ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 606-621 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00606

研究报告

身份信息与位置信息的加工进程及语境预测性的影响 *

徐迩嘉, 隋雪,

儿童青少年健康人格评定与培养协同创新中心, 大连 116029

Effects of predictability on the time course of identity information and location information in Chinese word recognition

XU Erjia, SUI Xue,

Collaborative Innovation Center for Healthy Personality Assessment and Training of Children and Adolescents, Dalian 116029, China

通讯作者: 隋雪, E-mail:suixue88@163.com

收稿日期: 2017-05-1   网络出版日期: 2018-06-01

基金资助: 国家留学基金委公派留学项目.  201608210288
辽宁省自然科学基金项目.  201602460
辽宁省教育厅一般科研项目.  L201683659
辽宁省教育科学“十三五”规划年度课题.  JG16CB341

Received: 2017-05-1   Online: 2018-06-01

Fund supported: .  201608210288
.  201602460
.  L201683659
.  JG16CB341

摘要

采用行为实验和眼动实验, 探讨汉字身份信息和位置信息在词汇单独呈现和在语境中呈现的加工进程。实验1发现, 当启动时间为80 ms时, 换位启动效应与原词、尾字替换启动效应差异显著; 当启动时间为150 ms时, 换位启动效应与首字替换、尾字替换启动效应均差异显著; 当启动时间为300 ms时, 换位启动与原词、首字替换启动效应差异显著。实验2发现, 与低预测性条件相比, 高预测性条件下, 阅读时间更短, 注视次数更少; 在整句眼动指标上, 高预测性条件下, 原词条件与首字替换条件差异显著, 换位条件和替换条件差异不显著, 而低预测性条件下, 换位条件与原词条件和尾字替换条件差异显著。实验3采用边界范式, 发现预视时间为0 ms时, 换位条件更接近原词条件, 与替换条件差异显著。而预视时间为50和100 ms时, 换位条件与替换条件没有显著差异。研究结果表明, 在词汇单独呈现时, 位置信息的作用在早期阶段较大而后逐渐降低, 身份信息的作用逐渐增强。在句子阅读中, 位置信息的作用在副中央凹加工的早期阶段较小而后逐渐增大。语境预测性在加工的早期, 对位置 信息作用大, 在加工的晚期, 对身份信息作用大。研究结果支持SOLAR 模型和贝叶斯读者模型, 不支持SERIOL模型。

关键词: 语境预测性 ; 位置信息 ; 身份信息 ; 加工进程

Abstract

In the process of word recognition, the encoding of letter identity and letter location information plays a vital role. Many English studies found that the letter location information is more flexible than letter identity information. And context predictability has a different effect on letter location and identity information. Chinese word consists of meaningful morpheme, so the encoding of Chinese character identity and location information may have different features from English letter. In present study, we discussed the effect and the time course of predictability on the encoding of Chinese character identity and location information.

In order to explore the morpheme processing, the present study recruited 20 students as participants in experiment 1, and instructed them to do the lexical decision task. We used 5 types of word (original word, transposed non-word, initial substituted non-word, final substituted non-word and unmeaning symbol) as prime words when the prime time is 80 ms, 150 ms and 300 ms. We collected reaction time as the index. We found that the effect caused by transposed non-word is significant from that caused by original word under 80 ms and 300 ms prime condition, but it is opposite under 150 ms condition.

To study the morpheme processing in sentence, 50 participants took part in experiment 2, and was instructed to read high predictability and low predictability sentences. Each sentence included a different target word of 4 conditions which is original word(OR), transposed non-word (TN), first substituted (FS) non-word and end substituted (ES) non-word. The participation’s eye movement was recorded by EyeLink1000 during reading process. The results showed that the TN condition is not significant with FS and ES condition under high-predictability, but it is opposite under low-predictability.

To explore the time course of encoding of Chinese character location and identity information, we used the same materials as experiment 2 and manipulated parafoveal target word delay time for 0ms, 50 ms and 100 ms. We found that TN condition and OR condition are quite similar when the previewing is 0 ms, and the TN condition is analogy with FS and ES condition when the previewing is 50 ms and 100 ms.

On the whole, the data of the present study suggested that the encoding of Chinese character identity information and location information are separated. When Chinese words presented alone, the effect of location information is gradually reduced with the processing time increase. In sentence reading, location information is more flexible at the early stage in parafoveal processing. High predictability can promote the encoding of location information at early stage, and promote the encoding of identity information at later stage.

Keywords: context predictability ; location information ; identity information ; time course of processing

PDF (436KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

徐迩嘉, 隋雪. 身份信息与位置信息的加工进程及语境预测性的影响 *. 心理学报[J], 2018, 50(6): 606-621 doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00606

XU Erjia, SUI Xue. Effects of predictability on the time course of identity information and location information in Chinese word recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica[J], 2018, 50(6): 606-621 doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00606

1 引言

人们在区分相同字母组成的单词时, 如salt (盐)和slat (板), 依靠的是相同字母的位置信息, 也就是说, 字母在英文单词中的作用是通过两方面信息体现的, 即身份信息(identity information)和位置信息(location information)。在汉语词汇加工中, 读者也需要通过词素身份信息来确认组成词汇的字是什么, 而出现“人工”和“工人”这对身份信息相同的词时, 就需要依靠位置信息来区分两个词语。在拼音文字的研究中发现, 读者对字母的身份信息和位置信息编码的进度是不同的(Rayner & Fischer, 1996)。与替换单词内个别字母(substitution-letter, SL)形成的非词(例如:由bridge替换字母d变为t形成的britge)相比, 单词内字母换位(transposition- letter, TL)形成的非词(将bridge内部的字母dg进行换位变为gd形成的非词brigde), 更容易被识别成与它相对的真词(bridge) (Perea & Carreiras, 2006), 这种现象称为字母换位效应(transposition-letter effect, TL effect), 中文也翻译成转置字母效应(滑慧敏, 顾俊娟, 林楠, 李兴珊, 2017)。TL非词能够在一定条件下激活原词的词汇理解和表征(Pagán, Paterson, Blythe, & Liversedge, 2016; Sánchez-Gutiérrez & Rastle, 2013)。在阅读情况下, TL非词比SL非词能够产生更大的预视效应(Johnson, Perea, & Rayner, 2007)。这说明, 在词汇识别和加工过程中, 字母的身份信息比位置信息更重要, 位置信息更加灵活。研究也发现, 字母身份信息和字母位置信息的编 码过程是分离的。对词语内部不同位置的字母进行换位, 其效果也是不同的。换位发生在词首、词尾比发生在词内部对词汇识别的破坏性更大(White, Johnson, Liversedge, & Rayner, 2008; Yakup, Abliz, Sereno, & Perea, 2014)。关于识别的时间段, 两种信息的作用也不同, 在视觉词汇识别的早期阶段, 字母位置信息的作用很小(Luke & Christianson, 2012)。

依托拼音文字对字母身份信息和位置信息的研究, McClelland和Rumelhart (1981)提出交互激活模型(interactive activation model)并主张, 词汇识别过程中, 字母位置固定, 词汇识别依赖于词汇中包含的字母信息(what)和字母位置(where)。Norris (2006)提出的贝叶斯读者模型(the Bayesian reader model)主张, 词汇中的字母与他们的特定位置相联系。Whitney (2001)提出的顺序编码模型(sequential encoding regulated by inputs to oscillations within letter units, the SERIOL model)主张, 词汇加工有5个水平:节点、视网膜、特征、字母、双字母组合、词汇。在双字母组合水平中, 字母探测转为对双字母对的探测, 例如card (卡片)一词中包含双字母对:ca、cr、cd、ar、ad、rd, 这与换位词crad包含的双字母对是一样的, 而替换词cald包含的双字母对为ca、cl、cd、al、ad、ld, 其中只有三个与原词card是一样的, 因而换位词比替换词更接近本词。Davis (2001)提出自我组织词汇习得与识别模型(self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition, the SOLAR model)并主张, 每个字母的识别与自我激活水平有关, 第一个字母激活水平最高, 依次递减, 最后一个激活水平最低, 因而位置与激活水平有关, 相邻两个字母激活水平相似。这些理论不同程度地的解释了字母位置加工及换位后产生效应的原因。那么汉语词汇识别中的位置信息更接近哪一个理论解释的情况呢?将在本研究中得到关注。

句子语境下, 词汇信息的识别受语境特性的影响, 如语境预测性高低。读者可以通过上文内容对接下来的内容进行预测, 上下文关系越密切, 预测作用越大。拼音文字的研究发现, 对高预测性词的反应时比对低预测性词的反应时短(Smith & Levy, 2013; Whitford & Titone, 2014)。高预测性词比低预测性词被略读的可能性更大, 被注视时间更短, 回视更少(Kretzschmar, Schlesewsky, & Staub, 2015)。在中文关于预测性的研究中, 控制关键词的首字频率、尾字频率和整词频率, 发现词频的影响在词素位置颠倒的情况下也会发挥作用(卞迁,崔磊, 闫国利, 2010)。而在篇章阅读中, 低预测性目标词比高、中预测性目标词的注视时间长, 高预测性目标词被跳读的概率高(Liu, Reichle, & Li, 2016)。

在拼音文字的研究中, 发现语境预测性和词频与换位效应有交互作用(Luke & Christianson, 2012), 但这种交互作用在中文词汇加工和文本阅读中并没有得到一致性的验证。关于汉语词汇的构成, 首先由笔画组成部首, 再由部首组成词素, 又由词素组成词汇, 最后由词汇通过语法结构组成句子。在拼音文字研究中, 字母是组成单词的最小单位, 而在中文研究中, 词素通常被定义为形态和意义最小的语言单位(张玲燕, 金檀, 田朝霞, 2013)。笔画换位和部首换位与英文中字母换位的对应情况都是不理想的, 因为汉语中不仅有8种基本笔画, 还有很多复杂笔画, 而且这些笔画并不是水平排列的, 换位后会导致换位后的汉字无法识别; 而汉字部首之间有左右结构和上下结构, 部首换位在很多情况下是无法进行的。因此, 英文字母和中文汉字并不能完全类比(滑慧敏等, 2017), 无论怎样进行实验设计, 英文的换位效应研究都不可能在中文中复制, 但是我们可以借鉴其研究方法, 研究汉字词素位置信息和身份信息加工的特点。研究者采用语义启动范式, 使用汉语逆序词(如“工人”-“人工”)作为实验材料, 考察不同SOA (57 ms, 157 ms, 314 ms) 下的启动效应, 发现在SOA为157 ms时, 正常的语义启动和逆序启动两种效应之间没有显著差异, 都能缩短联想词的判断时间; 而在加工的早期(SOA为57 ms)和晚期(SOA为314 ms), 逆序词的启动明显弱于正常的语义启动, 这一结果说明, 词素表征的激活经历了由弱到强再逐渐减弱的过程, 词素位置信息的加工晚于词素身份信息的加工, 词素位置信息的加工发生在词汇加工的晚期(彭聃龄, 丁国盛, 王春茂, Taft, 朱晓平, 1999) 。这个研究与换位的研究略有不同, 汉语逆序词本身也有一定的含义, 换位后的词语也能提取汉语中对应的语义, 这也会对词素身份信息和位置信息的作用产生影响。新近研究(Gu, Li, & Liversedge, 2015)已经发现中文字序编码与位置信息编码不同。字序编码发生在阅读的早期阶段, 而位置信息编码没有这么严格。所以, 为了避免字序加工的影响, 本研究避免了换位后产生逆序词的情况。在实验1中, 使用原词(如“经济”)、换位非词(如:由原词“经济”通过首字和尾字换位形成的假词“济经”)、两种替换词(如:由原词“经济”通过使用无意义的符号对首字进行替换, 形成首字替换非词“吅济”和对尾字进行替换, 形成的尾字替换非词“经吅”)以及无意义符号非词(吅吅)作为启动词, 通过比较不同条件的启动效应, 探究词素位置信息和身份信息的加工进程, 并以无意义的符号启动(无关启动)为基线, 比较原词条件、换位条件、替换条件的启动效应之间的差异。首字替换和尾字替换两个条件的设置, 是为了比较身份信息在词语的不同位置发生改变后的差异。实验1采用启动范式, 研究词汇单独呈现时, 词素身份信息和位置信息的加工进程, 并通过改变启动词呈现时间来探究启动词换位效果的延续性。本文参考了彭聃龄等人的研究及相关英文研究(Vergara-Martínez, Perea, Gómez, & Swaab, 2013), 结合本实验特点选用了80 ms, 150 ms, 300 ms三个启动时间。

实验1的结果能够反映, 在词汇单独呈现情况下, 汉语词素的身份信息和位置信息加工过程, 以及启动时间的影响。但是身份信息与位置信息的作用以及延续性, 在句子语境下, 是否会因为语境预测性因素的加入有所改变呢?为了探究这个问题, 设计了实验2, 通过记录被试阅读句子过程中的眼动特征, 探究词素位置信息和身份信息在句子阅读中的作用, 同时操纵语境对目标词的预测性, 研究语境的预测性对词素位置信息和身份信息加工的影响。实验2能够考察句子呈现条件下, 词汇身份信息和位置信息加工的特点, 以及语境预测性的调节作用, 但是, 不能回答词汇身份信息和位置信息加工的时间进程。因此, 设计了实验3, 采用边界范式, 通过调节目标词预视时间来统一测量位置编码的时间进程及预测性对时间进程的影响。采用边界范式对词边界对汉字顺序编码的影响的研究(Gu & Li, 2015)有效地考察了四字词的情况。说明边界的设定可以考察4个字的空间, 本研究是双字词, 边界的作用可以得到保证。

换位非词是位置信息错误, 身份信息是完全正确的; 而词素掩蔽词是位置信息正确, 而身份信息错误。两者比较可以考察身份信息和位置信息加工的分离。另外, 语境的预测性会影响目标词被加工的深度(Cona, Arcara, Tarantino, & Bisiacchi, 2015), 自上而下的语义预测与自下而上的词汇通达能够相互作用, 高预测性的目标词可以不必完全加工, 因此对词素位置信息和身份信息完整性的要求会降低; 而低预测性的目标词, 对位置信息和身份信息的完整性要求很高, 并且, 位置信息的改变对阅读的影响比身份信息的改变小, 并且如前文中提到的, 已有研究证明通常词首的字母或者词首的字更重要(Schotter, Angele, & Rayner, 2012), 且在句子阅读中, 存在副中央凹预视效应, 能够通过副中央凹的预视来加工目标词(臧传丽, 张慢慢, 岳音其, 白学军, 闫国利, 2013)。本研究假设, 汉语双字词加工中位置信息的作用相比于身份信息更灵活, 在词汇单独呈现时, 随着加工时间的延长, 位置信息与身份信息的作用逐渐接近, 在句子阅读中, 语境预测性能够促进身份信息和位置信息的加工, 高预测性情况下, 二者的作用相似, 低预测性情况下, 位置信息的作用较身份信息更为灵活。目标词的预视时间短, 位置信息的作用较身份信息的作用小, 随着预视时间延长, 位置信息和身份信息的作用逐渐接近。与首字替换词对句子阅读的影响相比, 尾字替换词对句子阅读的负作用更小。

2 实验1:词汇加工早期位置信息的作用

2.1 方法

2.1.1 被试

被试为20名在校大学生, 均为右利手, 年龄21~24岁。被试的裸视或矫正视力正常, 均不了解实验目的。母语均为汉语。每个被试都阅读了《知情同意书》, 并签字同意。所有被试均不知实验目的, 实验结束后获得学分和适当报酬。

2.1.2 设计和材料

选取了90个中频双字词作为实验材料(如:手机), 并对这些双字词进行如下处理:(1)换位:将原词的词素换位形成新的换位假词(如:机手, 材料处理时保证换位后的非词在语音和语义上均为无意义的假词); (2)首字替换:将原词的首字用无意义符号“吅”替换, 形成首字替换假词(如:吅机); (3)尾字替换:将原词的尾字用无意义符号“吅”替换, 形成尾字替换假词(如:手吅)。并将材料分为3组, 每组的启动词呈现时间不同, 实验材料的基本情况见表1

表1   实验材料的基本情况(M ± SD)

启动时间笔画词频字频
首字尾字
80 ms16.17 ± 4.460.26 ± 0.150.18 ± 0.300.23 ± 0.39
150 ms15.50 ± 3.770.26 ± 0.220.20 ± 0.310.27 ± 0.48
300 ms17.47 ± 4.350.21 ± 0.350.24 ± 0.540.25 ± 0.51

注:词频及字频来自于1986年《现代汉语词频词典》,取值为每百万次出现的次数。

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


本实验为3(启动时间)×5(启动类型)两因素被试内设计, 被试对单独呈现的词汇进行真假词判定。启动时间分别为80 ms、150 ms和300 ms, 5种启动条件分别为:(1)原词启动:用原词启动目标词, 如“经济”启动“经济”; (2)换位启动:启动词为目标词的换位词, 如“济经”启动“经济”; (3)首字替换启动:用首字替换非词启动目标词, 如以“吅济”启动“经济”; (4)尾字替换启动:用尾字替换非词启动目标词, 如以“经吅”启动“经济”; (5)无关启动(无意义符号):由无意义符号“吅吅”启动目标词, 如以“吅吅”启动“经济”。实验材料举例见表2

表2   不同启动条件真假词判断任务的材料示例

启动词条件示例列表
原词条件经济-经济List 1
换位非词条件济经-经济List 2
首字替换条件吅济-经济List 3
尾字替换条件经吅-经济List 4
无意义符号条件吅吅-经济List 5

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


5种条件下, 用不同启动词来启动同一目标词, 对材料分组并进行了拉丁方匹配, 在一个List中同一组启动词-目标词(如表1)只呈现一对词, 共5个List, 共形成450个实验项目。另外每个List加入45个填充项目, 填充项目的目标词均为假词。每个List总共呈现135个试次, 进行伪随机处理。

2.1.3 实验程序

实验使用台式联想计算机, 通过E-prime软件呈现并收集数据。每个试次的程序为:“+”字注视点→被试按键→启动词→“####”掩蔽刺激呈现 50 ms→目标词→被试按键判断。实验材料以白底黑字呈现。每个被试均为单独测验, 眼睛离屏幕为60 cm, 启动词和目标词均为40号宋体加粗, 每个目标刺激所占的视角约为1.9°。指导语如下:屏幕中央会出现注视点, 请您按键, 按键后, 注视点消失, 然后出现刺激“####”, 这个刺激消失后, 出现目标词, 请您判断是不是真词?如果是真词, 请按F键, 如果不是真词, 请按J键(被试间进行平衡)。被试阅读指导语后, 进行15个试次的练习, 然后, 进行正式实验。

2.2 结果

数据分析时, 填充材料不参与分析, 实验中被试的平均正确率为97.72%, 我们删除了低于300 ms或高于3000 ms的数据15个, 总删除率为0.8%。反应时结果见表3

表3   三种启动时间和5种启动类型的反应时(M ± SD)

启动类型启动时间
80 ms150 ms300 ms
无意义符号873 ± 132801 ± 94773 ± 125
换位非词782 ± 122634 ± 126656 ± 119
尾字替换737 ± 112694 ± 73664 ± 90
首字替换803 ± 126721 ± 85758 ± 92
原词741 ± 80616 ± 83569 ± 67

注:反应时指标的单位是ms, M表示平均数, SD表示标准差, 下同。

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


对反应时结果进行方差分析, 结果表明:启动时间的主效应显著, F (2, 236) = 67.82, 偏η2 = 0.37, p < 0.01, 事后检验(Least Significant Difference, LSD)发现, 随启动时间的增加, 目标词的反应时缩短, 三种启动条件下的反应时均差异显著(ps < 0.01)。为了分析位置信息和身份信息的改变对启动效应的影响, 将无意义符号启动条件做为基线, 其他条件与用无意义符号条件的反应时相减, 结果见图1

图1

图1   不同条件下的启动效应

注:*p < 0.01


以启动效应为因变量, 启动条件和启动时间为自变量, 进行方差分析, 结果表明:启动时间的主效应不显著, F (2, 236) = 2.07, 偏η2 = 0.02, p > 0.05。启动词类型的主效应显著, F (3, 354) = 52.30, 偏η2= 0.31, p < 0.01。LSD检验发现, 除了换位条件与尾字替换条件之间的启动效应差异不显著外(p > 0.05), 其他条件的启动效应之间均差异显著(ps < 0.01)。启动类型和启动时间交互作用显著, F (6, 708) = 10.08, 偏η2 = 0.08, p < 0.01。

80 ms的启动效应, 换位条件与首字替换差异不显著(p > 0.05), 两者与原词(ps < 0.01)、尾字替换(ps < 0.01)差异均显著, 原词效应与尾字替换效应差异不显著(p > 0.05)。150 ms的启动效应, 换位效应与原词效应没有显著差异(p > 0.05), 两者与两种替换效应均差异显著(ps < 0.01), 两种替换条件之间差异不显著(p > 0.05)。300 ms的启动效应, 只有换位效应与尾字替换效应差异不显著(p > 0.05), 其它条件效应之间均差异显著(ps < 0.01)。

2.3 讨论

实验1的结果表明, 在启动时间为80 ms时, 换位效应与首字替换效应差异不显著, 与尾字替 换和原词启动效应差异显著, 这与拼音文字的实 验结果不一致(Luke & Christianson, 2012; Kezilas, McKague, Kohnen, Badcock, & Castles, 2017)。在中文词语单独加工的早期阶段, 如果词素的位置错误, 与身份错误一样对词汇加工造成影响, 此时, 词素的身份信息和位置信息都很重要。身份信息正确, 位置信息错误, 启动效应也无法与原词相比。换位与首字替换差异不显著, 说明, 不同位置的词素激活程度不同, 与SOLAR模型观点一致(Davis, 2001), 第一个字激活水平高于第二个字。而在启动时间为150 ms时, 换位启动与原词启动差异不显著, 与替换启动差异显著, 说明身份信息破坏比位置信息破坏影响更大。在这个阶段, 词素位置有了一定灵活性。而启动时间为300 ms时, 换位非词与尾字替换词出现了差异不显著的情况, 在此阶段启动词位置信息和身份信息的作用对于单独呈现的目标词而言都起到很大作用, 但从结果来看, 无法说谁起的作用更大。

比较三种启动时间下的首字替换词和尾字替换词启动条件可以发现, 尾字替换词对目标词的启动效果更大, 说明首字的替换对词语位置信息和身份信息的破坏更大, 这与拼音文字换位研究的结果是一致的(White et al., 2008; Yakup et al., 2014), 说明身份信息破坏的位置, 对词语识别的影响是不同的, 具有跨语言的一致性。词首字母具有内在的重要性, 更多的与高级认知功能有关, 而词尾字母与低水平的视知觉有关(滑慧敏等, 2017)。将三个阶段联系起来分析可以发现, 在识别单独呈现的汉语词汇时, 在识别的早期, 即使身份信息一致, 位置信息的改变也会影响目标词的识别。而随加工时间的延长, 位置信息的作用逐渐减小, 身份信息的作用逐渐增大。到了加工的晚期, 身份信息和位置信息的作用逐渐一致, 无法判断此时哪个作用更大, 而且此时身份信息在词语中的位置对启动效应的影响很大,这与中文词素位置作用的研究结果是一致的(梁菲菲, 王永胜, 白学军, 2016)。

实验1研究了词汇单独呈现时, 位置信息与身份信息作用的时间进程。而对于时间进程的研究, 大多采用脑电(ERP)进行, 研究发现(Vergara-Martínez et al., 2013), 在刺激呈现260 ms之后, 真假词判断有显著差异, 而在刺激呈现360 ms之后, 词语的频率会影响真词与换位假词的判断。可见, 中文词汇单独呈现时, 在刺激呈现的早期阶段, 位置信息对词语的识别加工作用更大, 而随着时间的推进, 对词语进行更深度的加工时, 词汇的身份信息、词频等因素都会产生影响。

3 实验2:语境预测性对词汇位置信息加工的影响

3.1 方法

3.1.1 被试

在校大学生50名, 均为右利手, 年龄19~24岁。被试的裸视或矫正视力正常, 均不了解实验目的。母语均为汉语。每个被试都阅读了《知情同意书》, 并签字同意。所有被试均不知实验目的, 实验结束后获得学分和适当报酬。

3.1.2 设计和材料

采用4(关键词类型)×2(预测性)两因素被试内设计。关键词类型为:a原词、b换位词、c首字替换、d尾字替换。预测性为:H对目标词预测性高、L对目标词预测性低。

实验使用了64个句子框架, 是基于32对双字词编出的, 选自现代汉语词频词典, 由50名不参加实验的被试完成填词任务, 形成句子框架(如:“这批产品降价是为了扰乱中国的____”), 要求被试填入双字词, 75%以上几率被填出则为高预测性词语(如“市场”), 25%以下被填出则为低预测性词语, (如“经济”), 相应将高低预测性词语颠倒的句子框架(如“出台这些政策是为了复苏国家的____”), 同样也在实验前进行填词任务。对于32对目标词, 在4种条件下控制它们的词素位置与词素信息:a原词, 即以单词正确的顺序和正字法呈现(如“市场”); b换位, 以错误的位置呈现词素, 即将双字词的两个字位置颠倒(如“场市”); c首字替换, 处于词首位置的字由符号“吅”替换呈现(如“吅场”); d尾字替换, 处于词尾位置的字由符号“吅”替换呈现(如“市吅”)。在实验前, 由28名不参加实验的被试对句子通顺性进行5点评分, 1为不通顺, 5为通顺, 句子的通顺性平均分为4.32。本实验的材料对同一个目标词编制高-低预测性的句子框架, 因此目标词的词频、字频、笔画等本身属性已经进行了控制。实验材料举例见表4表5

表4   句子阅读任务的材料举例

可预测性词汇类型句子举例
高预测性
词(市场)
原词填充这批产品的降价是为了扰乱
中国的市场并从中获利。
换位非词填充这批产品的降价是为了扰乱
中国的场市并从中获利。
首字替换词填充这批产品的降价是为了扰乱
中国的吅场并从中获利。
尾字替换词填充这批产品的降价是为了扰乱
中国的市吅并从中获利。
低预测性
词(经济)
原词填充这批产品的降价是为了扰乱
中国的经济并从中获利。
换位非词填充这批产品的降价是为了扰乱
中国的济经并从中获利。
首字替换词填充这批产品的降价是为了扰乱
中国的吅济并从中获利。
尾字替换词填充这批产品的降价是为了扰乱
中国的经吅并从中获利。

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


表5   句子阅读任务的材料举例

可预测性词汇类型句子举例
高预测性
词(经济)
原词填充出台这些政策是为了复苏国家的
经济状况和提高生产力。
换位非词填充出台这些政策是为了复苏国家的
济经状况和提高生产力。
首字替换词填充出台这些政策是为了复苏国家的
吅济状况和提高生产力。
尾字替换词填充出台这些政策是为了复苏国家的
经吅状况和提高生产力。
低预测性
词(市场)
原词填充出台这些政策是为了复苏国家的
市场状况和提高生产力。
换位非词填充出台这些政策是为了复苏国家的
场市状况和提高生产力。
首字替换词填充出台这些政策是为了复苏国家的
吅场状况和提高生产力。
尾字替换词填充出台这些政策是为了复苏国家的
市吅状况和提高生产力。

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


表4这组材料是同一个句子框架, 含有“市场-经济”作为关键词的情况。这个句子框架对于“市场”是高预测性的, 对于“经济”是低预测性的。具体关键词有4种情况。

表5这组材料是同一个句子框架, 含有“市场-经济”作为关键词的情况。这个句子框架对于“经济”是高预测性的, 对于“市场”是低预测性的。具体关键词有4种情况。

3.1.3 实验仪器

采用EyeLink 1000眼动仪追踪眼动轨迹并记录被试右眼的眼动数据。眼动仪的采样率为1000次/ms。刺激在一个21英寸的DELL显示器上呈现, 分辨率为1024×768像素, 刷新率为75 Hz。被试眼睛与屏幕的距离为68 cm。刺激以19号宋体形式呈现, 每个汉字在屏幕上占了25×25像素(字间距为3像素)。每个汉字成0.67°视角。

3.1.4 实验程序

实验中, 每个被试单独进行实验。首先向被试介绍实验仪器和实验环境, 之后, 被试开始阅读指导语, 以了解实验目的, 如果有问题先向主试提问, 确认后进行实验。首先是8个试次的练习实验, 确保被试完全了解实验后, 进行正式实验。正式实验中, 有54个句子后面跟随一个与之相关的判断题, 以便被试真正理解了句子(其中36个问题的答案为“是”, 18个问题的答案为“否”), 实验过程中的句子随机呈现, 实验开始和每个试次前都会进行校准, 整个实验过程大约需要15~20分钟。

3.2 结果

本研究使用Eyelink 1000眼动仪自带的数据处理软件Data Viewr将数据导出后, 采用Microsoft Office Excel 2007软件对数据进行管理和分析, 然后使用SPSS for windows 16.0对数据进行统计分析及处理。回答句子后出现的判断题, 被试的平均正确率为86%, 由于实验任务为阅读并回答问题, 较为困难, 因此我们调整了标准正确率, 删除了正确率低于80%的2名被试的数据, 并排除了注视点持续时间小于80 ms或大于1200 ms的数据, 占总数的1.63%。运用SPSS 16.0统计软件包对其他数据的具体指标进行分析。

根据本研究的实验假设和目的, 参考实验设计, 本研究选取目标词内的指标:首次注视持续时间(first fixation duration, FFD)、首次注视的注视次数(first run fixation count, FRFC)、凝视时间(gaze duration, GD)、总注视时间(total time, TT)、总注视次数(fixation count, FC)这样5个指标; 以及与目标词相关的整句指标:从目标词向前的回视(regression out, RO)、向目标词的回视(regression in, RI)、整句注视时间(sentence duration, SD)以及整句注视次数(sentence fixation, SF)。

3.2.1 兴趣区内指标

兴趣区内指标分析是指对不同条件下, 对目标词上的眼动指标进行分析。旨在了解不同预测性和不同的词语身份信息、位置信息条件下, 对兴趣区的加工情况。

具体指标的含义为:首次注视持续时间(first fixation duration, FFD), 是指落在兴趣区中第一个注视点的持续时间; 首次注视的注视次数(first run fixation count, FRFC), 是指在第一次注视兴趣区到进入下一个兴趣区之前, 所有注视次数的总和; 凝视时间(gaze duration, GD), 是指从第一次注视到离开兴趣区前的凝视时间; 总注视时间(total time, TT), 是指在当前兴趣区中所有注视时间的总和。总注视次数(fixation count, FC), 是指在当前兴趣区所有注视次数的总和。描述统计的结果见表6

表6   每种实验条件下各兴趣区内眼动指标的平均值和标准差(M ± SD)

实验条件首次注视持续时间(ms)首次注视次数(次)凝视时间(ms)总注视时间(ms)总注视次数(次)
HP-OR292 ± 1104.35 ± 3.14570 ± 2891362 ± 9025.16 ± 4.28
HP-TN299 ± 1254.30 ± 3.05574 ± 2931338 ± 11205.37 ± 3.59
HP-FS309 ± 1244.30 ± 3.15587 ± 2271411 ± 9335.40 ± 4.16
HP-ES305 ± 1164.26 ± 3.05603 ± 3501505 ± 12385.12 ± 3.51
LP-OR292 ± 1184.23 ± 3.26572 ± 2121362 ± 11035.29 ± 4.29
LP-TN307 ± 1214.27 ± 3.18574 ± 2991433 ± 10125.46 ± 3.98
LP-FS309 ± 1324.16 ± 2.94586 ± 2651399 ± 9405.64 ± 4.67
LP-ES305 ± 1144.32 ± 3.29629 ± 2471413 ± 10435.25 ± 3.57

注:HP代表高预测性条件, LP代表低预测性条件, OR代表原词, TN代表换位非词, FS代表首字替换词, ES代表尾字替换词, 下同。

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


对兴趣区内4个眼动指标进行重复测量方差分析, 结果如下:

(1)首次注视持续时间, 预测性主效应不显著, Fpred (1, 818) = 0.45, p > 0.05, 偏η2 = 0.10; 但位置信息的主效应显著, FTl (3, 2454) = 6.68, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.98, 多重比较(LSD)结果显示:原词与换位非词(p = 0.023)、两种替换非词之间存在显著差异(p < 0.01), 几种非词之间均不存在显著差异(ps > 0.05)。两个变量的交互作用不显著(p > 0.05)。

(2)首次注视的注视次数, 各条件均没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。

(3)凝视时间, 预测性主效应显著, Fpred (1, 818) = 17.06, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.11; 高预测性条件下, 对目标词的凝视时间短于低预测性条件下的凝视时间; 位置信息主效应显著, FTl (3, 2454) = 88.27, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.76。多重比较(LSD)发现, 原词条件下的凝视时间为517 ms、换位非词条件下的凝视时间为574 ms和两种替换词的凝视时间分别为尾字替换586 ms, 首字替换615 ms, 几种条件之间均存在显著差异(ps < 0.01)。两个变量的交互作用显著, Fpred×Tl (3, 2454) = 10.89, p < 0.01, 偏 η2 = 0.10。在高预测性条件下, 原词条件与首字替换条件差异显著(p = 0.018), 与其余条件之间差异均不显著(ps > 0.05), 换位非词条件与首字替换词条件差异也显著(p = 0.041), 与其余条件之间差异不显著(ps > 0.05), 两种替换条件之间差异不显著, p > 0.05而在低预测性条件下, 首字替换词条件与其他条件之间均差异显著(ps < 0.01), 其他条件之间均没有显著差异(ps > 0.05)。

(4)总注视时间, 预测性主效应显著, Fpred (1, 818) = 5.57, p = 0.025, 偏η2 = 0.66; 高预测性条件下, 对目标词的总注视时间短于低预测性条件下的总注视时间; 位置信息主效应显著, FTl (3, 2454) = 3.78, p = 0.031, 偏η2 = 0.82。多重比较(LSD)发现, 原词条件与换位非词和首字替换词条件之间存在显著差异(p < 0.01), 但与尾字替换词条件差异不显著(p > 0.05), 而换位非词与首字替换词和尾字替换词之间不存在显著差异(p > 0.05)。两个变量的交互作用显著, Fpred×Tl (3, 2454) = 3.28, p < 0.01, 偏 η2 = 0.75。在高预测性条件下, 原词条件与首字替换词条件的总注视时间差异显著(p = 0.037), 其余条件差异均不显著(ps > 0.05), 而在低预测性条件下, 原词与尾字替换词条件的总注视时间差异显著(p < 0.01), 原词条件与换位非词条件的总注视时间差异不显著(p > 0.05), 其余条件均没有显著差异(ps > 0.05)。

(5)总注视次数, 预测性主效应显著, Fpred (1, 818) = 4.99, p = 0.02, 偏η2 = 0.61, 高预测性条件下, 对于目标词的总注视次数少于低预测性条件; 位置信息主效应不显著, FTl (3, 2454) = 1.43, p > 0.05, 偏η2 = 0.38, 两个变量之间存在交互作用, FTl×pred (3, 2454) = 4.16, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.86。在高预测性条件下, 各条件之间均没有显著差异(ps > 0.05)。而在低预测性条件下, 原词条件与换位词(p = 0.033)、首字替换词条件(p < 0.01)的总注视次数差异显著, 换位词与尾字替换词差异显著(p = 0.013), 其余条件均没有显著差异(ps > 0.05)。

3.2.2 目标词相关指标

在阅读加工过程中, 加工到目标词后, 又对目标词之前的内容进行注视, 即从目标词向前的回视(regression out, RO), 这类回视是与目标词加工有关的回视。在加工目标词之后的内容时, 出现向目标词的回视, 这也是加工中需要提取目标词信息时出现的回视, 就是向目标词的回视(regression in, RI)。这两个指标是与目标词相关的指标。在本实验中, 兴趣区之前、之后的内容相同, 被试对兴趣区之前、之后内容的理解应该是一样的, 但由于兴趣区中的词语有不同条件, 所以从兴趣区向前回视和从兴趣区后向兴趣区的回视反应的就是目标词加工的差异。为了探讨目标词加工差异在兴趣区外的表现, 本文增加了这两个指标进行分析。描述统计的结果见表7

表7   每种实验条件下各与目标词相关眼动指标的平均值和标准差(M ± SD)

实验条件从目标词向前回视(次)向目标词后的回视(次)整句阅读时间(ms)整句阅读次数(次)
HP-OR0.16 ± 0.370.20 ± 0.405612 ± 218612.84 ± 5.88
HP-TN0.22 ± 0.420.25 ± 0.445848 ± 235213.59 ± 5.08
HP-FS0.20 ± 0.400.25 ± 0.436007 ± 240713.73 ± 6.15
HP-ES0.20 ± 0.400.23 ± 0.425848 ± 201813.17 ± 4.63
LP-OR0.19 ± 0.390.24 ± 0.435753 ± 225913.22 ± 5.69
LP-TN0.22 ± 0.420.26 ± 0.446132 ± 224413.94 ± 5.43
LP-FS0.23 ± 0.420.26 ± 0.446090 ± 252913.54 ± 5.05
LP-ES0.23 ± 0.420.27 ± 0.446302 ± 305514.49 ± 7.45

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


对4个与目标词相关眼动指标进行重复测量方差分析发现:

(1)从目标词向前回视率, 预测性主效应显著Fpred (1, 818) = 12.35, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.93; 比较发现, 高预测性条件下, 从目标词向前回视率低于低预测性条件下的回视率; 位置信息主效应显著, FTl (3, 141) = 6.73, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.98, 多重比较(LSD)结果表明, 原词条件与换位条件(p = 0.012)、替换条件(ps = 0.013)之间均差异显著, 换位条件与两种替换条件(首字条件p = 0.013, 尾字条件p = 0.012)之间也差异显著, 两种换位条件直接差异也显著(p = 0.012)。其中原词条件下的从目标词向前回视率最低, 换位条件下最高。两个变量的交互作用不显著(p > 0.05)。

(2)向目标词的回视率, 预测性主效应显著, Fpred (1, 818) = 7.73, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.79; 其中高预测性条件下, 从目标词区域向前回视率低于低预测性条件向前回视率; 位置信息主效应显著, FTl (3, 2454) = 3.46, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.78, 多重比较(LSD)结果表明, 原词条件与几种非词条件均差异显著(ps = 0.011), 但几种非词条件差异不显著(ps > 0.05), 两个变量之间的交互作用不显著(p > 0.05)。

(3)整句阅读时间, 预测性主效应显著, Fpred (3, 1149) = 5.95, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.96, 高预测性条件下的整句阅读时间短; 位置信息主效应也显著, FTl (1, 383) = 11.73, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.93, 多重比较(LSD)结果表明, 原词条件与换位条件、首字替换条件(p = 0.045), 尾字替换条件(p = 0.050)之间均差异显著, 尾字替换条件与换位条件(p = 0.046)和首字替换条件(p = 0.035)之间也差异显著, 而换位条件与首字替换条件之间差异不显著(p > 0.05)。预测性与位置信息之间没有交互作用(p > 0.05)。

(4)整句注视次数, 预测性主效应显著, Fpred (3, 1149) = 3.91, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.87, 高预测性条件下的整句注视次数少; 位置信息主效应也显著, FTl (1, 383) = 11.04, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.91, 多重比较(LSD)结果表明, 原词条件与换位条件差异不显著, 与两种替换条件差异显著, 而首字替换与其他三种条件均差异显著, 且次数最多, 尾字替换与换位条件差异不显著, 与其他两种情况差异均显著。同时, 预测性与位置信息之间存在交互作用, Fpred×Tl (3, 1149) = 4.35, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.76, 进一步分析发现, 在高预测性条件下, 原词条件与换位条件和尾字替换条件差异均不显著(p > 0.05), 与首字替换词之间差异显著(p = 0.015), 其他条件之间差异均不显著(ps > 0.05)。而低预测性条件下, 原词条件与换位条件差异不显著(p > 0.05), 与尾字替换词之间差异显著(p = 0.035), 其他条件之间均差异显著(p > 0.05)。

3.3 讨论

在实验2中, 使用原词、换位词、首字替换词、尾字替换词作为目标词, 通过编制高预测性及低预测性句子框架, 探究预测性对于位置信息加工的影响。结果发现, 除首次注视持续时间(FFD)和首次注视的注视次数(FRFC)外, 均有预测性主效应, 说明句子的预测性对阅读的影响可以通过眼动指标反映出来。结合目标词内指标与句子中其他与目标词相关的指标可以发现, 相比于首字替换假词, 换位假词对于阅读的影响较小。结合目标词内凝视时间、整句阅读时间和整句总注视次数指标, 可以看出预测性对于位置信息的影响。高预测性条件下, 汉字位置信息与身份信息对于句子的影响均有所下降, 可以看到首字替换词的注视时间长、注视次数多, 说明在此情况下, 首字身份信息的破坏对于整句阅读的影响大, 这与本实验的假设是一致的。而低预测性条件下, 位置信息和身份信息的影响增大, 换位非词和替换非词没有显著差异, 但依然是换位非词更加靠近原词, 这说明预测性增大了身份信息和位置信息改变对阅读产生影响, 但无法彻底抵消身份信息的改变对阅读的破坏, 尤其是替换发生在词首位置。

对于目标词内首次注视时间和首次注视次数指标预测性不显著的情况, 我们认为可能是由于当首次注视到目标词时, 由于是刚刚接触到目标词, 预测性并没有对这个阶段的词语加工产生影响, 这也对预测性研究提出一个新思路, 在进行预测性研究时, 应该关注整句的注视时间、向前眼跳比率和向后眼跳比率(Luke & Christianson, 2016)这些能更好反应预测性的指标。

由于对目标词的位置信息做了4种不同的处理, 形成了原词、换位非词、首字替换词和尾字替换词。研究发现在从目标词向前眼动和从目标词向后眼动的指标中, 换位词与原词存在显著差异, 与首字替换词和尾字替换词均不存在显著差异, 出现身份信息和位置信息都重要的情况。回视率是衡量加工后期情况的指标, 在这个阶段, 换位词与原词存在显著差异的情况与以往的研究是一致的(Pagán et al., 2016)。位置信息和身份信息在目标词内指标中, 换位词与原词之间均存在显著差异, 与尾字替换词均不存在显著差异, 但在首次注视时间、首次凝视时间、凝视时间上与首字替换词存在显著差异。

而在整句阅读次数指标上, 出现了预测性与位置信息的交互作用, 在高、低预测性条件下, 原词与换位非词差异均不显著, 但高预测性条件下, 原词与尾字替换词差异不显著, 在低预测性条件下, 原词与首字替换词的差异显著。根据以往研究(Yakup et al., 2014)并结合本实验中的其他指标, 可以发现, 首字替换词对阅读的影响比尾字替换词要大, 尤其是在高预测性的条件下。因为首字替换词的第一个字的身份信息被完全破坏, 导致在预测性高的情况下, 看到已经破坏的非词时, 对阅读产生较大的影响, 而且也较难通过尾字来关联原词, 但看到的如果是尾字替换词的话, 那么看到的首字是确定的, 通过之前句子的预测, 能够对词语进行关联, 因此对阅读产生的影响较小。而在预测性低的情况下, 无法预测出即将出现的目标词, 因此无论出现的是首字替换词还是换位词, 都无法做出预测, 所以在这种情况下, 原词与换位词, 首字替换词之间差异并不显著。

目标词内的指标反映了被试在进行句子阅读中对于目标词加工的情况, 在这些指标中, 换位词与尾字替换词的加工是不存在显著差异的, 但这能说明在中文句子阅读的情况下就不存在换位效应吗?显然是不能的, 因为在首次注视时间、首次凝视时间和凝视时间的指标中, 我们发现换位词与首字替换词之间是存在显著差异的, 这说明在进行句子阅读时, 位置信息与身份信息相比是较灵活的, 也就是说, 当换位词导致了位置信息100%的变化, 而首字替换词导致的50%身份信息变化时, 换位词依然能够较快的进行加工。而尾字替换词由于双字词的首字是能够看到的, 因此在句子通顺的情况下, 被试能够猜测出掩蔽词语, 并且在本实验中还发现, 在高预测性条件下, 尾字替换词比换位词加工更容易, 这种结果说明在预测性的帮助下, 能够通过预测来对整词进行提取加工。也就是说, 尾字替换词与换位词的类似不能解释为换位效应的消失, 而是由于在句子阅读中, 被试在进行副中央凹词加工时, 能够通过预测性来对目标词进行猜测, 使目标词的加工变快。

在实验2中, 我们发现词汇的身份信息对阅读的作用更大, 语境预测性能够促进词语身份信息的加工。那么语境的预测性对于词汇身份信息和位置信息影响的时间进程是如何呢?为了探究这一问题, 我们设计了实验3。实验3采用边界范式, 参考副中央凹预视效应的研究方法(Inhoff & Radach, 2014), 选用实验2中的实验材料, 通过改变掩蔽刺激的目标延迟时间, 来探究语境预测性对句子阅读中词汇身份信息和位置信息影响的时间进程。

4 实验3:语境预测性对词汇位置信息加工影响的时间进程

4.1 方法

4.1.1 被试

在校大学生26名, 均为右利手, 年龄21~23岁。被试的裸视或矫正视力正常,母语均为汉语。每个被试都阅读了《知情同意书》, 并签字同意。所有被试均不知实验目的, 实验结束后获得学分和适当报酬。

4.1.2 设计和材料

实验采用4(关键词类型)×2(预测性)×3(目标 延迟条件)三因素被试内设计。关键词类型及预测性与实验2相同, 预视时间分别为0 ms, 50 ms和100 ms。

实验材料的编制和评定同实验1。实验材料举例见表8。例子的词汇“手机”是实验的目标词n, 每个句子都包含一个无形的边界(McConkie & Rayner, 1975), 这个边界位于目标词之前的空白区, 目标词在句子阅读的开始处于掩蔽状态, 掩蔽材料包括(1)原词(2)换位非词(3)首字替换非词和(4)尾字替换非词。当被试眼睛越过边界, 目标词位置的掩蔽刺激在0 ms (没有延迟条件)、50 ms或者100 ms后被替换成目标刺激。

表8   实验2实验材料举例(边界在“手”之前)

目标延迟条件眼睛越过边界前后
0 ms苹果公司推出了最新款的
智能手吅和平板电脑。
(眼睛越过边界之前)
苹果公司推出了最新款的
智能手机和平板电脑。
(眼睛越过边界
0 ms之后)
50 ms苹果公司推出了最新款的
智能手吅和平板电脑。
(眼睛越过边界之前)
苹果公司推出了最新款的
智能手机和平板电脑。
(眼睛越过边界
50 ms之后)
100 ms苹果公司推出了最新款的
智能手吅和平板电脑。
(眼睛越过边界之前)
苹果公司推出了最新款的
智能手机和平板电脑。
(眼睛越过边界
100 ms之后)

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


4.1.3 实验仪器与实验程序

被试机屏幕刷新率为120 Hz, 其余与实验2 相同。

4.2 结果

结果分析使用的仪器和方法与实验2相同, 句子后出现的判断题的被试的平均正确率为93%, 删除了正确率低于90%的2名被试的数据, 并排除了注视点持续时间小于80 ms或大于1200 ms的数据, 占总数的1.40%。

根据实验3的实验假设和目的, 参考实验设计, 本次结果分析选取了目标词n的相关指标:首次注视持续时间(first fixation duration, FFD)、首次注视的注视次数(first run fixation count, FRFC)、凝视时间((gaze duration, GD)、总注视次数(fixation count, FC)。

4.2.1 首次注视持续时间

对目标词n的首次注视持续时间进行统计, 描述性统计结果见表9。预视时间为0 ms时, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 168) = 29.70, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.50; 位置信息的主效应也显著, F(3, 504) = 20.36, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.81, 多重比较(LSD)结果显示:原词条件与两种替换条件之间差异不显著(ps > 0.05), 尾字替换和首字替换条件差异不显著(p > 0.05), 其余条件之间均差异显著(ps < 0.01)。预测性与位置信息的交互作用显著, F(3, 504) = 16.02, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.18。在高预测性条件下, 几种条件之间均差异不显著(ps > 0.05), 而在低预测性条件下, 原词条件与换位条件差异不显著, 与替换条件差异显著(p < 0.01), 换位条件与两种替换条件差异也显著(尾字替换条件:p = 0.02; 首字替换条件:p < 0.01)。

表9   每种实验条件下首次注视的持续时间(ms)的平均值和标准差(M ± SD)

实验条件0 ms50 ms100 ms
HP-OR235 ± 13241 ± 32181 ± 12
HP-TN229 ± 21222 ± 23174 ± 18
HP-FS239 ± 20254 ± 17184 ± 17
HP-ES238 ± 11233 ± 16190 ± 21
LP-OR228 ± 10227 ± 34288 ± 19
LP-TN238 ± 25245 ± 21288 ± 21
LP-FS246 ± 13221 ± 27293 ± 32
LP-ES247 ± 31238 ± 25291 ± 11

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


预视时间为50 ms条件下, 预测性主效应、位置信息主效应均不显著。预视时间为100 ms条件下, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 172) = 36.26, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.64; 位置信息主效应不显著, 预测性与位置信息的交互作用也不显著。

4.2.2 首次注视的注视次数

对目标词首次注视的注视次数进行统计, 描述性统计结果见表10。预视时间为0 ms时, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 168) = 84.44, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.84; 位置信息的主效应也显著, F(3, 504) = 17.47, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.49, 多重比较(LSD)结果显示:原词与其他条件均差异显著(p < 0.01), 换位条件与首字替换条件差异显著(p < 0.01), 两种替换词条件之间差异也显著(p = 0.035), 其余条件之间均差异不显著(ps > 0.05)。预测性与位置信息的交互作用显著, F(3, 504) = 3.20, p = 0.023, 偏η2 = 0.19。在高预测性条件下, 原词条件与其它几种条件之间均差异显著(换位条件p = 0.029, 尾字替换条件p = 0.020, 首字替换条件p < 0.01), 换位条件与尾字替换条件差异不显著(p > 0.05), 与首字替换条件差异显著(p < 0.01); 尾字替换条件与首字替换条件差异也显著(p < 0.01)。而在低预测性条件下, 原词条件与其它几种条件均差异显著(ps < 0.01), 换位条件与两种替换条件差异也显著(尾字替换条件: p = 0.02; 首字替换条件:p < 0.01)。

表1   0 每种实验条件下首次注视的次数的平均值和标准差(M ± SD)

实验条件0 ms50 ms100 ms
HP-OR3.29 ± 0.723.34 ± 0.612.97 ± 0.67
HP-TN3.39 ± 0.833.60 ± 0.433.06 ± 0.99
HP-FS3.49 ± 0.923.43 ± 0.643.21 ± 0.72
HP-ES3.37 ± 0.453.64 ± 0.833.09 ± 0.68
LP-OR3.53 ± 1.033.85 ± 0.524.21 ± 0.55
LP-TN3.69 ± 0.993.77 ± 0.814.24 ± 0.64
LP-FS3.78 ± 0.803.79 ± 0.894.43 ± 0.53
LP-ES3.75 ± 0.823.89 ± 0.714.26 ± 0.65

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


预视时间为50 ms条件下, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 168) = 4.91, p = 0.028, 偏η2 = 0.28; 位置信息主效应不显著, 预测性与位置信息的交互作用也不显著。预视时间为100 ms条件下, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 172) = 56.73, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.84; 位置信息主效应不显著, 预测性与位置信息的交互作用也不显著。

4.2.3 凝视时间

对目标词的凝视时间进行统计, 描述性统计结果见表11。预视时间为0 ms时, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 168) = 9.35, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.53; 位置信息的主效应也显著, F(3, 504) = 30.81, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.51, 多重比较(LSD)结果显示:除尾字替换和首字替换条件差异不显著外(p > 0.05), 其余条件之间均差异显著。原词条件的凝视时间最短, 换位词条件较原词条件较长, 两种替换时间则更长。预测性与位置信息的交互作用显著, F(3, 504) = 5.80, p < 0.05, 偏η2 = 0.33。在高预测性条件下, 原词条件与其它条件差异显著(p < 0.01), 换位条件与替换条件差异也显著(p < 0.01), 而在低预测性条件下, 几种条件之间差异均不显著(ps > 0.05)预视时间为100 ms时, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 172) =15.90, p < 0.01, 偏η2= 0.85; 位置信息的主效应也显著, F(3, 516) = 3.28, p = 0.021, 偏η2 = 0.19, 多重比较(LSD)结果显示:原词条件只与首字替换条件差异显著(p < 0.01), 换位条件也仅与首字替换条件差异显著(p = 0.022), 其余条件之间差异均不显著(ps > 0.05)。预测性与位置信息的交互作用不显著。

表1   1 每种实验条件下凝视时间(ms)的平均值和标准差(M ± SD)

实验条件0 ms50 ms100 ms
HP-OR1121 ± 951254 ± 1171080 ± 78
HP-TN1274 ± 1121306 ± 1301151 ± 84
HP-FS1316 ± 1161398 ± 1221201 ± 96
HP-ES1314 ± 1181310 ± 1091172 ± 90
LP-OR1383 ± 1111532 ± 1401224 ± 95
LP-TN1431 ± 1191465 ± 1311222 ± 99
LP-FS1487 ± 1401509 ± 1411528 ± 113
LP-ES1451 ± 1231495 ± 1581404 ± 108

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


4.2.4 总注视次数

对目标词总注视次数进行统计, 描述性统计结果见表12。预视时间为0 ms条件下, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 168) = 32.78, p < 0.01, 偏η2= 0.63; 位置信息的主效应也显著, F(3, 504) = 24.81, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.92, 多重比较(LSD)结果显示:原词条件与其它条件之间均差异显著(ps < 0.01), 换位条件与尾字替换条件差异不显著(p > 0.05)与首字替换条件差异显著(p < 0.01), 首字替换条件与尾字替换条件差异也显著(p = 0.020)。预测性与位置信息的交互作用显著, F(3, 504) = 13.58, p < 0.05, 偏η2 = 0.75。在高预测性条件下, 原词条件与其它条件差异显著(p < 0.01), 其它条件之间均差异不显著 (ps > 0.05), 而在低预测性条件下, 几种条件差异均不显著(ps > 0.05)。

表1   2 每种实验条件下总注视次数(次)的平均值和标准差(M ± SD)

实验条件0 ms50 ms100 ms
HP-OR4.43 ± 1.764.97 ± 1.753.65 ± 1.0
HP-TN4.90 ± 1.115.27 ± 1.603.76 ± 1.7
HP-FS5.07 ± 1.275.42 ± 1.213.87 ± 1.4
HP-ES4.94 ± 1.885.25 ± 1.973.87 ± 1.8
LP-OR5.04 ± 1.735.24 ± 1.354.55 ± 1.5
LP-TN5.22 ± 1.825.75 ± 1.444.72 ± 3.4
LP-FS5.24 ± 1.336.09 ± 1.476.05 ± 1.7
LP-ES5.12 ± 1.565.88 ± 1.625.23 ± 1.6

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


预视时间为50 ms时, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 168) = 4.17, p = 0.043, 偏η2 = 0.24, 位置信息主效应不显著, 预测性与位置信息的交互作用也不显著。预视时间为100 ms时, 预测性主效应显著, F(1, 172) = 46.47, p < 0.01, 偏η2 = 0.,72; 位置信息的主效应也显著, F(3,516) = 3.08, p = 0.027, 偏η2 = 0.17, 多重比较(LSD)结果显示:原词条件只与首字替换条件差异显著(p = 0.011), 换位条件也仅与首字替换条件差异显著(p = 0.015), 其余条件之间差异均不显著(ps > 0.05)。预测性与位置信息的交互作用显著, F(3, 504) = 2.73, p = 0.043, 偏η2 = 0.15。在高预测性条件下, 几种条件差异均不显著(ps > 0.05), 而在低预测性条件下, 原词条件与首字替换条件差异显著(p < 0.01), 其余条件之间差异均显著(ps > 0.05)。

4.3 讨论

在实验3中, 通过控制目标词的预视时间, 发现预测性结果与实验2结果一致, 但位置信息和身份信息的作用与实验2相比有更深层的发现, 当预视时间为0 ms时, 位置信息的作用较小, 在预视时间为50 ms和100 ms时位置信息的作用增大, 位置信息的破坏与身份信息破坏一样对目标词的识别和加工造成影响。也就是说, 在句子阅读中, 预视时间较短时, 对目标词的预视时间不足, 这时位置信息的破坏较身份信息的破坏对汉语识别造成的影响小。这与四字词边界范式中单独词条件凝视时间结果、两个双字词条件的注视时间结果, 比较一致(Gu & Li, 2015)。上述影响受预测性的调节, 随着预视时间增加, 副中央凹加工的时间延长, 汉语位置信息的破坏对目标词的识别影响变大, 且预测性的改变不会对位置信息的破坏起到作用。

在预视时间为0 ms时, 分析首次注视的持续时间和首次注视的注视次数可以发现, 预测性可以调节位置信息和身份信息的作用, 高预测性时, 几种条件下的首次注视持续时间差异不显著, 也就是说, 高预测性能够降低身份信息和位置信息破坏对词汇识别造成的影响, 在高预测性条件下, 尾字替换条件的首次注视持续时间较首字替换条件更短, 这也是预测性对于身份信息破坏作用的调节的证明。也就是说, 在本实验中, 预测性在首次注视的时候就已经开始起作用, 这与实验2的结果不同。在实验2中, 改变的词语是通过副中央凹加工后, 还通过中央凹进行加工, 也就是说, 相比实验3中的首次注视指标, 实验2中反映的不仅仅是副中央凹加工的作用, 而是进一步加工的效果。结合凝视时间和总注视次数发现, 高预测性情况下, 原词条件的时间最短, 次数最小, 而低预测性条件下, 由于对目标词无法预测, 因此, 各个条件下的词汇的总注视时间和总注视次数是类似的, 这也是可以理解的。

将实验1与实验3的结果结合起来可以发现:在单独呈现条件下, 位置信息由启动时间为80 ms时比身份信息更重要, 到100 ms时作用减小, 在加工中比较灵活, 到300 ms时与身份信息共同作用的过程, 而在句子语境下, 预视时间为0 ms时, 位置信息作用小, 预视时间为50和100 ms时, 可以通过凝视时间和总注视次数两个指标看出, 位置信息的作用相比于预视时间较短时更重要。再比较高低预测性时的结果可以发现, 在预视时间较短时, 高预测性时的结果与实验1中启动时间短时的结果是类似的, 而低预测性时, 与实验1中几种启动时间下得到的启动效应都不同, 出现了都不显著的情况。而随着预视时间的延长, 高预测性时出现几种条件都不显著, 而低预测性时与实验1中启动时间较长时的结果是类似的。也就是说, 在单独呈现时, 在早期加工阶段, 位置信息的作用更大, 随着加工时间的延长, 位置信息的作用逐渐降低, 身份信息的作用逐渐增加。而在句子语境下, 由于句子语境预测性及副中央凹加工的存在, 位置信息的作用在早期阶段较为灵活, 随加工的深入, 位置信息的作用增大。

在预视时间为50 ms时, 各指标均出现了预测性主效应显著, 而没有出现位置信息的主效应显著。也就是说, 在这个阶段, 位置信息和身份信息的作用是类似的, 无法确认哪个作用更大。这与实验1的结果类似, 随着加工时间的延长, 位置信息的作用增大, 换位非词和替换非词都会对加工造成类似的影响。而在预视时间为100 ms时, 位置信息和身份信息的作用出现了差异, 此时, 目标词首字的身份信息的破坏对目标词的加工造成最大影响, 而位置信息和目标词尾字的身份信息的破坏我们也无法判定哪个的作用更大, 但可以肯定的是, 在这个阶段, 目标词首字的身份信息作用是最大的。

5 总讨论

通过行为实验和眼动实验, 采用真假词判断任务和句子阅读任务, 考察了在阅读加工的早期阶段和晚期阶段, 词语的身份信息和位置信息加工的特点, 以及预测性对位置信息的影响。综合三个实验的结果, 发现位置信息的作用在早期阶段(句子中预视时间为0 ms时)作用较小, 即使发生改变也不会带来很大影响, 相比身份信息更加灵活。随着加工时间的延长(单独呈现启动词80 ms, 句子中预视时间为50 ms), 位置信息的作用逐渐增大, 与身份信息改变相比, 位置信息改变需要更长的注视时间, 更多的注视次数。而到了加工的晚期阶段(单独呈现启动词300 ms, 句子预视时间为100 ms, 实验2), 位置信息的作用与身份信息的作用类似, 但身份信息的作用与所处的位置(处在词汇中的首字或尾字)有关。可见, 词汇中的字母作用与特定位置关系密切, 贝叶斯读者模型主张词汇中的字母与他们的特定位置相联系(Norris, Kinoshita, & van Casteren, 2010)。不同位置作用也是不一样的。而且首字替换比尾字替换破坏性更大, 也说明词汇识别中, 不同位置的刺激激活程度是不一样的。Davis (2001)提出的SOLAR模型也主张, 每个字母与自我激活水平有关, 第一个字母激活水平最高, 依次递减, 最后一个激活水平最低。所以尾字替换破坏性小很多。但是, 本研究结果并不支持Whitney (2001)提出的SERIOL模型, 没有出现一致的换位比替换优势的数据模式。其原因也许是, 本研究的实验材料是双字词, 双字母组合的差异体现不出来。未来研究需要探讨三字词、四字词、六字词情况。

在本研究中, 对于句子阅读的预测性效应的研究发现, 语境预测性对不同目标词条件下的阅读产生影响。结合实验2和实验3的结果, 发现, 预测性从副中央凹加工时, 就会对目标词的加工产生影响, 预测性在副中央凹加工的早期阶段, 会对位置信息的加工有促进作用, 而到了中央凹加工阶段, 对身份信息的加工有促进作用。参考实验1的结果, 我们可以推测与拼音文字研究(Blythe, Johnson, Liversedge, & Rayner, 2014)会有不同的结果, 汉语词汇中汉字的位置信息比英文词汇中的字母位置信息更为重要。在单独呈现双字词时, 位置信息的重要性在早期阶段表现的很明显。但在句子语境条件下, 位置信息的重要性较单独呈现的情况会降低, 但依然会产生很大的作用。结合眼动指标, 可以发现, 首字替换对阅读的阻碍作用最大, 证明了副中央凹更难加工换位词或者部分掩蔽词, 也再次证明SOLAR模型主张的不同位置字母激活不同的观点的正确性。而在目标词内的指标中发现, 换位词对于词语加工的阻碍作用小于掩蔽词, 这与在单独的词语阅读中发现的结果类似, 也就是说, 在有上下文语境的条件下, 语境的预测性对词语的加工促进作用。

位置信息和身份信息的作用, 汉语与拼音文字为什么不同呢?首先, 可能是因为实验使用的是双字词, 拼音文字的研究中, 使用的是多个字母的词汇, 例如“clerk” (Perea, Palti, & Gómez, 2012)。这种多字母的单词, 两个字母换位的情况下, 只会导致40%的字母位置的改变, 如果字母多的话, 位置信息改变所占比例更少。但是汉语双字词换位导致了位置信息100%的改变, 换位词激活原词的难度增大。就像在前言中提到的, 在英文研究中发现, 换位位置对词语的加工也有不同影响, 换位发生在词首、词尾比发生在词内部对词汇识别的破坏性更大(White et al., 2008; Yakup et al., 2014), 而在中文阅读中, 双字词的换位相当于将整个的首尾进行了颠倒, 所以说对词汇识别的加工破坏性增大。尤其是在整句阅读中, 在英语研究中, 在阅读关键词前的内容时, 副中央凹加工可以根据换位单词的前几个字母对整个单词进行猜测, 而在汉语阅读中, 由于位置信息100%的改变, 所以注视之前的词语时, 副中央凹加工很难猜测换位词的原词。其次, 结合实验3的发现, 预测性在早期阶段的时候对位置信息的加工有促进作用, 那么在中文的词汇中, 首字对尾字是否也是有促进作用呢?在拼音文字中, 字母更多的是以单独的形式出现, 且一般情况下, 仅出现1~2个首字母无法对整个单词进行预测, 而汉字中, 双字词最多, 当出现首字时, 读者可能就会有意识的预测到下一个字, 并进行组词, 因此当位置信息破坏时, 加工会变得更困难。

那么词素位置信息和身份信息是如何作用于句子阅读下的词汇识别呢?根据汉语词汇识别的单向切分假设(Inhoff & Wu, 2005), 即汉语词切分严格遵循从左往右的序列, 例如读者注视到“...家的经济状况...” (本研究实验2材料)时, 在头脑中首先会确定“家的”是否是一个词, 然后再确定“家的经”是否是一个词, 如果不是的话, “家的”会被认为是一个双字词, 同时下一个字“经”就是下一个词的开始, 以此类推。那么研究者推断, 读者在文本阅读时, 通过前后相邻的词语构成一个汉字串, 又构成一个句子, 那么要识别整句及句子中词语的意思, 就需要自下而上的通过对词语进行识别, 来分析整句的含义, 当句子中出现换位和替换时, 会对汉语词的切分和识别造成影响, 这也是汉语句子中身份信息和位置信息不同于拼音文字研究的原因之一。而结合预测性我们可以发现, 整句的意思能够对目标词的识别产生影响, 也就是说也存在自上而下的通过理解整句含义来分析词汇。以拼音文字的研究为基础, 有许多模型已经考虑到了字母位置信息编码的灵活性, 如空间编码模型(Davis, 2010), 重叠模型(overlap model) (Gome, Ratcliff, & Perea, 2008)和贝叶斯读者模型(Bayesian reader model)等。本实验结果较好地支持SOLAR模型和贝叶斯读者模型, 不支持SERIOL模型。另外, 双重途径加工模型(Whitney, Bertrand, & Grainger, 2012)也可以解释本研究的结果。双重途径加工模型(open-bigram account)认为, 词汇的激活是通过各字母身份信息和位置信息激活的数值通过加权的方式计算的, 比如单词“BIRD (鸟)”, BI、IR、RD与整词“BIRD”的匹配程度是1.0, BR, ID和整词的匹配程度是0.8, BD和整词的匹配程度是0.4, 所以单词“BIRD”的激活值为4.4 = 3 × 1 × 1 + 2 × 0.8 × 0.8+ 1 × 0.4 × 0.4, 当激活值不足时, 需要更深层次的加工, 而位置信息发生改变导致激活不足时, 如将“BIRD”变为了“BRID”, 激活值仍为4.4, 而如果身份信息发生了改变如I变为U激活值会下降。在汉语中, 身份信息和位置信息的加工可能同样遵循这种模式, 但中文中, 激活值的权重可能与身份信息的位置有关, 身份信息在副中央凹阶段最先加工, 然后位置信息开始加工, 随加工的深入, 身份信息继续加工, 直到达到词汇通达。

在本研究中, 句子预测性对关键词识别的促进作用与以往研究结果是一致的。句子阅读的研究表明在词汇通达的过程中存在预测性效应, 即对高预测性词汇的识别快于对低预测性词汇的识别(苏衡, 刘志方, 曹立人, 2016)。实验2和实验3的研究结果也表明, 对词素位置信息颠倒的高预测性词语的识别仍比对词素位置信息颠倒的低预测性词语的识别速度快, 这证明了预测性效应的存在, 即使双字词中的词素位置信息发生了颠倒, 高预测性词语仍能促进读者对它的识别速度。

本研究通过对词素身份信息和位置信息加以改变探讨了词素信息的重要性, 结果表明词素信息的加工会对句子阅读中的词汇加工产生影响, 这充分证明了词素位置信息的加工是词汇加工的重要阶段。结合以往研究, 运用颠倒字母位置的方法探讨拼音文字字母编码问题, 而对于汉语这种特殊的文字系统, 本研究运用词素位置改变和首字尾字替换的方法对词汇识别中词素位置信息和身份信息的重要性进行了进一步的探讨。

5 结论

汉语双字词的身份信息和位置信息的加工是分离的。在单独呈现时, 位置信息在早期加工阶段作用更大, 随着加工时间的延长, 位置信息的作用逐渐降低, 身份信息的作用逐渐增加。在句子阅读中, 位置信息在副中央凹加工的早期阶段作用较为灵活, 随加工的深入, 位置信息的作用增大, 语境预测性在早期能够促进位置信息的加工, 在晚期能够促进身份信息的加工。

参考文献

Bian Q., Cui L., & Yan G. L . ( 2010).

Effects of the transposed morpheme on the Chinese sentence reading: evidence from eye movement data

Psychological Research, 3, 29-35.

[本文引用: 1]

[ 卞迁, 崔磊, 闫国利 . ( 2010).

词素位置颠倒对汉语句子阅读影响的眼动研究

心理研究, 3, 29-35.]

[本文引用: 1]

Blythe H. I., Johnson R. L., Liversedge S. P., & Rayner K . ( 2014).

Reading transposed text: Effects of transposed letter distance and consonant-vowel status on eye movements.

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(8), 2424-2440.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-014-0707-2      URL     PMID:24980151      [本文引用: 1]

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the flexibility of letter-position encoding in word identification during reading. In both experiments, two tasks were used. First, participants鈥 eye movements were measured as they read sentences containing transposed letter (TL) strings. Second, participants were presented with the TL strings in isolation and were asked to discriminate them from nonwords. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the distance between transposed letters ( ligament vs. liagment vs. limagent vs. lieamgnt ). Reading/response times increased with the distance between TLs. In Experiment 2 , we manipulated whether the TLs were consonants, vowels, or one of each ( ssytem vs. faeture vs. fromat ). Reading/response times showed that CV transpositions were the most disruptive. In both experiments, response accuracy was particularly poor for words presented in isolation when there was an intervening letter between TLs. These data show that processing across multiple fixations, and the presence of a meaningful sentence context, are important for flexible letter position encoding in lexical identification.

Cona G., Arcara G., Tarantino V., & Bisiacchi P. S . ( 2015).

Does predictability matter? Effects of cue predictability on neurocognitive mechanisms underlying prospective memory

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 188.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00188      URL     PMID:25918503      [本文引用: 1]

Prospective memory (PM) represents the ability to successfully realize intentions when the appropriate moment or cue occurs. In this study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to explore the impact of cue predictability on the cognitive and neural mechanisms supporting PM. Participants performed an ongoing task and, simultaneously, had to remember to execute a pre-specified action when they encountered the PM cues. The occurrence of the PM cues was predictable (being signaled by a warning cue) for some participants and was completely unpredictable for others. In the predictable cue condition, the behavioral and ERP correlates of strategic monitoring were observed mainly in the ongoing trials wherein the PM cue was expected. In the unpredictable cue condition they were instead shown throughout the whole PM block. This pattern of results suggests that, in the predictable cue condition, participants engaged monitoring only when subjected to a context wherein the PM cue was expected, and disengaged monitoring when the PM cue was not expected. Conversely, participants in the unpredictable cue condition distributed their resources for strategic monitoring in more continuous manner. The findings of this study support the most recent views-the "Dynamic Multiprocess Framework" and the "Attention to Delayed Intention" (AtoDI) model-confirming that strategic monitoring is a flexible mechanism that is recruited mainly when a PM cue is expected and that may interact with bottom-up spontaneous processes.

Davis, C. J . ( 2001).

The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition

Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 62, 594.

URL     [本文引用: 3]

Abstract The ability to read is supported by the existence of codes that represent the orthographic, phonological, and semantic properties of words. This thesis addresses the issue of how orthographic codes are self-organised. This question is explored using a combination of theoretical and computational approaches, leading to the introduction of a new computational model of Visual word recognition. The thesis begins with a review and critique of existing models of visual word recognition, with particular reference to their inability to satisfy adaptive constraints. This analysis highlights the inability of current models to explain self-organisation processes or to operate in real-world input environments. Subsequent chapters review neural networks for pattern recognition, learning and working memory, focussing on the work of Grossberg and colleagues. Two specific networks-the masking field network and its extension, the SONNET network-exhibit adaptive properties that are lacking in current models of visual word recognition. The SOLAR (Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition) model is a new neural network model of visual word recognition that embodies self-organisation and masking principles. The model differs from previous models in its capacity for stable self-organisation, its spatial coding scheme, its combination of serial and parallel processes, and its chunking mechanism. The model also introduces a novel mechanism to explain word frequency effects. Another distinctive feature of the model is its incorporation of a novel opponent processing mechanism for performing lexical decision. The SOLAR model explains a broad range of empirical data, including frequency effects, the lexical status effect, length effects, facilitatory and inhibitory effects of orthographic Similarity, the pseudohomophone effect, masked and unmasked repetition priming effects, the frequency attenuation effect, and left-to-right processing effects. Simulations have also demonstrated the model's ability to recognise complex stimuli (e.g., polysyllabic words) via a chunking mechanism that implements segmentation-through-recognition. This poses a critical challenge to alternative computational models, which are restricted to processing monosyllabic words. The SOLAR model also generates a number of novel empirical predictions. The final chapter discusses how the model might be extended to incorporate phonological codes, and the implications for explaining reading performance in skilled and dyslexic readers. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Davis, C. J . ( 2010).

The spatial coding model of visual word identification

Psychological Review, 117(3), 713-758.

DOI:10.1037/a0019738      URL     PMID:20658851      [本文引用: 1]

Visual word identification requires readers to code the identity and order of the letters in a word and match this code against previously learned codes. Current models of this lexical matching process posit context-specific letter codes in which letter representations are tied to either specific serial positions or specific local contexts (e.g., letter clusters). The spatial coding model described here adopts a different approach to letter position coding and lexical matching based on context-independent letter representations. In this model, letter position is coded dynamically, with a scheme called spatial coding. Lexical matching is achieved via a method called superposition matching, in which input codes and learned codes are matched on the basis of the relative positions of their common letters. Simulations of the model illustrate its ability to explain a broad range of results from the masked form priming literature, as well as to capture benchmark findings from the unprimed lexical decision task.

Gomez P., Ratcliff R., & Perea M . ( 2008).

The overlap model: A model of letter position coding

Psychological Review, 115(3), 577-600.

DOI:10.1037/a0012667      URL     PMID:2597794      [本文引用: 1]

Recent research has shown that letter identity and letter position are not integral perceptual dimensions (e.g., jugde primes judge in word-recognition experiments). Most comprehensive computational models of visual word recognition (e.g., the interactive activation model, J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart, 1981, and its successors) assume that the position of each letter within a word is perfectly encoded. Thus, these models are unable to explain the presence of effects of letter transposition (trial-trail), letter migration (beard-bread), repeated letters (moose-mouse), or subset/superset effects (faulty-faculty). The authors extend R. Ratcliff's (1981) theory of order relations for encoding of letter positions and show that the model can successfully deal with these effects. The basic assumption is that letters in the visual stimulus have distributions over positions so that the representation of one letter will extend into adjacent letter positions. To test the model, the authors conducted a series of forced-choice perceptual identification experiments. The overlap model produced very good fits to the empirical data, and even a simplified 2-parameter model was capable of producing fits for 104 observed data points with a correlation coefficient of .91.

Gu J. J., & Li X. S . ( 2015).

The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading

Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77(1), 272-281.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-014-0749-5      URL     PMID:25139264      [本文引用: 1]

Given the lack of spaces between words in Chinese text, Chinese readers must parse these characters into words using their word knowledge. In this situation, are the characters belonging to a single...

Gu J. J., Li X. S., & Liversedge S. P . ( 2015).

Character order processing in Chinese reading

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 41(1), 127-137.

DOI:10.1037/a0038639      URL     PMID:25621586      [本文引用: 2]

We explored how character order information is encoded in isolated word processing or Chinese sentence reading in 2 experiments using a masked priming paradigm and a gaze-contingent display-change paradigm. The results showed that response latencies in the lexical decision task and reading times on the target word region were longer in the unrelated condition (the prime or the preview was unrelated with the target word) than the transposed-character condition (the prime or the preview was a transposition of the 2 characters of the target word), which were respectively longer than in the identity condition (the prime or preview was identical to the target word). These results show that character order is encoded at an early stage of processing in Chinese reading, but character position encoding was not strict. We also found that character order encoding was similar for single-morpheme and multiple-morpheme words, suggesting that morphemic status does not affect character order encoding. The current results represent an early contribution to our understanding of character order encoding during Chinese reading

Hua H. M., Gu J. J., Lin N., & Li X. S . ( 2017).

Letter/ character position encoding in visual word recognition

Advances in Psychological Science, 25(7), 1132-1138.

[本文引用: 3]

[ 滑慧敏, 顾俊娟, 林楠, 李兴珊 . ( 2017).

视觉词汇识别中的字符位置编码

心理科学进展, 25(7), 1132-1138.]

[本文引用: 3]

Inhoff A. W., & Radach R . ( 2014).

Parafoveal preview benefits during silent and oral reading: Testing the parafoveal information extraction hypothesis

Visual Cognition, 22(3-4), 354-376.

DOI:10.1080/13506285.2013.879630      URL     [本文引用: 1]

The preview of a parafoveally visible word conveys benefits when it is subsequently fixated. The current study examined whether these benefits are determined by the effectiveness of parafoveal information extraction, as implied by current models of eye movement control during reading, or by the effectiveness with which extracted information is integrated when a previewed word is fixated. For this, the boundary technique was used to manipulate the extent to which parafoveal information could be extracted, and text was read silently or orally. Consistent with prior work, a parafoveal target word preview conveyed fewer benefits when less parafoveal information could be extracted, target viewing durations were longer during oral than during silent reading, and the two factors interacted in the target fixation data, with smaller preview benefits during oral than during silent reading. Survival analyses indicated that this occurred because parafoveal information use occurred at later point in time during oral reading. Diminished opportunity for parafoveal information extraction also diminished target skipping rate, and it resulted in smaller saccades to target words, but these effects were not influenced by reading mode. Parafoveally extracted information was thus used less effectively during oral reading only when it involved the integration of parafoveally extracted information during subsequent target viewing. The dissociation of extraction from integration challenges current models of eye movement control.

Inhoff A. W., & Wu C. L . ( 2005).

Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading

Memory & Cognition, 33(8), 1345-1356.

DOI:10.3758/BF03193367      URL     PMID:16615382      [本文引用: 1]

Readers of Chinese must generally determine word units in the absence of visually distinct inter-word spaces. In the present study, we examined how a sequence of Chinese characters is parsed into words under these conditions. Eye movements were monitored while participants read sentences with a critical four-character (C1234) sequence. Three partially overlapping character groupings formed legal words in the ambiguous condition (C12, C23, and C34), two of which corresponded to context-consistent words (C12 and C34). Two nonoverlapping groupings corresponded to legal words in the control conditions (C12 and C34). In two experiments, readers spent more time viewing the critical character sequence and its two center characters (C23) in the ambiguous condition. These results argue against the strictly serial assignment of characters to words during the reading of Chinese text.

Johnson R. L., Perea M., & Rayner K . ( 2007).

Transposed- letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33(1), 209-229.

DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209      URL     PMID:17311489      [本文引用: 1]

Abstract Three eye movement experiments were conducted to examine the role of letter identity and letter position during reading. Before fixating on a target word within each sentence, readers were provided with a parafoveal preview that differed in the amount of useful letter identity and letter position information it provided. In Experiments 1 and 2, previews fell into 1 of 5 conditions: (a) identical to the target word, (b) a transposition of 2 internal letters, (c) a substitution of 2 internal letters, (d) a transposition of the 2 final letters, or (e) a substitution of the 2 final letters. In Experiment 3, the authors used a further set of conditions to explore the importance of external letter positions. The findings extend previous work and demonstrate that transposed-letter effects exist in silent reading. These experiments also indicate that letter identity information can be extracted from the parafovea outside of absolute letter position from the first 5 letters of the word to the right of fixation. Finally, the results support the notion that exterior letters play important roles in visual word recognition.

Kezilas Y., McKague M., Kohnen S., Badcock N. A., & Castles A . ( 2017).

Disentangling the developmental trajectories of letter position and letter identity coding using masked priming.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 43(2), 250-258.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000293      URL     PMID:27428877      [本文引用: 1]

Masked transposed-letter (TL) priming effects have been used to index letter position processing over the course of reading development. Whereas some studies have reported an increase in TL priming over development, others have reported a decrease. These findings have led to the development of 2 somewhat contradictory accounts of letter position development: the lexical tuning hypothesis and the multiple-route model. One factor that may be contributing to these discrepancies is the use of baseline primes that substitute letters in the target word, which may confound the effect of changes in letter position processing over development with those of letter identity. The present study included an identity prime (e.g., listen—LISTEN), in addition to the standard two-substituted-letter (2SL; e.g., lidfen—LISTEN) and all-letter-different (ALD; e.g., rodfup—LISTEN) baselines, to remove the potential confound between letter position and letter identity information in determining the effect of the TL prime. Priming effects were measured in a lexical decision task administered to children aged 7–12 and a group of university students. Using inverse transformed response times, targets preceded by a TL prime were responded to significantly faster than those preceded by 2SL and ALD primes, and priming remained stable across development. In contrast, targets preceded by a TL prime were responded to significantly slower than those preceded by an ID prime, and this reaction-time cost increased significantly over development, with adults showing the largest cost. These findings are consistent with a lexical tuning account of letter position development, and are inconsistent with the multiple-route model.

Kretzschmar F., Schlesewsky M., & Staub A . ( 2015).

Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,

& Cognition, 41(6), 1648-1662.

[本文引用: 1]

Liang F. F., Wang Y. S., & Bai X. J . ( 2016).

Word spacing facilitates novel word's acquisition during Chinese reading: The modulation of within- word position

Psychological Exploration, 36, 403-408.

[本文引用: 1]

[ 梁菲菲, 王永胜, 白学军 . ( 2016).

词间空格促进汉语阅读的新词学习: 词素位置的调节作用

心理学探新, 36, 403-408.]

URL     [本文引用: 1]

采用眼动仪考察词素位置是否是影响词间空格在新词学习中起作用的重要因素。通过以下方式进行操纵:构造两类假词作为新词,第一类新词由低频首字、高频尾字构成;第二类新词由高频首字、低频尾字构成。采用"学习-测试"范式将新词放在句子中要求被试阅读。结果发现,相比由高频首字和低频尾字构成的新词,词间空格在由低频首字和高频尾字构成的新词学习中促进作用更大。表明在汉语阅读中词素位置可能作为一种线索参与词切分。

Liu Y. P., Reichle E. D., & Li X. S . ( 2016).

The effect of word frequency and parafoveal preview on saccade length during the reading of Chinese

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 1008-1025.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000190      URL     PMID:27045319      [本文引用: 1]

Abstract There are currently 2 theoretical accounts of how readers of Chinese select their saccade targets: (a) by moving their eyes to specific saccade targets (i.e., the default-targeting hypothesis) and (b) by adjusting their saccade lengths to accommodate lexical processing (i.e., the dynamic-adjustment hypothesis). In this article, we first report the results of an eye-movement experiment using a gaze-contingent boundary paradigm. This experiment demonstrates that both target-word frequency and its preview validity modulate the lengths of the saccades entering and exiting the target words, with longer saccades to/from high-frequency words when their preview was available. We then report the results of 2 simulations using computational models that instantiate the core theoretical assumptions of the default-targeting and dynamic-adjustment hypotheses. Comparisons of these simulations indicate that the dynamic-adjustment hypothesis provides a better quantitative account of the data from our experiment using fewer free parameters. We conclude by discussing evidence for dynamic saccade adjustment during the reading of alphabetic languages, and why such a heuristic may be necessary to fully explain eye-movement control during the reading of both alphabetic and nonalphabetic languages. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved.

Luke S. G., & Christianson K . ( 2012).

Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect

Memory & Cognition, 40(4), 628-641.

[本文引用: 3]

Luke S. G., & Christianson K . ( 2016).

Limits on lexical prediction during reading

Cognitive Psychology, 88, 22-60.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.002      URL     PMID:27376659      [本文引用: 1]

Efficient language processing may involve generating expectations about upcoming input. To investigate the extent to which prediction might facilitate reading, a large-scale survey provided cloze scores for all 2689 words in 55 different text passages. Highly predictable words were quite rare (5% of content words), and most words had a more-expected competitor. An eye-tracking study showed sensitivity to cloze probability but no mis-prediction cost. Instead, the presence of a more-expected competitor was found to be facilitative in several measures. Further, semantic and morphosyntactic information was highly predictable even when word identity was not, and this information facilitated reading above and beyond the predictability of the full word form. The results are consistent with graded prediction but inconsistent with full lexical prediction. Implications for theories of prediction in language comprehension are discussed.

McClelland J. L., & Rumelhart D. E . ( 1981).

An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Ι. An account of basic findings

Psychological Review, 88(5), 375-407.

DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375      URL     [本文引用: 1]

CiteSeerX - Scientific documents that cite the following paper: An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings

McConkie G. W., & Rayner K . ( 1975).

The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading

Perception and Psychophysics, 17(6), 578-586.

DOI:10.3758/BF03203972      URL     [本文引用: 1]

A computer-based eye-movement controlled, display system was developed for the study of perceptual processes in reading. A study was conducted to identify the region from which skilled readers pick up various types of visual information during a fixation while reading. This study involved making display changes, based on eye position, in the text pattern as the subject was in the act of reading from it, and then examining the effects these changes produced on eye behavior. The results indicated that the subjects acquired word-length pattern information at least 12 to 15 character positions to the right of the fixation point, and that this information primarily influenced saccade lengths. Specific letter- and word-shape information were acquired no further than 10 character positions to the right of the fixation point.

Norris, D. ( 2006).

The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process

Psychological Review, 113(2), 327-357.

DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.327      URL     PMID:16637764      [本文引用: 1]

This article presents a theory of visual word recognition that assumes that, in the tasks of word identification, lexical decision, and semantic categorization, human readers behave as optimal Bayesian decision makers. This leads to the development of a computational model of word recognition, the Bayesian reader. The Bayesian reader successfully simulates some of the most significant data on human reading. The model accounts for the nature of the function relating word frequency to reaction time and identification threshold, the effects of neighborhood density and its interaction with frequency, and the variation in the pattern of neighborhood density effects seen in different experimental tasks. Both the general behavior of the model and the way the model predicts different patterns of results in different tasks follow entirely from the assumption that human readers approximate optimal Bayesian decision makers.

Norris D., Kinoshita S., & van Casteren M . ( 2010).

A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order

Journal of Memory & Language, 62(3), 254-271.

DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.002      URL     [本文引用: 1]

Early on during word recognition, letter positions are not accurately coded. Evidence for this comes from transposed-letter (TL) priming effects, in which letter strings generated by transposing two adjacent letters (e.g., ) and the SOLAR model (Davis & Bowers, 2006) explain this effect by proposing a higher level of representation than individual letter identities in which letter position is not coded accurately. An alternative to this is to assume that position coding is noisy (e.g., Gomez, Ratcliff, & Perea, 2008). We propose an extension to the Bayesian Reader (Norris, 2006) that incorporates letter position noise during sampling from perceptual input. This model predicts “leakage” of letter identity to nearby positions, which is not expected from models incorporating alternative position coding schemes. We report three masked priming experiments testing predictions from this model.

Perea M., & Carreiras M . ( 2006).

Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600-1613.

DOI:10.1080/17470210500298880      URL     PMID:17176663      [本文引用: 1]

Abstract One key issue for any computational model of visual word recognition is the choice of an input coding scheme for assigning letter position. Recent research has shown that transposed-letter similarity effects occur even when the transposed letters are not adjacent (caniso-casino; Perea & Lupker, 2004, JML). In the present study we conducted two single-presentation lexical decision experiments to examine whether transposed-letter effects occur at a syllable level. We tested two types of nonwords: (1) nonwords created by transposing two internal CV syllables (PRIVEMARA; the base word is primavera, the Spanish for spring) and (2) nonwords created by transposing two adjacent bigrams that do not form a syllable (PRIMERAVA). We also created the appropriate orthographic control conditions, in which the critical letters were replaced instead of being switched. Results showed that the transposition of two syllables or two adjacent bigrams produced a quite robust (and similar) transposed-letter effect. Thus, transposed-letter effects seem to occur at an early orthographic, graphemic level, rather than at a syllable level. We examine the implications of the observed results for the input coding schemes in visual word recognition.

Pagán A., Paterson K. B., Blythe H. I., & Liversedge S. P . ( 2016).

An inhibitory influence of transposed-letter neighbors on eye movements during reading

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 278-284.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-015-0869-5      URL     PMID:26032225      [本文引用: 2]

Previous research has shown that prior exposure to a word’s substitution neighbor earlier in the same sentence can disrupt processing of that word, indicating that interword lexical priming occurs naturally during reading, due to the competition between lexical candidates during word identification. Through the present research, we extended these findings by investigating the effects of prior exposure to a word’s transposed-letter neighbor (TLN) earlier in a sentence. TLNs are constituted from the same letters, but in different orders. The findings revealed an inhibitory TLN effect, with longer total reading times for target words, and increased regressions to prime and target words, when the target followed a TLN rather than a control word. These findings indicate that prior exposure to a TLN can disrupt word identification during reading. We suggest that this is caused by a failure of word identification, due to the initial misidentification of the target word (potentially as its TLN) triggering postlexical checking.

Perea M., Palti D., & Gomez P . ( 2012).

Associative priming effects with visible, transposed-letter nonwords: Jugde facilitates court.

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(3), 481-488.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-012-0271-6      URL     PMID:22274995      [本文引用: 1]

Associative priming effects can be obtained with masked nonword primes or with masked pseudohomophone primes (e.g., judpe –COURT, tode –FROG), but not with visible primes. The usual explanation is that when the prime is visible, these stimuli no longer activate the semantic representations of their base words. Given the important role of transposed-letter stimuli (e.g., jugde ) in visual word recognition, here we examined whether or not an associative priming effect could be obtained with visible transposed-letter nonword primes (e.g., jugde –COURT) in a series of lexical decision experiments. Results showed a sizable associative priming effect with visible transposed-letter nonword primes (i.e., jugde –COURT faster than neevr –COURT) in Experiments 1–3 that was close to that with word primes. In contrast, we failed to find a parallel effect with replacement-letter nonword primes ( Experiment 2 ). These findings pose some constraints to models of visual word recognition.

Peng D. L., Ding G. S., Wang C. M., Taft M., & Zhu X. P . ( 1999).

The processing of Chinese reversible words - the role of morphemes in lexical access

Acta Psychologica Sinica, 31, 236-270.

[本文引用: 1]

[ 彭聃龄, 丁国盛, 王春茂, Taft, M., 朱晓平 . ( 1999).

汉语逆序词的加工——词素在词加工中的作用

心理学报, 31, 236-270.]

DOI:10.1088/0256-307X/16/12/025      URL     [本文引用: 1]

正 逆序词是汉语构词的一种特殊形式,其结果为AB-BA(如“工人”-“人工”),逆序词的特点是,构成双字词的两个字其字形和音节是完全相同的,只是它们的位置不同构成一对逆序词的两个词在意义上有的相同或相近(如“相互”-“互相”),有的则完全不同(如“结巴”-“巴结”),本实验采用词义不同的汉语逆序词为材料,探讨了词素在汉语合成词加工中作用。

Rayner K., & Fischer M. H . ( 1996).

Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different

Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 734-747.

DOI:10.3758/BF03213106      URL     PMID:8710452      [本文引用: 1]

In an extension of a study by Vitu, O’Regan, Inhoff, and Topolski (1995), we compared global and local characteristics of eye movements during (1) reading, (2) the scanning of transformed text (in which each letter was replaced with a z), and (3) visual search. Additionally, we examined eye behavior with respect to specific target words of high or low frequency. Globally, the reading condition led to shorter fixations, longer saccades, and less frequent skipping of target strings than did scanning transformed text. Locally, the manipulation of word frequency affected fixation durations on the target word during reading, but not during visual search or z-string scanning. There were also more refixations on target words in reading than in scanning. Contrary to Vitu et al.’s (1995) findings, our results show that eye movements are not guided by a global strategy and local tactics, but by immediate processing demands.

Sánchez-Gutiérrez C., & Rastle K . ( 2013).

Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference?

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 988-996.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-013-0425-0      URL     PMID:23543423      [本文引用: 1]

Research on the impact of letter transpositions that arise across morpheme boundaries has yielded conflicting results. These results have led to the suggestion that a cross-linguistic difference may exist in the recognition of Spanish and English words. In two masked-priming experiments run on separate groups of Spanish and English speakers, we tested this hypothesis by comparing the impacts of primes with letter transpositions that arose within morphemes or across morpheme boundaries on the recognition of identical or near-identical Spanish鈥揈nglish cognate targets. The results showed transposed-letter benefits in both Spanish and English that were not modulated by the position of the transposed letter in the prime stimulus. Our findings therefore add to the growing body of literature suggesting that the transposed-letter benefit is not affected by the position of the transposed letters relative to the morpheme boundary, and they dispel previous suggestions that there might be a genuine difference in orthographic coding across the Spanish and English writing systems.

Schotter E. R., Angele B., & Rayner K . ( 2012).

Parafoveal processing in reading.

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5-35.

[本文引用: 1]

Smith N. J., & Levy R . ( 2013).

The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic

Cognition, 128(3), 302-319.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013      URL     PMID:23747651      [本文引用: 1]

It is well known that real-time human language processing is highly incremental and context-driven, and that the strength of a comprehender's expectation for each word encountered is a key determinant of the difficulty of integrating that word into the preceding context. In reading, this differential difficulty is largely manifested in the amount of time taken to read each word. While numerous studies over the past thirty years have shown expectation-based effects on reading times driven by lexical, syntactic, semantic, pragmatic, and other information sources, there has been little progress in establishing the quantitative relationship between expectation (or prediction) and reading times. Here, by combining a state-of-the-art computational language model, two large behavioral data-sets, and non-parametric statistical techniques, we establish for the first time the quantitative form of this relationship, finding that it is logarithmic over six orders of magnitude in estimated predictability. This result is problematic for a number of established models of eye movement control in reading, but lends partial support to an optimal perceptual discrimination account of word recognition. We also present a novel model in which language processing is highly incremental well below the level of the individual word, and show that it predicts both the shape and time-course of this effect. At a more general level, this result provides challenges for both anticipatory processing and semantic integration accounts of lexical predictability effects. And finally, this result provides evidence that comprehenders are highly sensitive to relative differences in predictability - even for differences between highly unpredictable words - and thus helps bring theoretical unity to our understanding of the role of prediction at multiple levels of linguistic structure in real-time language comprehension. (c) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Su H., Liu Z. F., & Cao L. R . ( 2016).

The effects of word frequency and word predictability in preview and their implications for word segmentation in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements

Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48, 625-636.

[本文引用: 1]

[ 苏衡, 刘志方, 曹立人 . ( 2016).

中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示: 基于眼动的证据

心理学报, 48, 625-636.]

DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00625      URL     [本文引用: 1]

研究采用眼动随动显示技术考察中文阅读预视加工中的词汇加工问题.前三项实验发现,剥夺预视加工的掩蔽条件、正确提示词n+1右侧边界的掩蔽条件以及不能提示词n+1右侧边界的掩蔽条件都不影响词频效应,说明中文读者对词n+1处文字的预视加工达不到词汇水平.实验4考察剥夺预视加工的掩蔽条件、提示词n+1右侧边界的掩蔽条件对预测性效应的影响,结果发现,剥夺预视加工完全消除预测性效应,提示词n+1右侧边界则减少预测性效应,说明对词汇的预期加工是中文读者切分词n+1的参考线索.综合4项实验结果可知,中文读者较难通过自下而上的文字识别切分词n+1,自上而下的词汇预期则是切分词n+1的加工形式.

Vergara-Martínez M., Perea M., Gómez P., & Swaab T. Y . ( 2013).

ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency

Brain & Language, 125(1), 11-27.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.009      URL     PMID:3612367      [本文引用: 2]

The encoding of letter position is a key aspect in all recently proposed models of visual-word recognition. We analyzed the impact of lexical frequency on letter position assignment by examining the temporal dynamics of lexical activation induced by pseudowords extracted from words of different frequencies. For each word (e.g., BRIDGE), we created two pseudowords: A transposed-letter (TL: BRIGDE) and a replaced-letter pseudoword (RL: BRITGE). ERPs were recorded while participants read words and pseudowords in two tasks: Semantic categorization (Experiment 1) and lexical decision (Experiment 2). For high-frequency stimuli, similar ERPs were obtained for words and TL-pseudowords, but the N400 component to words was reduced relative to RL-pseudowords, indicating less lexical/semantic activation. In contrast, TL- and RL-pseudowords created from low-frequency stimuli elicited similar ERPs. Behavioral responses in the lexical decision task paralleled this asymmetry. The present findings impose constraints on computational and neural models of visual-word recognition.

White S. J., Johnson R. L., Liversedge S. P., & Rayner K . ( 2008).

Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34(5), 1261-1276.

DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261      URL     PMID:2662926      [本文引用: 3]

Participants' eye movements were recorded as they read sentences with words containing transposed adjacent letters. Transpositions were either external (e.g., problme, rpoblem) or internal (e.g., porblem, probelm) and at either the beginning (e.g., rpoblem, porblem) or end (e.g., problme, probelm) of words. The results showed disruption for words with transposed letters compared to the normal baseline condition, and the greatest disruption was observed for word-initial transpositions. In Experiment 1, transpositions within low frequency words led to longer reading times than when letters were transposed within high frequency words. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the position of word-initial letters is most critical even when parafoveal preview of words to the right of fixation is unavailable. The findings have important implications for the roles of different letter positions in word recognition and the effects of parafoveal preview on word recognition processes.

Whitford V., & Titone D . ( 2014).

The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1151-1165.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2013.848216      URL     PMID:24205888      [本文引用: 1]

We used eye movement measures of paragraph reading to examine whether word frequency and predictability interact during the earliest stages of lexical processing, with a specific focus on whether these effects are modulated by individual differences in reading comprehension or launch site (i.e., saccade length between the prior and currently fixated word--a proxy for the amount of parafoveal word processing). The joint impact of frequency and predictability on reading will elucidate whether these variables additively or multiplicatively affect the earliest stages of lexical access, which, in turn, has implications for computational models of eye movements during reading. Linear mixed effects models revealed additive effects during both early- and late-stage reading, where predictability effects were comparable for low- and high-frequency words. Moreover, less cautious readers (e.g., readers who engaged in skimming, scanning, mindless reading) demonstrated smaller frequency effects than more cautious readers. Taken together, our findings suggest that during extended reading, frequency and predictability exert additive influences on lexical and postlexical processing, and that individual differences in reading comprehension modulate sensitivity to the effects of word frequency.

Whitney, C. ( 2001).

How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221-243.

DOI:10.3758/BF03196158      URL     PMID:11495111      [本文引用: 2]

This paper describes a novel theoretical framework of how the position of a letter within a string is encoded, the SERIOL model (sequential encoding regulated by inputs to oscillations within letter units). Letter order is represented by a temporal activation pattern across letter units, as is consistent with current theories of information coding based on the precise timing of neural spikes. The framework specifies how this pattern is invoked via an activation gradient that interacts with subthreshold oscillations and how it is decoded via contextual units that activate word units. Using mathematical modeling, this theoretical framework is shown to account for the experimental data from a wide variety of string-processing studies, including hemispheric asymmetries, the optimal viewing position, and positional priming effects.

Whitney C., Bertrand D., & Grainger J . ( 2012).

On coding the position of letters in words: A test of two models

Experimental Psychology, 59(2), 109-114.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000132      URL     PMID:22044790      [本文引用: 1]

Open-bigram and spatial-coding schemes provide different accounts of how position is encoded by the brain during visual word recognition. Open-bigram coding involves an explicit representation of order based on pairs, while spatial coding involves a comparison function operating over representations of individual . We identify a set of priming conditions (subset primes and reversed interior primes) for which the two types of coding schemes give opposing predictions, hence providing the opportunity for strong scientific inference. Experimental results are consistent with the open-bigram account, and inconsistent with the spatial-coding scheme.

Yakup M., Abliz W., Sereno J., & Perea M . ( 2014).

How is letter position coding attained in scripts with position- dependent allography?

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1600-1606.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-014-0621-6      URL     PMID:25023954      [本文引用: 4]

We examined how letter position coding is achieved in a script (Arabic) in which the different letter forms (i.e., allographs) may vary depending on their position within the letter string (e.g., compare the same-ligation pair and vs. the different-ligation pair and . To that end, we conducted an experiment in Uyghur, an agglutinative language from the Turkic family that employs an Arabic-based script in which both consonants and vowels are explicitly written. Participants had to reproduce the correct word forms in rapid serial visual presentation sentences that either contained jumbled words (with the same ligation or different ligation) or were intact. The results revealed that readers had more difficulty correctly reporting the target words in the jumbled sentences when the letter transposition involved changes in the ligation pattern, thus demonstrating that position-dependent allography affects letter position coding. This finding poses constraints to a universal model of letter position encoding.

Zang C. L., Zhang M. M., Yue Y. Q., Bai X. J., & Yan G. L . ( 2013).

The modulation of parafoveal processing on Chinese silent and oral reading

Studies of Psychology & Behavior, 11(4), 444-450.

[本文引用: 1]

[ 臧传丽, 张慢慢, 岳音其, 白学军, 闫国利 . ( 2013).

副中央凹信息量对中文朗读和默读的调节作用

心理与行为研究, 11(4), 444-450.]

[本文引用: 1]

Zhang L. Y., Jin T., & Tian Z. X . ( 2013).

Morphological processing: Morpho-orthographic or morpho-semantic?

Psychological Science, 36, 576-579.

[本文引用: 1]

[ 张玲燕, 金檀, 田朝霞 . ( 2013).

词素认知加工——基于形式还是基于语义?

心理科学, 36, 576-579.]

[本文引用: 1]

/


版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
地址:北京市朝阳区林萃路16号院 
邮编:100101 
电话:010-64850861 
E-mail:xuebao@psych.ac.cn
备案编号:京ICP备10049795号-1 京公网安备110402500018号

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发