ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

• •    

探索消费者亲环境行为中的意图-结果不一致效应

钟科, 王振邦, 杨霖云, 李佩镅   

  1. 海南大学 国际商学院,
    海南经贸职业技术学院国际旅游学院, 海南 571127 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-13 修回日期:2025-12-02 接受日期:2025-12-09
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区项目:消费者亲环境行为中的意图-结果不一致效应及其心理机制研究(72562011)

Exploring the behavioral intention-outcome inconsistency effect in consumers’ pro-environmental behavior

ZHONG Ke, WANG Zhenbang, YANG Linyun, LI Peimei   

  1. , ,
    International Tourism College, Hainan College of Economics and Business 571127, China
  • Received:2025-10-13 Revised:2025-12-02 Accepted:2025-12-09

摘要: 促进消费者的亲环境行为是近年的热点研究话题。现有研究更多关注亲环境行为意图形成的前因及干预手段,忽视了个体行为的实际结果可能偏离意图的现象。本研究提出消费者亲环境行为存在“意图-结果不一致效应”,并计划开展系列研究构建理论框架,以揭示亲环境行为何时及为何出现主观意图与客观结果的不一致。具体而言,本研究试图从社会困境中的个体动机冲突切入,从环境效能考量、自利考量和公正考量三种动机维度考察意图-结果不一致的诱因和表现形式,分别论证绿色效能错觉效应、新奇陌生排斥效应以及旁观者错怪效应的研究构想,验证其心理机制并提出针对性干预措施。研究结论为未来绿色消费的研究延展出“客观结果与主观意图差异”这一新的聚焦点,不仅为政策制定者提供基于行为科学的精准干预方案,并且对促进绿色消费、推动可持续发展实践有重要理论价值与应用启示。

关键词: 亲环境行为, 心理阻力, 意图-结果不一致, 认知偏差, 社会困境

Abstract: Promoting consumers’ pro-environmental behavior has become a prominent research topic in recent years. Existing studies have primarily focused on the antecedents of pro-environmental intentions and the corresponding intervention strategies, while largely overlooking the phenomenon in which actual behavior deviates from intended behavior. This study introduces the concept of the “intention–behavior inconsistency effect” in consumers’ pro-environmental behavior and proposes a series of studies to construct a theoretical framework that explains when and why discrepancies occur between subjective intentions and objective outcomes. Specifically, the study approaches this issue from the perspective of motivational conflicts in social dilemmas, examining three motivational dimensions—environmental efficacy, self-interest, and fairness considerations—as factors driving intention–behavior inconsistency. The research conceptualizes and empirically tests three mechanisms: the green efficacy illusion effect, the novelty–familiarity rejection effect, and the bystander misattribution effect, and proposes targeted interventions based on these mechanisms. The findings extend the focus of future green consumption research to the “gap between subjective intention and objective outcome,” offering behaviorally grounded guidance for policymakers and providing both theoretical insights and practical implications for promoting green consumption and advancing sustainable development.

Key words: pro-environmental behavior, psychological resistance, intention–behavior inconsistency, cognitive bias, social dilemma