Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2014, Vol. 46 Issue (3) : 312-320     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00312
|
Self-related Information Modulates Global Advantage Effect in Visual Selection
LIU Minghui;ZHANG Ming;SUI Jie
(1 Department of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China) (2 Department of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China) (3 Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
Download: PDF(1351 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

It has been well documented that that personal significance modulates the high-level cognitive processes, including face recognition, memory and thinking. How personal significance (i.e., the self) modulates the visual selection remains poorly understood, however. Here by combining recent developed self-associative learning approach and a global-local task, this article present the evidence that self-salience impacted on visual selection–eliminating the effect of global advantage. The pattern consistently occurred in both divided and focused attention tasks. In contrast, this was not the case for friend-associations. The present study report 3 experiments to test how the self-salience modulated the selection of attention. It first developed a baseline experiment showing a global advantage effect in Experiment 1; 24 participants participated in Experiment 1 and carried out two tasks – a self-associative learning task following by a global-local task. In the self-associative learning task, three geometric shapes were randomly assigned to three persons (self, friend, and a stranger). Having formed a personal association, participants performed the global-local task where they were presented compound shapes (e.g. a global circle formed by local squares, self – square, stranger – circle, local self forming global stranger) and had to identify the shape-associated person (self vs. friend). Targets randomly appeared at either the global or local level. Reaction time and accuracy performance were measured and analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with Social Relevance (self vs. friend) and Attention Level (global vs. local). Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1 except that the stranger-related shapes were targets while the self- and friend-related shapes had to be ignored. There were 20 participants in Experiment 2. Different from Experiments 1 and 2 where the divided attention task was employed, Experiment 3 used a focus attention task where participants were instructed to complete either a local or global task in different blocks. There were three within-subjects factors with 2 (Social Relevance: self vs. friend) × 2 (Saliency Level: global saliency vs. local saliency) × 2 (Attention Level: global vs. local). 24 participants participated in Experiment 3. The results in Experiment 1 showed a reliable self-advantage effect where faster responses to global than local level targets occurred in both the self- and friend-related target conditions. In contrast, the global advantage to targets (stranger-shapes) was eliminated in the presence of self-related distractors while the effect survived in the presence of friend-related distractors in Experiment 2. The interference effect of self-salience was verified in Experiment 3where the focused rather than divided attention task (in Experiment 2) was used. In conclusion, the results demonstrated that compared with friend-related information, the self as distractors affected the global advantage effect, and the effect appeared at both global and local levels unanimously and cannot be influenced by task. The data indicate that self-saliency can modulate basic visual selection.

Keywords self-salience      visual selective      attention      global advantage effect      self-associate learning     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Ming;SUI Jie   
Issue Date: 25 March 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
LIU Minghui;ZHANG Ming;SUI Jie. Self-related Information Modulates Global Advantage Effect in Visual Selection[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2014, 46(3): 312-320.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00312     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2014/V46/I3/312
[1] LEI Yi, XIA Qi, MO Zhifeng, LI Hong. The attention bias effect of infant face: The mechanism of cuteness and familiarity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(7): 811-822.
[2] TANG Xiaoyu, WU Yingnan, PENG Xing, WANG Aijun, LI Qi. The influence of endogenous spatial cue validity on audiovisual integration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(7): 835-846.
[3] HUANG Yanqing, MENG Yingfang. Effects of target detection on memory retrieval[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 706-715.
[4] LI Yaojin, ZHANG Wei, FU Bei, Zhou Bingping. Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in internal and external conflicts: Evidence from Saccade task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 777-785.
[5] ZHENG Xutao,GUO Wenjiao,CHEN Man,JIN Jia,YIN Jun. Influence of the valence of social actions on attentional capture: Focus on helping and hindering actions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 584-596.
[6] YE Chaoxiong,HU Zhonghua,LIANG Tengfei,ZHANG Jiafeng,XU Qianru,LIU Qiang. The mechanism of retro-cue effect in visual working memory: Cognitive phase separation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 399-413.
[7] Xiaoyu TANG,Jiaying SUN,Xing PENG. The effect of bimodal divided attention on inhibition of return with audiovisual targets[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 257-268.
[8] MENG Yingfang,YE Xiumin,MA Huijiao. Comparing the attentional boost effect between classified learning and mixed learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(2): 139-148.
[9] XIAO Rong,LIANG Dandan,LI Shanpeng. Effects of aging on the Mandarin lexical tone perception: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 1-11.
[10] LUO Yu,NIAN Jingqing,BAO Wei,ZHANG Jingjing,ZHAO Shouying,PAN Yun,XU Shuang,ZHANG Yu. Acute psychological stress impairs attention disengagement toward threat-related stimuli[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 26-37.
[11] LIU Jingyuan,LI Hong. How state anxiety influences time perception: Moderated mediating effect of cognitive appraisal and attentional bias[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 747-758.
[12] PENG Xing,CHANG Ruosong,LI Qi,WANG Aijun,TANG Xiaoyu. Visually induced inhibition of return affects the audiovisual integration under different SOA conditions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 759-771.
[13] ZHANG Di,HAO Renning,LIU Qiang. The effects of the attention resource allocation on visual working memory consolidation process[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 772-780.
[14] LI Shouxin, CHE Xiaowei, LI Yanjiao, WANG Li, CHEN Kaisheng. The effects of capacity load and resolution load on visual selective attention during visual working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 527-542.
[15] LI Quan,SONG Yanan,LIAN Bin,FENG Tingyong. Mindfulness training can improve 3-and 4-year-old children’s attention and executive function[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 324-336.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech