心理科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1189-1207.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1189 cstr: 32111.14.2026.1189
胡艾新, 马滢, 呼雨欣, 庹敏, 曾烁, 王庭照
收稿日期:2025-06-18
出版日期:2026-07-15
发布日期:2026-05-11
通讯作者:
王庭照, E-mail: wangtingzhao@snnu.edu.cn
基金资助:HU Aixin, MA Ying, HU Yuxin, TUO Min, ZENG Shuo, WANG Tingzhao
Received:2025-06-18
Online:2026-07-15
Published:2026-05-11
摘要: 视觉工作记忆是短时视觉信息存储与在线加工的核心认知系统, 其信息加工灵活性依赖内部注意的定向调控。回溯线索范式是探究二者关系的关键工具, 其通过在记忆阵列之后、探测测试之前呈现线索, 引发回溯线索效益, 以直观反映内部注意选择优势。本研究基于连续资源模型, 系统梳理相关研究表明:内部注意选择优势的形成以工作记忆巩固程度为前提, 这一前提决定了回溯线索效用的发挥; 在此基础上, 需依托持续注意维持目标表征的稳定激活, 并通过提升决策阶段的信息积累质量, 实现记忆表现的优化。而时间进程、记忆项变化、线索变化以及外部干扰, 通过调节工作记忆资源分配效率与表征稳定性, 动态影响内部注意选择效果。据此, 本研究构建了一个整合内部注意选择优势产生机制及其与影响因素交互关系的认知模型。基于此模型, 未来研究应进一步关注主动抑制机制、复杂刺激加工及神经发育障碍人群的内部注意特征, 从而为深入理解内部注意对视觉工作记忆中信息灵活管理的过程提供新视角。
中图分类号:
胡艾新, 马滢, 呼雨欣, 庹敏, 曾烁, 王庭照. (2026). 视觉工作记忆中内部注意选择优势是如何产生的? 基于回溯线索范式视角. 心理科学进展 , 34(7), 1189-1207.
HU Aixin, MA Ying, HU Yuxin, TUO Min, ZENG Shuo, WANG Tingzhao. (2026). How the internal attention selection advantage emerges in visual working memory: Evidence from the retro-cue paradigm. Advances in Psychological Science, 34(7), 1189-1207.
| [1] 付凯. (2020). 视觉工作记忆中内部注意优先化选择的灵活性有限 [硕士学位论文]. 辽宁师范大学. [2] 付凯, 王天昊, 梁腾飞, 付雪莹, 刘强. (2020). 视觉工作记忆中的内部注意选择: 效果、特性及机制.心理科学, 43(6), 1333-1340. [3] 龙芳芳, 李昱辰, 陈晓宇, 李子媛, 梁腾飞, 刘强. (2019). 视觉工作记忆的巩固加工: 时程、模式及机制.心理科学进展, 27(8), 1404-1416. [4] 潘志虎, 刘茹邑, 郭利静, 叶超雄. (2024). 视觉工作记忆中干扰对回溯线索收益的影响.四川师范大学学报(自然科学版), 47(2), 179-187. [5] 王一峰, 唐雨竹, 肖坤辰, 荆秀娟. (2025). 持续性注意低频波动的机制与干预.心理科学进展, 33(7), 1091-1103. [6] 叶超雄, 胡中华, 梁腾飞, 张加峰, 许茜如, 刘强. (2020). 视觉工作记忆回溯线索效应的产生机制: 认知阶段分离.心理学报, 52(4), 399-413. [7] Ahmad J., Swan G., Bowman H., Wyble B., Nobre A. C., Shapiro K. L., & McNab F. (2017). Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 4785. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05011-X [8] Barth, A., & Schneider, D. (2018). Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference. Psychophysiology, 55(7), e13062. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13062 [9] Bays P. M., Schneegans S., Ma W. J., & Brady T. F. (2024). Representation and computation in visual working memory. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(6), 1016-1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01871-2 [10] Berryhill M. E., Richmond L. L., Shay C. S.,& Olson, I. R.(2012). Shifting attention among working memory representations: Testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 426-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.593605 [11] Capodieci A., Ruffini C., Frascari A., Rivella C., Bombonato C., Giaccherini S.,… Pecini, C.(2023). Executive functions in children with specific learning disorders: Shedding light on a complex profile through teleassessment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 142, 104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104621 [12] Cepeda-Freyre H. A., Garcia-Aguilar G., Eguibar J. R., & Cortes C. (2020). Brain processing of complex geometric forms in a visual memory task increases P2 amplitude. Brain Sciences, 10(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10020114 [13] Chen S., Töllner T., Müller H. J., & Conci M. (2024). ERPs and alpha oscillations track the encoding and maintenance of object-based representations in visual working memory. Psychophysiology, 61(7), e14557. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14557 [14] Chen W., Ye S., Ding X., Shen M., & Gao Z. (2024). Selectively maintaining an object's feature in visual working memory: A comparison between highly discriminable and fine-grained features. Memory & Cognition, 53(3), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01612-w [15] Chen Z., Sun Q., & Li X. (2023). Differences of resource allocation to active and passive states in visual working memory. Psychological Research, 87(6), 1761-1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01772-x [16] Daume J., Kamiński J., Salimpour Y., Schjetnan A. G.P., Anderson, W. S., Valiante, T. A., … Rutishauser, U.(2024). Persistent activity during working memory maintenance predicts long-term memory formation in the human hippocampus. Neuron, 112(23), 3957-3968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.013 [17] Ding Y., Postle B. R., & van Ede F. (2024). Neural signatures of competition between voluntary and involuntary influences over the focus of attention in visual working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 36(5), 815-827. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02123 [18] Dube B., Lumsden A., & Al-Aidroos N. (2019). Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 641-646. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1533-7 [19] Echeverria-Altuna I., Boettcher S. E., van Ede F., & Nobre A. C. (2025). Sensory and motor contents are prioritized dynamically in working memory. PLOS Biology, 23(7), e3003273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003273 [20] Ester E. F.,& Nouri, A.(2023). Internal selective attention is delayed by competition between endogenous and exogenous factors. iScience, 262023.107259 [21] Ester E. F., Nouri A., & Rodriguez L. (2018). Retrospective cues mitigate information loss in human cortex during working memory storage. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(40), 8538-8548. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1566-18.2018 [22] Fan L., Zhang L., Diao L., Xu M., Chen R., & Zhang X. (2021). Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(3), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820966264 [23] Fu X., Ye C., Hu Z., Li Z., Liang T.,& Liu, Q.(2022). The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms. Biological Psychology, 170, 108320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108320 [24] Gao C., Zhang Q., & Zhang X. (2023). Active inhibition of the retro-cue effect in visual working memory: Evidence from event-related potential. i-Perception, 14(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695231182290 [25] Gresch D., Behnke L., van Ede F., Nobre A. C., & Boettcher S. E. (2025). Neural dynamics of reselecting visual and motor contents in working memory after external interference. Journal of Neuroscience, 45(18), e2347242025. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2347-24.2025 [26] Gressmann M.,& Janczyk, M.(2016). The (Un)clear effects of invalid retro-cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00244 [27] Günseli E., Fahrenfort J. J., van Moorselaar D., Daoultzis K. C., Meeter M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2019). EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 13499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0 [28] Gunseli E., van Moorselaar D., Meeter M., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2015). The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1334-1341. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0796-x [29] Guo L., Nie D., Liu P., Zhang L., & Ye C. (2025). Color first, space next, orientation last: A temporal comparison of retro-cue effects in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01789-8 [30] Hajonides J. E., van Ede F. V., Stokes M. G., & Nobre A. C. (2020). Comparing the prioritization of items and feature-dimensions in visual working memory. Journal of Vision, 20(8), 25. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.8.25 [31] Han, S., & Ku, Y. (2022). Mnemonic attention in analogy to perceptual attention: Harmony but not uniformity. Psychological Research, 86(4), 1274-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01556-9 [32] Han S., Zhou H., Tian Y.,& Ku, Y.(2023). Early top-down control of internal selection induced by retrospective cues in visual working memory: Advantage of peripheral over central cues. Progress in Neurobiology, 230, 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102521 [33] Hao R., Becker M. W., Ye C., Liu Q., & Liu T. (2018). The bandwidth of VWM consolidation varies with the stimulus feature: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(5), 767-777. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000488 [34] Hollingworth, A., & Maxcey-Richard, A. M. (2013). Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39(4), 1047-1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/a003023 [35] Hou L., Yang J., Xu L., Peng J., Joyce Law C. Y., & Chen T. (2023). Activation of brain regions associated with working memory and inhibitory control in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: A systematic review. Current Medical Imaging, 19(8), 865-873. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405618666220822101019 [36] Kuo B. C., Lin S. H.,& Yeh, Y. Y.(2018). Functional interplay of top-down attention with affective codes during visual short-term memory maintenance. Cortex, 103, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.003 [37] Kuo B. C., Rotshtein P.,& Yeh, Y. Y.(2011). Attentional modulation of perceptual comparison for feature binding. Brain and Cognition, 772011.10.001 [38] Kuo B. C., Yeh Y. Y., Chen A. J.W., & D'Esposito, M.(2011). Functional connectivity during top-down modulation of visual short-term memory representations. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1589-1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.043 [39] Lepsien J., Thornton I.,& Nobre, A. C.(2011). Modulation of working-memory maintenance by directed attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1569-1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.011 [40] Li H. H., Sprague T. C., Yoo A. H., Ma W. J., & Curtis C. E. (2025). Neural mechanisms of resource allocation in working memory. Science Advances, 11(15), eadr8015. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adr8015 [41] Liljefors J., Almeida R., Rane G., Lundström J. N., Herman P., & Lundqvist M. (2024). Distinct functions for beta and alpha bursts in gating of human working memory. Nature Communications, 15(1), 8950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53257-7 [42] Lin Y. T., Sasin E., & Fougnie D. (2021). Selection in working memory is resource-demanding: Concurrent task effects on the retro-cue effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(4), 1600-1612. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02239-0 [43] Liu Q., Yin X., Guo L., & Ye C. (2024). Influence of presentation duration on filtering of irrelevant stimuli in visual working memory. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 469. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01969-2 [44] Liu R., Guo L., Lin X., Nie D., Astikainen P.,& Ye, C.(2024). Dimension-based retro-cue benefit in working memory does not require unfocused dimension removal. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1433405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433405 [45] Liu R., Guo L., Sun H. J., Parviainen T., Zhou Z., Cheng Y., .. Ye C. (2023). Sustained attention required for effective dimension-based retro-cue benefit in visual working memory. Journal of Vision, 23(5), 13. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.5.13 [46] Luo T., Huang L., & Tian M. (2023). Retro-cue effect: The retro-cue is effective when and only when working memory consolidation is inadequate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(9), 1439-1458. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001225 [47] Luo X., Guo J., Liu L., Zhao X., Li D., Li H., .. Sun, L.(2019). The neural correlations of spatial attention and working memory deficits in adults with ADHD. NeuroImage: Clinical, 22, 101728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101728 [48] Makovski T.,& Pertzov, Y.(2015). Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 682015.1049623 [49] Matsukura M., Luck S. J., & Vecera S. P. (2007). Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? Perception & Psychophysics, 69(8), 1422-1434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192957 [50] Mössing, W. A., & Busch, N. A. (2020). Lateralized alpha oscillations are irrelevant for the behavioral retro-cueing benefit in visual working memory. PeerJ, 8, e9398. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9398 [51] Myers N. E., Stokes M. G.,& Nobre, A. C.(2017). Prioritizing information during working memory: Beyond sustained internal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(6), 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.010 [52] Ngiam, W. X. Q. (2024). Mapping visual working memory models to a theoretical framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31(2), 442-459. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02356-5 [53] Niklaus M., Nobre A. C., & van Ede F. (2017). Feature- based attentional weighting and spreading in visual working memory. Scientific Reports, 7, 42384. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42384 [54] Niklaus M., Singmann H.,& Oberauer, K.(2019). Two distinct mechanisms of selection in working memory: Additive last-item and retro-cue benefits. Cognition, 183, 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.015 [55] Pacheco-Estefan D., Fellner M. C., Kunz L., Zhang H., Reinacher P., Roy C., .. Axmacher N. (2024). Maintenance and transformation of representational formats during working memory prioritization. Nature Communications, 15(1), 8234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52541-w [56] Paluch K., Magnuski M., Średniawa W., Ivanovski D., Rysz A., Służewska-Niedźwiedź M., .. Kamiński J. (2025). Unattended working memory items are coded by persistent activity in human medial temporal lobe neurons. Nature Human Behaviour, 9(10), 2099-2113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02235-0 [57] Panichello, M. F., & Buschman, T. J. (2021). Shared mechanisms underlie the control of working memory and attention. Nature, 592(7855), 601-605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03390-w [58] Pertzov Y., Bays P. M., Joseph S., & Husain M. (2013). Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030947 [59] Poch C., Carretie L.,& Campo, P.