Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 1194-1204.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01194
• Research Method • Previous Articles Next Articles
WEI Xuhua, ZHANG Lianghua()
Received:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
Abstract:
Single-item measures have long been debated by researchers. Proponents advocate the efficiency of single-item measures, while opponents question reliability and validity of them. Through comprehensive qualitative and quantitative reviews, advantages and disadvantages of single-item measures are summarized, and doubts and debates in the literature are analyzed and responded specially. Through systematic review, results show that single-item measures have acceptable level of reliability and validity. More notably, the criterion-related validity of multi-item measures is not superior than single-item measures. With the review and current findings, issues that should be noted during the development and usage of single-item measures were addressed. Although multi-item measures are more acceptable, single-item measures may also have its legitimacy in academic research. That is, researchers should value the potential advantages and application scope of single-item measures, so that single-item measures can play its appropriate role in managerial psychology and social science research.
Key words: single-item, multi-item, measure, reliability, validity
CLC Number:
B841
B849
WEI Xuhua, ZHANG Lianghua. Single-item measures: Queries, responses and suggestions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1194-1204.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/adps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01194
https://journal.psych.ac.cn/adps/EN/Y2019/V27/I7/1194