were asked to assess on-line the level of pain experienced by the person in the photographs. The results demonstrated that perceiving and assessing painful situations in others was associated with significant bilateral changes in activity in several regions notably, the anterior cingulate, the anterior insula, the cerebellum, and to a lesser extent the thalamus. These regions are known to play a significant role in pain processing. Finally, the activity in the anterior cingulate was strongly correlated with the participants' ratings of the others' pain, suggesting that the activity of this brain region is modulated according to subjects' reactivity to the pain of others. Our findings suggest that there is a partial cerebral commonality between perceiving pain in another individual and experiencing it oneself. This study adds to our understanding of the neurological mechanisms implicated in intersubjectivity and human empathy.

Kline R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.

[本文引用: 1]

Kloosterman P. H., Keefer K. V., Kelley E. A., Summerfeldt L. J., & Parker J. D. A. (2011).

Evaluation of the factor structure of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient

Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 310-314.

DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.015      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Kunihira Y., Senju A., Dairoku H., Wakabayashi A., & Hasegawa T. (2006).

“Autistic” traits in non-autistic Japanese populations: Relationships with personality traits and cognitive ability

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(4), 553-566.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-006-0094-1      PMID:16602034      [本文引用: 1]

We explored the relationships between 'autistic' traits as measured by the AQ (Autism-Spectrum Quotient; Baron-Cohen et al., J. Autism Develop. Disord. (2001b) 31 5) and various personality traits or cognitive ability, which usually coincide with autistic symptoms, for general populations. Results showed the AQ was associated with tendencies toward an obsessional personality as defined by the TCI (Temperament and Character Inventory), higher depression and anxiety, and higher frequency of experience of being bullied. These results parallel the patterns in autism and corroborate the validity of the AQ for general populations. Contrary to our prediction, however, there was no relationship between the AQ and cognitive ability, such as theory of mind, executive functioning, and central coherence, suggesting the AQ does not reflect autism-specific cognitive patterns in general populations.

Lamm C., Decety J., & Singer T. (2011).

Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain

Neuroimage, 54(3), 2492-2502.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014      PMID:20946964      [本文引用: 1]

A growing body of evidence suggests that empathy for pain is underpinned by neural structures that are also involved in the direct experience of pain. In order to assess the consistency of this finding, an image-based meta-analysis of nine independent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations and a coordinate-based meta-analysis of 32 studies that had investigated empathy for pain using fMRI were conducted. The results indicate that a core network consisting of bilateral anterior insular cortex and medial/anterior cingulate cortex is associated with empathy for pain. Activation in these areas overlaps with activation during directly experienced pain, and we link their involvement to representing global feeling states and the guidance of adaptive behavior for both self- and other-related experiences. Moreover, the image-based analysis demonstrates that depending on the type of experimental paradigm this core network was co-activated with distinct brain regions: While viewing pictures of body parts in painful situations recruited areas underpinning action understanding (inferior parietal/ventral premotor cortices) to a stronger extent, eliciting empathy by means of abstract visual information about the other's affective state more strongly engaged areas associated with inferring and representing mental states of self and other (precuneus, ventral medial prefrontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, and temporo-parietal junction). In addition, only the picture-based paradigms activated somatosensory areas, indicating that previous discrepancies concerning somatosensory activity during empathy for pain might have resulted from differences in experimental paradigms. We conclude that social neuroscience paradigms provide reliable and accurate insights into complex social phenomena such as empathy and that meta-analyses of previous studies are a valuable tool in this endeavor.Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Lau W. Y.-P., Gau S. S.-F., Chiu Y.-N., & Wu Y.-Y. (2014).

Autistic traits in couple dyads as a predictor of anxiety spectrum symptoms

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(11), 2949-2963.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-014-2151-5      PMID:24907095      [本文引用: 1]

The link between parental autistic tendency and anxiety symptoms was studied in 491 Taiwanese couples raising biological children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Parental autistic tendency as measured by Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) was associated with anxiety symptoms across all domains. Large effect sizes were found in social phobia and post traumatic stress disorders for both parents, and in general anxiety disorder and agoraphobia for mothers. These associations were irrespective of child's autistic tendency, spouse's AQ scores and the couples' compatibility in their autistic tendency. Perceived family support and parental education moderated the link but not child's autistic severity. Research and clinical implications regarding psychiatric vulnerability of parents of children with ASD were drawn and discussed.

Li J., Song T., Meng F., Li H., Dai Y., Han S., Zhang R., Han J. (2015).

Pain threshold in children with autism and age-matched typically developed children: A comparative study

Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine, 21(12), 908-913.

[本文引用: 1]

[李晋, 宋天佳, 孟凡超, 李汉霞, 戴玉川, 韩松平, 张嵘, 韩济生. (2015).

孤独症与正常儿童的痛阈比较研究

中国疼痛医学杂志, 21(12), 908-913 ]

[本文引用: 1]

Li W., & Han S. (2010).

Perspective taking modulates event-related potentials to perceived pain

Neuroscience Letters, 469(3), 328-332.

DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.021      PMID:20026179      [本文引用: 1]

Recent event-related brain potential (ERP) study disentangled an early automatic component and a late top-down controlled component of neural activities to perceived pain of others. This study assessed the hypothesis that perspective taking modulates the top-down controlled component but not the automatic component of empathy for pain by recording ERPs from 24 subjects who performed pain judgments of pictures of hands in painful or non-painful situations from either self-perspective or other-perspective. We found that, relative to non-painful stimuli, painful stimuli induced positive shifts of ERPs at frontal-central electrodes as early as 160 ms after sensory stimulation and this effect lasted until 700 ms. The amplitudes of ERPs at 230-250 ms elicited by painful stimuli negatively correlated with both subjective ratings of others' pain and self-unpleasantness in both self-perspective and other-perspective conditions. Neural response to perceived pain over the central-parietal area was significantly reduced at 370-420 ms when performing the pain judgment task from other-perspective compared to self-perspective. The results suggest that shifting between self-perspectives and other-perspectives modulates the late controlled component but not the early automatic component of neural responses to perceived pain.(c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Li X., Li Z., Xiang B., & Meng J. (2020).

Empathy for pain in Individuals with autistic traits influenced by attention cues: Evidence from an ERP study

Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(3), 294-306.

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00294      [本文引用: 1]

Previous studies have found that the behavioral patterns of individuals with autistic traits are similar to those of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). That is, individuals with autistic traits show the impairment of empathy in daily life, but the severity of such impairment is not enough to meet the clinical diagnostic criteria for ASD. The similar behaviors between the two mean that studying individuals with autistic traits can help us understand the empathy characteristics of ASD. At present, the results of studies on the empathy for pain of autistic individuals are not consistent. It is possible that attention cues and specific face processing affect their empathy processing. Therefore, in this study, pictures of painful faces were used as stimulus materials, and the event-related potentials (ERP) technique was adopted to explore the effect of attention cues on the pain empathy processing in autistic individuals. The study randomly selected 30 healthy undergraduates (15 males) as the autistic trait group, and 30 healthy undergraduates (16 males) as the control group. The experiment, based on three-factor mixed design (2×2×2), included two tasks: 1) Pain judgment task: The subjects were required to judge whether there was pain in the pictures of the painful faces (with a needle in the cheek) and the pictures of the non-painful faces (touched gently with a cotton swab), where the subjects' attention was directed to the pain cues. 2) Attractiveness judgment task: The subjects were required to judge whether the faces were attractive or unattractive, where the subjects' attention did not point to the pain cues. EEG during the observation of pictures under different experiment tasks was recorded by a 64-channel amplifier using a standard 10-20 system (Brain Products). The ERP results revealed that the attention cues would influence the late cognitive processing stage component P3, but not the early automatic component. Compared with the control group, the autistic trait group induced a larger P3 amplitude by the painful face pictures in the attractiveness judgment task; however, in the pain judgment task, there was no significant difference between the two groups. This suggests that top-down attention to visual pain cues may modulate the late processing of pain empathy in autistic individuals, as manifested in the following fact: When autistic individuals pay attention to pain cues, they have similar empathic neural responses to the control group; when they do not pay attention to pain cues, they process other people's painful faces to a higher degree. This result also suggests that autistic individuals may avoid other people's face information, and provides evidence for the empathy deficit of autistic individuals. This conclusion is helpful for understanding the cognitive processing characteristics and influencing factors of pain empathy in ASD.

Liao C., Wu H., Guan Q., Luo Y., & Cui F. (2018).

Predictability and probability modulate the neural responses to other’s pain: An event-related potential investigation

Biological Psychology, 138, 11-18.

DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.002      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Liu M. (2008).

Screening adults for asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism by using the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) (Mandarin Version)

Bulletin of Special Education, 33(1), 73-92.

[本文引用: 1]

[刘萌容. (2008).

自闭症光谱量表─autism-spectrum quotient 中文成人版之预测效度及相关因素分析

特殊教育研究学刊, 33(1), 73-92.]

[本文引用: 1]

Magnée M. J. C. M., de Gelder B., van Engeland H., & Kemner C. (2007).

Facial electromyographic responses to emotional information from faces and voices in individuals with pervasive developmental disorder

Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(11), 1122-1130.

PMID:17995488      [本文引用: 1]

Despite extensive research, it is still debated whether impairments in social skills of individuals with pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) are related to specific deficits in the early processing of emotional information. We aimed to test both automatic processing of facial affect as well as the integration of auditory and visual emotion cues in individuals with PDD.In a group of high-functioning adult individuals with PDD and an age- and IQ-matched control group, we measured facial electromyography (EMG) following presentation of visual emotion stimuli (facial expressions) as well as the presentation of audiovisual emotion pairs (faces plus voices). This emotionally driven EMG activity is considered to be a direct correlate of automatic affect processing that is not under intentional control.Our data clearly indicate that among individuals with PDD facial EMG activity is heightened in response to happy and fearful faces, and intact in response to audiovisual affective information.This study provides evidence for enhanced sensitivity to facial cues at the level of reflex-like emotional responses in individuals with PDD. Furthermore, the findings argue against impairments in crossmodal affect processing at this level of perception. However, given how little comparative work has been done in the area of multisensory perception, there is certainly need for further exploration.

McNeil D. W., & Rainwater A. J. (1998).

Development of the fear of pain questionnaire-III

Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(4), 389-410.

DOI:10.1023/a:1018782831217      PMID:9789168      [本文引用: 1]

Fear and/or anxiety about pain is a useful construct, in both theoretical and clinical terms. This article describes the development and refinement of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FPQ), which exists in its most current form as the FPQ-III. Factor analytic refinement resulted in a 30-item FPQ-III which consists of Severe Pain, Minor Pain, and Medical Pain subscales. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the FPQ-III were found to be good. Four studies are presented, including normative data for samples of inpatient chronic pain patients, general medical outpatients, and unselected undergraduates. High fear of pain individuals had greater avoidance/escape from a pain-relevant Behavioral Avoidance Test with Video, relative to their low fear counterparts, suggesting predictive validity. Chronic pain patients reported the greatest fear of severe pain. Directions for future research with the FPQ-III are discussed, along with general comments about the relation of fear and anxiety to pain.

Meng J., Li Z., & Shen L. (2017).

Responses to others’ pain in adults with autistic traits: The influence of gender and stimuli modality

PloS One, 12(3), e0174109.

[本文引用: 1]

Meng J., Shen L., Li Z., & Peng W. (2019).

Top-down effects on empathy for pain in adults with autistic traits

Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8022.

[本文引用: 1]

Minio-Paluello I., Baron-Cohen S., Avenanti A., Walsh V., & Aglioti S. M. (2009).

Absence of embodied empathy during pain observation in Asperger syndrome

Biological Psychiatry, 65(1), 55-62.

DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.08.006      PMID:18814863      [本文引用: 1]

Asperger syndrome (AS) is a neurodevelopmental condition within the autism spectrum conditions (ASC) characterized by specific difficulties in communication, social interaction, and empathy that is essential for sharing and understanding others' feelings and emotions. Although reduced empathy is considered a core feature of ASC, neurophysiological evidence of empathic deficits before and below mentalizing and perspective taking is lacking. We explored whether people with AS differ from neurotypical control participants in their empathic corticospinal response to the observation of others' pain and the modulatory role played by phenomenal experience of observed pain and personality traits.Sixteen right-handed men with AS (aged 28.0+/-7.2 years) and 20 neurotypical controls (aged 25.3+/-6.7 years) age, sex, and IQ matched, underwent single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation during observation of painful and nonpainful stimuli affecting another individual.When observing other's pain, participants with AS, in contrast to neurotypical control participants, did not show any amplitude reduction of motor-evoked potentials recorded from the muscle vicariously affected by pain, nor did their neurophysiological response correlate with imagined pain sensory qualities. Participants with AS represented others' pain in relation to the self-oriented arousal experienced while watching pain videos.Finding no embodiment of others' pain provides neurophysiological evidence for reduced empathic resonance in people with AS and indicates that their empathic difficulties involve not only cognitive dimensions but also sensorimotor resonance with others. We suggest that absence of embodied empathy may be linked to changes at very basic levels of neural processing.

Mischkowski D., Crocker J., & Way B. M. (2016).

From painkiller to empathy killer: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) reduces empathy for pain

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(9), 1345-1353.

DOI:10.1093/scan/nsw057      PMID:27217114      [本文引用: 2]

Simulation theories of empathy hypothesize that empathizing with others' pain shares some common psychological computations with the processing of one's own pain. Support for this perspective has largely relied on functional neuroimaging evidence of an overlap between activations during the experience of physical pain and empathy for other people's pain. Here, we extend the functional overlap perspective to the neurochemical level and test whether a common physical painkiller, acetaminophen (paracetamol), can reduce empathy for another's pain. In two double-blind placebo-controlled experiments, participants rated perceived pain, personal distress and empathic concern in response to reading scenarios about another's physical or social pain, witnessing ostracism in the lab, or visualizing another study participant receiving painful noise blasts. As hypothesized, acetaminophen reduced empathy in response to others' pain. Acetaminophen also reduced the unpleasantness of noise blasts delivered to the participant, which mediated acetaminophen's effects on empathy. Together, these findings suggest that the physical painkiller acetaminophen reduces empathy for pain and provide a new perspective on the neurochemical bases of empathy. Because empathy regulates prosocial and antisocial behavior, these drug-induced reductions in empathy raise concerns about the broader social side effects of acetaminophen, which is taken by almost a quarter of adults in the United States each week.© The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mobascher A., Brinkmeyer J., Warbrick T., Musso F., Wittsack H.-J., Saleh A., Schnitzler A., & Winterer G. (2009).

Laser-evoked potential P2 single-trial amplitudes covary with the fMRI BOLD response in the medial pain system and interconnected subcortical structures

Neuroimage, 45(3), 917-926.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.051      PMID:19166948      [本文引用: 1]

Pain is a complex experience with sensory, emotional and cognitive aspects. The cortical representation of pain - the pain matrix - consists of a network of regions including the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) sensory cortex, insula, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). These structures interact with brain regions such as the prefrontal cortex and the amygdalae. Simultaneous EEG/fMRI (electroencephalography/functional magnetic resonance imaging) has recently been introduced as a method to study the spatiotemporal characteristics of cognitive processes with high spatial and high temporal resolution at the same time. The present study was conducted to clarify if single trial EEG-informed BOLD modeling supports the definition of functional compartments within the pain matrix and interconnected regions. Twenty healthy subjects received painful laser stimulation while EEG and the fMRI blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal were recorded simultaneously. While the laser-evoked N2 potential provided no additional information for BOLD modeling, the regressor obtained from the single trial laser-evoked P2 potential explained additional variance in a network of cortical and subcortical structures that largely overlapped with the pain matrix. This modeling strategy yielded pronounced activation in the ACC, right amygdala and thalamus. Our results suggest that laser-evoked potential (LEP) informed fMRI can be used to visualize BOLD activation in the pain matrix with an emphasis on functional compartments (as defined by the temporal dynamics of the LEP) such as the medial pain system. Furthermore, our findings suggest a concerted effort of the ACC and the amygdala in the cognitive-emotional evaluation of pain.

Moore D. J. (2015).

Acute pain experience in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A review

Autism, 19(4), 387-399.

DOI:10.1177/1362361314527839      PMID:24687688      [本文引用: 1]

In addition to the diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder, a number of clinically important comorbid complaints, including sensory abnormalities, are also discussed. One difference often noted in these accounts is hyposensitivity to pain; however, evidence for this is limited. The purpose of the current review therefore was to examine sensitivity to pain of individuals with autism spectrum disorder. This review is interested in reports which consider differences in subjective experience of pain (i.e. different pain thresholds) and differences in behavioural response to pain (i.e. signs of pain-related distress). Studies were included if they were conducted with human subjects, included a clearly diagnosed autism spectrum disorder population and reported data pertaining to pain experience relative to the neurotypical population. Studies were classified as being self/parent report, clinical observations, observations of response to medical procedures or experimental examination of pain. Both self/parent report and clinical observations appeared to report hyposensitivity to pain, whereas observations of medical procedures and experimental manipulation suggested normal or hypersensitive responses to pain. This review suggests that contrary to classical reports, individuals with autism spectrum disorder do not appear to have systematically altered pain responses or thresholds. More systematic experimental examination of this area is needed to understand responses to pain of individuals with autism spectrum disorder. © The Author(s) 2014.

Mul C.-L., Stagg S. D., Herbelin B., & Aspell J. E. (2018).

The feeling of me feeling for you: Interoception, alexithymia and empathy in autism

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(9), 2953-2967.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-018-3564-3      [本文引用: 1]

Murray K., Johnston K., Cunnane H., Kerr C., Spain D., Gillan N.,... Happé F. (2017).

A new test of advanced theory of mind: The “Strange Stories Film Task” captures social processing differences in adults with autism spectrum disorders

Autism Research, 10(6), 1120-1132.

DOI:10.1002/aur.1744      PMID:28296216      [本文引用: 1]

Real-life social processing abilities of adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) can be hard to capture in lab-based experimental tasks. A novel measure of social cognition, the "Strange Stories Film task' (SSFt), was designed to overcome limitations of available measures in the field. Brief films were made based on the scenarios from the Strange Stories task (Happé) and designed to capture the subtle social-cognitive difficulties observed in ASD adults. Twenty neurotypical adults were recruited to pilot the new measure. A final test set was produced and administered to a group of 20 adults with ASD and 20 matched controls, alongside established social cognition tasks and questionnaire measures of empathy, alexithymia and ASD traits. The SSFt was more effective than existing measures at differentiating the ASD group from the control group. In the ASD group, the SSFt was associated with the Strange Stories task. The SSFt is a potentially useful tool to identify social cognitive dis/abilities in ASD, with preliminary evidence of adequate convergent validity. Future research directions are discussed. Autism Res 2017. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Autism Res 2017, 10: 1120-1132. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Neil L., Olsson N. C., & Pellicano E. (2016).

The relationship between intolerance of uncertainty, sensory sensitivities, and anxiety in autistic and typically developing children

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(6), 1962-1973.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-016-2721-9      PMID:26864157      [本文引用: 1]

Guided by a recent theory that proposes fundamental differences in how autistic individuals deal with uncertainty, we investigated the extent to which the cognitive construct 'intolerance of uncertainty' and anxiety were related to parental reports of sensory sensitivities in 64 autistic and 85 typically developing children aged 6-14 years. Intolerance of uncertainty and anxiety explained approximately half the variance in autistic children's sensory sensitivities, but only around a fifth of the variance in typical children's sensory sensitivities. In children with autism only, intolerance of uncertainty remained a significant predictor of children's sensory sensitivities once the effects of anxiety were adjusted for. Our results suggest intolerance of uncertainty is a relevant construct to sensory sensitivities in children with and without autism.

Oberman L. M., Winkielman P., & Ramachandran V. S. (2009).

Slow echo: Facial EMG evidence for the delay of spontaneous, but not voluntary, emotional mimicry in children with autism spectrum disorders

Developmental Science, 12(4), 510-520.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00796.x      PMID:19635079      [本文引用: 1]

Spontaneous mimicry, including that of emotional facial expressions, is important for socio-emotional skills such as empathy and communication. Those skills are often impacted in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Successful mimicry requires not only the activation of the response, but also its appropriate speed. Yet, previous studies examined ASD differences in only response magnitude. The current study investigated timing and magnitude of spontaneous and voluntary mimicry in ASD children and matched controls using facial electromyography (EMG). First, participants viewed and recognized happy, sad, fear, anger, disgust and neutral expressions presented at different durations. Later, participants voluntarily mimicked the expressions. There were no group differences on emotion recognition and amplitude of expression-appropriate EMG activity. However, ASD participants' spontaneous, but not voluntary, mimicry activity was delayed by about 160 ms. This delay occurred across different expressions and presentation durations. We relate these findings to the literature on mirroring and temporal dynamics of social interaction.

Peled-Avron L., & Shamay-Tsoory S. G. (2017).

Don't touch me! autistic traits modulate early and late ERP components during visual perception of social touch

Autism Research, 10(6), 1141-1154.

DOI:10.1002/aur.1762      PMID:28339141      [本文引用: 1]

Although individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have impaired responses to interpersonal touch, the underlying neural correlates remain largely unknown. Here, we examined the neural correlates that underlie interpersonal touch perception in individuals with either high or low autistic traits. Fifty-three participants were classified as having either high or low autistic traits based on their performance on the autism quotient (AQ) questionnaire. We hypothesized that individuals with high AQ scores would have relatively high touch hypervigilance, reflected as earlier P1 and stronger late positive potential (LPP) responses, two components of event-related potentials that serve as electrophysiological markers of anxiety bias. We recorded each participant's electroencephalography activity during presentation of images depicting human touch, object touch, and non-touch control images. Consistent with our hypothesis, AQ scores were positively correlated with social touch aversion. Moreover, participants with high AQ scores had earlier P1 and stronger LPP responses when presented with human touch compared to the control images. Importantly, a regression model revealed that earlier P1 and larger LPP amplitude measured during social touch observation can accurately predict higher autistic trait levels. Taken together, these findings indicate that individuals with high levels of autistic traits may have a hypervigilant response to observed social touch. Autism Res 2017, 0: 000-000. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Autism Res 2017, 10: 1141-1154. © 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.© 2017 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Pelton M. K., & Cassidy S. A. (2017).

Are autistic traits associated with suicidality? A test of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide in a non-clinical young adult sample

Autism Research, 10(11), 1891-1904.

DOI:10.1002/aur.1828      PMID:28685996      [本文引用: 1]

Autism spectrum conditions (ASC) has recently been associated with increased risk of suicidality. However, no studies have explored how autistic traits may interact with current models of suicidal behavior in a non-clinical population. The current study therefore explored how self-reported autistic traits interact with perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness in predicting suicidal behavior, in the context of the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide (IPTS). 163 young adults (aged 18-30 years) completed an online survey including measures of thwarted belonging and perceived burdensomeness (Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire), self-reported autistic traits (Autism Spectrum Quotient), current depression (Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), and lifetime suicidality (Suicide Behavior Questionnaire-Revised). Results showed that burdensomeness and thwarted belonging significantly mediated the relationship between autistic traits and suicidal behavior. Both depression and autistic traits significantly predicted thwarted belonging and perceived burdensomeness. Autistic traits did not significantly moderate the relationship between suicidal behavior and thwarted belonging or perceived burdensomeness. Results suggest that the IPTS provides a useful framework for understanding the influence of autistic traits on suicidal behavior. However, the psychometric properties of these measures need be explored in those with clinically confirmed diagnosis of ASC. Autism Res 2017, 10: 1891-1904. © 2017 The Authors Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Recent research has shown that people with high autistic traits are more likely to attempt suicide. However, no studies have explored why. We found that people with high autistic traits were more likely to experience feelings that they do not belong in the world, are a burden on others, and depression, which may increase their likelihood of attempting suicide. These results suggest that promoting inclusion and independence in those with high autistic traits could help prevent people attempting suicide.© 2017 The Authors Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Peng W., Huang X., Liu Y., & Cui F. (2019).

Predictability modulates the anticipation and perception of pain in both self and others

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(7), 747-757.

DOI:10.1093/scan/nsz047      PMID:31236566      [本文引用: 2]

Predictability has been suggested to modulate both the anticipation and perception of self-pain. Considering the overlapping neural circuits between self-pain and other-pain perceptions, the present study investigated how the predictability of forthcoming pain modulates the anticipation and perception of self-pain and other-pain. We used a balanced, within-participant experimental design in which a visual cue indicating the recipient, intensity and predictability of an upcoming painful electrical stimulation was presented before its delivery. Subjective ratings and electroencephalography activities to the anticipation and perception of self-pain and other-pain were recorded and compared between certain and uncertain conditions. Results showed that predictability affected the perception of self-pain and other-pain in a similar manner such that the differences in behavioral ratings and event-related potentials to high-intensity and low-intensity pain were significantly reduced when the intensity was uncertain. The strengths of predictability-induced modulation of self-pain and other-pain perceptions were positively correlated with each other. Furthermore, predictability also modulated the anticipation of both self-pain and other-pain such that pre-stimulus high-frequency α-oscillation power at sensorimotor electrodes contralateral to the stimulation side was maximally suppressed when anticipating certain high-intensity pain. These findings demonstrate that predictability-induced modulation on pain anticipation and perception was similarly applied to both self-pain and other-pain.© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.

Perchet C., Godinho F., Mazza S., Frot M., Legrain V., Magnin M., & Garcia-Larrea L. (2008).

Evoked potentials to nociceptive stimuli delivered by CO2 or Nd: YAP lasers

Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(11), 2615-2622.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.06.021      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Pickles A., Starr E., Kazak S., Bolton P., Papanikolaou K., Bailey A., Goodman R., & Rutter M. (2000).

Variable expression of the autism broader phenotype: Findings from extended pedigrees

Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 491-502.

PMID:10836679      [本文引用: 1]

Factors influencing the rate, form, and severity of phenotypic expression among relatives of autistic probands are examined. Family history data on 3095 first- and second-degree relatives and cousins from 149 families with a child with autism and 36 families with a child with Down syndrome are studied. The results provide further evidence of an increased risk among autism relatives for the broadly defined autism phenotype. Of proband characteristics, severity of autism and obstetric optimality were confirmed as being related to familial loading for probands with speech. There was little variation in loading among probands lacking speech. The type of phenotypic profile reported in relatives appeared little influenced by characteristics of the relative or the proband, except for variation by degree of relative, parental status of relative, and perhaps proband's birth optimality score. Phenotypic rates among parents suggested reduced fitness for the severest and more communication-related forms of expression but not for the more mild and social forms of expression. Patterns of expression within the families did not support a simple X-linked nor an imprinted X-linked mode of inheritance. The basis for sex differences in rates of expression is discussed.

Piven J., Palmer P., Jacobi D., Childress D., & Arndt S. (1997).

Broader autism phenotype: Evidence from a family history study of multiple-incidence autism families

American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(2), 185-190.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.154.2.185      PMID:9016266      [本文引用: 1]

Studies of families ascertained through a single autistic proband suggest that the genetic liability for autism may be expressed in nonautistic relatives in a phenotype that is milder but qualitatively similar to the defining features of autism. The objective of this study was to examine behaviors that may define this broader phenotype in relatives ascertained through two autistic siblings.The authors used a semistructured family history interview to compare the rates of social and communication deficits and stereotyped behaviors in relatives ascertained through two autistic siblings (families with multiple-incidence autism; 25 families) with the rates in relatives of Down syndrome probands (30 families).Higher rates of social and communication deficits and stereotyped behaviors were found in the relatives in the families with multiple-incidence autism.These data suggest that further studies should be undertaken to delineate the boundaries of the broader autism phenotype and that this broader phenotype should be included in some future genetic analyses of this disorder.

Ponnet K. S., Roeyers H., Buysse A., de Clercq A., & van der Heyden E. (2004).

Advanced mind-reading in adults with Asperger syndrome

Autism, 8(3), 249-266

PMID:15358869      [本文引用: 1]

This study investigated the mind-reading abilities of 19 adults with Asperger syndrome and 19 typically developing adults. Two static mind-reading tests and a more naturalistic empathic accuracy task were used. In the empathic accuracy task, participants attempted to infer the thoughts and feelings of target persons, while viewing a videotape of the target persons in a naturally occurring conversation with another person. The results are consistent with earlier findings. The empathic accuracy task indicated significant between-group differences, whereas no such differences were found on the static mind-reading tasks. The most innovative finding of the present study is that the inference ability of adults with pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) and controls depends on the focus of the target's thoughts and feelings, and that the empathic accuracy of adults with Asperger syndrome and control adults might be different in terms of quantity and quality.

Preacher K. J., & Hayes A. F. (2008).

Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models

Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.

DOI:10.3758/brm.40.3.879      PMID:18697684      [本文引用: 2]

Hypotheses involving mediation are common in the behavioral sciences. Mediation exists when a predictor affects a dependent variable indirectly through at least one intervening variable, or mediator. Methods to assess mediation involving multiple simultaneous mediators have received little attention in the methodological literature despite a clear need. We provide an overview of simple and multiple mediation and explore three approaches that can be used to investigate indirect processes, as well as methods for contrasting two or more mediators within a single model. We present an illustrative example, assessing and contrasting potential mediators of the relationship between the helpfulness of socialization agents and job satisfaction. We also provide SAS and SPSS macros, as well as Mplus and LISREL syntax, to facilitate the use of these methods in applications.

Quan X., Fong D. Y. T., Leung A. Y. M., Liao Q., Ruscheweyh R., & Chau P. H. (2018).

Validation of the Mandarin Chinese version of the pain sensitivity questionnaire

Pain Practice, 18(2), 180-193.

DOI:10.1111/papr.12587      PMID:28422444      [本文引用: 1]

The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), a self-reported scale, has been used to assess the pain sensitivity level in a Caucasian population. However, a validated Mandarin Chinese version of the PSQ is not available. This study was aimed to translate the PSQ into Mandarin Chinese (PSQ-C) and validate it to measure pain sensitivity among Chinese people.The English version of the PSQ has been translated into Mandarin Chinese (PSQ-C), according to the standard steps of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported scales. Three of the 17 items were revised owing to cultural adaptation. The final version was validated on a population of 182 Chinese people in Changsha City, China, during October to December 2015. The participants underwent electrical experimental pain testing. The psychometric properties of the PSQ-C and its subscales were examined.The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the PSQ-C-total, PSQ-C-moderate, and PSQ-C-minor were 0.90, 0.86, and 0.81, respectively. Acceptable test-retest reliability, content validity, and construct validity were demonstrated. Concurrent validity was shown via significant positive correlations between PSQ-C scores and perceived pain intensity at pain threshold and during pain stimulation with a fixed intensity. Convergent validity was shown via significant positive correlations between Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores and PSQ-C scores. Known group validity was demonstrated via higher PSQ-C-total and PSQ-C-moderate scores among those with high neuroticism scores. These results indicate that the PSQ-C has reasonably good psychometric properties, similar to the original English and German versions.The PSQ-C is a reliable and useful tool to assess pain sensitivity levels in a Chinese population.© 2017 World Institute of Pain.

Rattaz C., Dubois A., Michelon C., Viellard M., Poinso F., & Baghdadli A. (2013).

How do children with autism spectrum disorders express pain? A comparison with developmentally delayed and typically developing children

Pain, 154(10), 2007-2013.

DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.011      PMID:24040973      [本文引用: 1]

There is a lack of knowledge about pain reactions in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), who have often been considered as insensitive to pain. The objective of this study was to describe the facial, behavioral and physiological reactions of children with ASD during venipuncture and to compare them to the reactions of children with an intellectual disability and nonimpaired control children. We also examined the relation between developmental age and pain reactions. The sample included 35 children with ASD, 32 children with an intellectual disability, and 36 nonimpaired children. The children were videotaped during venipuncture and their heart rate was recorded. Facial reactions were assessed using the Child Facial Coding System (CFCS) and behavioral reactions were scored using the Noncommunicating Children's Pain Checklist (NCCPC). A linear mixed-effects model showed that children's reactions increased between baseline and venipuncture and decreased between the end of venipuncture and the recovery period. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the amount of facial, behavioral and physiological reactions. However, behavioral reactions seemed to remain high in children with ASD after the end of the venipuncture, in contrast with children in the 2 other groups. Moreover, we observed a significant decrease in pain expression with age in nonimpaired children, but no such effect was found regarding children with ASD. The data reveal that children with ASD displayed a significant pain reaction in this situation and tend to recover more slowly after the painful experience. Improvement in pain assessment and management in this population is necessary. Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Ren Q., Lu X., Zhao Q., Zhang H., & Hu L. (2020).

Can self-pain sensitivity quantify empathy for others' pain?

Psychophysiology, 57(10), e13637.

[本文引用: 1]

Robinson E. B., Koenen K. C., McCormick M. C., Munir K., Hallett V., Happé F., Plomin R., & Ronald A. (2011).

Evidence that autistic traits show the same etiology in the general population and at the quantitative extremes (5%, 2.5%, and 1%)

Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(11), 1113-1121.

DOI:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.119      PMID:22065527      [本文引用: 1]

Genetic factors play an important role in the etiology of both autism spectrum disorders and autistic traits. However, little is known about the etiologic consistency of autistic traits across levels of severity.To compare the etiology of typical variation in autistic traits with extreme scoring groups (including top 1%) that mimicked the prevalence of diagnosed autism spectrum disorders in the largest twin study of autistic traits to date.Twin study using phenotypic analysis and genetic model-fitting in the total sample and extreme scoring groups (top 5%, 2.5%, and 1%).A nationally representative twin sample from the general population of England.The families of 5968 pairs aged 12 years old in the Twins' Early Development Study. Main Outcome Measure  Autistic traits as assessed by the Childhood Autism Spectrum Test.Moderate to high heritability was found for autistic traits in the general population (53% for females and 72% for males). High heritability was found in extreme-scoring groups. There were no differences in heritability among extreme groups or between the extreme groups and the general population. A continuous liability shift toward autistic trait affectedness was seen in the cotwins of individuals scoring in the top 1%, suggesting shared etiology between extreme scores and normal variation.This evidence of similar etiology across normal variation and the extremes has implications for molecular genetic models of autism spectrum disorders and for conceptualizing autism spectrum disorders as the quantitative extreme of a neurodevelopmental continuum.

Rogers K., Dziobek I., Hassenstab J., Wolf O. T., & Convit A. (2007).

Who cares? Revisiting empathy in Asperger syndrome

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(4), 709-715.

PMID:16906462      [本文引用: 1]

A deficit in empathy has consistently been cited as a central characteristic of Asperger syndrome (AS), but previous research on adults has predominantly focused on cognitive empathy, effectively ignoring the role of affective empathy. We administered the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), a multi-dimensional measure of empathy, and the Strange Stories test to 21 adults with AS and 21 matched controls. Our data show that while the AS group scored lower on the measures of cognitive empathy and theory of mind, they were no different from controls on one affective empathy scale of the IRI (empathic concern), and scored higher than controls on the other (personal distress). Therefore, we propose that the issue of empathy in AS should be revisited.

Ronald A., Happé F., & Plomin R. (2008).

A twin study investigating the genetic and environmental aetiologies of parent, teacher and child ratings of autistic-like traits and their overlap

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 17(8), 473-483.

[本文引用: 1]

Ruscheweyh R., Marziniak M., Stumpenhorst F., Reinholz J., & Knecht S. (2009).

Pain sensitivity can be assessed by self-rating: Development and validation of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire

Pain, 146(1-2), 65-74.

DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.020      PMID:19665301      [本文引用: 1]

Experimental determination of pain sensitivity has received increasing attention because of emerging clinical applications (including prediction of postoperative pain and treatment response) and scientific implications (e.g. it has been proposed that above-average pain sensitivity is a risk factor for the development of chronic pain disorders). However, the use of experimental pain sensitivity assessment on a broad scale is hampered by its requirements on time, equipment and human resources and the fact that it is painful for the tested subject. Alternatives to experimental pain testing are currently lacking. Here we developed a self-rating instrument for the assessment of pain sensitivity, the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) that is based on pain intensity ratings of daily life situations and takes 5-10min to complete. Adequate reliability of the PSQ was confirmed in 354 subjects. In a validation study comprising 47 healthy subjects, the results of comprehensive experimental pain testing, including different modalities (heat, cold, pressure, and pinprick) and different measures (pain thresholds, pain intensity ratings), were compared to the results of the PSQ. PSQ scores were significantly correlated to experimental pain intensity ratings (r = 0.56, p < 0.001) but not to pain thresholds (r = 0.03). Prediction of experimental pain intensity ratings by the PSQ was better than by pain-associated psychological factors (pain catastrophizing, depression, anxiety). This shows that the PSQ may be a simple alternative to experimental pain intensity rating procedures in healthy subjects and makes the PSQ a highly promising tool for clinical and experimental pain research.

Rütgen M., Seidel E.-M., Riečanský I., & Lamm C. (2015).

Reduction of empathy for pain by placebo analgesia suggests functional equivalence of empathy and first-hand emotion experience

Journal of Neuroscience, 35(23), 8938-8947.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3936-14.2015      PMID:26063925      [本文引用: 2]

Previous research in social neuroscience has consistently shown that empathy for pain recruits brain areas that are also activated during the first-hand experience of pain. This has been interpreted as evidence that empathy relies upon neural processes similar to those underpinning the first-hand experience of emotions. However, whether such overlapping neural activations imply that equivalent neural functions are engaged by empathy and direct emotion experiences remains to be demonstrated. We induced placebo analgesia, a phenomenon specifically modulating the first-hand experience of pain, to test whether this also reduces empathy for pain. Subjective and neural measures of pain and empathy for pain were collected using self-report and event-related potentials (ERPs) while participants underwent painful electrical stimulation or witnessed that another person was undergoing such stimulation. Self-report showed decreased empathy during placebo analgesia, and this was mirrored by reduced amplitudes of the pain-related P2, an ERP component indexing neural computations related to the affective-motivational component of pain. Moreover, these effects were specific for pain, as self-report and ERP measures of control conditions unrelated to pain were not affected by placebo analgesia. Together, the present results suggest that empathy seems to rely on neural processes that are (partially) functionally equivalent to those engaged by first-hand emotion experiences. Moreover, they imply that analgesics may have the unwanted side effect of reducing empathic resonance and concern for others.Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/358938-10$15.00/0.

Rütgen M., Seidel E.-M., Silani G., Riečanský I., Hummer A., Windischberger C., Petrovic P., & Lamm C. (2015).

Placebo analgesia and its opioidergic regulation suggest that empathy for pain is grounded in self pain

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(41), E5638-E5646.

[本文引用: 1]

Santiesteban I., Gibbard C., Drucks H., Clayton N., Banissy M. J., & Bird G. (2021).

Individuals with autism share others’ emotions: Evidence from the continuous affective rating and empathic responses (CARER) task

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(2), 391-404.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-020-04535-y      [本文引用: 2]

Sasson N. J., & Bottema-Beutel K. (2022).

Studies of autistic traits in the general population are not studies of autism

Autism, 26(4), 1007-1008.

DOI:10.1177/13623613211058515      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Studies of autistic traits in the general population are becoming increasingly prevalent. In this letter to the editor, we caution researchers against framing and interpreting studies of autistic traits in the general population as extending to autism and implore them to be clear about when their study sample does and does not include autistic participants.

Serbic D., Ferguson L., Nichols G., Smith M., Thomas G., & Pincus T. (2020).

The role of observer’s fear of pain and health anxiety in empathy for pain: An experimental study

British Journal of Pain, 14(2), 74-81.

DOI:10.1177/2049463719842595      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Empathy for pain is influenced by several factors, including observer beliefs. This study aimed to test the associations between empathy for pain, fear of pain and health anxiety.

Sessa P., Meconi F., Castelli L., & Dell’Acqua R. (2014).

Taking one’s time in feeling other-race pain: An event-related potential investigation on the time-course of cross-racial empathy

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(4), 454-463.

DOI:10.1093/scan/nst003      URL     [本文引用: 2]

Sharpe L., Ianiello M., Dear B. F., Perry K. N., Refshauge K., & Nicholas M. K. (2012).

Is there a potential role for attention bias modification in pain patients? Results of 2 randomised, controlled trials

Pain, 153(3), 722-731.

DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2011.12.014      PMID:22281100      [本文引用: 2]

Potential applications of attention bias modification (ABM) for acute and chronic pain patients are investigated. In study 1, 54 acute back pain patients (46 of whom completed the study) were recruited at their initial physiotherapy session and randomised to receive 1 session of ABM or placebo. Patients were followed up 3 months later. Participants who were randomised to receive ABM reported less average (P=0.001) and current pain (P=0.008) and experienced pain for fewer days (P=0.01) than those who received placebo. In study 2, 34 chronic pain patients were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either 4 sessions of ABM (n=22) or placebo (n=12), followed by 8 sessions of cognitive behavioural treatment (CBT). After ABM, there was a significant group-by-time effect for disability. By 6-month follow-up, differences had emerged between the 2 training groups, such that the ABM group had shown greater reductions in anxiety sensitivity and disability than the placebo group. Although the results of these studies show that there is potential in the application of ABM to pain conditions, the mechanisms of treatment could not be established. Neither group showed an initial bias towards the word stimuli or a training effect, and only in the acute pain group were changes in biases related to outcome. Nonetheless, the fact that 2 independent samples showed a positive effect of ABM on clinical outcomes suggests that ABM is worthy of future study as an intervention for pain patients.Copyright © 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. All rights reserved.

Singer T., & Lamm C. (2009).

The social neuroscience of empathy

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 81-96.

[本文引用: 1]

Siu A. M., & Shek D. T. (2005).

Validation of the interpersonal reactivity index in a Chinese context

Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 118-126.

DOI:10.1177/1049731504270384      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Objectives: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (C-IRI) for the assessment of empathy in Chinese people were examined. Method: The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) was translated to Chinese, and an expert panel reviewed its content validity and cultural relevance. The translated instrument (C-IRI) was administered to 189 junior high school students and 391 university students. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a stable hierarchical three-factor structure that was consistent with structure of the English IRI, but the cognitive and emotional aspects of empathy were combined to form a new factor. The subscales of the C-IRI demonstrated acceptable to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Some evidence for the construct validity of the measure was also found. Conclusions: The C-IRI possessed acceptable psychometric properties in Chinese adolescent samples. The present findings suggest that the cognitive and emotional aspects of empathy are not differentiated in Chinese adolescents.

Song Y., Nie T., Shi W., Zhao X., & Yang Y. (2019).

Empathy impairment in individuals with autism spectrum conditions from a multidimensional perspective: A meta-analysis

Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1902.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01902      PMID:31649570      [本文引用: 3]

Although empathy has always been considered to be impaired in individuals with autism spectrum conditions (ASCs), the relevant findings have been inconsistent. The present meta-analysis aims to determine which empathy components are impaired and how culture, gender, and age moderate such empathy impairment. By using "Autism," "Asperger Syndrome," "Empathy," and related Chinese synonyms as keywords, we searched the databases of Weipu, Wanfang, CNKI, Web of Science, Science Direct, SpringerLink, and Elsevier through "subject" and "keyword" searches. We also conducted a manual search according to the references. In total, 51 studies from Eastern and Western countries were included in this meta-analysis, which comprised 144 independent effects, 2,095 individuals with ASCs and 2,869 controls without ASCs. For the retrieved data, Hedge's was taken as the quantitative measure of effect, and CMA V2.0 software was used for publication bias tests (by using Rosenthal's Classic Failsafe- and Egger's methods), heterogeneity tests (by using a -test, -test, and -test) and a moderating effect test (by using a univariate regression model). The results showed that the empathy impairment evident in individuals with ASCs is component specific; that is, trait-cognitive empathy, trait-empathic concern, state-cognitive empathy, and state-empathic concern are impaired, whereas state-empathic accuracy remains intact, and trait-empathic accuracy is superior to the trait-empathic accuracy in neurotypical individuals. The univariate regression model showed that gender moderates the impairment of the trait-empathic concern, trait-empathic accuracy, and state-cognitive empathy in autistic individuals and that age moderates the impairment of the trait-cognitive empathy, trait-empathic accuracy, state-empathic concern, and state-empathic accuracy in autistic individuals. However, culture does not moderate any empathy components (trait-cognitive empathy, trait-empathic concern, or state-cognitive empathy) involved in the present meta-analysis. These findings contribute to ending the controversy over the empathic integrity of individuals with ASCs and shed some light on future research about the empathy impairment of autistic individuals. More specifically, subsequent studies should distinguish specific empathy components and consider the role of gender and age when demonstrating empathy impairment in individuals with ASCs. Moreover, related studies based on Asian collectivist cultural samples and female samples should be further enriched.Copyright © 2019 Song, Nie, Shi, Zhao and Yang.

Sucksmith E., Roth I., & Hoekstra R. A. (2011).

Autistic traits below the clinical threshold: Re-examining the broader autism phenotype in the 21st century

Neuropsychology Review, 21(4), 360-389.

DOI:10.1007/s11065-011-9183-9      PMID:21989834      [本文引用: 1]

Diagnosis, intervention and support for people with autism can be assisted by research into the aetiology of the condition. Twin and family studies indicate that autism spectrum conditions are highly heritable; genetic relatives of people with autism often show milder expression of traits characteristic for autism, referred to as the Broader Autism Phenotype (BAP). In the past decade, advances in the biological and behavioural sciences have facilitated a more thorough examination of the BAP from multiple levels of analysis. Here, the candidate phenotypic traits delineating the BAP are summarised, including key findings from neuroimaging studies examining the neural substrates of the BAP. We conclude by reviewing the value of further research into the BAP, with an emphasis on deriving heritable endophenotypes which will reliably index autism susceptibility and offer neurodevelopmental mechanisms that bridge the gap between genes and a clinical autism diagnosis.

Sullivan M. J. L., Bishop S. R., & Pivik J. (1995).

The pain catastrophizing scale: Development and validation

Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 524-534.

DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Sullivan M. J. L., Martel M. O., Tripp D. A., Savard A., & Crombez G. (2006).

Catastrophic thinking and heightened perception of pain in others

Pain, 123(1-2), 37-44.

DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.007      PMID:16563630      [本文引用: 1]

Past research has shown that pain catastrophizing contributes to heightened pain experience. The hypothesis advanced in this study was that individuals who score high on measures of pain catastrophizing would also perceive more intense pain in others. The study also examined the role of pain behaviour as a determinant of the relation between catastrophizing and estimates of others' pain. To test the hypothesis, 60 undergraduates were asked to view videotapes of individuals taking part in a cold pressor procedure. Each individual in the videotapes was shown three times over the course of a 1min immersion such that the same individual was observed experiencing different levels of pain. Correlational analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between levels of pain catastrophizing and inferred pain intensity, r=.31, p<.01. Follow-up analyses indicated that catastrophizing was associated with a heightened propensity to rely on pain behaviour as a basis for drawing inferences about others' pain experience. Catastrophizing was associated with more accurate pain inferences on only one of three indices of inferential accuracy. The pattern of findings suggests that increasing reliance on pain behaviour as a means of inferring others' pain will not necessarily yield more accurate estimates. Discussion addresses the processes that might underlie the propensity to attend more to others' pain behaviour, and the clinical and interpersonal consequences of perceiving more pain in others.

Takahashi J., Tamaki K., & Yamawaki N. (2013).

Autism spectrum, attachment styles, and social skills in university student

Creative Education, 4(8), 514-520.

DOI:10.4236/ce.2013.48075      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Tonge N. A., Rodebaugh T. L., Fernandez K. C., & Lim M. H. (2016).

Self-reported social skills impairment explains elevated autistic traits in individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder

Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 38, 31-36.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.12.005      PMID:26766150      [本文引用: 1]

Screening for autism in individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD) is complicated by symptom overlap between GSAD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We examined the prevalence of self-reported autistic traits within a sample of participants with a diagnosis of GSAD (n=37) compared to individuals without a GSAD diagnosis (NOSAD; n=26). Of the GSAD sample participants, 70.84% self-reported autistic traits above a cut-off of 65 on the Autism Quotient-Short (AQ-S) and reported significantly more autistic traits on 3 of 5 AQ-S subscales compared to the NOSAD group. Diagnosis uniquely predicted variation in the social skills subscale above and beyond the other subscales and other predictors. Furthermore, variation in the social skills subscale largely explained group differences on the other subscales. Our results suggest caution in utilizing measures like the AQ-S with clinical populations characterized by social difficulties such as individuals with a GSAD diagnosis. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Tracey I. (2011).

Can neuroimaging studies identify pain endophenotypes in humans?

Nature Reviews Neurology, 7(3), 173-181.

DOI:10.1038/nrneurol.2011.4      PMID:21304481      [本文引用: 1]

Pain is a complex, multidimensional experience that has defied our understanding for centuries. Through the advent of noninvasive neuroimaging techniques, we have been able to examine the human brain and its response to nociceptive inputs. As a result, our knowledge of which brain regions are critical for generating an acute pain experience has grown, as has our understanding of how cognitive, emotional, contextual and various physiological factors influence the pain experience. Furthermore, we have been able to identify key processes within the brain that underpin the transition to and maintenance of chronic pain states, as well as highlight the dramatic consequences of chronic pain on the brain's structure and neurochemistry. Building upon this knowledge, we are now in a position to consider whether any of these brain imaging 'phenotypes' of acute or chronic pain should be considered as useful endophenotypes; thereby enabling us to relate the complex genetics that underpin everyday pain sensitivity or chronic pain states to intermediate biomarkers. This endophenotypic approach-the focus of this Review-simplifies the connection between genes and behavior and is needed for complex disorders like chronic pain.

Vasa R. A., Kreiser N. L., Keefer A., Singh V., & Mostofsky S. H. (2018).

Relationships between autism spectrum disorder and intolerance of uncertainty

Autism Research, 11(4), 636-644.

DOI:10.1002/aur.1916      PMID:29316350      [本文引用: 1]

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is a dispositional risk factor involving maladaptive responding under conditions of uncertainty. Recent data indicate that IU is likely elevated in youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and is positively correlated with anxiety. This study examined whether IU may be associated with ASD independent of anxiety. Relationships between anxiety, ASD, and IU were examined in 57 children with ASD without co-occurring intellectual disability and 32 control participants, ages 7-16 years. Hierarchal linear regressions were run to examine whether ASD variables, including emotion dysregulation, were predictive of IU when controlling for anxiety. Severity of social communication deficits, repetitive behaviors, and emotion dysregulation were each related to IU when controlling for the effects of anxiety. When these variables were entered into the regression model together, emotion dysregulation was the only significant predictor of IU. These findings suggest that IU is directly related to features of ASD possibly due to shared genetic, neurological, or psychological underpinnings. Autism Res 2018, 11: 636-644. © 2018 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Youth with ASD without co-occurring intellectual disability experience high levels of intolerance of uncertainty (IU), which is related to anxiety. This study found that IU may also have a relationship with certain aspects of ASD, particularly emotion dysregulation.© 2018 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Wakabayashi A., Baron-Cohen S., & Wheelwright S. (2006).

Are autistic traits an independent personality dimension? A study of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and the NEO-PI-R

Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 873-883.

DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.003      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Wiech K., Ploner M., & Tracey I. (2008).

Neurocognitive aspects of pain perception

Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(8), 306-313.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.005      PMID:18606561      [本文引用: 2]

The perception of pain is sensitive to various mental processes such as the feelings and beliefs that someone has about pain. It is therefore not exclusively driven by the noxious input. Attentional modulation involving the descending pain modulatory system has been examined extensively in neuroimaging studies. However, the investigation of neural mechanisms underlying more complex cognitive modulation is an emerging field in pain research. Recent findings indicate an engagement of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during more complex modulation, leading to a change or reappraisal of the emotional significance of pain. Taking placebo-induced analgesia as an example, we discuss the contribution of attention, expectation and reappraisal as three basic mechanisms that are important for the cognitive modulation of pain.

Yang Z., Jackson T., Chen H., Huang C. Z., Su L., & Gao T. (2016).

The attention bias related to fear of pain and its modification

Advances in Psychological Science, 24(4), 547-555.

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00547      [本文引用: 1]

Fear of pain plays a crucial role in the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Fear of pain appears to have a key role in early stage of attention processing towards pain-related information across different types of stimuli and groups. Considerable evidence indicates associated attention biases reflect hypervigilance that may contribute to perpetuating the focus on pain and interfere with the capacity to attend to non-painful experiences. Modifying attention biases related to fear of pain has the potential to improve pain experience. Future research should use tasks with more ecological validity to investigate information- processing related to fear of pain and its neural substrates. In addition, more research is needed to explore how effective different attention modification strategies are in reducing distress and disability among chronic pain patients.

[杨周, Todd, J., 陈红, 黄承志, 苏琳, 高婷. (2016).

疼痛恐惧相关的注意偏向及其矫正

心理科学进展, 24(4), 547-555. ]

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00547      [本文引用: 1]

疼痛恐惧是影响和维持慢性痛的重要因素。不同材料和被试类型情况下, 疼痛恐惧均主要作用于个体对疼痛相关信息的早期注意加工阶段, 表现为注意警觉模式。该注意模式使个体将注意维持在疼痛上, 从而干扰了对非疼信息的注意能力。矫正疼痛恐惧相关注意偏向可以改善疼痛体验。未来研究应采用更具生态效度的任务测量疼痛恐惧相关的注意偏向及其神经基础, 进一步考察矫正疼痛恐惧相关注意偏向能否改善慢痛患者的忧郁和功能丧失等问题。

Yang Z., Todd J., Meng J., & Chen H. (2013).

The reliability and validity of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III

Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(5), 768-770.

[本文引用: 1]

[杨周, Todd, J., 孟景, 陈红. (2013).

中文版疼痛恐惧问卷-III的信效度

中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 768-770 ]

[本文引用: 1]

Yao J., Li X., Zhang W., Lin X., Lyu X., Lou W., & Peng W. (2021).

Analgesia induced by anodal tDCS and high-frequency tRNS over the motor cortex: Immediate and sustained effects on pain perception

Brain Stimulation, 14(5), 1174-1183.

DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2021.07.011      PMID:34371209      [本文引用: 1]

Many studies have shown effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) and high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, tRNS with direct current (DC)-offset is more likely to lead to increases in cortical excitability than solely tRNS. While a-tDCS over primary motor cortex (M1) has been shown to attenuate pain perception, tRNS with DC-offset may prove as an effective means for pain relief.This study aimed to examine effects of a-tDCS and high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset over M1 on pain expectation and perception, and assess whether these effects could be influenced by the certainty of pain expectation.Using a double-blinded and sham-controlled design, 150 healthy participants were recruited to receive a single-session a-tDCS, high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset, or sham stimulation over M1. The expectation and perception of electrical stimulation in certain and uncertain contexts were assessed at baseline, immediately after, and 30 min after stimulation.Compared with sham stimulation, a-tDCS induced immediate analgesic effects that were greater when the stimulation outcome was expected with uncertainty; tRNS induced immediate and sustained analgesic effects that were mediated by decreasing pain expectation. Nevertheless, we found no strong evidence for tRNS being more effective for attenuating pain than a-tDCS.The analgesic effects of a-tDCS and tRNS showed different temporal courses, which could be related to the more sustained effectiveness of high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset in elevating cortical excitability. Moreover, expectations of pain intensity should be taken into consideration to maximize the benefits of neuromodulation.Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Yap J. C., Lau J., Chen P. P., Gin T., Wong T., Chan I., Chu J., & Wong E. (2008).

Validation of the Chinese Pain Catastrophizing Scale (HK-PCS) in patients with chronic pain

Pain Medicine, 9(2), 186-195.

DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00307.x      PMID:18298701      [本文引用: 1]

This study was conducted to examine the psychometric properties of a Chinese translation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (HK-PCS).Patients aged 18-79 years (N = 130) with chronic nonmalignant pain attending an outpatient multidisciplinary pain center in Hong Kong participated in this cross-sectional study.Subjects completed a set of health-related instruments: HK-PCS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, SF-36 Health Survey, and a general demographic questionnaire. Data were analyzed for the distribution, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity.A satisfactory internal consistency was found (alpha = 0.927). The item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.575 to 0.777. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.969 for the total HK-PCS score, 0.956 for helplessness, 0.945 for magnification, and 0.910 for rumination. Confirmatory factor analysis verified a second-order factor structure with the comparative fit index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation = 0.038, and normed fit index = 0.99 (chi(2) ((58)) = 68.84, P = 0.16). Significant correlations were found for pain intensity, disability, anxiety, and depression (r = 0.223-0.597, P < 0.01). The general health, social function, role emotional, and mental health domains of the SF-36 consistently demonstrated negative association with catastrophizing across all HK-PCS scores (r =-0.279 to -0.396, P < 0.01). No gender difference was noted for HK-PCS scores (P > 0.05), which is contrary to the existing literature.This study has illustrated satisfactory psychometric properties of the HK-PCS. We provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the HK-PCS as an instrument for measuring pain catastrophizing in the Chinese patient with chronic pain.

Zhang W., Li X., Yao J., Ye Q., & Peng W. (2021).

Abnormalities in pain sensitivity among individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from meta-analysis

Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(6), 613-638.

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00613      [本文引用: 2]

<p id="p00005">Pain is defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage. Pain is of vital functional significance, as it signals threat and initiates behavioral adaptations to avoid harm so as to protect the body. Previous studies have shown abnormalities in pain sensitivity among individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which have been associated with their clinical core symptoms, including restricted and repetitive behaviors as well as deficits in social behaviors. Evidence from case studies and surveys suggested the hyposensitivity to pain for individuals with ASD. Nevertheless, results from experimental studies that involved the application of noxious stimulations and psychophysical measurements were heterogeneous, e.g., some studies reported hypersensitivity to pain in ASD individuals, others reported their hyposensitivity or even normal sensitivity to pain. </p> <p id="p00010">These results suggest that the abnormalities of pain sensitivity among individuals with ASD were modality-dependent, with the abnormality selectively applicable to pressure pain or medical pain. Future studies should combine behavioral, physiological, and neuroimaging measures to comprehensively investigate the pain sensitivity profiles of individuals with ASD. The potential link between pain sensitivity and clinical core symptoms among individuals with ASD should be characterized. Relevant results would potentially expand our understanding of ASD neurobiological mechanisms and provide the theoretical basis for pain assessment among individuals with ASD.</p> <p id="p00015">In this study, we utilized a meta-analysis approach to systematically review experimental studies that investigated pain sensitivity among individuals with ASD and were published before August 10, 2020. The meta-analysis was performed according to the rigorous PRISMA Protocol. Studies were included in the analysis if they included both clearly diagnosed ASD individuals and healthy controls, reported data relevant to pain sensitivity, including pain threshold, pain tolerance, pain ratings, and pain-evoked physiological responses. Relevant studies were obtained from databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PubMed by searching for keywords including pain, nociception, autis*, and Asperger. The meta-analysis was conducted in STATA 12, and the effect size<i>Hedge's g</i> with ±95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using a random effect statistical model. Further, we assessed possible moderating effects from variables of pain modality, pain site, the age of involved participants, the sample size of the ASD group and sample locations. </p> <p id="p00020">Sixteen experimental studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total sample size <i>N</i> = 822. Pain threshold was not significantly different between ASD individuals and healthy controls (<i>g</i> = 0.34, 95% CI = [-0.14, 0.82]), and this estimate was moderated by variables of pain modality, the age of involved participants, and the sample size of the ASD group. Specifically, individuals with ASD exhibited lower pain thresholds than those of healthy controls selectively for pressure pain (<i>g</i> = 1.62, 95% CI = [0.46, 2.77]). For the outcome variable of pain evoked physiological response, individuals with ASD showed significantly greater physiological responses to medical procedures than those of healthy controls (<i>g</i>= 2.87, 95% CI = [1.07, 4.67]). Nevertheless, ASD and control groups had comparable pain ratings (<i>g</i> = -0.26, 95% CI = [-0.64, 0.11]). </p>

[张文芸, 李晓云, 姚俊杰, 叶倩, 彭微微. (2021).

自闭症谱系障碍个体的疼痛敏感性异常:来自元分析的证据

心理学报, 53(6), 613-628. ]

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00613      [本文引用: 2]

本研究采用元分析方法, 以疼痛阈限、疼痛诱发生理反应和疼痛评分为结果变量, 考察了自闭症谱系障碍个体(Autism Spectrum Disorder, ASD)的疼痛敏感性异常, 以期为ASD的诊断和干预提供参考。元分析共纳入16项研究(总样本量N = 822)。对于疼痛阈限, ASD组和对照组无显著差异, 但受到疼痛模态等变量的调节作用, 如ASD组的压力疼痛阈限显著低于对照组。对于疼痛诱发生理反应, ASD组对现实医疗疼痛的生理反应强于对照组。然而, ASD组和对照组在疼痛评分上无显著差异。将来研究应结合多模态疼痛刺激和多维度疼痛评估, 系统考察ASD个体的疼痛敏感性及其与临床核心症状之间的联系。

Zhang W., Zhuo S., Li X., & Peng W. (2022).

Autistic traits and empathy for others’ pain among the general population: Test of the mediating effects of first-hand pain sensitivity

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10.1007/s10803-022-05471-9.

[本文引用: 1]

Zhao X., Li X., Song Y., & Shi W. (2019).

Autistic traits and prosocial behaviour in the general population: test of the mediating effects of trait empathy and state empathic concern

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(10), 3925-3938

DOI:10.1007/s10803-018-3745-0      PMID:30203310      [本文引用: 2]

Although the core characteristics associated with autistic traits are impaired social interactions, there are few studies examining how autistic traits translate into prosocial behaviour in daily life. The current study explored the effect of autistic traits on prosocial behaviour and the mediating role of multimodal empathy (trait empathy and state empathic concern). The results showed that autistic traits reduced prosocial behaviour directly and indirectly through complex mediation by multimodal empathy. The findings revealed the internal mechanism of autistic traits impeding prosocial behaviour and expanded our understandings of social behaviour in autism spectrum conditions (ASCs) and autistic traits in the general population. Furthermore, the results have implications for social adaptability interventions for individuals with ASCs and high levels of autistic traits.

Zhou L., Wei H., Zhang H., Li X., Bo C., Wan L., Lu X., & Hu L. (2019).

The influence of expectancy level and personal characteristics on placebo effects: Psychological underpinnings

Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 20

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00020      PMID:30804816      [本文引用: 1]

Placebo effects benefit a wide range of clinical practice, which can be profoundly influenced by expectancy level and personal characteristics. However, research on the issue of whether these factors independently or interdependently affect the placebo effects is still in its infancy. Here, we adopted a 3-day between-subject placebo analgesia paradigm (2-day conditioning and 1-day test) to investigate the influence of expectancy levels (i.e., No, Low, and High) and personal characteristics (i.e., gender, dispositional optimism, and anxiety state) on placebo effects in 120 healthy participants (60 females). Our results showed that the reduction of pain intensity in the test phase was influenced by the interaction between expectancy and gender, as mainly reflected by greater reductions of pain intensity in females at Low expectancy level than females at No/High expectancy levels, and greater reductions of pain intensity in males than in females at High expectancy level. Additionally, the reduction of pain unpleasantness was not only modulated by the interaction between expectancy and gender, but also by the interaction between expectancy and dispositional optimism, as well as the interaction between expectancy and anxiety state. Specifically, participants who were more optimistic in Low expectancy group, or those who were less anxious in High expectancy group showed greater reductions of pain unpleasantness. To sum up, we emphasized on regulating the expectancy level individually based on the assessment of personal characteristics to maximize placebo effects in clinical conditions.

Ziermans T., de Bruijn Y., Dijkhuis R., Staal W., & Swaab H. (2019).

Impairments in cognitive empathy and alexithymia occur independently of executive functioning in college students with autism

Autism, 23(6), 1519-1530.

DOI:10.1177/1362361318817716      PMID:30547668      [本文引用: 2]

Reduced empathy and alexithymic traits are common across the autism spectrum, but it is unknown whether this is also true for intellectually advanced adults with autism spectrum disorder. The aim of this study was to examine whether college students with autism spectrum disorder experience difficulties with empathy and alexithymia, and whether this is associated with their cognitive levels of executive functioning. In total, 53 college students with autism spectrum disorder were compared to a gender-matched group of 29 neurotypical students on cognitive and affective dimensions of empathy and alexithymia. In addition, cognitive performance on executive functioning was measured with computerized and paper-and-pencil tasks. The autism spectrum disorder group scored significantly lower on cognitive empathy and higher on cognitive alexithymia (both  = 0.65). The difference on cognitive empathy also remained significant after controlling for levels of cognitive alexithymia. There were no group differences on affective empathy and alexithymia. No significant relations between executive functioning and cognitive alexithymia or cognitive empathy were detected. Together, these findings suggest that intellectually advanced individuals with autism spectrum disorder experience serious impairments in the cognitive processing of social-emotional information. However, these impairments cannot be attributed to individual levels of cognitive executive functioning.

Zuluaga Valencia J. B., Marín Correa L. Y., & Becerra Espinosa A. M. (2018).

Theory of mind and empathy in children with Asperger syndrome diagnosis and a control group

Psicogente, 21(39), 88-101.

[本文引用: 1]

/


版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
地址:北京市朝阳区林萃路16号院 
邮编:100101 
电话:010-64850861 
E-mail:xuebao@psych.ac.cn
备案编号:京ICP备10049795号-1 京公网安备110402500018号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发