(2017). A dual mechanism underlying alpha lateralization in attentional orienting to mental representation. Biological Psychology, 128, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.015 [60] Poth, C. H. (2020). Prioritization in visual working memory enhances memory retention and speeds up processing in a comparison task. Cognitive Processing, 21(3), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00967-7 [61] Printzlau F. A., Myers N. E., Manohar S. G., & Stokes M. G. (2022). Neural reinstatement tracks spread of attention between object features in working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(9), 1681-1701. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01879 [62] Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2013). Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1075-1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031172 [63] Rerko L., Souza A. S., & Oberauer K. (2014). Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention. Memory & Cognition, 42(5), 712-728. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0392-8 [64] Riddle J., McPherson T., Sheikh A., Shin H., Hadar E., & Frohlich F. (2024). Internal representations are prioritized by frontoparietal theta connectivity and suppressed by alpha oscillation dynamics: Evidence from concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation EEG and invasive EEG. Journal of Neuroscience, 44(15), e1381232024. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1381-23.2024 [65] Sahu P. P.,& Tseng, P.(2021). Frontoparietal theta tACS nonselectively enhances encoding, maintenance, and retrieval stages in visuospatial working memory. Neuroscience Research, 172, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2021.05.005 [66] Sasin, E., & Fougnie, D. (2020). Memory-driven capture occurs for individual features of an object. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 19499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76431-5 [67] Schneider D., Barth A., Getzmann S.,& Wascher, E.(2017). On the neural mechanisms underlying the protective function of retroactive cuing against perceptual interference: Evidence by event-related potentials of the EEG. Biological Psychology, 124, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.01.006 [68] Schneider D., Barth A.,& Wascher, E.(2017). On the contribution of motor planning to the retroactive cuing benefit in working memory: Evidence by mu and beta oscillatory activity in the EEG. NeuroImage, 162, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.057 [69] Schneider D., Mertes C., & Wascher E. (2016). The time course of visuo-spatial working memory updating revealed by a retro-cuing paradigm. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 21442. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21442 [70] Sewell D. K., Lilburn S. D., & Smith P. L. (2016). Object selection costs in visual working memory: A diffusion model analysis of the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(11), 1673-1693. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040213 [71] Shepherdson P., Oberauer K., & Souza A. S. (2018). Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(2), 286-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000448 [72] Smith P. L., Lilburn S. D., Corbett E. A., Sewell D. K.,& Kyllingsbæk, S.(2016). The attention-weighted sample- size model of visual short-term memory: Attention capture predicts resource allocation and memory load. Cognitive Psychology, 89, 71-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.07.002 [73] Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2016). In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1839-1860. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5 [74] Souza A. S., Rerko L., & Oberauer K. (2016). Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(6), 890-910. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000192 [75] Stemmann, H., & Freiwald, W. A. (2019). Evidence for an attentional priority map in inferotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(47), 23797-23805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821866116 [76] Superbia-Guimarães,L., Bader, M., & Camos, V.(2022). Attentional orienting in working memory in children with ADHD. Developmental Neuropsychology, 472022.2155164 [77] Tanoue, R. T., & Berryhill, M. E. (2012). The mental wormhole: Internal attention shifts without regard for distance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1199-1215. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0305-0 [78] Tomić, I., & Bays, P. M. (2024). A dynamic neural resource model bridges sensory and working memory. eLife, 13, e91034. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91034 [79] Trapp S.,& Lepsien, J. R.(2012). Attentional orienting to mnemonic representations: Reduction of load-sensitive maintenance-related activity in the intraparietal sulcus. Neuropsychologia, 502012.08.003 [80] Ülkü S., Getzmann S., Wascher E., & Schneider D. (2025). EEG correlates of cognitive dynamics in task resumption after interruptions: The impact of available time and flexibility. European Journal of Neuroscience, 61(4), e70027. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70027 [81] Vandenbroucke A. R. E., Sligte I. G., de Vries J. G., Cohen M. X., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2015). Neural correlates of visual short-term memory dissociate between fragile and working memory representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(12), 2477-2490. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00870 [82] Van Ede, F., & Nobre, A. C. (2024). A neural decision signal during internal sampling from working memory in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 44(19), e1475232024. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1475-23.2024 [83] van Moorselaar, D., Gunseli, E., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L.(2015). The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01053 [84] van Moorselaar D., Olivers C. N., Theeuwes J., Lamme V. A., & Sligte I. G. (2015). Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1755-1763. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000124 [85] Van Moorselaar D., Theeuwes J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014). In competition for the attentional template: Can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 40(4), 1450-1464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036229 [86] Wang Z., Xuan B., & Li S. (2022). Motion or sociality? The cueing effect and temporal course of autistic traits on gaze-triggered attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(4), 1167-1177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02480-9 [87] Ye C., Sun H. -J., Xu Q., Liang T., Zhang Y., & Liu Q. (2019). Working memory capacity affects trade-off between quality and quantity only when stimulus exposure duration is sufficient: Evidence for the two-phase model. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44998-3 [88] Yu Q., Teng C., & Postle B. R. (2020). Different states of priority recruit different neural representations in visual working memory. PLOS Biology, 18(6), e3000769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000769 [89] Yuk V., Urbain C., Anagnostou E.,& Taylor, M. J.(2020). Frontoparietal network connectivity during an n-back task in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 551808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.551808 [90] Zhou Y., Curtis C. E., Sreenivasan K. K., & Fougnie D. (2022). Common neural mechanisms control attention and working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(37), 7110- 7120. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022 [91] Zickerick B., Rösner M., Sabo M., & Schneider D. (2021). How to refocus attention on working memory representations following interruptions-Evidence from frontal theta and posterior alpha oscillations. European Journal of Neuroscience, 54(11), 7820-7838. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15506 |
| [1] | 潘晗希, 陈泽锋, 许楠, 高在峰. 社会工作记忆的脑机制:来自fMRI的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 107-107. |
| [2] | 徐宇寒, 张琪. 抑制性线索引导对工作记忆内相应表征的抑制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 90-90. |
| [3] | 肖芬妮, 孟迎芳. 目标探测促进知觉加工?视觉工作记忆中的注意促进效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 86-86. |
| [4] | 黄一丰, 沈毅, 赵苑秀. 事件信息与客体信息在视觉工作记忆中的独立存储[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 81-81. |
| [5] | 魏宁, 宋锦涛, 周天罡. 空间位置信息对视觉工作记忆重复优势效应的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(suppl.): 72-72. |
| [6] | 张照, 张力为, 龚然. 视觉工作记忆的过滤效能[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 635-651. |
| [7] | 龙芳芳, 李昱辰, 陈晓宇, 李子媛, 梁腾飞, 刘强. 视觉工作记忆的巩固加工:时程、模式及机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1404-1416. |
| [8] | 梁腾飞, 吴海燕, 张引, 龙芳芳, 陈江涛, 胡中华, 刘强. 知觉场景与工作记忆表征中的注意选择: 一个统一的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(4): 625-635. |
| [9] | 戴梦诺, 李艳菊, 杜峰. 多重注意定势的证据:来自空间瞬脱的结果[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 9-9. |
| [10] | 何旭;郭春彦. 视觉工作记忆的容量与资源分配[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(10): 1741-1748. |
| [11] | 孙慧明;傅小兰. 视觉工作记忆巩固机制:固化抑或衰退[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(11): 1605-1614. |
| [12] | 刘飞; 王恩国. 客体工作记忆研究的现状与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(2): 200-209. |
| [13] | 魏柳青;张学民;刘冰;鲁学明;李迎娣. 多目标视觉追踪的现象、规律和认知加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(12): 1919-1925. |
| [14] | 单西娇;李寿欣. 由两个模型看视觉工作记忆容量机制的研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(11): 1684-1691. |
| [15] | 潘毅;许百华;胡信奎. 视觉工作记忆在视觉搜索中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(5): 754-760. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||