Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2013, Vol. 45 Issue (10) : 1179-1186     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01179
The Item Parameters’ Estimation Accuracy of Two-Parameter Logistic Model
DU Wenjiu;ZHOU Juan;LI Hongbo
(1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China) (2 Chongqing Educational Examination Authority, Chongqing 401147, China)
Download: PDF(1113 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  The item parameters’ estimation accuracy is very important to test development, especially to the construction of item bank. Nowadays, in domestic and foreign, the study of item parameters’ estimation accuracy is mostly based on that the true values of the item parameters are known, under this circumstances, applying kinds of estimation methods to estimate new estimators, then evaluating methods’ effectiveness by comparison with the true values about the root-mean-square-error (RMSE) and Bias. But this method can’t present the change rules of estimation error among the different parameters’ true values. In order to solve this problem, this article attempts to explore the item parameters’ estimation accuracy issue on the point of item parameters estimation information function. Based on the two-parameter Logistic model, given the definition of the item parameters’ estimation information function firstly, then generated examinee sample to explore the factors which affected item parameters’ estimation accuracy by computer simulation randomly. The experiments were designed (2 × 3 × 2) cases. The study is conducted and revealed: (1) The accuracy of the estimators enhance as the quantity of the sample increases. (2) The examinee’s ability distribution has more influences on difficulty parameter estimation accuracy, while less influences on discrimination parameter. (3) The estimation accuracy of item discrimination and item difficulty parameter are both influenced by parameter a and parameter b’s true value.
Keywords Item response theory      two parameter logistic model      item parameters estimation precision      information function     
Corresponding Authors: DU Wenjiu   
Issue Date: 25 October 2013
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
DU Wenjiu;ZHOU Juan;LI Hongbo. The Item Parameters’ Estimation Accuracy of Two-Parameter Logistic Model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2013, 45(10): 1179-1186.
URL:     OR
[1] LIU Yue, LIU Hongyun.  Reporting overall scores and domain scores of bi-factor models[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1234-1246.
[2] CHEN Ping. Two new online calibration methods for computerized adaptive testing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1184-1198.
[3] MENG Xiangbin; TAO Jian; CHEN Shali. Warm’sweighted maximum likelihood estimation of latent trait in the four-parameter logistic model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 1047-1056.
[4] WANG Wenyi;SONG Lihong;DING Shuliang. Classification accuracy and consistency indices for complex decision rules in multidimensional item response theory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1612-1624.
[5] ZHAN Peida; CHEN Ping; BIAN Yufang. Using confirmatory compensatory multidimensional IRT models to do cognitive diagnosis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(10): 1347-1356.
[6] ZHAN Peida; LI Xiaomin; WANG Wen-Chung; BIAN Yufang; WANG Lijun. The Multidimensional Testlet-Effect Cognitive Diagnostic Models[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 689-701.
[7] YAO Ruosong;ZHAO Baonan;LIU Ze;MIAO Qunying. The Application of Many-Facet Rasch Model in Leaderless Group Discussion[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(9): 1039-1049.
[8] LIU Yue;LIU Hongyun. Comparison of MIRT Linking Methods for Different Common Item Designs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(4): 466-480 .
[9] LIU Hong-Yun,LI Chong,ZHANG Ping-Ping,LUO Fang. Testing Measurement Equivalence of Categorical Items’ Threshold/Difficulty Parameters: A Comparison of CCFA and (M)IRT Approaches[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(8): 1124-1136.
[10] DU Wen-Jiu;XIAO Han-Min. Multidimensional Grade Response Model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(10): 1402-1407.
[11] LIU Hong-Yun,LUO Fang,WANG Yue,ZHANG Yu. Item Parameter Estimation for Multidimensional Measurement: Comparisons of SEM and MIRT Based Methods[J]. , 2012, 44(1): 121-132.
[12] TU Dong-Bo,CAI Yan,DAI Hai-Qi,DING Shu-Liang. Parameters Estimation of MIRT Model and Its Application in Psychological Tests[J]. , 2011, 43(11): 1329-1340.
[13] WU Rui,DING Shu-Liang,GAN Deng-Wen. Test Equating with Testlets[J]. , 2010, 42(03): 434-442.
[14] LUO Zhao-Sheng, OUYANG Xue-Lian, QI Shu-Qing, DAI Hai-Qi,,DING Shu-Liang. IRT Information Function of Polytomously Scored Items under the Graded Response Model[J]. , 2008, 40(11): 1212-1220.
[15] YANG Ye-Bing,MIAO Dan-Min,TIAN Jian-Quan,XIAO Li-Jun,SUN Han,HONG Xia. Item Analysis of the Chinese Soldier Personality Questionnaire Using Item Response Theory[J]. , 2008, 40(05): 611-617.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech