Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2020, Vol. 52 Issue (5) : 562-571     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00562
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The inhibitory effect of long-term associative representation on working memory
ZHANG Yin1,2,LIANG Tengfei1,2,YE Chaoxiong1,3,LIU Qiang1,2()
1 Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610000, China
2 Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
3 Department of Psychology, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, 40014, Finland
Download: PDF(2709 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

Studies on how long-term memory affects working memory (WM) have found that long-term memory can enhance WM processing. However, these studies only use item memory as the representation of long-term memory. In addition to item memory, associative memory is also an essential part of long-term memory. The associative memory and item memory involve different cognitive mechanisms and brain areas. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how associative memory affects WM processing.
Before the WM task, participants were asked to store 16 pairs of dissimilar pictures into long-term memory. The participants would obtain the associative memory of these pairs of pictures in the long-term memory. The WM task was a change detection paradigm. Memory pictures in the memory array appeared in pairs (associative condition) or out of pairs (independent condition). In Experiment 1, the memory array with 6 items (3 pairs) was presented for 500 ms or 1000 ms. After a 1000 ms interval, participants needed to determine whether the probe item was the same as the memory array. The design and procedure of Experiment 2 were similar to those of Experiment 1, except that memory array was presented for only 500 ms, and 2 items (1 pairs) and 4 terms (2 pairs) were added in set size condition. Alpha power of electroencephalogram (EEG) was also collected and analyzed in Experiment 2.
The results in Experiment 1 showed that WM capacity and accuracy were significantly lower in the associative condition than in the independent condition (for both presentation-time conditions: 500ms and 1000ms). The results in Experiment 2 showed that the alpha power in the independent condition increased as the memory set size increased (2 items < 4 items < 6 items), while the alpha power in the associative condition reached the asymptote when the set size was 4 (2 items < 4 items = 6 items). Both of these two experiments' results showed that WM capacity in the associative condition was lower than that in the independent condition.
In conclusion, long-term associative representations inhibit the current WM processing and decrease WM capacity. This inhibitory effect is not affected by the length of encoding time. It implies that the reason for the increase of WM load by associative memory may come from the disorder of attention distribution.

Keywords long-term memory      working memory      associative memory      alpha power     
PACS:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Qiang LIU     E-mail:
Issue Date: 26 March 2020
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Yin, LIANG Tengfei, YE Chaoxiong, LIU Qiang. The inhibitory effect of long-term associative representation on working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2020, 52(5): 562-571.
URL:     OR
[1] Ahmad F. N., & Hockley W. E . (2014). The role of familiarity in associative recognition of unitized compound word pairs. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(12), 2301-2324.
[2] Bao X. H., Ji M., Huang J., He L. G., & You X. Q . (2014). The Effects of activation levels of visual long-term memory on visual short-term memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(8), 1086-1093.
[2] [ 鲍旭辉, 姬鸣, 黄杰, 何立国, 游旭群 . (2014). 视觉长时记忆激活度对促进视觉短时记忆的影响. 心理学报, 46(8), 1086-1093.]
[3] Bastin C., Diana R. A., Simon J., Collette F., Yonelinas A. P., & Salmon E . (2013). Associative memory in aging: The effect of unitization on source memory. Psychology & Aging, 28(1), 275-283.
[4] Brady T. F., Konkle T., & Alvarez G. A . (2011). A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 4-4.
[5] Brady T. F., Konkle T., Gill J., Oliva A., & Alvarez G. A . (2013). Visual long-term memory has the same limit on fidelity as visual working memory. Psychological Science, 24(6), 981-990.
[6] Brown G. D. A., Neath I., & Chater N . (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114(3), 539-576.
[7] Cowan N . (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 163-191.
[8] Cowan N . (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory. Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
[9] Cowan, & Nelson . (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87-185.
[10] Delorme A., & Makeig S . (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9-21.
[11] Eichenbaum H . (2016). Memory: Organization and control. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 19-45.
[12] Ezzyat Y., & Davachi L . (2014). Similarity breeds proximity: Pattern similarity within and across contexts is related to later mnemonic judgments of temporal proximity. Neuron, 81(5), 1179-1189.
[13] Feldmann-Wüstefeld T., Vogel E. K., & Awh E . (2018). Contralateral delay activity indexes working memory storage, not the current focus of spatial attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(8), 1185-1196.
[14] Fukuda K., & Woodman G. F . (2017). Visual working memory buffers information retrieved from visual long-term memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(20), 5306-5311.
[15] Guillaume F., & Etienne Y . (2015). Target-context unitization effect on the familiarity-related FN400: A face recognition exclusion task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95(3), 345-354.
[16] Hasson U., & Chen J., Honey C. J . (2015). Hierarchical process memory: Memory as an integral component of information processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6):304-313.
[17] Jeneson A., & Squire L. R . (2012). Working memory, long-term memory, and medial temporal lobe function. Learning & Memory, 19(1), 15-25.
[18] Jung T.s-P., Makeig S., Humphries C., Lee T.-W., Mckeown M. J., Iragui V., & Sejnowski T. J . (2000). Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 163-178.
[19] Kcs A., Robison M. K., & Vogel E. K . (2018). Contralateral delay activity tracks fluctuations in working memory performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(9), 1229-1240.
[20] Liu Z. X., Grady C., & Moscovitch M . (2016). Effects of prior-knowledge on brain activation and connectivity during associative memory encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 27(3), 1991-2009.
[21] Luck S. J., & Vogel E. K . (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279-281.
[22] Oberauer K . (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 411-421
[23] Oberauer K., Awh E., & Sutterer D. W . (2016). The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(1), 1-22.
[24] Oberauer K., & Lin H. Y . (2017). An interference model of visual working memory. Psychological Review, 124(1), 21-59.
[25] Old S. R., & Naveh-Benjamin M . (2008). Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 104-118.
[26] Olson I. R., & Jiang Y. H . (2004). Visual short-term memory is not improved by training. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1326-1332.
[27] Parks C. M., & Yonelinas A. P . (2015). The importance of unitization for familiarity-based learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(3), 881-903.
[28] Sauvage M. M., Beer Z., & Eichenbaum H . (2010). Recognition memory: Adding a response deadline eliminates recollection but spares familiarity. Learning & Memory, 17(2), 104-108.
[29] Schurgin M. W., & Flombaum J. I . (2015). Visual long-term memory has weaker fidelity than working memory. Visual Cognition, 23(7), 859-862.
[30] Thavabalasingam S., O’Neil E. B., Tay J., Nestor A., & Lee A. C. H . (2019). Evidence for the incorporation of temporal duration information in human hippocampal long-term memory sequence representations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(13), 6407-6414.
[31] Wang J. X., Rogers L. M., Gross E. Z., Ryals A. J., Dokucu M. E., & Brandstatt K. L. … Voss J. L . (2014). Targeted enhancement of cortical-hippocampal brain networks and associative memory. Science, 345(6200), 1054-1057.
[32] Xie W., & Zhang W . (2017). Familiarity speeds up visual short-term memory consolidation: Electrophysiological evidence from contralateral delay activities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(1), 1-13.
[33] Yonelinas A. P., Aly M., Wang W.-C., & Koen J. D . (2010). Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20(11), 1178-1194.
[34] Zalesak M., & Heckers S . (2009). The role of the hippocampus in transitive inference. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 172(1), 24-30.
[35] Zeithamova D., Dominick A. L., & Preston A. R . (2012). Hippocampal and ventral medial prefrontal activation during retrieval-mediated learning supports novel inference. Neuron, 75(1), 168-79.
[1] YE Chaoxiong,HU Zhonghua,LIANG Tengfei,ZHANG Jiafeng,XU Qianru,LIU Qiang. The mechanism of retro-cue effect in visual working memory: Cognitive phase separation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 399-413.
[2] ZHANG Di,HAO Renning,LIU Qiang. The effects of the attention resource allocation on visual working memory consolidation process[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 772-780.
[3] PENG Wanqing,LUO Wei,ZHOU Renlai. HRV evidence for the improvement of emotion regulation in university students with depression tendency by working memory training[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 648-661.
[4] LI Shouxin, CHE Xiaowei, LI Yanjiao, WANG Li, CHEN Kaisheng. The effects of capacity load and resolution load on visual selective attention during visual working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 527-542.
[5] Sisi WANG,Yixuan KU. The causal role of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in visual working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 727-738.
[6] LI Biqin, LI Ling, WANG Aijun, ZHANG Ming.  Visual and auditory verbal working memory affects visual attention in the semantic matching[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 483-493.
[7] WANG Jing, XUE Chengbo, LIU Qiang.  Storage mechanism of same-dimension features in visual working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 176-185.
[8] Yushang HUANG,Liren CAO. Effect of spatial position based configuration on visual working memory performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1222-1234.
[9] Ting WANG,Yuxia GUAN,Hongying GUAN,Jijia ZHANG. Effect of ecological environment and mode of production on the visual-spatial working memory of Oroqens[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1094-1104.
[10] Dong-ni PAN,Daotuan WANG,Xue-bing LI. Cognitive and emotional benefits of emotional dual dimension n-back training based on an APP[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1105-1119.
[11] LIU Tuanli, BAI Xuejun.  The effect of part-list cues on memory retrieval: The role of inhibition ability[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1158-1171.
[12] ZHANG Bao, HU Cenlou, CHEN Yanzhang, MIAO Sumei, HUANG Sai.  The modulation of working memory load and perceptual load on attentional guidance from representations of working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1009-1021.
[13] ZHU Zude, DUAN Yixing, WANG Suiping.  The baseline fluid intelligence modulated the transfer effect from working memory to fluid intelligence[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1022-1030.
[14] DING Xiao, LV Na, YANG Yalin, SI Jiwei.  Age-related differences of different components of working memory: The predictive effect on strategy utilization in arithmetic[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 759-770.
[15] LI Songze; HU Jinsheng; LI Chengshi; WANG Qi; HE Jianqing; WANG Yan; YANG Cuiping. Chunking processing of spatial working memory in autism preschool children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 631-642.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech