ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

• •    

执中致和:中庸思维与心理健康关系的三水平元分析

吕艳奇, 韦庆旺   

  1. 中国人民大学心理学系, 北京 100872 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-01 修回日期:2025-11-15 接受日期:2025-11-20

Holding Balance Brings Harmony: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Zhongyong Thinking and Mental Health

LYU Yanqi, WEI Qingwang   

  1. , 100872, China
  • Received:2025-09-01 Revised:2025-11-15 Accepted:2025-11-20

摘要: 基于中庸实践思维体系和心理健康双因素模型,运用三水平元分析方法探讨中庸思维与心理健康的关系及其调节因素。检索2025年4月30日之前的文献,最终纳入56篇中庸思维与积极心理健康关系文献,60个独立样本,139个效应量,35410名被试以及43篇中庸思维与消极心理健康关系文献,45个独立样本,136个效应量,35596名被试。结果发现,中庸思维与积极心理健康指标显著正相关(r = .24),与消极心理健康指标显著负相关(r = -.21),二者均为中等水平效应量;中庸思维与心理弹性、工作满意度、工作幸福感的相关高于其与生活满意度的相关;中庸思维和幸福感、安适感、积极情绪的相关与其和生活满意度的相关无显著差异。使用中庸信念—价值量表、中庸意见表达量表以及中庸价值取向量表测得的效应量彼此差异较小,且与中庸实践自评量表测得的效应量差异显著。结合元分析的结果,对中庸思维的理论内涵、测量方式,及其与心理健康的关系进行了讨论,指出从超越二元对立的“执中致和”视角理解中庸思维与心理健康所具有的理论建构意义。

关键词: 中庸思维, 心理健康, 三水平元分析

Abstract: Drawing on the Zhongyong practical thinking framework and the dual-factor model of mental health, this study employed a three-level meta-analytic approach to examine the relationship between Zhongyong thinking and mental health, as well as its moderators. A systematic review identified 56 studies on Zhongyong thinking and positive mental health and 43 studies on Zhongyong thinking and negative mental health published before April 30, 2025. The final analysis incorporated 60 independent samples (139 effect sizes, N = 35,410) for the relationship with positive mental health, and 45 independent samples (136 effect sizes, N = 35,596) for the relationship with negative mental health. The pooled correlation indicated that Zhongyong thinking had a significant positive association with positive mental health (r = .24) and a significant negative association with negative mental health (r = -.21), both of medium effect size. Furthermore, Zhongyong thinking showed stronger correlations with resilience, job satisfaction, and work-related well-being than with life satisfaction. Its correlations with general well-being, peace of mind, and positive affect did not significantly differ from its correlation with life satisfaction. Moreover, the effect sizes measured by the Zhongyong Belief–Value Scale, the Zhongyong Opinion Expression Scale, and the Zhongyong Value Orientation Scale were relatively similar to each other, but differed significantly from those measured by the Zhongyong Practice Self-report Scale. Based on these findings, the study discusses the theoretical connotations and measurement approaches of Zhongyong thinking, as well as its relationship with mental health, highlighting the theoretical significance of understanding Zhongyong thinking and mental health from the perspective of “Holding Balance Brings Harmony”, which transcends binary oppositions.

Key words: Zhongyong thinking, mental health, three-level meta-analysis