Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 1104-1119.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.1104
• Conceptual Framework • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2024-06-30
Online:
2025-07-15
Published:
2025-04-27
Contact:
ZHANG Shuman
E-mail:zhshuman@126.com
CLC Number:
CHEN Chao, ZHANG Shuman. Leader digital mindset: Conceptualization and model construction[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(7): 1104-1119.
不同视角 | 作者及年份 | 概念及内涵 |
---|---|---|
能力角度 | Lipman ( | 组织的数字思维包括失败的能力、检验新想法的能力、灵活与合作的能力等。 |
Christy ( | 数字思维是支持协作、创新、知识共享、持续改进、敏捷性、灵活性的组织结构和流程, 并让员工认识到数字技术是组织的战略支柱。 | |
态度及行为角度 | Solberg et al. ( | 数字思维概念是基于两个普遍的、个人持有的信念, 即: 第一种信念是自我导向的, 反映了个人对学习和使用新技术的能力在多大程度上是固定的或可塑的信念。第二种信念是形势导向的, 反映了技术变革的情境在多大程度上是由必须争夺的有限资源构成的, 而不是各方都有机会获得的可扩展资源的信念。 |
郭琳( | 数字思维是基于数据与算法, 并由此来实现对问题的求解、对行为的理解或更清晰具体的任务目标。 | |
Paul & Tsedal ( | 数字思维是一套态度和行为, 让员工和组织得以看到数据、算法和AI如何开启新的可能性并在日益由数据密集的技术和智慧科技所主宰的商业领域中描绘成功之道。 |
不同视角 | 作者及年份 | 概念及内涵 |
---|---|---|
能力角度 | Lipman ( | 组织的数字思维包括失败的能力、检验新想法的能力、灵活与合作的能力等。 |
Christy ( | 数字思维是支持协作、创新、知识共享、持续改进、敏捷性、灵活性的组织结构和流程, 并让员工认识到数字技术是组织的战略支柱。 | |
态度及行为角度 | Solberg et al. ( | 数字思维概念是基于两个普遍的、个人持有的信念, 即: 第一种信念是自我导向的, 反映了个人对学习和使用新技术的能力在多大程度上是固定的或可塑的信念。第二种信念是形势导向的, 反映了技术变革的情境在多大程度上是由必须争夺的有限资源构成的, 而不是各方都有机会获得的可扩展资源的信念。 |
郭琳( | 数字思维是基于数据与算法, 并由此来实现对问题的求解、对行为的理解或更清晰具体的任务目标。 | |
Paul & Tsedal ( | 数字思维是一套态度和行为, 让员工和组织得以看到数据、算法和AI如何开启新的可能性并在日益由数据密集的技术和智慧科技所主宰的商业领域中描绘成功之道。 |
比较内容 | 计算思维 | 流量思维 | 成长思维 | AI意识 | 数字思维 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
概念定义及内涵 | 计算思维强调人们将身边的问题用计算方法快速指定有效解决方案的思维与能力, 包含从编程概念、算法能力到思维意识等一系列要素。 | 在数字经济时代, 流量思维指一种做大客户群体、占领市场份额并将这些客户资源变现的经营理念。 | 成长思维是更注重提高和发展内在的能力, 并认为智力等属性是可塑的, 能从错误中学习。 | 人工智能意识被定义为员工对人工智能影响未来职业生涯的认知 | 数字思维是一套态度和行为, 让员工和组织得以看到数据、算法和AI如何开启新的可能性, 并在日益由数据密集的技术和智慧科技所主宰的商业领域中描绘成功之道。 |
回应的问题 | 如何利用不同计算方法解决问题 | 如何做大客户群体、占领市场 | 如何提高与发展自身的能力 | 如何利用AI影响员工未来职业发展 | 如何塑造认知活动以适应数字化情境 |
概念的文献出处 | Corradini et al. ( | 彭俞超 等( | Zhang et al. ( | Teng et al. ( | Paul & Tsedal ( |
自我导向 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
情境导向 | √ | √ | √ |
比较内容 | 计算思维 | 流量思维 | 成长思维 | AI意识 | 数字思维 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
概念定义及内涵 | 计算思维强调人们将身边的问题用计算方法快速指定有效解决方案的思维与能力, 包含从编程概念、算法能力到思维意识等一系列要素。 | 在数字经济时代, 流量思维指一种做大客户群体、占领市场份额并将这些客户资源变现的经营理念。 | 成长思维是更注重提高和发展内在的能力, 并认为智力等属性是可塑的, 能从错误中学习。 | 人工智能意识被定义为员工对人工智能影响未来职业生涯的认知 | 数字思维是一套态度和行为, 让员工和组织得以看到数据、算法和AI如何开启新的可能性, 并在日益由数据密集的技术和智慧科技所主宰的商业领域中描绘成功之道。 |
回应的问题 | 如何利用不同计算方法解决问题 | 如何做大客户群体、占领市场 | 如何提高与发展自身的能力 | 如何利用AI影响员工未来职业发展 | 如何塑造认知活动以适应数字化情境 |
概念的文献出处 | Corradini et al. ( | 彭俞超 等( | Zhang et al. ( | Teng et al. ( | Paul & Tsedal ( |
自我导向 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
情境导向 | √ | √ | √ |
[1] | 陈晓萍. (2022). 如何构建企业的数字化心态? 管理视野, 30, 1-4. |
[2] | 付丽华, 叶青青. (2024). CEO社会资本对企业数字创新的影响研究. 创新科技, 24(9), 73-90. |
[3] | 桂橙林, 赵旭宏, 张鹏程, 刘智强, 周蓉. (2024). 数智化背景下员工AI意识对其创新绩效的影响机制. 中国人力资源开发, 41(8), 6-22. |
[4] | 郭琳. (2022). 数字思维、数据知识生产与技术隐喻研究. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 53(5), 87-96. |
[5] | 李燕萍, 苗力. (2020). 企业数字领导力的结构维度及其影响——基于中国情境的扎根理论研究. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 73(6), 125-136. |
[6] | 李正东. (2022). 数字化转型中领导共情对员工创新绩效的影响研究——一个有调节的双中介模型. 财经论丛, (2), 89-100. |
[7] | 彭俞超, 王南萱, 邓贵川, 顾雷雷. (2022). 数字经济时代的流量思维——基于供应链资金占用和金融获利的视角. 管理世界, 38(8), 170-187. |
[8] | 邱功英, 龙立荣. (2014). 威权领导与下属建言的关系: 一个跨层分析. 科研管理, 35(10), 86-93. |
[9] | 孙健敏, 陈乐妮, 尹奎. (2018). 挑战性压力源与员工创新行为: 领导-成员交换与辱虐管理的作用. 心理学报, 50(4), 436-449. |
[10] | 万伦来, 杨泓艺. (2022). 人工智能时代人机关系的哲学反思. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (1), 29-33. |
[11] | 杨洋, 苏莹莹, 李仲秋, 刘宝巍. (2022). 未来清晰一定会导致工作投入吗?系统视角下的定性比较研究. 管理评论, 34(1), 191-204. |
[12] | 张兰霞, 杨硕, 王乐乐, 孙欣. (2022). 职场排斥对员工助人行为的影响机制研究. 管理学报, 19(9), 1306-1315. |
[13] | 周晓雪, 崔淼. (2024). 应对外部环境挑战的企业数字韧性塑造机理研究: 基于数字化战略更新的视角. 南开管理评论, 27(2), 4-17. |
[14] | AlNuaimi, B. K., Singh, S. K., Ren, S., Budhwar, P., & Vorobyev, D. (2022). Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648. |
[15] | Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615-668. |
[16] | Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105-131. |
[17] | Avtalion, Z., Aviv, I., Hadar, I., Luria, G., & Bar-Gil, O. (2024). Digital infrastructure as a new organizational digital climate dimension. Applied Sciences, 14(19), 8592. |
[18] | Babalola, M. T., Mawritz, M. B., Greenbaum, R. L., Ren, S., & Garba, O. A. (2021). Whatever it takes: How and when supervisor bottom-line mentality motivates employee contributions in the workplace. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1134-1154. |
[19] | Chen, L., Chang, H., Rudoler, J., Arnardottir, E., Zhang, Y., de Los Angeles, C., & Menon, V. (2022). Cognitive training enhances growth mindset in children through plasticity of cortico-striatal circuits. NPJ Science of Learning, 7(1), 1-10. |
[20] | Christy, M. A. (2023). Digital mindset in civil case settlement through electronic court (e-court) in the era of digital transformation. Legal Brief, 12(4), 382-390. |
[21] | Corradini, I., Lodi, M., & Nardelli, E. (2017, August 18-20). Conceptions and misconceptions about computational thinking among Italian primary school teachers. Paper presented at ICER’17-Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, Tacoma, WA, United States. |
[22] | Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 01938. |
[23] | Deng, W., Dai, Y., Gao, Y., Lin, R., Lei, F., & Lei, L. (2022). Relationships between proactive personality and creativity: Mindsets and golden mean thinking as parallel mediators among Chinese third language students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 969209. |
[24] | Dupin, J. J., Pascal, A., & Godé, C. (2022). A systematic literature review on digital resilience in organizations: Towards a conceptualization. Working Paper, HAL. |
[25] |
Eissa, G., Wyland, R., Lester, S. W., & Gupta, R. (2019). Winning at all costs: An exploration of bottom-line mentality, Machiavellianism, and organisational citizenship behaviour. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(3), 469-489.
doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12241 |
[26] | Fleron, B., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R. (2021, January 5-8). Digital organizational resilience: A history of denmark as a most digitalized country. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 54th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, United States. |
[27] | Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280. |
[28] | Gfrerer, A., Hutter, K., Füller, J., & Ströhle, T. (2021). Ready or not: Managers’ and employees’ different perceptions of digital readiness. California Management Review, 63(2), 23-48. |
[29] | Gooty, J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2016). The leader-member exchange relationship a multisource, cross-level investigation. Journal of Management, 42(4), 915-935. |
[30] | Greenbaum, R. L., Babalola, M. T., Quade, M. J., Guo, L., & Kim, Y. C. (2021). Correction to: Moral burden of bottom-line pursuits: How and when perceptions of top management bottom-line mentality inhibit supervisors’ ethical leadership practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(1), 109-123. |
[31] | Harms, P. D., & Han, G. (2019). Algorithmic leadership: The future is now. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(4), 74-75. |
[32] | He, C., Teng, R., & Song, J. (2023). Linking employees' challenge-hindrance appraisals toward AI to service performance: The influences of job crafting, job insecurity and AI knowledge. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(3), 975-994. |
[33] | Herdman, A. O., Yang, J., & Arthur, J. B. (2014). How does leader-member exchange disparity affect teamwork behavior and effectiveness in work groups? The moderating role of leader-leader exchange. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1498-1523. |
[34] | Horner-Long, P., & Schoenberg, R. (2002). Does e-business require different leadership characteristics?: An empirical investigation. European Management Journal, 20(6), 611-619. |
[35] | Jungst, M., Milner, J. & Milner, T. (2022). The effect of leader-member exchange on voice: The role of engagement and digital communication. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 18(1), 1-19. |
[36] | Kane, G. C., Phillips, A. N., Copulsky, J., & Andrus, G. (2019). How digital leadership is(n’t) different. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34-39. |
[37] | Kleine, A. K., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2019). Thriving at work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9-10), 973-999. |
[38] | Leung, K., & Wang, J. (2015). Social processes and team creativity in multicultural teams: A socio-technical framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), 1008-1025. |
[39] |
Li, A. N., & Liao, H. (2014). How do leader-member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 847-866.
doi: 10.1037/a0037233 pmid: 25000359 |
[40] | Lipman, V. (2017). Practical tips to help companies develop a digital mindset. 2017-7-19 https://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman/2017/07/19/practical-tips-to.help-companies-develop-a-I-mindset/#67931e947fe5. |
[41] | Liu, D., Hernandez, M., & Wang, L. (2014). The role of leadership and trust in creating structural patterns of team procedural justice: A social network investigation. Personnel Psychology, 67(4), 801-845. |
[42] | Mangalaraj, G., Nerur, S., Dwivedi, R. (2022). Digital transformation for agility and resilience: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(4), 1-13. |
[43] | Mehedintu, A., & Soava, G. (2022). A structural framework for assessing the digital resilience of enterprises in the context of the technological revolution 4.0. Electronics, 11(15), 2439. |
[44] | Ogbeibu, S., Pereira, V., Emelifeonwu, J., & Gaskin, J. (2021). Bolstering creativity willingness through digital task interdependence, disruptive and smart HRM technologies. Journal of Business Research, 124, 422-436. |
[45] | Paul, L., & Tsedal, N. (2022). The digital mindset: What it really takes to thrive in the age of data, algorithms, and AI. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press. |
[46] | Pham, N. T., Tuan, T. H., Thuy, V. T. N., Hoang, H. T., & Hoang, G. (2023). Improving employee outcomes in the remote working context: A time-lagged study on digital- oriented training, work-to-family conflict and empowering leadership. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 61(4), 1008-1038. |
[47] | Pulley, M. L., & Sessa, V. I. (2013). E-leadership: Tackling complex challenges. Industrial & Commercial Training, 33(6), 225-230. |
[48] | Rego, A., Owens, B., Yam, K. C., Bluhm, D., Cunha, M. P. E., Silard, A.,... Liu, W. (2019). Leader humility and team performance: Exploring the mediating mechanisms of team PsyCap and task allocation effectiveness. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1009-1033. |
[49] | Rice, D. B., & Reed, N. (2022). Supervisor emotional exhaustion and goal-focused leader behavior: The roles of supervisor bottom-line mentality and conscientiousness. Current Psychology, 41(12), 8758-8773. |
[50] | Roman, A. V., Wart, M. V., Wang, X. H., Liu, C., Kim, S., & McCarthy, A. (2019). Defining e-leadership as competence in ICT-mediated communications: An exploratory assessment. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 853-866. |
[51] |
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
pmid: 10307892 |
[52] | Schwarzmüller, T., Brosi, P., Duman, D., & Welpe, I. M. (2018). How does the digital transformation affect organizations? Key themes of change in work design and leadership. Management Revue-Socio-Economic Studies, 29(2), 114-138. |
[53] | Sharma, M. K., Anand, N., Roopesh, B. N., Sunil, S. (2022). Digital resilience mediates healthy use of technology. Medico-Legal Journal, 90(4), 195-199. |
[54] | Shih, H. A., & Wijaya, N. (2017). Team-member exchange, voice behavior, and creative work involvement. International Journal of Manpower, 38(3), 417-431. |
[55] | Solberg, E., Traavik, L., & Wong, S. I. (2020). Digital mindsets: Recognizing and leveraging individual beliefs for digital transformation. California Management Review, 62(4), 1-20. |
[56] | Stoverink, A. C., Kirkman, B. L., Mistry, S., & Rosen, B. (2020). Bouncing back together: Toward a theoretical model of work team resilience. Academy of Management Review, 45(2), 395-422. |
[57] | Sun, X. B., & Zhang, Q. Q. (2021). Building digital incentives for digital customer orientation in platform ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 137, 555-566. |
[58] |
Tangirala, S., Green, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2007). In the shadow of the boss's boss: Effects of supervisors' upward exchange relationships on employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 309-320.
pmid: 17371080 |
[59] | Teng, R., Zhou, S., Zheng, W., & Ma, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) awareness and work withdrawal: Evaluating chained mediation through negative work-related rumination and emotional exhaustion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(7), 2311-2326. |
[60] |
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500 pmid: 12814298 |
[61] | Tim, Y., Cui, L., Sheng, Z. (2020). Rural communities leapfrogging via digital resilience to sustainable development. Information Systems Journal, 31(2), 323-345. |
[62] | Tse, H. H. M. (2014). Linking leader-member exchange differentiation to work team performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(8), 710-724. |
[63] | Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Thomas, C. L., Yu, J., & Spitzmueller, C. (2017). Explaining benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of engagement, team proactivity composition and perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 101, 90-103. |
[64] | Wright, D. J. (2016). Toward a digital resilience. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4, 000082. |
[65] | Xu, G., Xue, M., & Zhao, J. (2023). The association between artificial intelligence awareness and employee depression: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of perceived organizational support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 5147. |
[66] |
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269-1284.
doi: 10.1037/amp0000794 pmid: 33382294 |
[67] | Zeng, X., Li, S., Yousaf, Z. (2022). AI adoption, digital innovation: Digital resilience mediation and training moderation. Sustainability, 14(14), 8286. |
[68] | Zhang, X., Ye, J., Wang, D., Tian, F., & Fu, S. (2023). Leadership mindsets, cultural norms and organizational resilience in China: The moderating effect of supportive human resource practices. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(1), 248-265. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||