Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2018, Vol. 50 Issue (5): 483-493    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00483
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 言语工作记忆内容在语义水平的注意捕获
 李毕琴1;李 玲1;王爱君2;张 明2
 (1江西师范大学心理学院, 江西省心理与认知科学重点实验室, 南昌 330022) (2苏州大学心理学系, 心理与行为科学研究中心, 苏州 215123)
 Visual and auditory verbal working memory affects visual attention in the semantic matching
 LI Biqin1; LI Ling1; WANG Aijun2; ZHANG Ming2
 (1 Lab of Psychology and Cognition Science of Jiangxi, School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China) (2 Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)
全文: PDF(1512 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  采用工作记忆−视觉搜索双任务范式, 探讨不同呈现方式下与言语工作记忆内容语义水平匹配的刺激的注意捕获效应。结果发现:(1)视觉呈现下, 与言语工作记忆内容知觉和语义匹配的刺激均能捕获注意, 且在视觉搜索快速反应的阶段仍能捕获注意; (2)听觉呈现下, 与言语工作记忆内容语义匹配的刺激不能捕获注意, 反而被抑制, 但在视觉搜索快速反应的早期阶段却能捕获注意。研究表明, 基于视听呈现的言语工作记忆内容在语义水平对注意的引导作用可发生在注意搜索过程快速反应的早期阶段。而晚期阶段由于受到跨通道注意选择的抑制, 听觉呈现下的语义表征不能捕获注意, 而视觉呈现下的语义表征仍能捕获注意。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李毕琴
李玲
王爱君
张明
关键词 注意捕获 言语工作记忆 视觉搜索 语义匹配    
Abstract: Previous studies have showed that information held in working memory (WM) can guide or capture attention during visual search in a relatively automatic way, even when it is irrelevant and detrimental to current task performance. Some researchers have proposed that the semantic match between WM contents and distractors could also capture attention, as well as the perceptual match. As we known, the verbal WM contents can be stored in the visual and auditory inputs. Even though the automatic influence of visual verbal WM on visual attention have been demonstrated, it remains unknown whether the auditory verbal WM could automatically capture attention. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the attention guidance by the verbal WM contents. The present study included two experiments to explore the questions presented above. In Experiment 1, the memory item was a verbal Chinese character that presented visually, denoting a color, such as “红”. The participants were instructed to remember the word and avoid the potential distractors. Subsequently, they completed a visual search task, in order to test whether the verbal WM contents could guide attention. The results showed that, compared with the control condition, the visual search RTs were longer in the perceptual-matching and semantic-matching conditions, and the same as the RTs in the fastest trials. With the memory item that never matched the target in the search task, we suggested that the verbal WM contents that were presented visually (vis-VWM) could capture attention at perceptual and semantic levels automatically. In Experiment 2, the memory item was presented by the auditory inputs via the headphones (audi-VWM). The results showed that the visual search RTs in the semantic-matching condition were shorter than RTs in the control and perceptual-matching conditions, and there was no significant difference in the other conditions. Meanwhile, compared the shortest RTs across the different conditions, the results showed that the RTs in the semantic-matching condition were longer than in the control condition, which suggested that the aurally presented verbal WM could capture attention at the semantic level in the fastest response trials. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the verbal working memory that presented visually could automatically capture attention at both perceptual and semantic levels, and also verified the hypothesis that the attention capture effect would occur at the early stages of attention. However, the contents of verbal working memory would always capture attention at the earlier processing stage and could only be rejected at the later processing stage when the contents were aurally presented. Due to the modality specificity, attentional resources would be distributed to different sensory modalities. The memory-matching distractors could be rejected at the later processing stage because of there were the sufficient cognitive resources.
Key wordsattention capture    verbal working memory    visual search    semantic matching
收稿日期: 2017-08-17      出版日期: 2018-03-31
ZTFLH:     
  B842  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目(31700939); 江西省科技计划项目(20171BAB214023); 江苏省基础研究计划(BK20170333); 江西师范大学青年英才培育计划; 江西师范大学心理学院拔尖人才培育计划
通讯作者: 王爱君, E-mail: ajwang@suda.edu.cn; 李毕琴, E-mail: cyrill_@163.com     E-mail: E-mail: ajwang@suda.edu.cn; E-mail: cyrill_@163.com
引用本文:   
李毕琴, 李玲, 王爱君, 张明.  言语工作记忆内容在语义水平的注意捕获[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(5): 483-493.
LI Biqin, LI Ling, WANG Aijun, ZHANG Ming.  Visual and auditory verbal working memory affects visual attention in the semantic matching. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 483-493.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00483      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2018/V50/I5/483
[1] 袁小钧, 崔晓霞, 曹正操, 阚红, 王晓, 汪亚珉. 虚拟仿真场景中威胁性视觉刺激搜索的 注意偏向效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 622-636.
[2] 李杨卓, 钱浩悦, 朱敏, 高湘萍.  自我相关信息对视觉搜索主动抑制的易化作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(1): 28-35.
[3] 刘丽;白学军. 注意控制定势和线索类型在注意捕获中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1093-1104.
[4] 张豹;胡岑楼;黄赛. 认知控制在工作记忆表征引导注意中的作用:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1105-1118.
[5] 王慧媛; 隋洁; 张明. 线索靶子关联和搜索策略对注意捕获的作用 ——来自意义线索的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 783-793.
[6] 白学军; 刘丽; 宋娟; 郭志英. 特征和位置信息在价值驱动注意捕获中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1357-1369.
[7] 胡艳梅;张明. 基于记忆的注意捕获和注意抑制效应:ERP证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(1): 12-21.
[8] 张微;周兵平;臧玲;莫书亮. 网络成瘾倾向者在视觉工作记忆引导下的注意捕获[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(10): 1223-1234.
[9] 王慧媛;张明;隋洁. 线索靶子关联和搜索策略对注意捕获的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2): 185-195.
[10] 牟兵兵;宛小昂. 视觉搜索中的情绪干扰项预习效应[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(11): 1603-1612.
[11] 刘丽;李运;李力红;白学军. 自上而下的注意控制定势在注意捕获中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(10): 1442-1453.
[12] 林欧;王正科;孟祥芝. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的视知觉学习[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(7): 762-772.
[13] 张豹;黄赛;祁禄. 工作记忆表征引导视觉注意选择的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(2): 139-148.
[14] 胡中华,赵光,刘强,李红. 视觉搜索任务中直视探测优势的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(4): 435-445.
[15] 魏萍;康冠兰. 注意捕获效应受知觉负载及目标与干扰项距离的共同影响[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(11): 1454-1462.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn