ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B

›› 2008, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 1306-1327.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Cognitive Revolution and Second-Generation Cognitive Science

LI Qi-Wei   

  1. Institute of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2008-09-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-12-30 Online:2008-12-30
  • Contact: LI Qi-Wei

Abstract: Neither the traditional cognitive psychology with computation metaphor as core hypothesis nor the connectionist psychology can overcome the fundamental problem of so-called disembodied mind. Thus the contemporary cognitive psychology is in need of change for a new paradigm. The second-generation cognitive science highly features embodiment and situatedness. It will lead cognitive neuroscience into a new era and create potentials of eventually combining the scientism and humanism in psychology. It is based on the dynamic system model, which might result in the revolution of psychological methodology because the relationship among variables (factors) in this model is completely different from the interaction relationship among variables in the traditional analysis of variance.
The emergence of the second-generation cognitive science will encourage people to reconsider some important issues, such as psychological ontology, mind-body relationship, physiological reductionism, consciousness research and the possibility of complete mind imitation by artificial intelligence.
The author contends that with regard to the mind-body relationship, we should consider physiology as the necessary condition but not the substantial condition of psychology, avoid physiological reductionism and re-examine the theory of dualism-based physiological mechanism. The scientism and humanism in psychology tradition are likely to combine together on the basis of cognitive situatedness, which is emphasized by the second-generation cognitive science. Psychologists should put much emphasis on how mind process information. The first-generation cognitive science fails to conduct reliable studies on consciousness, because it confounds conscious with mind processing, such as perception, attention, memory and thinking. This tendency of replacing consciousness with psychology should be avoided. The dynamic system model used by the second-generation cognitive science is more likely to help us uncover the mystery of how the consciousness comes into being

Key words: Cognitive neuroscience, Cognitive revolution, Second-generation cognitive science, Embodied cognition, Dynamic system theory

CLC Number: