Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2017, Vol. 49 Issue (8) : 1080-1088     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01080
 Narcissistic personality modulates outcome evaluation in the trust game
WANG Yiwen1; FU Chao1; REN Xiangfeng1; LIN Yuzhong1; GUO Fengbo1; ZHANG Zhen1; HUANG Liang2; YUAN Bo3; ZHENG Yuwei4
 (1 Institute of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China) (2 Institute of Applied Psychology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China) (3 Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China) (4 School of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China)
Download: PDF(675 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Abstract   Narcissism is a personality characteristic involving arrogance, a feeling of entitlement, and the willingness to exploit others. Narcissistic people tend to be self-centered, grandiose and sensitive to feedback from others. They are also extremely selfish, focusing solely on themselves, lacking regard for others, and showing deficits in pro-social behavior and emotional empathy. Research on Social Value Orientation (SVO) has found that proself people are less trusting and trustworthy than prosocial people. Because of his or her egoism and lack of emotional empathy, the narcissist may tend to not trust other people, especially unfamiliar ones. Relatedly, narcissism may also modulate the outcome evaluation of trust decisions. Previous social neuroscience research has revealed two ERP components related to outcome evaluation, including feedback related negativity (FRN) and P300. In this study, we aimed to investigate how narcissistic personality modulates outcome evaluation in the one-shot trust game. 38 healthy undergraduate participated in our experiment. To assess their narcissism and control for potential depression, all participants completed a brief version of narcissistic personality inventory (NPI-16) and Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II) before the behavioral task. Participants then played the role of trustor in the one-shot trust game, while their electroencephalograms (EEGs) were recorded. In the trust game, each participant decide whether to trust or distrust different partners over 150 trials. The partners’ reciprocation strategies were pre-programed by the experimenter (the overall reciprocating rate was 50%). All participants were provided with post-decision feedback about the outcome of their decisions (gain or loss game points) in each trail. We analyzed their behavioral responses at the decision-making stage and ERP components at the outcome evaluation stage. Based on NPI-16 scores, 19 participants were classified as relatively low narcissists (scores below the 50th percentile), while the other 19 participants were classified as relatively high narcissists (scores above the 50th percentile); these two groups differed significantly in NPI-16 scores, but not significantly in BDI-II scores (depression). Behavioral results revealed that the high-narcissistic group made less trusting choices than did the low-narcissistic group in the trust game. ERP results indicated that the feedback-related negativity (FRN) was more negative going in response to loss feedback compared to gain feedback. This may indicate that participants typically experienced expectation violation when their trust was exploited. More importantly, the FRN difference wave (dFRN, loss-FRN minuses gain-FRN) was larger for the high narcissistic group than the low narcissistic group. Relatedly, the P300 amplitudes following outcome feedback were larger for the high narcissistic group than the low narcissistic group, especially at the frontalcentral site (FCz). Both dFRN and P300 effects suggested that more narcissistic people may be more sensitive to the outcome feedback of trust decisions. The present study provides preliminary evidence that individual differences in narcissism modulate trust decision- making and outcome evaluation.
Keywords  Trust game      narcissistic personality      outcome evaluation      differentiated feedback related negativity      P300     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Zhen, E-mail:; YUAN Bo, E-mail:     E-mail: E-mail:; E-mail:
Issue Date: 25 June 2017
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
WANG Yiwen, FU Chao, REN Xiangfeng, LIN Yuzhong, GUO Fengbo.  Narcissistic personality modulates outcome evaluation in the trust game[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2017, 49(8): 1080-1088.
URL:     OR
[1] FU Yilei, LUO Yuejia, CUI Fang.  Consistency of choice modulates outcome evaluation: Evidence from ERP studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1089-1099.
[2] WANG Yiwen; ZHANG Zhen; YUAN Sheng; GUO Fengbo; HE Shaoying; JING Yiming. The Decision-making and Outcome Evaluation during a Repeated Trust Game[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 1028-1038.
[3] GAO Xuemei; WENG Lei; ZHOU Qun; ZHAO Cai; LI Fang. Dose Violent Offenders Have Lower Capacity of Empathy for Pain: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 478-487.
[4] DOU Wei;QU Lulu;QU Chen. Social Comparison Affects Outcome Evaluation in The Cooperative Task: An ERP Study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 405-414.
[5] ZHONG Yiping;FAN Wei;CAI Ronghua;TAN Qianbao;XIAO Lihui;ZHAN Youlong;LUO Xi;QIN Minhui. The Influence of Positive Emotion on the Degree Effect in Self-referential Processes: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 341-352 .
[6] BAI Liying; YUAN Bo; ZHANG Wei; ZHANG Zhen; Lan Jiao; WANG Yiwen. Interpersonal Cooperation and Conflict Influenced Outcome Evaluation in Social Decision-making[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1760-1771.
[7] XIANG Ling;WANG Bao-Xi;ZHANG Qing-Lin. Performance Monitoring and Behavioral Adjustments in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence from ERP Study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(9): 1149-1159.
[8] SUO Tao,FENG Ting-Yong,LUO Jun-Long,LUO Yu,LI Hong. Positive Outcome Evaluation Is Modulated by Closeness of Outcome: An ERP Research[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(8): 1047-1057.
[9] SUO Tao,FENG Ting-Yong,GU Ben-Bo,WANG Hui-Li,LI Hong. Modulation of Attribution of Responsibility on ‘Action Effect’ and Its ERP Evidence[J]. , 2011, 43(12): 1430-1440.
[10] WU Yan,LUO Yue-Jia. The Outcome Evaluation in the Altruistic Punishment: An ERP Study[J]. , 2011, 43(06): 661-673.
[11] YUE Ling-Yun,FENG Ting-Yong,LI Sen-Sen,LI Guang-Pu,LI Hong. The Differences of Individuals Having Different Regulatory Modes on Counterfactual Thinking: Evidence from An ERP Study[J]. , 2011, 43(03): 274-282.
[12] CHEN Jing,SUO Tao,YUAN Wen-Ping,FENG Ting-Yong. Outcome Prediction and Evaluation in Young Adolescents: A Study of Event-Related Potentials[J]. , 2011, 43(02): 152-163.
[13] WU Yan,YU Rong-Jun,ZHOU Xiao-Lin,LUO Yue-Jia. Self-relevant Criteria Determine the Evaluation of Outcomes in the Self-performance and Other-performance Gambling Task[J]. , 2010, 42(02): 279-287.
[14] ZHANG Hui-Jun,ZHOU Li-Ming,LUO Yue-Jia. The Influence of Responsibility on the Regret Intensity: An ERP Study[J]. , 2009, 41(05): 454-463.
[15] CUI Qian,ZHANG Qing-Lin,QIU Jiang,LIU Qiang,DU Xiu-Min,RUAN Xiao-Lin. The Functionally Separation of P300 and CNV in Lie Detection[J]. , 2009, 41(04): 316-328.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech