不同SOA下视觉返回抑制对视听觉整合的调节作用
|
|
彭姓, 常若松, 李奇, 王爱君, 唐晓雨
|
Visually induced inhibition of return affects the audiovisual integration under different SOA conditions
|
|
PENG Xing, CHANG Ruosong, LI Qi, WANG Aijun, TANG Xiaoyu
|
|
表1 不同SOA条件下Cueing effect、rMRE、pAUC结果对比
|
| |
|
| 条件 | M | 95% CI | t | p | | 下限 | 上限 | | 短SOA | | | | | | | Cueing effect (ms) | | | | | | | V | 38.77 | 31.54 | 46.00 | 11.09 | 0.000 | | A | 1.83 | -1.43 | 5.10 | 1.16 | 0.257 | | AV | 16.00 | 11.55 | 20.45 | 7.43 | 0.000 | | Cueing effect对比(ms) | | | | | | | AV vs. V | -22.77 | -30.12 | -15.43 | -6.41 | 0.000 | | V vs. A | 36.94 | 28.53 | 45.34 | 9.09 | 0.000 | | AV vs. A | 14.17 | 9.06 | 19.28 | 5.74 | 0.000 | | rMRE对比(%) | | | | | | | 无效vs.有效 | 3.20 | 1.53 | 4.87 | 3.97 | 0.001 | | pAUC对比(ms) | | | | | | | 无效vs.有效 | -4.30 | -6.64 | -1.96 | -3.80 | 0.001 | | 长SOA | | | | | | | Cueing effect (ms) | | | | | | | V | 26.98 | 19.42 | 34.54 | 7.38 | 0.000 | | A | 5.88 | 0.51 | 11.24 | 2.26 | 0.033 | | AV | 10.85 | 5.88 | 15.83 | 4.51 | 0.000 | | Cueing effect对比(ms) | | | | | | | AV vs. V | -16.13 | -26.51 | -5.74 | -3.21 | 0.004 | | V vs. A | 21.10 | 14.24 | 27.97 | 6.36 | 0.000 | | AV vs. A | 4.98 | -2.88 | 12.84 | 1.31 | 0.203 | | rMRE对比(%) | | | | | | | 无效 vs. 有效 | 0.4 | -1.78 | 2.59 | 0.38 | 0.706 | | pAUC对比(ms) | | | | | | | 无效 vs. 有效 | 2.14 | -1.12 | 5.40 | 1.36 | 0.188 |
|
|
|