心理学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5): 860-882.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0860
收稿日期:
2024-04-13
发布日期:
2025-03-06
出版日期:
2025-05-25
通讯作者:
徐婷, E-mail: xting@stu.edu.cn作者简介:
靳成雯和陈瑞贡献相同。
基金资助:
JIN Chengwen1, CHEN Rui1, XU Ting2()
Received:
2024-04-13
Online:
2025-03-06
Published:
2025-05-25
摘要:
女性的消费行为伴随生理周期波动而变化, 尤其是食物消费方面, 以往研究揭示女性在黄体期具有“一般化的食物欲求”和“对特定食物风险回避”的心理机制。本研究从进化适应的视角, 关注女性在黄体期与“食物欲求”有关的“食物探索”行为, 探究生理周期对新奇食物的偏好影响。通过1项激素检测实验和另外8项实验, 在多种新奇食物(新生产工艺食物、新成分食物、新文化食物)中, 本研究发现与卵泡期相比, 处于黄体期的女性更偏好新奇食物(实验1A−C、实验2、实验3), 且这一效应是由感知食物短缺所驱动的(实验4、实验5), 并在具有食物恐新症的女性中减弱(实验6)、当食物风险显著时逆转(实验7)。研究结论从进化学视角为新奇食物偏好提供了新的理解, 丰富了女性的食物决策研究。
中图分类号:
靳成雯, 陈瑞, 徐婷. (2025). 生理周期对女性新奇食物偏好的影响:感知食物短缺的中介机制. 心理学报, 57(5), 860-882.
JIN Chengwen, CHEN Rui, XU Ting. (2025). The effects of the menstrual cycle on women’s novel food preferences: The mechanism of food shortage perception. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 57(5), 860-882.
实验 | 实验设计 | 生理周期测量 | 因变量测量 | 最终样本 | 主要结果 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
实验1A | 黄体期(FCD17~27) vs. 卵泡期(FCD6~14), 组间设计 | 向前计数法 | 英国血肠 vs. 哈尔滨红肠, 真实选择 | 咖啡馆消费者(84人) | 处于黄体期的女性更多地选择了新奇食物。 |
实验1B | 黄体期(FCD17~27) vs. 卵泡前期(FCD6~8) vs. 排卵期(FCD9~14), 组间设计 | 向前计数法 | 英国血肠 vs. 哈尔滨红肠 | 问卷星 (244人) | 处于黄体期的女性更多地选择了新奇食物; 卵泡前期与排卵期对新奇食物的偏好无显著差异。 |
实验1C | 黄体中期日(23rd day) vs. 排卵日(14th day), 组内设计 | 向前+向后计数法 | 印度手抓饭、清洁肉汉堡的偏好 | 学生 (52人) | 女性在黄体中期日(vs. 排卵日)对新奇食物的偏好更高。 |
实验2 | 雌二醇、黄体酮检测 | 唾液中的激素检测 | 三组食物选择 | 学生 (65人) | 雌二醇与新奇食物偏好的关系不显著, 孕酮对新奇食物偏好有正向预测作用。 |
实验3 | 2 (生理周期:黄体期(RCD2~13) vs. 卵泡期(RCD14~24)) × 2 (食物类型: 新奇食物 vs. 熟悉食物), 组间设计 | 向后计数法 | 清洁肉汉堡/经典牛肉汉堡的偏好 | 学生 (112人) | 对于熟悉的食物, 生理周期的偏好效应消失。 |
实验4 | 黄体期(FCD16~27) vs. 卵泡期(FCD5~15), 组间设计 | 向前计数法 | 清洁肉汉堡 vs. 经典牛肉汉 | 见数 (109人) | 感知食物短缺的中介效应显著。 |
实验5 | 2 (生理周期:黄体期(RCD2~13) vs. 卵泡期(RCD14~24)) × 2 (食物短缺:食物短缺组vs. 控制组), 组间设计 | 向后计数法 | 清洁肉汉堡 vs. 经典牛肉汉 | 见数 (173人) | 对于控制组, 黄体期更偏好新奇食物; 对于启动了食物短缺的女性, 新奇食物偏好的生理周期差异消失。 |
实验6 | 2 (生理周期: 黄体期(FCD17~27) vs. 卵泡期(FCD6~14)) × 食物恐新症(连续测量), 组间设计 | 向前计数法 | 土笋冻、海蛎煎和沙茶面 | 游客 (96人) | 对于低食物恐新症的女性, 黄体期更偏好新奇食物; 对于高食物恐新症的女性, 新奇食物偏好无显著的生理周期差异。 |
实验7 | 2 (生理周期: 黄体期(RCD2~13) vs. 卵泡期(RCD14~24)) × 2 (食物风险: 控制组 vs. 风险显著组), 组间设计 | 向后计数法 | 越南昆虫食物 | 问卷星 (268人) | 对于控制组, 黄体期更偏好新奇食物; 对于食物风险显著组, 黄体期的新奇食物偏好低于卵泡期。 |
表1 实验概述
实验 | 实验设计 | 生理周期测量 | 因变量测量 | 最终样本 | 主要结果 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
实验1A | 黄体期(FCD17~27) vs. 卵泡期(FCD6~14), 组间设计 | 向前计数法 | 英国血肠 vs. 哈尔滨红肠, 真实选择 | 咖啡馆消费者(84人) | 处于黄体期的女性更多地选择了新奇食物。 |
实验1B | 黄体期(FCD17~27) vs. 卵泡前期(FCD6~8) vs. 排卵期(FCD9~14), 组间设计 | 向前计数法 | 英国血肠 vs. 哈尔滨红肠 | 问卷星 (244人) | 处于黄体期的女性更多地选择了新奇食物; 卵泡前期与排卵期对新奇食物的偏好无显著差异。 |
实验1C | 黄体中期日(23rd day) vs. 排卵日(14th day), 组内设计 | 向前+向后计数法 | 印度手抓饭、清洁肉汉堡的偏好 | 学生 (52人) | 女性在黄体中期日(vs. 排卵日)对新奇食物的偏好更高。 |
实验2 | 雌二醇、黄体酮检测 | 唾液中的激素检测 | 三组食物选择 | 学生 (65人) | 雌二醇与新奇食物偏好的关系不显著, 孕酮对新奇食物偏好有正向预测作用。 |
实验3 | 2 (生理周期:黄体期(RCD2~13) vs. 卵泡期(RCD14~24)) × 2 (食物类型: 新奇食物 vs. 熟悉食物), 组间设计 | 向后计数法 | 清洁肉汉堡/经典牛肉汉堡的偏好 | 学生 (112人) | 对于熟悉的食物, 生理周期的偏好效应消失。 |
实验4 | 黄体期(FCD16~27) vs. 卵泡期(FCD5~15), 组间设计 | 向前计数法 | 清洁肉汉堡 vs. 经典牛肉汉 | 见数 (109人) | 感知食物短缺的中介效应显著。 |
实验5 | 2 (生理周期:黄体期(RCD2~13) vs. 卵泡期(RCD14~24)) × 2 (食物短缺:食物短缺组vs. 控制组), 组间设计 | 向后计数法 | 清洁肉汉堡 vs. 经典牛肉汉 | 见数 (173人) | 对于控制组, 黄体期更偏好新奇食物; 对于启动了食物短缺的女性, 新奇食物偏好的生理周期差异消失。 |
实验6 | 2 (生理周期: 黄体期(FCD17~27) vs. 卵泡期(FCD6~14)) × 食物恐新症(连续测量), 组间设计 | 向前计数法 | 土笋冻、海蛎煎和沙茶面 | 游客 (96人) | 对于低食物恐新症的女性, 黄体期更偏好新奇食物; 对于高食物恐新症的女性, 新奇食物偏好无显著的生理周期差异。 |
实验7 | 2 (生理周期: 黄体期(RCD2~13) vs. 卵泡期(RCD14~24)) × 2 (食物风险: 控制组 vs. 风险显著组), 组间设计 | 向后计数法 | 越南昆虫食物 | 问卷星 (268人) | 对于控制组, 黄体期更偏好新奇食物; 对于食物风险显著组, 黄体期的新奇食物偏好低于卵泡期。 |
新奇食物 | 均值 | 标准差 | 测量方式a | t值 | 显著性 | 效应量(Cohen's d) | 结论 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
英国血肠 | 2.28 | 1.43 | 语义差异量表(1=英国血肠更新奇, 7=哈尔滨红肠更新奇) | t (137) = −14.11 | p < 0.001 | −1.20 | 英国血肠更新奇 |
印度手抓饭 | 2.01 | 1.32 | 语义差异量表(1=印度手抓饭更新奇, 7=传统蛋炒饭更新奇) | t (137) = −17.72 | p < 0.001 | −1.51 | 印度手抓饭更新奇 |
人造清洁肉汉堡 | 1.86 | 1.30 | 语义差异量表(1=人造清洁肉汉堡更新奇, 7=经典牛肉汉堡更新奇) | t (137) = −19.40 | p < 0.001 | −1.65 | 人造清洁肉汉堡更新奇 |
海蛎煎 | 4.54 | 1.38 | 测量海蛎煎的新奇感知(1=一点也不新奇, 7=非常新奇) | t (34) b = 2.33 | p = 0.026 | 0.39 | 海蛎煎很新奇 |
土笋冻 | 6.43 | 0.78 | 测量土笋冻的新奇感知(1=一点也不新奇, 7=非常新奇) | t (34) b = 18.47 | p < 0.001 | 3.12 | 土笋冻很新奇 |
沙茶面 | 4.91 | 1.52 | 测量沙茶面的新奇感知(1=一点也不新奇, 7=非常新奇) | t (34) b = 3.55 | p = 0.001 | 0.60 | 沙茶面很新奇 |
越南昆虫食物 | 6.42 | 0.69 | 测量越南昆虫食物的新奇感知(1=一点也不新奇, 7=非常新奇) | t (137) = 41.08 | p < 0.001 | 3.51 | 越南昆虫食物很新奇 |
附表1 新奇食物的新奇感知调查结果
新奇食物 | 均值 | 标准差 | 测量方式a | t值 | 显著性 | 效应量(Cohen's d) | 结论 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
英国血肠 | 2.28 | 1.43 | 语义差异量表(1=英国血肠更新奇, 7=哈尔滨红肠更新奇) | t (137) = −14.11 | p < 0.001 | −1.20 | 英国血肠更新奇 |
印度手抓饭 | 2.01 | 1.32 | 语义差异量表(1=印度手抓饭更新奇, 7=传统蛋炒饭更新奇) | t (137) = −17.72 | p < 0.001 | −1.51 | 印度手抓饭更新奇 |
人造清洁肉汉堡 | 1.86 | 1.30 | 语义差异量表(1=人造清洁肉汉堡更新奇, 7=经典牛肉汉堡更新奇) | t (137) = −19.40 | p < 0.001 | −1.65 | 人造清洁肉汉堡更新奇 |
海蛎煎 | 4.54 | 1.38 | 测量海蛎煎的新奇感知(1=一点也不新奇, 7=非常新奇) | t (34) b = 2.33 | p = 0.026 | 0.39 | 海蛎煎很新奇 |
土笋冻 | 6.43 | 0.78 | 测量土笋冻的新奇感知(1=一点也不新奇, 7=非常新奇) | t (34) b = 18.47 | p < 0.001 | 3.12 | 土笋冻很新奇 |
沙茶面 | 4.91 | 1.52 | 测量沙茶面的新奇感知(1=一点也不新奇, 7=非常新奇) | t (34) b = 3.55 | p = 0.001 | 0.60 | 沙茶面很新奇 |
越南昆虫食物 | 6.42 | 0.69 | 测量越南昆虫食物的新奇感知(1=一点也不新奇, 7=非常新奇) | t (137) = 41.08 | p < 0.001 | 3.51 | 越南昆虫食物很新奇 |
新奇食物 | 感知均值 | 标准差 | t值a | 显著性 | 效应量(Cohen’s d) | 结论 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
营养感知调查结果 | 英国血肠 | 4.57 | 1.2 | t(89) = 4.48 | p < 0.001 | 0.48 | 高营养 |
越南昆虫食物 | 5.22 | 1.33 | t(89) = 8.72 | p < 0.001 | 0.92 | 高营养 | |
土笋冻 | 5.33 | 1.24 | t(23) = 5.27b | p < 0.001 | 1.07 | 高营养 | |
海蛎煎 | 5.33 | 0.92 | t(23) = 7.13b | p < 0.001 | 1.45 | 高营养 | |
沙茶面 | 4.67 | 1.49 | t(23) = 2.19b | p = 0.039 | 0.45 | 高营养 | |
人造清洁肉汉堡 | 4.17 | 1.52 | t(89) = 1.04 | p = 0.302 | 0.11 | 一般 | |
印度手抓饭 | 4.12 | 1.34 | t(89) = 0.87 | p = 0.389 | 0.09 | 一般 | |
风险感知调查结果 | 英国血肠 | 3.27 | 1.39 | t(89) = −5.01 | p < 0.001 | −0.53 | 低风险 |
越南昆虫食物 | 3.50 | 1.81 | t(89) = −2.62 | p = 0.010 | −0.28 | 低风险 | |
土笋冻 | 3.29 | 1.46 | t(23) = −2.38b | p = 0.026 | −0.49 | 低风险 | |
海蛎煎 | 3.17 | 1.17 | t(23) = −3.50b | p = 0.002 | −0.71 | 低风险 | |
沙茶面 | 2.83 | 1.27 | t(23) = −4.49b | p < 0.001 | −0.92 | 低风险 | |
人造清洁肉汉堡 | 3.50 | 1.74 | t(89) = −2.73 | p = 0.008 | −0.29 | 低风险 | |
印度手抓饭 | 3.62 | 1.67 | t(89) = −2.14 | p = 0.035 | −0.23 | 低风险 | |
稀缺感知调查结果 | 人造清洁肉汉堡 | 4.49 | 1.55 | t(89) = 3.00 | p = 0.003 | 0.32 | 稀缺 |
越南昆虫食物 | 4.91 | 1.56 | t(89) = 5.53 | p < 0.001 | 0.58 | 稀缺 | |
土笋冻 | 5.17 | 1.71 | t(23) = 3.34b | p = 0.003 | 0.68 | 稀缺 | |
印度手抓饭 | 3.07 | 1.48 | t(89) = −6.00 | p < 0.001 | −0.63 | 不稀缺 | |
英国血肠 | 3.67 | 1.54 | t(89) = −2.06 | p = 0.042 | −0.21 | 不稀缺 | |
沙茶面 | 2.76 | 1.29 | t(23) = −4.61b | p < 0.001 | −0.96 | 不稀缺 | |
海蛎煎 | 3.25 | 1.73 | t(23) = −2.13b | p = 0.044 | −0.43 | 不稀缺 | |
新奇感知调查结果 | 转基因食物 | 3.40 | 1.74 | t(89) = −3.27 | p = 0.002 | −0.69 | 低新奇 |
风险性感知调查结果 | 转基因食物 | 4.38 | 1.35 | t(89) = 2.66 | p = 0.009 | 0.56 | 高风险 |
附表2 新奇食物的营养、风险和稀缺性感知与转基因食物的新奇感和风险感知调查结果
新奇食物 | 感知均值 | 标准差 | t值a | 显著性 | 效应量(Cohen’s d) | 结论 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
营养感知调查结果 | 英国血肠 | 4.57 | 1.2 | t(89) = 4.48 | p < 0.001 | 0.48 | 高营养 |
越南昆虫食物 | 5.22 | 1.33 | t(89) = 8.72 | p < 0.001 | 0.92 | 高营养 | |
土笋冻 | 5.33 | 1.24 | t(23) = 5.27b | p < 0.001 | 1.07 | 高营养 | |
海蛎煎 | 5.33 | 0.92 | t(23) = 7.13b | p < 0.001 | 1.45 | 高营养 | |
沙茶面 | 4.67 | 1.49 | t(23) = 2.19b | p = 0.039 | 0.45 | 高营养 | |
人造清洁肉汉堡 | 4.17 | 1.52 | t(89) = 1.04 | p = 0.302 | 0.11 | 一般 | |
印度手抓饭 | 4.12 | 1.34 | t(89) = 0.87 | p = 0.389 | 0.09 | 一般 | |
风险感知调查结果 | 英国血肠 | 3.27 | 1.39 | t(89) = −5.01 | p < 0.001 | −0.53 | 低风险 |
越南昆虫食物 | 3.50 | 1.81 | t(89) = −2.62 | p = 0.010 | −0.28 | 低风险 | |
土笋冻 | 3.29 | 1.46 | t(23) = −2.38b | p = 0.026 | −0.49 | 低风险 | |
海蛎煎 | 3.17 | 1.17 | t(23) = −3.50b | p = 0.002 | −0.71 | 低风险 | |
沙茶面 | 2.83 | 1.27 | t(23) = −4.49b | p < 0.001 | −0.92 | 低风险 | |
人造清洁肉汉堡 | 3.50 | 1.74 | t(89) = −2.73 | p = 0.008 | −0.29 | 低风险 | |
印度手抓饭 | 3.62 | 1.67 | t(89) = −2.14 | p = 0.035 | −0.23 | 低风险 | |
稀缺感知调查结果 | 人造清洁肉汉堡 | 4.49 | 1.55 | t(89) = 3.00 | p = 0.003 | 0.32 | 稀缺 |
越南昆虫食物 | 4.91 | 1.56 | t(89) = 5.53 | p < 0.001 | 0.58 | 稀缺 | |
土笋冻 | 5.17 | 1.71 | t(23) = 3.34b | p = 0.003 | 0.68 | 稀缺 | |
印度手抓饭 | 3.07 | 1.48 | t(89) = −6.00 | p < 0.001 | −0.63 | 不稀缺 | |
英国血肠 | 3.67 | 1.54 | t(89) = −2.06 | p = 0.042 | −0.21 | 不稀缺 | |
沙茶面 | 2.76 | 1.29 | t(23) = −4.61b | p < 0.001 | −0.96 | 不稀缺 | |
海蛎煎 | 3.25 | 1.73 | t(23) = −2.13b | p = 0.044 | −0.43 | 不稀缺 | |
新奇感知调查结果 | 转基因食物 | 3.40 | 1.74 | t(89) = −3.27 | p = 0.002 | −0.69 | 低新奇 |
风险性感知调查结果 | 转基因食物 | 4.38 | 1.35 | t(89) = 2.66 | p = 0.009 | 0.56 | 高风险 |
[1] |
Alberti-Fidanza, A., Fruttini, D., & Servili, M. (1998). Gustatory and food habit changes during the menstrual cycle. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 68(2), 149-153.
pmid: 9565832 |
[2] | Allen, J. O., Griffith, D. M., & Gaines, H. C. (2013). “She looks out for the meals, period”: African American men's perceptions of how their wives influence their eating behavior and dietary health. Health Psychology, 32(4), 447-455. |
[3] | Alley, T. R. (2018). Conceptualization and measurement of human food neophobia. In Reilly, S. (Ed.), Food neophobia (pp. 169-192). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing. |
[4] | Andrić, A., Miličić, M., Bojanić, M., Obradović, V., Zorić, L. S., Petrović, M., & Gadjanski, I. (2023). Survey on public acceptance of insects as novel food in a non-EU country: A case study of Serbia. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 10, 91-106. |
[5] |
Baird, D. D., McConnaughey, D. R., Weinberg, C. R., Musey, P. L., Collins, D. C., Kesner, J. S., Knecht, E. A., & Wilcox, A. J. (1995). Application of a method for estimating day of ovulation using urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites. Epidemiology, 6(5), 547-550.
pmid: 8562634 |
[6] | Barrena, R., & Sánchez, M. (2013). Neophobia, personal consumer values and novel food acceptance. Food Quality and Preference, 27(1), 72-84. |
[7] | Biondolillo, M., & Epstein, L. (2021). Constructing a performance measure of future time orientation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(2), 278-288. |
[8] | Bisconsin-Júnior, A., Rodrigues, H., Behrens, J. H., da Silva, M. A. A. P., & Mariutti, L. R. B. (2022). “Food made with edible insects”: Exploring the social representation of entomophagy where it is unfamiliar. Appetite, 173, 106001. |
[9] |
Björk, P., & Kauppinen-Räisänen, H. (2019). Destination foodscape: A stage for travelers' food experience. Tourism Management, 71, 466-475.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.11.005 |
[10] | Blake, K. R., Dixson, B. J., O'Dean, S. M., & Denson, T. F. (2016). Standardized protocols for characterizing women's fertility: A data-driven approach. Hormones and Behavior, 81, 74-83. |
[11] |
Blanchard, S. S., Gerrek, M., Czinn, S., Chelimsky, G., Seaman, D., Siegel, C., & Splawski, J. (2006). Food protein sensitivity with partial villous atrophy after pediatric liver transplantation with tacrolimus immunosuppression. Pediatric Transplantation, 10(4), 529-532.
pmid: 16712617 |
[12] | Bowen, D. J., & Grunberg, N. E. (1990). Variations in food preference and consumption across the menstrual cycle. Physiology and Behavior, 47(2), 287-291. |
[13] | Brattoli, M., de Gennaro, G., de Pinto, V., Loiotile, A. D., Lovascio, S., & Penza, M. (2011). Odour detection methods: Olfactometry and chemical sensors. Sensors (Basel), 11(5), 5290-5322. |
[14] |
Brockmeyer, T., Anderle, A., Schmidt, H., Febry, S., Wünsch- Leiteritz, W., Leiteritz, A., & Friederich, H.-C. (2018). Body image related negative interpretation bias in anorexia nervosa. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 104, 69-73.
doi: S0005-7967(18)30039-1 pmid: 29567546 |
[15] | Bryant, C., Szejda, K., Parekh, N., Deshpande, V., & Tse, B. (2019). A survey of consumer perceptions of plant-based and clean meat in the USA, India, and China. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, 1-11. |
[16] | Buffenstein, R., Poppitt, S. D., McDevitt, R. M., & Prentice, A. M. (1995). Food intake and the menstrual cycle: A retrospective analysis, with implications for appetite research. Physiology and Behavior, 58(6), 1067-1077. |
[17] | Cardello, A. V., Maller, O., Masor, H. B., Dubose, C., & Edelman, B. (1985). Role of consumer expectancies in the acceptance of novel foods. Journal of Food Science, 50(6), 1707-1714. |
[18] | Carter, S. (2024). Who Runs the World? Women Control 85% of Purchases, 29% of STEM Roles. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/03/07/who-runs-the-world-women-control-85-of-purchases-29-of-stem-roles/ |
[19] | Chen, Q., Anders, S., & An, H. (2013). Measuring consumer resistance to a new food technology: A choice experiment in meat packaging. Food Quality and Preference, 28(2), 419-428. |
[20] | Chen, R., Liu, M. W., Guan, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Female responses to genetically modified foods: Effects of the menstrual cycle and food risk concerns. Journal of Business Research, 120, 608-618. |
[21] | Chen, R., Sun, H., Guo, Z., & Chen, H. (2024). He loves the one he has invested in: The effects of mating cues on men’s and women’s sunk cost bias. Journal of Consumer Research. doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucae048 |
[22] |
Chen, R., & Zheng, Y. H. (2015). The evolved ovulation cycle: Fluctuating reproduction motivation and behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 23(5), 836-848.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00836 |
[陈瑞, 郑毓煌. (2015). 进化的女性生理周期: 波动的繁衍动机和行为表现. 心理科学进展, 23(5), 836-848.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00836 |
|
[23] | Clemens, L. E., Siiteri, P. K., & Stites, D. P. (1979). Mechanism of immunosuppression of progesterone on maternal lymphocyte activation during pregnancy. The Journal of Immunology, 122(5), 1978-1985. |
[24] | Cohen, E., & Avieli, N. (2004). Food in tourism: Attraction and impediment. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4), 755-778. |
[25] |
Cohen, I. T., Sherwin, B. B., & Fleming, A. S. (1987). Food cravings, mood, and the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 21(4), 457-470.
pmid: 3428887 |
[26] | Cohen, Z. Z., Gotlieb, N., Erez, O., Wiznitzer, A., Arbel, O., Matas, D., Koren, L., & Henik, A. (2022). Attentional networks during the menstrual cycle. Behavioural Brain Research, 425, 113817. |
[27] | Coulthard, H., Aldridge, V., & Fox, G. (2022). Food neophobia and the evaluation of novel foods in adults; the sensory, emotional, association (SEA) model of the decision to taste a novel food. Appetite, 168, 105764. |
[28] | Cui, H.-J., Yao, F., Jin, X.-T., Zhao, T.-Y., Xu, W., & Smyczek, S. (2021). Effect of regulatory focus on food variety-seeking behavior of Chinese tourists. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(1), 153-176. |
[29] | Dalley, S. E., & Buunk, A. P. (2011). The motivation to diet in young women: Fear is stronger than hope. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 672-680. |
[30] | Damisa, M. A., Saleh, M. K., & Aliyu, R. (2011). Rural household perception and response strategies to seasonal food shortages in the Northern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 13(6), 118-128. |
[31] | Dibbets, P., Borger, L., & Nederkoorn, C. (2021). Filthy fruit! Confirmation bias and novel food. Appetite, 167, 105607. |
[32] |
Doyle, C., Ewald, H. A. S., & Ewald, P. W. (2007). Premenstrual syndrome: An evolutionary perspective on its causes and treatment. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50(2), 181-202.
doi: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0015 pmid: 17468538 |
[33] | Dukas, R., & Clark, C. W. (1995). Sustained vigilance and animal performance. Animal Behaviour, 49(5), 1259-1267. |
[34] | Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Cantú, S. M., & Simpson, J. A. (2014). Money, status, and the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(1), 27-39. |
[35] | Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., & Li, N. P. (2011). Ovulation, female competition, and product choice: Hormonal influences on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 921-934. |
[36] | Durante, K. M., & Laran, J. (2016). The effect of stress on consumer saving and spending. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 814-828. |
[37] |
Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in women's choice of dress across the ovulatory cycle: Naturalistic and laboratory task-based evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1451-1460.
doi: 10.1177/0146167208323103 pmid: 18719219 |
[38] |
Dye, L., & Blundell, J. (1997). Menstrual cycle and appetite control: Implications for weight regulation. Human Reproduction, 12(6), 1142-1151.
pmid: 9221991 |
[39] | Faraji-Rad, A., Moeini-Jazani, M., & Warlop, L. (2013). Women seek more variety in rewards when closer to ovulation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 503-508. |
[40] | Fatmaningrum, D., Roshita, A., & Februhartanty, J. (2016). Coping strategies for food insecurity among adolescent girls during the lean season in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: A qualitative study. British Journal of Nutrition, 116(S1), S42-S48. |
[41] | Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. |
[42] | Fessler, D. M., & Navarrete, C. D. (2003). Domain-specific variation in disgust sensitivity across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(6), 406-417. |
[43] |
Fleischman, D. S., & Fessler, D. M. (2011). Progesterone’s effects on the psychology of disease avoidance: Support for the compensatory behavioral prophylaxis hypothesis. Hormones and Behavior, 59(2), 271-275.
doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.11.014 pmid: 21134378 |
[44] | Flint, M., Bowles, S., Lynn, A., & Paxman, J. R. (2023). Novel plant-based meat alternatives: Future opportunities and health considerations. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 82(3), 370-385. |
[45] | Florack, A., Koch, T., Haasova, S., Kunz, S., & Alves, H. (2021). The differentiation principle: Why consumers often neglect positive attributes of novel food products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(4), 684-705. |
[46] |
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233-239.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x pmid: 17444920 |
[47] | Galindo-Caballero, Ó. J., Alzate-Pamplona, F. A., Gangestad, S. W., & Cruz, J. E. (2023). A review and p-curve analysis of research on the menstrual cycle correlates of consumer preferences and economic decisions. Hormones and Behavior, 150, 105317. |
[48] | Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., Welling, L. L., Gildersleeve, K., Pillsworth, E. G., Burriss, R. P., Larson, C. M., & Puts, D. A. (2016). How valid are assessments of conception probability in ovulatory cycle research? Evaluations, recommendations, and theoretical implications. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(2), 85-96. |
[49] | Gilbert, S. F. (2014). The saga of the germ line. In S. F. Gilbert (Ed.), Developmental biology. Sunderland: Sinauer Associations |
[50] | Gumussoy, M., & Rogers, P. J. (2023). It tastes OK, but I don't want to eat it: New insights into food disgust. Appetite, 188, 106642. |
[51] | Günden, C., Atakan, P., Yercan, M., Mattas, K., & Knez, M. (2024). Consumer response to novel foods: A review of behavioral barriers and drivers. Foods, 13(13), 2051. |
[52] | Hamidovic, A., Soumare, F., Naveed, A., & Davis, J. (2023). Mid-Luteal progesterone is inversely associated with premenstrual food cravings. Nutrients, 15(5), 1097. |
[53] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications. |
[54] |
Hlay, J. K., Albert, G., Batres, C., Richardson, G., Placek, C., Arnocky, S., Lieberman, D., & Hodges-Simeon, C. R. (2021). The evolution of disgust for pathogen detection and avoidance. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 13468.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91712-3 pmid: 34188198 |
[55] | Hormes, J. M., & Niemiec, M. A. (2017). Does culture create craving? Evidence from the case of menstrual chocolate craving. PloS One, 12(7), e0181445. |
[56] | Ji, M., Wong, I. A., Eves, A., & Scarles, C. (2016). Food-related personality traits and the moderating role of novelty-seeking in food satisfaction and travel outcomes. Tourism Management, 57, 387-396. |
[57] | John, M., Melis, A. P., Read, D., Rossano, F., & Tomasello, M. (2018). The preference for scarcity: A developmental and comparative perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 35(8), 603-615. |
[58] | Jung, I. N., Sharma, A., & Mattila, A. S. (2022). The impact of supermarket credibility on purchase intention of novel food. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102754. |
[59] | Kim, J. C., Wadhwa, M., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2019). When busy is less indulging: Impact of busy mindset on self-control behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 933-952. |
[60] | Knaapila, A., Tuorila, H., Silventoinen, K., Keskitalo, K., Kallela, M., Wessman, M., ... Perola, M. (2007). Food neophobia shows heritable variation in humans. Physiology & Behavior, 91(5), 573-578. |
[61] | Kröger, T., Dupont, J., Busing, L., & Fiebelkorn, F. (2022). Acceptance of insect-based food products in western societies: A systematic review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 8, 759885. |
[62] | Lake, A. A., Hyland, R. M., Mathers, J. C., Rugg-Gunn, A. J., Wood, C. E., & Adamson, A. J. (2006). Food shopping and preparation among the 30-somethings: Whose job is it? (The ASH30 study). British Food Journal, 108(6), 475-486. |
[63] | Leavitt, K., Zhu, L., & Aquino, K. (2016). Good without knowing it: Subtle contextual cues can activate moral identity and reshape moral intuition. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 785-800. |
[64] | Lin, J., Cui, Q., Marin, J., & Xu, H. (2019). Distinction and omnivorousness in tourists’ food consumption. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 83, 95-102. |
[65] |
Loper, H. B., La Sala, M., Dotson, C., & Steinle, N. (2015). Taste perception, associated hormonal modulation, and nutrient intake. Nutrition Reviews, 73(2), 83-91.
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuu009 pmid: 26024495 |
[66] | Mak, A. H., Lumbers, M., & Eves, A. (2012). Globalisation and food consumption in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 171-196. |
[67] | Malo-Vintimilla, L., Aguirre, C., Vergara, A., Fernández-Verdejo, R., & Galgani, J. E. (2024). Resting energy metabolism and sweet taste preference during the menstrual cycle in healthy women. British Journal of Nutrition, 131(3), 384-390. |
[68] | Maner, J. K., & Miller, S. L. (2014). Hormones and social monitoring: Menstrual cycle shifts in progesterone underlie women's sensitivity to social information. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 9-16. |
[69] |
Maratos, F. A., & Staples, P. (2015). Attentional biases towards familiar and unfamiliar foods in children. The role of food neophobia. Appetite, 91, 220-225.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.003 pmid: 25862982 |
[70] |
Marcu, A., Gaspar, R., Rutsaert, P., Seibt, B., Fletcher, D., Verbeke, W., & Barnett, J. (2015). Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat. Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 547-562.
doi: 10.1177/0963662514521106 pmid: 24553438 |
[71] |
Margittai, Z., Van Wingerden, M., Schnitzler, A., Joëls, M., & Kalenscher, T. (2018). Dissociable roles of glucocorticoid and noradrenergic activation on social discounting. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 90, 22-28.
doi: S0306-4530(17)31373-2 pmid: 29407513 |
[72] | Martínez-García, M., Paternina-Die, M., Barba-Müller, E., Martín de Blas, D., Beumala, L., Cortizo, R., ... Carmona, S. (2021). Do pregnancy-induced brain changes reverse? The brain of a mother six years after parturition. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 168-181. |
[73] | Maury-Sintjago, E., Rodríguez-Fernández, A., Parra-Flores, J., & Ruíz-De la Fuente, M. (2022). Obese women have a high carbohydrate intake without changes in the resting metabolic rate in the luteal phase. Nutrients, 14(10), 1997. |
[74] |
Mazac, R., Meinilä, J., Korkalo, L., Järviö, N., Jalava, M., & Tuomisto, H. L. (2022). Incorporation of novel foods in European diets can reduce global warming potential, water use and land use by over 80%. Nature Food, 3(4), 286-293.
doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00489-9 pmid: 37118200 |
[75] | McCarthy, D. O., Kluger, M. J., & Vander, A. J. (1985). Suppression of food intake during infection: Is interleukin-1 involved? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 42(6), 1179-1182. |
[76] |
McVay, M. A., Copeland, A. L., Newman, H. S., & Geiselman, P. J. (2012). Food cravings and food cue responding across the menstrual cycle in a non-eating disordered sample. Appetite, 59(2), 591-600.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.07.011 pmid: 22824054 |
[77] |
Metcalf, M., Evans, J., & Mackenzie, J. (1984). Indices of ovulation: Comparison of plasma and salivary levels of progesterone with urinary pregnanediol. Journal of Endocrinology, 100(1), 75-80.
pmid: 6690646 |
[78] |
Moding, K. J., & Stifter, C. A. (2016). Stability of food neophobia from infancy through early childhood. Appetite, 97, 72-78.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.016 pmid: 26612089 |
[79] | Morgan, J. D., & Moseley, W. G. (2020). The secret is in the sauce: Foraged food and dietary diversity among female farmers in southwestern Burkina Faso. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 41(2), 296-313. |
[80] | Motoki, K., Park, J., Spence, C., & Velasco, C. (2022). Contextual acceptance of novel and unfamiliar foods: Insects, cultured meat, plant-based meat alternatives, and 3D printed foods. Food Quality and Preference, 96, 104368. |
[81] | Nejad, L. M., Wertheim, E. H., & Greenwood, K. M. (2004). Predicting dieting behavior by using, modifying, and extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2099-2131. |
[82] |
Nezlek, J. B., & Forestell, C. A. (2019). Food neophobia and the five factor model of personality. Food Quality and Preference, 73, 210-214.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.11.007 |
[83] | Ng, S., Faraji-Rad, A., & Batra, R. (2021). Uncertainty evokes consumers’ preference for brands incongruent with their global-local citizenship identity. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(2), 400-415. |
[84] | Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J., & Dagevos, H. (2021). A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat. Appetite, 159, 105058. |
[85] | Oyarce-Vildósola, O., Rodríguez-Fernández, A., & Maury-Sintjago, E. (2022). Association between homophobia and sociodemographic characteristics in health workers in Southern Chile. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 13749. |
[86] | Patricio, B.-P., & Sergio, B.-G. (2019). Normal menstrual cycle. In Lutsenko, O. I. (Ed.). (2019). Menstrual cycle (pp. 15-42). Norderstedt: BoD-Books on Demand. |
[87] |
Pecorella, I., Fattorini, N., Macchi, E., & Ferretti, F. (2019). Sex/age differences in foraging, vigilance and alertness in a social herbivore. Acta Ethologica, 22, 1-8.
doi: 10.1007/s10211-018-0300-0 |
[88] | Perone, P., Çınar, Ç., D'ursi, P., Durmuşoğlu, L. R., Lal, V., & Tybur, J. (2021). Examining the effect of hunger on responses to pathogen cues and novel foods. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(4), 371-378. |
[89] | Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., & Costantini, G. (2018). A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 31(1), 1-23. |
[90] |
Piccinni, M.-P., Giudizi, M.-G., Biagiotti, R., Beloni, L., Giannarini, L., Sampognaro, S., ... Livi, C. (1995). Progesterone favors the development of human T helper cells producing Th2-type cytokines and promotes both IL-4 production and membrane CD30 expression in established Th1 cell clones. Journal of Immunology, 155(1), 128-133.
pmid: 7541410 |
[91] |
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19(2), 105-120.
doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w pmid: 1489209 |
[92] |
Pliner, P., & Stallberg-White, C. (2000). “Pass the ketchup, please”: Familiar flavors increase children’s willingness to taste novel foods. Appetite, 34(1), 95-103.
pmid: 10744896 |
[93] | Randler, C. (2021). Which species discovers novel food sources first? A camera trap study in a natural environment. Avian Research, 12(1), 1-4. |
[94] | Reynolds, L. P., McLean, K. J., McCarthy, K. L., Diniz, W. J., Menezes, A. C. B., Forcherio, J. C., ... Caton, J. S. (2022). Nutritional regulation of embryonic survival, growth, and development. In H. Dong, N. Rezaei, O. Steinlein, J. Xiao, A. Rosenhouse-Dantsker, R. Gerlai (Series Eds.) & G. Wu (Vol. Ed). Advances in experimental medicine and biology: Vol. 1354. Recent advances in animal nutrition and metabolism (pp. 63-76). Springer. |
[95] |
Ritchey, P. N., Frank, R. A., Hursti, U. K., & Tuorila, H. (2003). Validation and cross-national comparison of the food neophobia scale (FNS) using confirmatory factor analysis. Appetite, 40(2), 163-173.
pmid: 12781166 |
[96] |
Rogan, M. M., & Black, K. E. (2022). Dietary energy intake across the menstrual cycle: A narrative review. Nutrition Reviews, 81(7), 869-886.
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac094 pmid: 36367830 |
[97] | Saad, G., & Stenstrom, E. (2012). Calories, beauty, and ovulation: The effects of the menstrual cycle on food and appearance-related consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 102-113. |
[98] |
Salerno, A., & Sevilla, J. (2019). Scarce foods are perceived as having more calories. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(3), 472-482.
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.1090 |
[99] |
Schultheiss, O. C., Dargel, A., & Rohde, W. (2003). Implicit motives and gonadal steroid hormones: Effects of menstrual cycle phase, oral contraceptive use, and relationship status. Hormones and Behavior, 43(2), 293-301.
doi: 10.1016/s0018-506x(03)00003-5 pmid: 12694639 |
[100] | Sellitto, M., & Kalenscher, T. (2022). Variations in progesterone and estradiol across the menstrual cycle predict generosity toward socially close others. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 140, 105720. |
[101] |
Siegrist, M., & Hartmann, C. (2020). Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies. Nature Food, 1(6), 343-350.
doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x pmid: 37128090 |
[102] | Siegrist, M., Hartmann, C., & Keller, C. (2013). Antecedents of food neophobia and its association with eating behavior and food choices. Food Quality and Preference, 30(2), 293-298. |
[103] | Silvestris, E., Lovero, D., & Palmirotta, R. (2019). Nutrition and female fertility: An interdependent correlation. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 10, 451315. |
[104] | Smith, N. K., & Grueter, B. A. (2022). Hunger-driven adaptive prioritization of behavior. FEBS Journal, 289(4), 922-936. |
[105] |
Sparks, A. M., Fessler, D. M., Chan, K. Q., Ashokkumar, A., & Holbrook, C. (2018). Disgust as a mechanism for decision making under risk: Illuminating sex differences and individual risk-taking correlates of disgust propensity. Emotion, 18(7), 942-958.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000389 pmid: 29389205 |
[106] |
Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845-851.
pmid: 16393019 |
[107] | Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 37(10), 1660-1672. |
[108] | Stenstrom, E., Saad, G., & Hingston, S. T. (2018). Menstrual cycle effects on prosocial orientation, gift giving, and charitable giving. Journal of Business Research, 84, 82-88. |
[109] | Stone, H., FitzGibbon, L., Millan, E., & Murayama, K. (2022). Curious to eat insects? Curiosity as a Key Predictor of Willingness to try novel food. Appetite, 168, 105790. |
[110] | Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., van Trijp, H. C. M., & Stieger, M. (2016). Tasty but nasty? Exploring the role of sensory-liking and food appropriateness in the willingness to eat unusual novel foods like insects. Food Quality and Preference, 48, 293-302. |
[111] | Tan, H. S. G., Tibboel, C. J., & Stieger, M. (2017). Why do unusual novel foods like insects lack sensory appeal? Investigating the underlying sensory perceptions. Food Quality and Preference, 60, 48-58. |
[112] | Tebbich, S., & Teschke, I. (2014). Coping with uncertainty: Woodpecker finches (Cactospiza pallida) from an unpredictable habitat are more flexible than birds from a stable habitat. PloS One, 9(3), e91718. |
[113] | Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[114] |
Trzonkowski, P., Myśliwska, J., Łukaszuk, K., Szmit, E., Bryl, E., & Myśliwski, A. (2001). Luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in young healthy women is associated with decline in interleukin 2 levels. Hormone and Metabolic Research, 33(6), 348-353.
pmid: 11456283 |
[115] |
Tuorila, H., & Hartmann, C. (2020). Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods. Current Opinion in Food Science, 33, 1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2019.09.004 |
[116] | Van Loo, E. J., Caputo, V., & Lusk, J. L. (2020). Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter? Food Policy, 95, 101931. |
[117] | Walker, S., Mustafa, A., Walker, R., & Riad-Fahmy, D. (1981). The role of salivary progesterone in studies of infertile women. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 88(10), 1009-1015. |
[118] |
Wang, M. C., Naidoo, N., Ferzacca, S., Reddy, G., & Van Dam, R. M. (2014). The role of women in food provision and food choice decision-making in Singapore: A case study. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 53(6), 658-677.
doi: 10.1080/03670244.2014.911178 pmid: 25357270 |
[119] |
Wilcox, A. J., Dunson, D., & Baird, D. D. (2000). The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: Day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ, 321(7271), 1259-1262.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1259 pmid: 11082086 |
[120] | World, Bank. (2023). Population, female. World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL.FE.IN. |
[121] | Yang, S.-L., Yu, F., Li, K., Rao, T.-T., & Lian, D.-P. (2022). No control, no consumption: Association of low perceived control and intention to accept genetically modified food. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7642. |
[122] | Yao, F., Chen, K., Zhuang, Y., Shen, X., & Wang, X. (2022). Mid-luteal olfactory abilities reveal healthy women’s emotional and cognitive functions. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 826547. |
[123] | Yao, F., Zhuang, Y., Shen, X., & Wang, X. (2022). Attentional bias towards appealing and disgusting food cues varies with the menstrual cycle. Appetite, 175, 106063. |
[124] |
Yeo, S. K., Sun, Y., McKasy, M., & Shugart, E. C. (2019). Disgusting microbes: The effect of disgust on perceptions of risks related to modifying microbiomes. Public Understanding of Science, 28(4), 433-448.
doi: 10.1177/0963662519832200 pmid: 30827192 |
[125] | Zahler, L., Sommer, K., Reinecke, A., Wilhelm, F. H., Margraf, J., & Woud, M. L. (2020). Cognitive vulnerability in the context of panic: Assessment of panic-related associations and interpretations in individuals with varying levels of anxiety sensitivity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 44(4), 858-873. |
[126] |
Zellner, D. A., Garriga-Trillo, A., Centeno, S., & Wadsworth, E. (2004). Chocolate craving and the menstrual cycle. Appetite, 42(1), 119-121.
pmid: 15036792 |
[127] | Zhuang, J. Y., & Wang, J. X. (2015). The relationship between menstrual cycles and women’s ornamental behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 23(5), 729-736. |
[庄锦英, 王佳玺. (2015). 女性生理周期与修饰行为的关系. 心理科学进展, 23(5), 729-736.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00729 |
[1] | 李建花, 解佳佳, 庄锦英. 生理周期对情景记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(5): 466-480. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||