ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (7): 1170-1186.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1170 cstr: 32110.14.2025.1170

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

联合行动情境对个体时间知觉的影响

汪俊1,2(), 郑峥1,2()   

  1. 1.浙江师范大学心理学院
    2.浙江省儿童青少年心理健康与危机干预智能实验室, 金华 321004
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2025-04-24 出版日期:2025-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 郑峥, E-mail: zhengz@zjnu.edu.cn;
    汪俊, E-mail: jun.wang@zjnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育规划项目“基于多元融合目标的同伴介入法对自闭症儿童融合教育的促进机制研究”(BBA240045)

The effect of joint action contexts on time perception

WANG Jun1,2(), ZHENG Zheng1,2()   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University
    2. Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory for the Mental Health and Crisis Intervention of Children and Adolescents, Jinhua 321004, China
  • Received:2023-03-20 Online:2025-04-24 Published:2025-07-25

摘要:

以往研究大多从个体水平上探究时间知觉偏差来源, 但鲜有研究关注社会情境下的时间知觉偏差机制。本研究结合联合行动情景和时间二分任务范式, 系统探究了联合行动情境对个体时间知觉的影响机制。实验1发现, 相对于单人情境, 联合情境下个体长时距的主观相等点向同伴短时距任务区间显著偏移(即主观相等点下降), 且时间知觉敏感性显著下降。实验2通过操纵信念激发共同表征, 并通过同伴不在场削弱社会促进强度。结果显示, 相较于单人情境, 个体在信念情景下表现出与联合情境类似的主观相等点偏移, 但时间知觉敏感性无显著变化。实验3中通过操纵同伴的任务目标为非时间估计任务来削弱共同表征的影响, 同时通过操纵同伴在场激发社会促进。结果显示, 相较于单人情境, 个体的时间知觉敏感性显著下降, 但主观相等点无显著偏移。综上, 联合行动情境中个体通过共同表征机制表征同伴的时距任务信息, 从而导致时间估计发生偏移; 而当他人在场竞争注意资源时, 个体时间知觉敏感性会显著降低。

关键词: 时间知觉, 联合行动, 共同表征, 社会促进

Abstract:

Previous studies have primarily focused on exploring the sources of time perception bias at an individual level, but few studies have investigated the mechanisms behind time perception bias in social contexts. To address this gap, the present study combined joint action and time perception paradigms with the goal of investigating time perception in social contexts and further examining the mechanisms of co-representation and/or social facilitation in joint temporal perception through three experiments.

This study used a between-subject 2 × 2 experimental design, with the factors of context (individual vs. joint) and duration distribution (short intervals vs. long intervals). The stimulus durations were 400 ms or 1000 ms for the short interval group, and 1000 ms or 1600 ms for the long interval group. The varying intervals were indicated by yellow or green circles. Participants initially completed a learning task alone and were then randomly assigned to either an individual or joint context to complete a practice task. In the joint context, two participants who were unfamiliar with each other practiced with different temporal intervals and completed the experiment together. In the individual context, one participant sat alone on the left or right side of the screen to complete the experiment. During the learning phase, participants became familiar with the short- and long-interval stimuli. In the practice phase, solid orange circles of varying durations (from 400 ms to 1000 ms, in 100 ms increments) or solid green circles (from 1000 ms to 1600 ms, in 100 ms increments) were randomly shown on the screen. Participants then judged whether the duration of the stimulus was “short” or “long” based on criteria presented during the learning phase.

In Experiment 1, we found that individuals’ subjective equivalence points were significantly altered, and their sensitivity to time perception was notably reduced in joint situations compared to individual situations. In Experiment 2, we stimulated co-representation by manipulating participants’ beliefs, and the absence of peers reduced the influence of social inhibition. Individuals had similar shifts in subjective equivalence points as observed in joint situations, but there was no significant change in temporal perceptual sensitivity. In Experiment 3, co-representation was attenuated by giving the peer a non-temporal estimation task, while the presence of peers elicited social inhibition. These findings demonstrated a significant decrease in individuals’ time-perception sensitivity compared to the individual situation, but no significant shift in subjective equivalence points was observed.

In summary, the present study suggests that individuals in joint action contexts represent their peers’ task information through the mechanism of co-representation, which introduces bias in time estimation. Additionally, the presence of others creates competition for attentional resources, leading to a reduction in individuals’ sensitivity to time perception in joint action contexts.

Key words: time perception, joint action, co-representation, social facilitation

中图分类号: