Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (10) : 1120-1130     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01120
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The processing advantage of self-positive expression: Evidence from an ERPs study
Qun TAN1,Yueyang YIN1,2,Shen LIU1,3(),Shangfeng HAN1,Qiang XU1,Lin ZHANG1()
1 Department and Institute of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
2 School of Philosophy and Sociology, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, China
3 School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230022, China
Download: PDF(714 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

It is well established in a number of studies that there is a cognitive advantage for self-related information, which is called “self-reference effect”. Some researchers have found that the processing of self-related information and the processing of emotional valence information are not only independent, but also interactive. However, these previous studies lacked the investigation of how individuals processed self-related information with different emotional valence. It is difficult to reveal the interaction between self-attribute and emotional valence of stimuli. Moreover, the influence of emotional valence of self-related information on “self-processing advantage” and the cognitive processing of self-expression performs are unclear. So, we used self-expression as stimulus to investigate the processing of self-related information with different emotional valence, and to explore the interaction between self and emotion in the self-face perception process.

In the present study, we adopted the visual search paradigm and the event related potential technology to investigate the processing of self-expression. We designed a 2 (emotion type: happy VS angry) ×2 (identity type: self VS other) within groups design. A total of 25 college students (11 males, 14 females) participated in the experiment, and 6 of the participants were eliminated because of too much artifacts in EEG. We gathered the happy and angry faces of each participant in advance, and selected other people's emotional faces from the Chinese Facial Affective Picture System. All photos were processed in a unified manner, and only the main features of the face were retained. In the visual search task, participants were asked to search the target expression and to ignore other faces in the 6 faces (1 target expression face with 5 neutral faces or 6 neutral faces). When they see the target expression, they should press the "F" as soon as possible; and if all are neutral faces, then press the "J". We record their reaction and corresponding EEG signals.

Behavioral results showed that, (1) the search of self-expression is significantly faster and better than the others, and it is not influenced by the emotional valence; (2) the search of self-happy expression is significantly faster and better than the self-angry expression, that is, the processing advantage of self-positive expression exist. And the results of ERP showed that the N1, N2 and LPP amplitudes of self-happy expressions were greater than those of self-anger and other people’s expressions. The results reflected that the processing advantage of self-positive expression began in visual coding phase of N1 composition, and there is also displayed in expression decoding stage and behavioral decision stage. It showed that the early attention to self-positive expression is faster, and the middle and later period get more attention resources.

Overall, these results consistently showed that, there was a processing advantage effect of self-positive expression. According to implicit positive association theory, the self-expression with different emotional valences might have different meanings to individuals. To be detailed, the self-positive expression was related to positive attribute in self-concept, and it could promote individual cognitive processing of such stimuli. The self-negative expression was related to negative property of self-concept and it might weaken the advantages of self-processing, thereby causing individuals to slow down the processing of such stimuli.

Keywords self-expression      other-expression      visual search paradigm      implicit positive association theory      self-positivity bias     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Issue Date: 23 August 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Qun TAN
Yueyang YIN
Shen LIU
Shangfeng HAN
Qiang XU
Lin ZHANG
Cite this article:   
Qun TAN,Yueyang YIN,Shen LIU, et al. The processing advantage of self-positive expression: Evidence from an ERPs study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1120-1130.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01120     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I10/1120
  
  
身份类型 表情类型 反应时 正确率
自我 快乐 713 ± 218 97 ± 2
愤怒 899 ± 336 97 ± 5
他人 快乐 765 ± 257 94 ± 4
愤怒 1060 ± 377 91 ± 9
  
