ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 940-950.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00940

• 研究方法 • 上一篇    

结构化面试预测效度的贡献成分分析

徐长江; 梁崇理; 刘争光   

  1. (1浙江师范大学心理学系, 金华 321004) (2新东方教育科技集团总公司人力资源部, 北京 100080)
  • 收稿日期:2011-09-29 出版日期:2013-05-15 发布日期:2013-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 徐长江
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(11YJA880124)资助。

The Contributing Components Analysis on the Predictive Validity of the Structured Interview

XU Changjiang;LIANG Chongli;LIU Zhengguang   

  1. (1 Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China) (2 Department of Human Resources, New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Beijing 100080, China)
  • Received:2011-09-29 Online:2013-05-15 Published:2013-05-15
  • Contact: XU Changjiang

PDF (PC)

3147

被引次数

7

摘要： 以情境面试和行为面试为主要形式的结构化面试, 被广泛证明能够预测员工绩效, 但其构念效度一直没被清晰地证明。面试的结构性、应聘者印象管理行为、动机、认知能力和人格特征等成分对结构化面试的预测效度都有积极贡献, 这种对结构化面试预测效度贡献成分的分析有助于认清结构化面试的构念效度。未来的研究需关注结构化面试构念是否以人际技能为主, 以及人际技能、动机、认知能力各自所占比重。

关键词: 结构化面试, 情境面试, 行为面试, 预测效度, 构念效度

Abstract: The structured interview which is mainly composed of the situational interview and the behavioral interview, has been widely verified to be effective in predicting employees’ performance, but its construct validity has not been clearly verified. The components of the interview structure, the applicants’ impression management behavior, motivation, cognitive ability and psychological merits have positively contributed for the structured interview in predicting performance. The analysis on the components contributing to the predictive validity of the structured interview helps understanding the construct validity of the constructed interview. The future’s orientations of the research are necessary to concern about whether interpersonal skill is measured by the structured interview, and to estimate the respective ratio of interpersonal skills, motivation and cognitive abilities in the constructs.

Key words: the structured interview, the situational interview, the behavioral interview, predictive validity, construct validity