ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报

• •    

中国员工工作价值观的代际变迁(社会变迁专栏)

唐宁玉,甄丹蕾,关健   

  1. 上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-14 修回日期:2023-04-07 出版日期:2023-04-11 发布日期:2023-04-11
  • 通讯作者: 唐宁玉
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金

Work values of Chinese generational cohorts

TANG Ningyu, ZHEN Danlei, GUAN Jian   

  1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Received:2022-12-14 Revised:2023-04-07 Online:2023-04-11 Published:2023-04-11
  • Contact: Ningyu Tang

摘要: 随着时代发展,我国工作场所中的员工队伍构成呈现出多样化趋势。代际差异的存在,使得理解不同代际的中国员工的工作价值观变得迫切而重要。本文基于Inglehart的现代化演进理论,通过采用不同研究设计、不同分析方法和不同视角的三个研究,对不同代际(改革前一代、改革一代和后改革一代)员工工作价值观的状况和变迁展开了系统而深入的分析。研究结果显示,(1)我国不同代际员工的工作价值观既存在差异,又存在相似之处,后改革一代的工作价值观较之其他两代差异最为明显;(2)部分工作价值观具有跨研究设计、分析方法、研究视角的一致性。后改革一代的物质主义工作价值观最弱,后物质主义工作价值观最强,对开放的重视程度最高;三代员工在自我超越工作价值观上没有显著差异。(3)研究还发现代际变迁伴随着年龄和时期效应;在现阶段,不同代际员工对物质主义价值观仍然比较重视。本文采用多方法研究设计,通过三个研究得到了有关工作价值观代际变迁较为稳健的发现,填补了现有工作价值观研究的不足。研究对代际变迁的基础理论进行了反思,研究结果丰富了工作价值观代际差异以及新生代员工研究的知识体系。同时,多方法的采用为代际价值观研究提供了范例。研究结果也可以为处在大变局中的企业管理实践提供借鉴和参考。

关键词: 工作价值, 代际差异, 物质主义, 后物质主义, APC 分析方法

Abstract: The entry of members of millennial generation (i.e., individuals born after 1980) into the Chinese workplace drives a more diverse labor force. Researchers and practioners alike have recognized that these younger workers hold different work expectations from workers in prior generations. Since the division between them and their older counterparts becomes more salient, researchers have increasingly emphasized issues such as how to accurately understand and effectively manage multi-generation employees. To address these issues, the current study aims to explore generational difference in work value in three generations (i.e., the pre-reform, the reform, and the post-reform generation) based on Inglehart’s evolutionary modernization theory and from different research designs, analysis methods and angles. In study 1, we utilized a longitudinal nationwide quantitative survey (China Labor-force Dynamic Survey, CLDS) . The sample consisted of 5850 CLDS2012 to CLDS2016. Age-Period-Cohort (APC) analysis were used to separate cohort effect in work values from age and period effect. Study 2 aims to validate the result of Study 1, and further explored intergenerational differences and similarities in work values. Since study 1 used a simple questionnaire to measure work value, we adopted the work values measurement developed by Cable and Edwards (2004), which follows Schwartz’s basic individual values framework. This research was conducted through Credamo, a Chinese professional data platform, and 1016 full-time employees participated in the study. Hierarchical regression modeling were used in this study. In Study 3, we conducted interpersonal perspective to overcome the potential self-serving bias in study 1 and study 2, and participants were asked to assess the work values of each generations. A total of 361 participants were recruited from the platform Credamo. The analyses of Study 1-3 showed (1) There exist both generational differences and similarities in work values. By and large, all else being equal, the post-reform generation showed more differences with the other two generations; (2) There are consistent findings among three studies which revealed that the post-reform generations place highest importance on post-materialism work value and least importance on materialism work value, meanwhile, there is increasing openness work values from pre-reform generation to reform and then post-reform generation, and there is no significant difference on self-transcedence work value among the three generations; (3) The study also found that there were both age and period effect on work values and last but not least, all generations still place more importance on materialist than post-materialist in current time. The research expands the value theory, provides nuanced insight for generational differences in work values, and enriches our understanding of evolutionary modernization theory by empirically testing it in the Chinese context. Moreover, we conducted three studies with different designs, analysis methods and angles , which supports the validity of our research findings. This study provides managerial implications for how to better understand the younger workers and how to manage different generational cohorts in the workplaces. It also shed lights on future research on work values in generation cohorts.

Key words: Work values, Generational differences, Materialism, Post Materialism, APC model