ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报

• •    

人工智能面试官的性别和专业性对求职者反应的影响:信任的中介作用(智管专刊)

王丽娜, 郑璐, Alexander Scott English, 赵腾, 李海蓉   

  1. 华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北 430074 中国
    温州肯恩大学人文学院文化行为研究中心, 浙江 325060 中国
    南开大学商学院, 天津 300071 中国
    中国人民大学劳动人事学院, 北京 100872 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-16 修回日期:2026-08-18 接受日期:2026-08-21
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72472057); 中央高校基本科研业务费资助(HUST: 2024WKYXQN026); 国家自然科学基金青年项目(72101257); 国家自然科学基金青年项目(72401147); 国家自然科学基金重点项目(72132001)

The Effects of AI Interviewers' Gender and Professionalism on Job Applicant Reactions: The Mediating Role of Trust

WANG Lina, ZHENG Lu, Alexander Scott ENGLISH, ZHAO Teng, LI Hairong, JIANG Yan   

  1. , 430074, China
    , 325060, China
    , 300071, China
    , 100872, China
  • Received:2025-12-16 Revised:2026-08-18 Accepted:2026-08-21

摘要: 人工智能面试正在成为组织招聘流程中的重要工具,越来越多的求职者需要与人工智能面试官而非人类面试官互动。在这一背景下,理解人工智能面试官外在形象特征如何影响求职者反应尤为关键。本文基于相似吸引理论,通过两个面试模拟实验和一个基于真实求职者的经验取样法研究发现:(1)人工智能面试官-求职者性别一致能够提升求职者对面试官的信任,并进一步降低其感知怪异感和隐私顾虑;(2)面试官形象专业性起到了调节作用,当面试官形象专业性低时,求职者更依赖性别一致线索,性别一致通过面试官信任影响感知怪异感和隐私顾虑的间接效应更为显著。研究结果有助于更好地促进相似吸引理论在人机互动中的应用,也有助于我们理解人工智能面试官外在形象设计对求职者情绪和认知反应的影响,为人工智能面试的设计提供实践参考和提升方案。

关键词: 人工智能面试官, 信任, 形象专业性, 求职者反应, 相似吸引理论

Abstract: AI interviews are becoming an increasingly integral component of organizational recruitment processes, leading to more applicants interacting with AI interviewers rather than human ones. In this context, it is crucial to understand how the appearance cues of AI interviewers influence applicants’ reactions. Drawing on similarity-attraction theory, this study proposed that gender congruence between AI interviewers and applicants would enhance applicants’ trust in the interviewer, which in turn reduced their emotional creepiness and privacy concerns. Additionally, the professional appearance of the AI interviewer influenced this process. When the interviewer appeared unprofessional, applicants leaned more on gender-related cues. As a result, the indirect effects of gender congruence on emotional creepiness and privacy concerns—through the aspect of trust—became more significant. To test our hypotheses, we conducted two scenario-based experiments and one experience sampling study. Study 1 employed a 2 (gender congruent vs. gender incongruent) × 2 (high vs. low professional appearance) between-subjects design to examine the mediating role of trust in the relationship between gender congruence and applicants’ emotional creepiness and privacy concerns, and the moderating role of the interviewer’s professional appearance. We recruited 440 participants with interview experience from Credamo and selected the Chinese AI interviewer appearances for the formal study based on a pretest. Participants watched a video simulation of an interview. Study 2 used an experience sampling method involving 112 job-seeking university students from five universities who participated in a 30-day daily survey, reporting on their experiences and perceptions of AI interviews for one month. Study 3 replicated the design of Study 2—a 2 × 2 between-subjects experiment—and examined whether the findings extended to AI interviewers of other racial backgrounds. A separate pretest was conducted to select the non-Chinese AI interviewer appearances used in the study. Study 1 demonstrated that applicants’ trust in the AI interviewer mediated the effect of gender congruence on emotional creepiness and privacy concerns, and that this indirect effect was moderated by the interviewer’s professional appearance. Specifically, when the AI interviewer’s professional appearance was low, applicants relied more heavily on gender-congruent cues, thereby strengthening the positive effect of gender congruence on trust and further reducing emotional creepiness and privacy concerns. When professional appearance was high, this reliance was attenuated. Study 2 further confirmed that gender congruence between AI interviewers and applicants enhances trust in the interviewer, which in turn reduces applicants’ emotional creepiness, while again supporting the moderating role of the interviewer’s professional appearance. However, the within-person variance of privacy concerns did not reach significance in this study, indicating that applicants’ privacy concerns remained relatively stable across different AI interview contexts. Study 3 extended these findings to a cross‐cultural context, showing that even when applicants interacted with AI interviewers of a different racial background, gender congruence similarly fostered trust and subsequently reduced emotional creepiness and privacy concerns. Across studies, the interviewer’s professional appearance consistently moderated these effects, highlighting its importance in shaping applicant reactions to AI interviewers. This research advances the understanding of applicant reactions in AI interviewing by shifting the focus from system functionality to the design of the AI interviewer’s appearance. We identify two key appearance cues—gender congruence and professional appearance—and demonstrate that they influence trust in AI interviewers and subsequent applicant reactions. Second, this research extends similarity-attraction theory to AI recruitment, demonstrating that applicants apply human-like social categorization to AI interviewers: gender similarity enhances perceived similarity and increases trust. Finally, this research enriches the literature on AI anthropomorphism by revealing a compensatory mechanism among appearance cues. A professional appearance acts as a strong cue that anchors trust judgments, diminishing the effect of weaker cues, such as gender congruence. When professionalism is low, applicants rely more heavily on gender similarity to reduce uncertainty.

Key words: AI interviewer, Trust, Professional appearance, Applicant reaction, Similarity-attraction theory