Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (8): 821-836.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00821
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2020-08-09
Published:
2021-08-25
Online:
2021-06-25
Contact:
ZHAO Jing
E-mail:conanzj@126.com
Supported by:
LI Jie, YANG Yue, ZHAO Jing. (2021). The development of visual simultaneous processing skill subcomponents of Chinese children with developmental dyslexia and its relationship with reading. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(8), 821-836.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00821
Items | Middle grade group | Senior grade group | DD (n = 43) | TD (n = 46) | t | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DD (n = 21) | TD (n = 23) | t | DD (n = 22) | TD (n = 23) | t | ||||
Age (years) | 9.25 (0.75) | 9.28 (0.62) | -0.17 | 11.46 (0.73) | 11.34 (0.67) | 0.55 | 10.37 (1.33) | 10.31 (1.22) | 0.24 |
Chinese character recognition test score | 1005 (307) | 1945 (417) | -8.57**** | 2265 (254) | 3195 (96) | -16.08*** | 1650 (696) | 2570 (699) | -6.22*** |
Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices test score | 40.43 (4.99) | 40.04 (3.10) | 0.30 | 43.45 (5.48) | 44.65 (3.42) | -0.88 | 41.98 (5.40) | 42.35 (3.98) | -0.37 |
Rapid digit naming (s) | 14.28 (3.11) | 11.21 (2.44) | 3.66** | 12.61 (3.04) | 10.19 (2.59) | 2.89** | 13.43 (3.15) | 10.70 (2.54) | 4.51*** |
Single-character reading test score speed (c/min) | 80.29 (21.90) | 100.87 (16.48) | -3.54** | 95.55 (17.92) | 114.91 (21.08) | -3.31** | 88.09 (21.18) | 107.89 (20.01) | -4.54*** |
Sentence reading test score (c/min) | 121.54 (65.73) | 149.59 (24.16) | -1.85 | 150.00 (36.72) | 232.88 (131.40) | -2.85** | 136.10 (54.21) | 191.24 (102.46) | -3.14** |
Table 1 Comparison of data for DD and TD children in different grade groups [M (SD)]
Items | Middle grade group | Senior grade group | DD (n = 43) | TD (n = 46) | t | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DD (n = 21) | TD (n = 23) | t | DD (n = 22) | TD (n = 23) | t | ||||
Age (years) | 9.25 (0.75) | 9.28 (0.62) | -0.17 | 11.46 (0.73) | 11.34 (0.67) | 0.55 | 10.37 (1.33) | 10.31 (1.22) | 0.24 |
Chinese character recognition test score | 1005 (307) | 1945 (417) | -8.57**** | 2265 (254) | 3195 (96) | -16.08*** | 1650 (696) | 2570 (699) | -6.22*** |
Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices test score | 40.43 (4.99) | 40.04 (3.10) | 0.30 | 43.45 (5.48) | 44.65 (3.42) | -0.88 | 41.98 (5.40) | 42.35 (3.98) | -0.37 |
Rapid digit naming (s) | 14.28 (3.11) | 11.21 (2.44) | 3.66** | 12.61 (3.04) | 10.19 (2.59) | 2.89** | 13.43 (3.15) | 10.70 (2.54) | 4.51*** |
Single-character reading test score speed (c/min) | 80.29 (21.90) | 100.87 (16.48) | -3.54** | 95.55 (17.92) | 114.91 (21.08) | -3.31** | 88.09 (21.18) | 107.89 (20.01) | -4.54*** |
Sentence reading test score (c/min) | 121.54 (65.73) | 149.59 (24.16) | -1.85 | 150.00 (36.72) | 232.88 (131.40) | -2.85** | 136.10 (54.21) | 191.24 (102.46) | -3.14** |
Items | Middle grade group | Senior grade group | F (group) | F (grade group) | F (interaction) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DD (n = 21) | TD (n = 23) | DD (n = 22) | TD (n = 23) | ||||
C | 6.91 (1.57) | 8.26 (0.96) | 7.93 (1.34) | 8.85 (1.05) | 18.68*** | 9.22** | 0.66 |
K | 3.30 (0.04) | 3.31 (0.05) | 3.28 (0.58) | 3.29 (0.04) | 1.12 | 2.22 | 0.04 |
ω | 0.49 (0.05) | 0.49 (0.03) | 0.50 (0.04) | 0.50 (0.02) | 0.05 | 1.32 | 0.45 |
α | 8.10×e-7 (6.80×e-7) | 9.13×e-7 (1.05×e-6) | 9.55×e-7 (1.23×e-6) | 4.78×e-7 (3.84×e-7) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Descriptive statistics [M (SD)] of subcomponents of visual simultaneous processing in Chinese character materials
Items | Middle grade group | Senior grade group | F (group) | F (grade group) | F (interaction) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DD (n = 21) | TD (n = 23) | DD (n = 22) | TD (n = 23) | ||||
C | 6.91 (1.57) | 8.26 (0.96) | 7.93 (1.34) | 8.85 (1.05) | 18.68*** | 9.22** | 0.66 |
K | 3.30 (0.04) | 3.31 (0.05) | 3.28 (0.58) | 3.29 (0.04) | 1.12 | 2.22 | 0.04 |
ω | 0.49 (0.05) | 0.49 (0.03) | 0.50 (0.04) | 0.50 (0.02) | 0.05 | 1.32 | 0.45 |
α | 8.10×e-7 (6.80×e-7) | 9.13×e-7 (1.05×e-6) | 9.55×e-7 (1.23×e-6) | 4.78×e-7 (3.84×e-7) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Reading test | Chinese character material | Graphic material | |
---|---|---|---|
C | ω | C | |
character reading | 0.19 | 0.22* | 0.16 |
Sentence reading speed | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis between subcomponents C、ω of visual simultaneous processing skill and reading test scores in Chinese characters and graphic materials
Reading test | Chinese character material | Graphic material | |
---|---|---|---|
C | ω | C | |
character reading | 0.19 | 0.22* | 0.16 |
Sentence reading speed | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Items | Steps | Predictive variable | R2 | F | DR2 | DF | b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Character reading speed | First level | 0.10 | 4.72* | 0.10 | 4.72* | ||
Age | 0.29* | ||||||
IQ | 0.10 | ||||||
Second level | Group | 0.29 | 11.77*** | 0.20 | 23.41 *** | 0.51*** | |
Third level | C | 0.31 | 9.51*** | 0.02 | 2.23 | -0.15 | |
Fourth level | ω | 0.35 | 8.78*** | 0.03 | 4.34* | 0.19* | |
Third level | ω | 0.33 | 10.37*** | 0.04 | 4.64* | 0.19* | |
Fourth level | C | 0.35 | 8.78*** | 0.02 | 1.96 | -0.15 | |
Sentence reading speed | First floor | 0.13 | 6.47** | 0.13 | 6.47** | ||
Age | Age | 0.36 ** | |||||
IQ | 0.16 | ||||||
Second level | Group | 0.24 | 8.71*** | 0.10 | 11.58** | 0.42*** | |
Third level | C | 0.28 | 8.08*** | 0.04 | 4.97* | -0.26* | |
Fourth level | ω | 0.28 | 6.43*** | 0.001 | 0.17 | -0.04 | |
Third level | ω | 0.24 | 6.48*** | 0.001 | 0.08 | -0.04 | |
Fourth level | C | 0.28 | 6.43*** | 0.04 | 5.01* | -0.26* |
Table 4 Regression analysis of subcomponents C、ω in visual simultaneous processing skill and reading test scores in Chinese character materials
Items | Steps | Predictive variable | R2 | F | DR2 | DF | b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Character reading speed | First level | 0.10 | 4.72* | 0.10 | 4.72* | ||
Age | 0.29* | ||||||
IQ | 0.10 | ||||||
Second level | Group | 0.29 | 11.77*** | 0.20 | 23.41 *** | 0.51*** | |
Third level | C | 0.31 | 9.51*** | 0.02 | 2.23 | -0.15 | |
Fourth level | ω | 0.35 | 8.78*** | 0.03 | 4.34* | 0.19* | |
Third level | ω | 0.33 | 10.37*** | 0.04 | 4.64* | 0.19* | |
Fourth level | C | 0.35 | 8.78*** | 0.02 | 1.96 | -0.15 | |
Sentence reading speed | First floor | 0.13 | 6.47** | 0.13 | 6.47** | ||
Age | Age | 0.36 ** | |||||
IQ | 0.16 | ||||||
Second level | Group | 0.24 | 8.71*** | 0.10 | 11.58** | 0.42*** | |
Third level | C | 0.28 | 8.08*** | 0.04 | 4.97* | -0.26* | |
Fourth level | ω | 0.28 | 6.43*** | 0.001 | 0.17 | -0.04 | |
Third level | ω | 0.24 | 6.48*** | 0.001 | 0.08 | -0.04 | |
Fourth level | C | 0.28 | 6.43*** | 0.04 | 5.01* | -0.26* |
Items | Middle grade group | Senior grade group | F (group) | F (grade group) | F (interaction) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DD (n = 21) | TD (n = 23) | DD (n = 22) | TD (n = 23) | ||||
C | 5.97 (1.61) | 6.72 (1.23) | 6.75 (1.45) | 7.22 (1.08) | 4.56* | 5.06* | 0.23 |
K | 3.29 (0.05) | 3.29 (0.05) | 3.27 (0.05) | 3.28 (0.05) | 0.40 | 2.23 | 0.08 |
ω | 0.48 (0.09) | 0.48 (0.05) | 0.48 (0.05) | 0.50 (0.04) | 1.11 | 1.07 | 0.50 |
α | 0.001 (0.003) | 8.91×e-7 (8.78×e-7) | 7.95×e-7 (8.26×e-7) | 7.17×e-7 (5.61×e-7) | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 |
Table 5 Descriptive statistics [M (SD)] and difference test of subcomponents of visual simultaneous processing skill in graphic materials
Items | Middle grade group | Senior grade group | F (group) | F (grade group) | F (interaction) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DD (n = 21) | TD (n = 23) | DD (n = 22) | TD (n = 23) | ||||
C | 5.97 (1.61) | 6.72 (1.23) | 6.75 (1.45) | 7.22 (1.08) | 4.56* | 5.06* | 0.23 |
K | 3.29 (0.05) | 3.29 (0.05) | 3.27 (0.05) | 3.28 (0.05) | 0.40 | 2.23 | 0.08 |
ω | 0.48 (0.09) | 0.48 (0.05) | 0.48 (0.05) | 0.50 (0.04) | 1.11 | 1.07 | 0.50 |
α | 0.001 (0.003) | 8.91×e-7 (8.78×e-7) | 7.95×e-7 (8.26×e-7) | 7.17×e-7 (5.61×e-7) | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 |
Item | Steps | Predictive variable | R2 | F | DR2 | DF | b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Character reading speed | First level | 0.10 | 4.72* | 0.10 | 4.72* | ||
Age | 0.29* | ||||||
IQ | 0.07 | ||||||
Second level | Group | 0.29 | 11.77*** | 0.20 | 23.41*** | 0.45*** | |
Third level | C | 0.30 | 8.78*** | 0.001 | 0.17 | -0.04 | |
Sentence reading speed | First level | 0.13 | 6.47** | 0.13 | 6.47** | ||
Age | 0.33** | ||||||
IQ | 0.15 | ||||||
Second level | Group | 0.21 | 8.71*** | 0.10 | 11.58 ** | 0.37*** | |
Third level | C | 0.24 | 7.95*** | 0.04 | 4.59* | -0.22* |
Table 6 Regression analysis between subcomponent C of visual simultaneous processing skill and reading test scores under graphic stimuli
Item | Steps | Predictive variable | R2 | F | DR2 | DF | b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Character reading speed | First level | 0.10 | 4.72* | 0.10 | 4.72* | ||
Age | 0.29* | ||||||
IQ | 0.07 | ||||||
Second level | Group | 0.29 | 11.77*** | 0.20 | 23.41*** | 0.45*** | |
Third level | C | 0.30 | 8.78*** | 0.001 | 0.17 | -0.04 | |
Sentence reading speed | First level | 0.13 | 6.47** | 0.13 | 6.47** | ||
Age | 0.33** | ||||||
IQ | 0.15 | ||||||
Second level | Group | 0.21 | 8.71*** | 0.10 | 11.58 ** | 0.37*** | |
Third level | C | 0.24 | 7.95*** | 0.04 | 4.59* | -0.22* |
Serial number | Chinese characters | Complexity | Graphics | Complexity |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 马 | 2.13 (1.03) | 2.06 (1.00) | |
2 | 片 | 2.50 (1.10) | 2.44 (1.15) | |
3 | 禾 | 2.31 (0.95) | 2.25 (1.07) | |
4 | 半 | 2.63 (0.86) | 2.13 (1.09) | |
5 | 目 | 2.31 (1.08) | 1.63 (0.96) | |
6 | 羊 | 2.63 (0.96) | 2.19 (0.98) | |
7 | 台 | 2.75 (0.78) | 2.62 (0.89) | |
8 | 也 | 2.19 (0.91) | 2.81 (1.17) | |
9 | 闪 | 2.50 (1.03) | 2.31 (1.25) | |
10 | 比 | 2.87 (0.89) | 2.13 (1.09) | |
11 | 巴 | 2.69 (0.79) | 2.69 (1.20) | |
12 | 从 | 2.50 (0.97) | 2.94 (1.12) | |
13 | 牙 | 2.69 (0.79) | 2.75 (1.29) | |
14 | 业 | 2.75 (0.68) | 2.00 (1.03) | |
15 | 方 | 2.19 (1.05) | 2.31 (1.20) | |
16 | 什 | 2.19 (0.66) | ||
17 | 今 | 2.19 (0.66) | ||
18 | 化 | 2.31 (0.79) | ||
19 | 为 | 2.44 (0.89) | ||
20 | 本 | 2.69 (0.79) |
Appendix Table 1 Visual complexity score M (SD) for Chinese characters and graphics stimuli
Serial number | Chinese characters | Complexity | Graphics | Complexity |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 马 | 2.13 (1.03) | 2.06 (1.00) | |
2 | 片 | 2.50 (1.10) | 2.44 (1.15) | |
3 | 禾 | 2.31 (0.95) | 2.25 (1.07) | |
4 | 半 | 2.63 (0.86) | 2.13 (1.09) | |
5 | 目 | 2.31 (1.08) | 1.63 (0.96) | |
6 | 羊 | 2.63 (0.96) | 2.19 (0.98) | |
7 | 台 | 2.75 (0.78) | 2.62 (0.89) | |
8 | 也 | 2.19 (0.91) | 2.81 (1.17) | |
9 | 闪 | 2.50 (1.03) | 2.31 (1.25) | |
10 | 比 | 2.87 (0.89) | 2.13 (1.09) | |
11 | 巴 | 2.69 (0.79) | 2.69 (1.20) | |
12 | 从 | 2.50 (0.97) | 2.94 (1.12) | |
13 | 牙 | 2.69 (0.79) | 2.75 (1.29) | |
14 | 业 | 2.75 (0.68) | 2.00 (1.03) | |
15 | 方 | 2.19 (1.05) | 2.31 (1.20) | |
16 | 什 | 2.19 (0.66) | ||
17 | 今 | 2.19 (0.66) | ||
18 | 化 | 2.31 (0.79) | ||
19 | 为 | 2.44 (0.89) | ||
20 | 本 | 2.69 (0.79) |
[1] |
Banfi, C., Kemény, F., Gangl, M., Schulte-Körne, G., Moll, K., & Landerl, K. (2018). Visual attention span performance in German-speaking children with differential reading and spelling profiles: No evidence of group differences. Plos One, 13(6), e0198903.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198903 URL |
[2] |
Bogon, J., Finke, K., Schulte-Körne, G., Müller, H. J., Schneider, W. X., & Stenneken, P. (2014b). Parameter-based assessment of disturbed and intact components of visual attention in children with developmental dyslexia. Developmental Science, 17(5), 697-713.
doi: 10.1111/desc.2014.17.issue-5 URL |
[3] | Bogon, J., Finke, K., & Stenneken, P. (2014a). TVA-based assessment of visual attentional functions in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,1172. |
[4] |
Bosse, M.-L., Tainturier, M. J., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104(2), 198-230.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009 URL |
[5] |
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523-547.
pmid: 2247540 |
[6] |
Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112(2), 291-328.
pmid: 15783288 |
[7] | Cao, H. B. (2019). The characteristics of visual attention span in dyslexic primary school students (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Liaoning Normal University. |
[8] | Chen, Z., H., &, Gong, Y., X. (1998). A study of memory in children with learning disabilities: I. short-term memory and working memory of children with learning disabilities. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6(3), 3-5. |
[9] |
Dubois, M., Kyllingsbæk, S., Prado, C., Musca, S. C., Peiffer, E., Lassus-Sangosse, D., & Valdois, S. (2010). Fractionating the multi- character processing deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies. Cortex, 46(6), 717-738.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.002 URL |
[10] |
Ducrot, S., Pynte, J. (2002). What determines the eyes' landing position in words? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1130-1144.
doi: 10.3758/BF03194762 URL |
[11] |
Dyrholm, M., Kyllingsbæk, S., Espeseth, T., & Bundesen, C. (2011). Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA. Journal of mathematical psychology, 55(6), 416-429.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2011.08.005 URL |
[12] |
Ekstrand, C., Neudorf, J., Gould, L., Mickleborough, M., & Borowsky, R. (2019). Where words and space collide: The overlapping neural activation of lexical and sublexical reading with voluntary and reflexive spatial attention. Brain Research, 1706,1-12.
doi: S0006-8993(18)30534-1 pmid: 30347218 |
[13] |
Facoetti, A., Paganoni, P., Turatto, M., Marzola, V., & Mascetti, G. G. (2000). Visual-spatial attention in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 36(1), 109-123.
pmid: 10728901 |
[14] |
Facoetti, A., Zorzi, M., Cestnick, L., Lorusso, M. L., Molteni, M., Paganoni, P., … Mascetti, G. G. (2006). The relationship between visuo-spatial attention and nonword reading in developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(6), 841-855.
doi: 10.1080/02643290500483090 pmid: 21049356 |
[15] | Fang, X. (2019). The visual-spatial attention’s characteristics of Chinese developmental dyslexia children (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Liaoning Normal University. |
[16] |
Frey, A., Bosse, M. L. (2018). Perceptual span, visual span, and visual attention span: Three potential ways to quantify limits on visual processing during reading. Visual Cognition, 26(6), 412-429.
doi: 10.1080/13506285.2018.1472163 URL |
[17] | Gu, C. L., Zhou, J. X. (2019). Character processing of Chinese developmental dyslexic children with rapid-serial-visual presentation paradigm. Journal of Bio-education, 7(2), 70-79. |
[18] |
Habekost, T. (2015). Clinical TVA-based studies: A general review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 290.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00290 pmid: 25852607 |
[19] |
Hari, R., & Renvall, H. (2001). Impaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5(12), 525-532.
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01801-5 URL |
[20] |
Hawelka, S., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Visual target detection is not impaired in dyslexic readers. Vision Research, 48(6), 850-852.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.003 URL |
[21] |
Huang, C., Lorusso, M. L., Luo, Z., & Zhao, J. (2019). Developmental differences in the relationship between visual attention span and Chinese reading fluency. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2450.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02450 pmid: 31780982 |
[22] |
Huang, C., & Zhao, J. (2018). Visual-spatial attention processing in developmental dyslexia. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(1), 72-80.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00072 URL |
[23] |
Kyllingsbaek, S. (2006). Modeling visual attention. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 123-133.
pmid: 16817521 |
[24] | Li, J., & Zhao, J. (2020). Visual attention span deficit in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 34(8), 667-672. |
[25] |
Liu, D., Chen, X., & Chung, K. K. H. (2015). Performance in a visual search task uniquely predicts reading abilities in third-grade Hong Kong Chinese children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(4), 307-324.
doi: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1030749 URL |
[26] | Liu, H.L., & Zhao, J. (2018). The development of visual attention span and its effect on reading fluency in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Psychological Development and Education, 34(5), 533-540. |
[27] | Liu, X. P., Ding, D., & Yang, S. (2004). Research on the phonetic interfere restrainning of developmental dyslexia children. Chinese Journal of Special Education, (8), 80-84. |
[28] | Liu, X. P., Du, W. Z., Wang, B., & Wu, S. W. (2005). Study on characteristics of visual short-term memory ability of Chinese-speaking dyslexic children. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 12, 48-55. |
[29] |
Lobier, M., Dubois, M., & Valdois, S. (2013). The role of visual processing speed in reading speed development. Plos One, 8(4), e58097.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058097 URL |
[30] |
Lobier, M., Zoubrinetzky, R., & Valdois, S. (2012). The visual attention span deficit in dyslexia is visual and not verbal. Cortex, 48(6), 768-773.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.09.003 URL |
[31] | Lobier, M. A., Peyrin, C., Pichat, C., Le, B.-J., & Valdois, S. (2014). Visual processing of multiple elements in the dyslexic brain: Evidence for a superior parietal dysfunction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 479. |
[32] |
Sireteanu, R., Goertz, R., Bachert, I., & Wandert, T. (2005). Children with developmental dyslexia show a left visual “minineglect”. Vision Research, 45(25-26), 3075-3082.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.030 URL |
[33] |
Sperling, A. J., Lu, Z. L., Manis, F. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2003). Selective magnocellular deficits in dyslexia: A “phantom contour” study. Neuropsychologia, 41(10), 1422-1429.
pmid: 12757913 |
[34] |
Stefanac, N., Spencer-Smith, M., Brosnan, N., Vangkilde, S., Castles, A., & Bellgrove, M. (2019). Visual processing speed as a marker of immaturity in lexical but not sublexical dyslexia. Cortex, 120(4), 567-581.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.08.004 URL |
[35] |
Stenneken, P., Egetemeir, J., Schulte-Korne, G., Müller, H. J., Schneider, W. X., & Finke, K. (2011). Slow perceptual processing at the core of developmental dyslexia: A parameter-based assessment of visual attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(12), 3454-3465.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.021 pmid: 21903119 |
[36] | Tian, M. Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y. W., & Bi, H. Y. (2016). Preliminary exploration of attention ability in different visual field in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 14(3), 289-297. |
[37] | Valdois, S., Bosse, M.-L., Ans, B., Carbonne, S., Zorman, M., David, D., & Pellat, J. (2003). Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies. Reading & Writing, 16(6), 541-572. |
[38] |
Valdois, S., Peyrin, C., Lassus-Sangosse, D., Lallier, M., Demonet, J. F., & Kandel, S. (2014). Dyslexia in a French-Spanish bilingual girl: Behavioural and neural modulations following a visual attention span intervention. Cortex, 53, 120-145.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.11.006 URL |
[39] |
Vangkilde, S., Bundesen, C., & Coull, J. T. (2011). Prompt but inefficient: Nicotine differentially modulates discrete components of attention. Psychopharmacology, 218(4), 667-680.
doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2361-x pmid: 21629997 |
[40] | Wang, E. G., Sen, D. L., & Lv, Y. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory and processing speed in children with Chinese learning disabilities. Journal of Psychological Science, 31(1), 5-10, 15. |
[41] | Wang, X. L. & Tao, B. P. (1996) Chinese character recognition test battery and assessment scale for primary school children. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Education Press. |
[42] |
Wiegand, I., Lauritzen, M. J., Osler, M., Mortensen, E. L., Rostrup, E., Rask, L., … Petersen, A. (2018). EEG correlates of visual short- term memory in older age vary with adult lifespan cognitive development. Neurobiology of Aging, 62, 210-220.
doi: S0197-4580(17)30357-3 pmid: 29175710 |
[43] | World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. World Health Organization. |
[44] | Xiao, Q., Zhang, Y. W., Zhao, J., & Bi, H. Y. (2014). Visual temporal processing in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 28(9), 679-684. |
[45] | Yang, Y. (2011). An investigation for the nature of phonological working memory deficit in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia(Unpublished master’s dissertation). Graduate university of Chinese academy of sciences. |
[46] |
Yeari, M., Isser, M., & Schiff, R. (2016). Do dyslexic individuals present a reduced visual attention span? Evidence from visual recognition tasks of non-verbal multi-character arrays. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(2), 128-146.
doi: 10.1007/s11881-016-0132-4 URL |
[47] | Zhang, H. C. & Wang, X. P. (1985). Raven standard progressive matrices:Chinese city revision (in Chinese). Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Publishing House. |
[48] |
Zhao, J. (2019). Skills of visual attention span in developmental dyslexia. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(1), 20-26.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00020 URL |
[49] | Zhao, J., Bi, H. Y., & Yang, Y. (2012). Rapid naming and orthographic processing skill in children with Chinese developmental dyslexia. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 26(1), 36-40. |
[50] | Zhao, J., Kwok, R. K. W., Liu, M. L., Liu, H. L., & Huang, C. (2017). Underlying skills of oral and silent reading fluency in Chinese: Perspective of visual rapid processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2082. |
[51] |
Zhao, J., Liu, M. L., Liu, H. L., & Huang, C. (2018a). The visual attention span deficit in Chinese children with reading fluency difficulty. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 73, 76-86.
doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.017 URL |
[52] |
Zhao, J., Liu, M. L., Liu, H. L., & Huang, C. (2018b). Increased deficit of visual attention span with development in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Reports, 8(1),3153.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21578-5 URL |
[53] |
Zoubrinetzky, R., Collet, G., Nguyen-Morel, M.-A., Valdois, S., & Serniclaes, W. (2019). Remediation of allophonic perception and visual attention span in developmental dyslexia: A joint assay. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,1502.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01502 pmid: 31379640 |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||