  
[1] Bruce V., &Young A .( 1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77( 3), 305-327.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/bjop.1986.77.issue-3
[2] Calvo M.G., &Beltrán D .( 2013). Recognition advantage of happy faces: Tracing the neurocognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 51( 11), 2051-2061.
pmid: 23880097 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393213002388
[3] Calvo M.G., &Beltrán D .( 2014). Brain lateralization of holistic versus analytic processing of emotional facial expressions. Neuroimage, 92( 10), 237-247.
pmid: 24495810 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811914000780
[4] Chen Y., Zhong Y. P., Zhou H. B., Zhou L. P., & Wang X. Y . ( 2012). An ERP study on implicit self-positivity bias effect. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psycholog, 20( 3), 297-300.
[4] [ 陈芸, 钟毅平, 周海波, 周路平, 王小艳 . ( 2012). 内隐自我正面偏见效应的ERP研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20( 3), 297-300.]
[5] Foti D., Hajcak G., & Dien J . ( 2009). Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: Evidence from temporal- spatial PCA. Psychophysiology, 46( 3), 521-530.
pmid: 19496228 url: http://blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/psyp.2009.46.issue-3
[6] Feldmann-Wüstefeld T., Schmidt-Daffy M., & Schubö A . ( 2011). Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: Differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces. Psychophysiology, 48( 5), 697-707.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/psyp.2011.48.issue-5
[7] Gong X., Huang Y. X., Wang Y., & Luo Y. J . ( 2011). Revision of the Chinese facial affective picture system. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25( 1), 40-46.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgxlwszz201101011
[7] [ 龚栩, 黄宇霞, 王妍, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2011). 中国面孔表情图片系统的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 25( 1), 40-46.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgxlwszz201101011
[8] Gosling A., & Eimer M .( 2011). An event-related brain potential study of explicit face recognition. Neuropsychologia, 49( 9), 2736-2745.
pmid: 21679721 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393211002740
[9] Gratton G., Coles M. G. H., & Donchin E . ( 1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalograghy & Clinical Neurophyiology, 55( 4), 468-484.
pmid: 6187540 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/6187540
[10] Guan L. L., Qi M. M., Zhang Q. L., & Yang J . ( 2014). The neural basis of self-face recognition after self-concept threat and comparison with important others. Social Neuroscience, 9( 4), 424-435.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470919.2014.920417
[11] Guan L. L., Zhang Q. L., Qi M. M., Yan H., & Yang J . ( 2012). Self-concept threat and comparison with important others weaken self-face advantage altogether. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44( 6), 789-796.
[11] [ 关丽丽, 张庆林, 齐铭铭, 侯燕, 杨娟 . ( 2012). 自我概念威胁以及与重要他人的比较共同削弱自我面孔优势效应. 心理学报, 44( 6), 789-796.]
[12] Han S.H., &Zhang Y.F .( 2012). A cultural neuroscience approach to self-concept representation. Advances in Psychological Science, 20( 5), 633-640.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201205001
[12] [ 韩世辉, 张逸凡 . ( 2012). 自我概念心理表征的文化神经科学研究. 心理科学进展, 20( 5), 633-640.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201205001
[13] Hoefler A., Athenstaedt U., Corcoran K., Ebner F., & Ischebeck A . ( 2015). Coping with self-threat and the evaluation of self-related traits: An fMRI study. PLoS ONE, 10( 9), e0136027.
pmid: 4558049 url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136027
[14] Kim H .( 2012). A dual-subsystem model of the brain's default network: Self-referential processing, memory retrieval processes, and autobiographical memory retrieval. Neuroimage, 61( 4), 966-977.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811912002984
[15] Ma Y.N., &Han S.H .( 2010). Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36( 3), 619-633.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0015797
[16] Pavel F.A., &Iordănescu E . ( 2012). The influence of facial expressions on recognition performance in facial identity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 548-552.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042812001899
[17] Rellecke J., Sommer W., & Schacht A . ( 2012). Does processing of emotional facial expressions depend on intention? Time-resolved evidence from event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 90( 1), 23-32.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301051112000245
[18] Sui J., Zhu Y., & Han S. H . ( 2006). Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroreport, 17( 4), 423-427.
url: https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00001756-200603200-00015
[19] Tong F., & Nakayama K . ( 1999). Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 25( 4), 1016-1035.
pmid: 10464943 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1016
[20] Verosky S.C., & Todorov A .( 2010). Differential neural responses to faces physically similar to the self as a function of their valence. Neuroimage, 49( 2), 1690-1698.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S105381190901088X
[21] Wang L. Y., Zhang M., & Sui J . ( 2011). Self-face advantage benefits from a visual self-reference frame. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43( 5), 494-499.
[21] [ 王凌云, 张明, 隋洁 . ( 2011). 自我参照框架决定了自我面孔优势效应的出现. 心理学报,43( 5), 494-499.]
[22] Wang Y.M., &Fu X.L .( 2007). Effect of discriminability on interference between facial expression and facial identity recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39( 2), 191-200.
[22] [ 汪亚珉, 傅小兰 . ( 2007). 区分度在面部表情与面孔身份识别交互中的作用. 心理学报, 39( 2), 191-200.]
[23] Watson L. A., Dritschel B., Obonsawin M. C., & Jentzsch I . ( 2007). Seeing yourself in a positive light: Brain correlates of the self-positivity bias. Brain Research, 1152, 106-110.
pmid: 17462610 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/17462610
[24] Wu B. X., Zhang Z. J., & Sun Y. S . ( 2015). Facial Familiarity Modulates the Interaction between Facial Gender and Emotional Expression. Acta Psychologica Sinica,47( 10), 1201-1212.
[24] [ 吴彬星, 张智君, 孙雨生 . ( 2015). 面孔熟悉度对面孔性别与表情相互作用的调节. 心理学报,47( 10), 1201-1212.]
[25] Xia M., Li X. L., Ye C., & Li H . ( 2014). The ERPs for the facial expression processing. Advances in Psychological Science, 22( 10), 1556-1563.
[25] [ 侠牧, 李雪榴, 叶春, 李红 . ( 2014). 面部表情加工的ERP成分. 心理科学进展, 22( 10), 1556-1563.]
[26] Xu X.Y., &Gao X.P . ( 2017). Self-threat Stimuli Capture Attention: Evidence from Inhibition of Return. Journal of Psychological Science, 40( 2), 296-302.
url: 研究点分析
[26] [ 徐欣颖, 高湘萍 . ( 2017). 自我威胁刺激对返回抑制的影响. 心理科学, 40( 2), 296-302.]
url: 研究点分析
[27] Yun J. Y., Hur J. W., Jung W. H., Jang J. H., Youn T., Kang D.-H., … Kwon J. S . ( 2014). Dysfunctional role of parietal lobe during self-face recognition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 152( 1), 81-88.
pmid: 23916187 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S092099641300354X
[28] Zhong Y. P., Chen Y., Zhou L. P., & Zhou H. B . ( 2010). An ERP study on self-positivity bias. Journal of Psychological Science, 33( 3), 560-563.
[28] [ 钟毅平, 陈芸, 周路平, 周海波 . ( 2010). 自我正面偏见的ERP研究. 心理科学, 33( 3), 560-563.]
[29] Zhong Y. P., Li J., Zhan Y. L., Fan W., & Yang Z. L . ( 2016). Rotated self-face recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48( 11), 1379-1389.
url: 研究点分析
[29] [ 钟毅平, 李琎, 占友龙, 范伟, 杨子鹿 . ( 2016). 自我旋转面孔识别的ERPs研究. 心理学报, 48( 11), 1379-1389.]
url: 研究点分析
[30] Zhou Y. L., Hu S. J., Cai J. Y., Hu Z. G., & Liu H. Y . ( 2016). Modulation effect of emotional state on self-positivity bias. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24( 2), 196-199.
[30] [ 周一琳, 胡少军, 蔡佳烨, 胡治国, 刘宏艳 . ( 2016). 情绪状态对积极自我偏向的调节. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24( 2), 196-199.]
[1] CAO Wen,CHEN Hong,GAO Xiao,Todd Jackson. Choice, Self-Expression and the Spreading Alternatives Effect[J]. , 2009, 41(08): 753-762.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech