ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (8): 1391-1413.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1391 cstr: 32110.14.2025.1391

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

高水平足球裁判员判罚决策的优势及神经机制

水祎舟1,2, 车翔2, 赵治豪1, 张禹3, 李杰4, 刘晨涛5, 密思雨5, 万炳军1(), 游旭群2()   

  1. 1.陕西师范大学体育学院, 西安 710119
    2.陕西师范大学心理学院, 西安 710065
    3.北京体育大学心理学院, 北京 100084
    4.杭州师范大学临床医学院, 杭州 311121
    5.西北大学体育教研部, 西安 710127
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-19 发布日期:2025-05-22 出版日期:2025-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 万炳军, E-mail: bingjunw55@snnu.edu.cn;
    游旭群, E-mail: youxuqun@snnu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:第一联系人:水祎舟和车翔是本文的共同第一作者。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(22CTY008);中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2024T170538)

Performance and cognitive neuromechanisms of high-level football referees' foul decision-making

SHUI Yizhou1,2, CHE Xiang2, ZHAO Zhihao1, ZHANG Yu3, LI Jie4, LIU Chentao5, MI Siyu5, WAN Bingjun1(), YOU Xuqun2()   

  1. 1. School of Physical Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
    2. School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710065, China
    3. School of Psychology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
    4. School of Clinical Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
    5. School of Physical Education, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
  • Received:2024-09-19 Online:2025-05-22 Published:2025-08-25

摘要: 足球裁判员的判罚决策不仅关乎着比赛的程序公平, 还对比赛结果有着重要影响。本研究结合决策的感知、多线索处理、决策形成三阶段模型及功能性近红外脑成像技术, 通过比较国家级及以上、一级和三级足球裁判员对不同犯规程度时判罚决策的行为及神经活动差异, 尝试揭示高水平足球裁判员判罚决策的行为及神经活动特点。结果发现, 相比于一级和三级裁判员, 国家级及以上裁判员在面对较轻犯规程度时, 其判罚决策的正确率更高; 该群体在在战术影响和最终判罚决策中表现出更广泛的前额叶−枕叶协同激活模式。此外, 国家级裁判的判罚正确率与特定脑区激活存在相关性:侵犯等级决策中, 中度犯规时双侧前额叶及前扣带回激活更强; 战术影响决策中, 枕叶与额下回参与程度随犯规程度变化; 最终判罚时, 重度犯规激活双侧枕叶多个亚区。研究表明, 高水平足球裁判员的判罚决策优势可能源于前额叶−枕叶激活反映的高效的感知与多线索处理的整合能力, 为裁判员选拔与培训提供了神经科学依据。

关键词: 足球裁判员, 判罚决策, 犯规程度, 决策类型, 功能性近红外光谱成像技术

Abstract:

The appropriateness of referees' decision-making in sports not only concerns the procedural fairness of the game process but also significantly affects the outcome of the match. Therefore, enhancing the quality and efficiency of referees' decision-making on the field is an urgent practical issue that needs to be addressed. This study attempts to provide insights from basic research into the resolution of this question by clarifying the behavioral manifestations and neural mechanisms of high-level football referees' decision-making. Considering the special requirements of football match rules, which is that the final decision-making is manifested as a comprehensive decision of “degree of infringement + tactical impact,” this study comprehensively considers three types of decisions in the experimental tasks: “degree of infringement,” “tactical impact,” and the comprehensive “final decision (degree of infringement + tactical impact).”

A total of 129 football referees at the national level and above, as well as first and third-level referees. They were recruited to perform decision-making tasks with 114 trials of 8 s foul videos (4 s vista +4 s close-up). A mixed experimental design was adopted in this study with three factors: 3 (referee level: national and above, first level, third level) × 3 (decision type: degree of infringement, tactical impact, final decision) × 4 (degree of foul: none, mild, moderate, severe). In this design, referee level is a between-subjects variable, while decision type and degree of foul are within-subjects variables. Decision-making behavior indicators were recorded, and functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to synchronously collect Hemoglobin Oxygen (HbO) during the decision-making tasks.

After conducting the experiment with the designed tasks and data collection methods, the following differences and relationships in referees' decision-making processes were discovered. 1) The reaction time for decision-making regarding tactical impact was longer than that for the severity of the infringement and the final decision for referees of all levels. National-level and above football referees had higher decision-making accuracy for “none” and “light” foul severity across all decision types compared to first and third-level referees, which corresponds to the activation of the left precuneus. 2) National-level and above referees showed different brain activation patterns compared to referees of other levels during decision-making: under the condition of tactical impact, there was stronger activation in the left superior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, and right middle occipital gyrus; under the condition of infringement severity, there was stronger activation in the superior frontal gyrus and right middle occipital gyrus. 3) National-level and above referees had a greater association between correct decision-making in tactical impact and final decision-making and the prefrontal and occipital brain regions.

Based on the above-mentioned research findings, we can draw the following inferences about the characteristics and mechanisms of high-level football referees' decision-making. 1) Decision-making for “none” and “light” foul severity is a primary advantage for high-level football referees. 2) High-level football referees exhibit stronger activation in corresponding brain regions when making decisions on infringement severity and tactical impact, confirming the role of the referee's experience level and the three-stage decision-making model in football refereeing decisions. 3) High-level referees have a close relationship with the prefrontal and occipital cortices during tactical impact and final decision-making, leading to a cautious and efficient decision-making process.

Key words: football referees, foul decision making, foul level, decision type, functional near-infrared spectroscopy

中图分类号: