ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 309-316.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00309

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

最优化与满意型决策风格孰优孰劣?

朱冬青;谢晓非   

  1. (1北京市“学习与认知”重点实验室, 首都师范大学心理系, 北京 100048) (2北京大学心理学系, 北京 100871)
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-16 出版日期:2013-02-15 发布日期:2013-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 谢晓非
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目“社会比较中的决策过程”(71172024)。

Which One Is Better, Maximizing or Satisficing?

ZHU Dongqing;XIE Xiaofei   

  1. (1 Beijing key lab of Learning and Cognition, Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China) (2 Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
  • Received:2012-08-16 Online:2013-02-15 Published:2013-02-15
  • Contact: XIE Xiaofei

摘要: 最优化决策者追求决策的最优解, 满意型决策者寻求决策的满意解。已有研究以理性模型和有限理性模型为基础, 提出了两类决策风格的概念并且从两类决策者的决策特征和心理指标这两个角度详细对比了两类决策风格的差异。就纯粹的经济学效益、主观的心理学意义和现实的决策选择这三方面而言, “两类决策风格孰优孰劣”是一个因人而异, 因决策目标而异的问题。未来研究可以在清晰界定两类决策风格概念的基础上进一步完善测量工具, 从而深入探讨两类决策风格的领域特异性、与正性情绪的关系及其心理悖论的根源。

关键词: 最优化与满意型决策风格, 有限理性模型, 最优化决策悖论, 边际效应, 满意度

Abstract: The maximizers are more likely to pursue optimal solutions, while the satisficers prefer to seek satisfied ones. Based on Rational Choice Theory and The Bounded Rationality Model, the previous studies proposed the maximizing and satisficing styles and thus compared the two groups of decision-makers on their decision-making features and psychological indexes. With regards to pure economic effectiveness, subjective psychological meanings and practical decision-making choices, the question of ‘which one is better between these two decision-making styles’ differs on individuals and decision-making targets. The future studies could focus on improving measuring tools basing on a clear distinction of those two decision-making styles. And then the domain specificity, the relationship between the two styles and the positive emotions and the origin of psychological paradox could be further explored.

Key words: maximizing and satisficing, bounded rationality model, maximization paradox, marginal utility, satisfaction