Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2015, Vol. 47 Issue (4) : 503-513     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00503
Survival-processing Memory Advantage Comes from Natural Selection: Evidence from Cross-age Comparison and Reproduction Scenarios
TANG Weihai1; XIE Si1; LIU Yuxia1,2; BAI Xuejun1,3; LIU Xiping1
(1 School of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China) (2 Party Committee of Jingzhi Town, Weifang 262119, China) (3 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China)
Download: PDF(460 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Words processed under a survival scenario have a remarkable advantage over those processed in other deep processing conditions (e.g. pleasantness rating, self-reference, moving scenario, and intentional learning). This robust phenomenon is known as survival-processing advantage effect. Nairne, Thompson and Pandeirada (2007) suggested that our memory systems were naturally adjusted to process and store fitness-relevant information which was beneficial to surviving and reproducing. However, this evolutionary-based explanation has little empirical support. The current study aimed to confirm this assumption directly. According to the assumption that the survival-processing advantage effect is due to the pressure brought by natural selection, we inferred that it should be equally found among individuals of different ages. Meanwhile, considering the fitness-relevance assumption, processing words in other fitness-relevant contexts using the same paradigm as survival processing should also yield better memory. Two experiments were conducted in the current study. In the first experiment, 300 participants were randomly chosen from five age groups (8, 10, 12, 21, and 64 years old). The participants were then assigned to the primitive hunting scenario or the hunting contest scenario. Primitive hunting scenario described a dangerous surrounding which participants imagined to hunt for the survival of their tribe. By contrast, the hunting contest scenario did not involve life safety. In this scenario, participants were instructed to imagine taking a hunting contest. All the participants were also asked to assess to what extent each word was relevant to the activities in the imaginative scenario. The instructions for the free recall appeared unexpectedly after a two-minute distraction task. In the second experiment, 150 undergraduates were randomly recruited and assigned to one of the five rating tasks: survival, mate selection, pregnancy, raising a child, and self-reference. The survival scenario needed participants imagine to survive without basic materials in foreign grasslands. The mate selection, pregnancy, raising a child scenarios were all related to reproduction. By contrast, the self-reference was unrelated to survival or reproduction and a namely fitness-irrelevant task. The procedures of word assessment and free recall were similar to Experiment 1. In both experiments, the accuracy of free recall, the ratings, and the rating latencies were recorded for analysis. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that the proportion of correct recall was higher in the primitive hunting condition than in the hunting contest condition across age groups. That is, we observed a typical survival-processing advantage effect in all groups. More importantly, there was no significant difference in the amount of survival benefit. Additionally, there were no statistical differences in the rating latencies and the ratings between primitive hunting condition and hunting contest condition within age group. The results of Experiment 2 showed that recall performances in the “mate selection” scenario and the “raising a child” scenario were better than that in fitness-irrelevant task, suggesting a reproduction advantage. The pregnancy condition did not show a memory advantage possibly because pregnancy was less important in terms of evolutionary significance, especially for the younger participants who were lack of experiences about pregnancy. Also, the error rate of free recall, the rating latencies and the ratings were similar to the results of the first experiment. There were no differences between conditions. In accordance with the natural selection explanation, the survival advantages occurred in different ages and the magnitude of the effects did not differ among ages. These results suggested that people prioritized the processing of fitness-relevant information independent of development. However, this conclusion needed to be further verified due to a low power of the ANOVA test. The higher accuracy of free recall found in the scenario of mate selection and raising a child suggested that reproduction-processing and survival-processing had memory advantages compared to fitness-irrelevant processing. Our findings provided good evidence for the natural selection explanation.

Keywords survival-processing advantage effect      natural selection theory      age      reproduction-processing     
Corresponding Authors: LIU Xiping, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 25 April 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
TANG Weihai; XIE Si; LIU Yuxia; BAI Xuejun; LIU Xiping. Survival-processing Memory Advantage Comes from Natural Selection: Evidence from Cross-age Comparison and Reproduction Scenarios[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2015, 47(4): 503-513.
URL:     OR
[1] ZHANG Jijia, LU Yutong, ZHANG Qirui, ZHANG Jinqiao. The effects of foreign language anxiety, nervousness and cognitive load on foreign language lying: Evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(7): 861-873.
[2] WU Hanlin, YU Zhou, WANG Xuejiao, ZHANG Qingfang. Language processing in normal aging: Contributions of information-universal and information-specific factors[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 541-561.
[3] GONG Xiushuang,ZHANG Honghong. Outstanding others vs. mediocre me: The effect of social comparison on uniqueness-seeking behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 645-658.
[4] ZHAO Xin,LI Hongli,JIN Ge,LI Shifeng,ZHOU Aibao,LIANG Wenjia,GUO Hongxia,CAI Yaya. Effects of phonological memory and central executive function on decoding, language comprehension of children in different grades[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 469-484.
[5] CHEN Ximei,LUO Yijun,CHEN Hong. Friendship quality and adolescents’ intuitive eating: A serial mediation model and the gender difference[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 485-496.
[6] Zhou YU,Qingfang ZHANG. Syntactic structure and verb overlap influence the syntactic priming effect in Mandarin spoken sentence production[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 283-293.
[7] Yaxuan RAN,Jiani LIU,Yishi ZHANG,Haiying WEI. The magic of one person: The effect of the number of endorsers on brand attitude[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 371-385.
[8] LUO Yu,NIAN Jingqing,BAO Wei,ZHANG Jingjing,ZHAO Shouying,PAN Yun,XU Shuang,ZHANG Yu. Acute psychological stress impairs attention disengagement toward threat-related stimuli[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 26-37.
[9] LIAO Yichen,XU Chuanzhe,GONG Xuan. Does nostalgic advertising contribute to the spread of a brand’s word of mouth? An emotional two-dimensional perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(8): 945-957.
[10] YANG Qun,ZHANG Qirui,FENG Yiran,ZHANG Jijia. Language and culture influence cognition: Effects of indirect or direct language[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 543-556.
[11] YANG Qun,FENG Yiran,ZHANG Jijia. The language and cultural differences of father-reference processing: Based on the retrieval-induced forgetting[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 304-315.
[12] LOU Hao,LI Cong,ZHANG Qingfang. Distinct effects of age of acquisition in Chinese object and action picture naming: An ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 143-153.
[13] WANG Peng,WANG Xiaotian,GAO Juan,LI Xialan,XU Jing. Adaptive time management: The effects of death awareness on time perception and intertemporal choice[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(12): 1341-1350.
[14] Qun JIANG,Shan LU,Qian ZHANG,Zhengyan WANG. The influence of maternal encouragement of autonomy on toddler’s exploration: Moderating effect of attachment[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 750-760.
[15] Jinsheng HU, Chengshi LI, Qi WANG, Songze LI, Taotao LI, Shuqing LIU. The deficiency of attention bias to emotional prosody in the teenagers with autism spectrum disorders: A perceptual mode of low efficiency[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 637-646.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech