Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2016, Vol. 48 Issue (5) : 540-555     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00540
Cueing effect in multimedia learning: A meta-analysis
XIE Heping1; WANG Fuxing1; ZHOU Zongkui1; WU Peng2
(1 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education; School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China) (2 School of Education, Hubei University, Wuhan 430415, China)
Download: PDF(484 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Cueing is an important instructional design technique to improve learning performance in multimedia learning. Recently, researchers focus on whether cueing could guide learners’ attention or facilitate learning outcomes. However, there is still no consistent conclusion about cueing effect of guiding attention, organization and integration in multimedia learning. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of cueing on learning performance (e.g. retention and transfer test), attention guiding (e.g. fixation time and fixation count of cued areas), and moderating factors (e.g. physical and spatial-temporal cues, declarative and procedural knowledge, dynamic and static presentation, and subjects of learning materials). We used key words (e.g. cue, cueing, signaling, attention guidance, multimedia learning, animation, eye tracking, eye movement) to search literatures in database and got 43 related empirical studies. Forty-four independent effect sizes (3910 participants) were included in retention tests-related meta-analysis while 41 independent effect sizes (3906 participants) were included in transfer tests-related meta-analysis. Fourteen independent effect sizes (938 participants) were included in fixation-time-related meta-analysis while eleven independent effect sizes (816 participants) were included in fixation-count-related meta-analysis to test the attention-guiding effect of cueing. According to the characteristics of studies about cueing effect, we reasonably chose random-effects model as meta-analysis model. CMA2.0 was used to test the independent effect sizes. Finally, the impact of publication bias was tested to guarantee a more convincing conclusion. The results showed that cueing could significantly improve learning outcomes of retention test (g = 0.53, 95% CI = [0.36, 0.69]) as well as transfer test (g = 0.36, 95% CI = [0.23, 0.49]). At the same time, learners’ fixation time (g = 0.50, 95% CI = [0.30, 0.71]) and fixation count (g = 0.70, 95% CI = [0.43, 0.97]) of cueing areas attracted much more attention than uncued areas. This result supported the attention guiding hypothesis of cueing in multimedia learning. Moderator analyses indicated that cueing effect in learning outcomes was mainly moderated by types of cueing, dynamism of materials, subjects of materials and types of knowledge. Specifically, cueing resulted in higher retention and transfer scores in conditions of static materials and declarative knowledge rather than dynamic materials and procedural knowledge. Compared with the materials in liberal arts, cueing effect in retention test was weaker than that in science or engineering. In addition, spatial-temporal cues performed much better than physical cues in transfer test. However, in regard to attention-guiding, cueing effect was mainly moderated by cueing types itself. Fixation time was longer and fixation count was more in the condition of physical cues than spatial-temporal cues. The observed strong cueing effect suggested that presenting cues rationally can indeed improve learners’ memorization and comprehension of knowledge as well as distribution of attention. Physical and spatial-temporal cues, declarative and procedural knowledge, dynamic and static presentation, and subjects of learning materials may act as important moderate variables in cueing effect in multimedia learning. The meta-analysis of moderator factors supported the boundary hypothesis of multimedia learning principles (Mayer, 2010). Limitations and future research were also discussed in this study.

Keywords cueing effect      learning outcome      attention-guiding      boundary condition      multimedia learning      meta-analysis     
Corresponding Authors: WANG Fuxing, E-mail:    
Issue Date: 25 May 2016
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
XIE Heping; WANG Fuxing; ZHOU Zongkui; WU Peng. Cueing effect in multimedia learning: A meta-analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2016, 48(5): 540-555.
URL:     OR
[1] REN Zhihong, Zhang Yawen, JIANG Guangrong.  Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation in intervention for anxiety: A meta-analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 283-305.
[2] LIU Tuanli, BAI Xuejun.  The effect of part-list cues on memory retrieval: The role of inhibition ability[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1158-1171.
[3] YANG Ruijuan, YOU Xuqun.  Advancing the Effort-Reward Imbalance Model: Economic rewards influence on teachers’ mental health[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1184-1194.
[4] GONG Shaoying, SHANGGUAN Chenyu, ZHAI Kuihu, GUO Yawei.  The effects of emotional design on multimedia learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 771-782.
[5] ZHAO Mengxue; FENG Zhengzhi; WANG Yichao; LAI Wei; HU Feng; LIU Keyu; XIA Fan; JIANG Juan; WANG Jia; XIA Lei. Chinese military mental health at high altitude, 1993-2013: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of SCL-90[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 653-662.
[6] REN Zhihong, RUAN Yijun, ZHAO Qingbai, ZHANG Wei, LAI Lizu, JIANG Guangrong.  The neuropsychological mechanism of therapy in depression and anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(10): 1302-1321.
[7] YU Zengyan; ZHAO Ameng; LIU Aishu. Childhood maltreatment and depression: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 40-49.
[8] ZHANG Shuhua; LIU Zhaoyan. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational identification and turnover intention[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1561-1573.
[9] HUANG Silin; HOU Jiawei; ZHANG Mei; XIN Ziqiang; ZHANG Hongchuan; SUN Ling; DOU Donghui. A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Changes in Chinese Migrant Workers’ Mental Health: 1995~2011[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 466-477.
[10] ZHOU Wenxia; XIE Baoguo; XIN Xun; BAI Guanglin; MIAO Rentao. A Meta-Analysis on Effects of Human, Social, and Psychological Capital on Career Success in Chinese Business Organizations[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 251-263.
[11] ZHANG Meichen; WEI Ping; ZHANG Qin. The Impact of Supra- and Sub-liminal Facial Expressions on the Gaze-cueing Effect[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(11): 1309-1317.
[12] CHEN Airui; DONG Bo; FANG Ying; YU Changyu; ZHANG Ming. The Role of Cue Type in the Subliminal Gaze-cueing Effect[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(9): 1281-1288.
[13] WU Peng;LIU Huashan. Association between Moral Reasoning and Moral Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(8): 1192-1207.
[14] LAI Han;XU Miao;SONG Yiying;LIU Jia. Distinct and Shared Neural Basis Underlying Music and Language: A Perspective from Meta-analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 285-297.
[15] LAI Han;XU Miao;SONY Yiying;LIU Jia. The Neural Mechanism underlying Music Perception: A Meta-analysis of fMRI Studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(5): 491-507.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech