Figure 1.Recipients’ reactions as a function of role in Study 1. Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 1. Recipients’ reactions as a function of role in Study 1.Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 2.Recipients’ reactions as a function of role in Study 2. Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 2. Recipients’ reactions as a function of role in Study 2.Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 3.Recipients’ reactions as a function of role in Study 3. Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 3. Recipients’ reactions as a function of role in Study 3.Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 4.Recipients’ reactions as a function of role and view in Study 4a. Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 4. Recipients’ reactions as a function of role and view in Study 4a.Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 5.Recipients’ reactions as a function of role and view in Study 4b. Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 5. Recipients’ reactions as a function of role and view in Study 4b.Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 6.The mediation role of the focus on self-esteem threat and the focus on information value. Note: The figure reports unstandardized path coefficients and their significance, *** p <.001.
Figure 6. The mediation role of the focus on self-esteem threat and the focus on information value.Note: The figure reports unstandardized path coefficients and their significance, *** p <.001.
Figure 7.Recipients’ reactions as a function of condition in Study 6. Note: Error bar indicates standard error.
Figure 7. Recipients’ reactions as a function of condition in Study 6.Note: Error bar indicates standard error.