ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B

›› 2005, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 687-693.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

THE DIFFERENT OUTCOME OF DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE

Zhou Hao,Long Lirong,Wang Yan1,Wang Zhongjun,Wu Yi, Ke Shanyu   

  1. College of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China College of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2005-01-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-09-30 Online:2005-09-30
  • Contact: Long Lirong

Abstract: This study examined the different outcome of distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice in scholarship appraisal. 661 college students participated in the study, a 2×2×2completely randomized design was employed, and 8 scenarios which consisted of the information on distributive justice/injustice, procedural justice/injustice and interactional justice/injustice were used as research materials to analyze the influence of organizational justices on students’ learning attitude, class honourableness, class belongingness and relationship with life teacher. The result indicated that distributive justice had the most explanative effect on person-referenced outcomes, procedural justice had the most explanative effect on organization-referenced outcomes, and interactional justice had the most explanative effect on supervisor-referenced outcomes, respectively.

Key words: organizational justice, organizational injustice, distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice

CLC Number: