Please wait a minute...
   2012, Vol. 44 Issue (2) : 237-248     DOI:
|
Climate for Innovation, Creative Efficacy and Team Innovation: The Moderating Role of Team Leadership
SUI Yang;CHEN Yun-Yun;WANG Hui
(Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
Download: PDF(434 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Organizational climates are defined as a set of shared perceptions regarding the policies, practices, and procedures that an organization rewards, supports, and expects. Organizational climates exert an important influence on organizations and employees who work in them. In recent years, climate researchers have switched their focus from global to facet-specific climates. This study defines climate for innovation (or support for innovation) as the innovation aspect of the work group climate, which reflects shared perceptions among group members regarding their work environment that is creativity-/ innovation-relevant. Previous studies have found that climate for innovation is significantly related to team innovation. However, the research on the relationship between climate and innovation at the team level is still lacking, especially in the Chinese context. Moreover, previous research has not answered the following questions: what is the psychological mechanism that channels the impact of climate for innovation on team innovation? What is the role of team leader in this relationship? This study aims to address the two questions by examining the mediating effect of team creative efficacy and the moderating role of team leader’s behaviors of leading innovation.
Data were collected from a high-tech company in China. Teamwork is popular in this company. A team leader is assigned to each team and this leader acts not only as the job coordinator but also as a coworker of team members. We randomly selected 90 R&D teams from a list of 380 teams provided by the HR department, and finally got a sample of 51 teams with average team size of 3.6. We used hierarchical regression and bootstrap method with the aid of SPSS macro developed by Preacher and Hayes (2008) to test our hypotheses.
With team innovation as the dependent variable, the results showed that the regression coefficients of climate for innovation on both team creative efficacy and team innovation were significantly positive. After adding leader’s leading innovation behavior and its interaction term with team creative efficacy, the regression coefficient on team innovation of the interaction term was significant. The moderating pattern showed that the relationship between team creative efficacy and team innovation becomes stronger as leaders’ leading innovation behavior growing from low to high. In addition, the mediating test with bootstrap method displayed that team creative efficacy acts as the mediator between climate for innovation and team innovation. Furthermore, conditional indirect effect test also showed that the mediating effect of team creative efficacy on the climate for innovation-team innovation linkage is significant only when the level of leader’s leading innovation behavior is high. All hypotheses were supported.
Findings of this study shed light on the innovation process at the team level. First, this research extends social cognitive theory to the work group level by revealing the mediating effect of team creative efficacy on the climate for innovation-team innovation relationship. This result adds to our understanding of the mechanisms through which climate for innovation influences team innovation. Future research should investigate additional mediators, such as team members’ external social networks. Second, the result of the positive relationship between climate for innovation and team innovation in the Chinese sample confirms the findings obtained from Western world and enriches the climate and innovation literature. Finally, the catalyst role of team leadership implies that innovation-supportive leadership can strengthen the effect of team creative efficacy on team innovation and the indirect effect of climate for innovation on team innovation.
Keywords climate for innovation      team creative efficacy      leadership      team innovation     
Corresponding Authors: SUI Yang   
Issue Date: 28 February 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
SUI Yang
CHEN Yun-Yun
WANG Hui
Cite this article:   
SUI Yang,CHEN Yun-Yun,WANG Hui. Climate for Innovation, Creative Efficacy and Team Innovation: The Moderating Role of Team Leadership[J]. , 2012, 44(2): 237-248.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2012/V44/I2/237
[1] ZHU Yu, LYU Yang, WANG Yanfei, WANG Lixuan.  Coaching leadership effect on employees' creativity: Multilevel moderated mediator analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 327-336.
[2] SHEN Yimo, CHOU Wanju, WEI Lihua, ZHANG Qinglin.  Benevolent leadership and subordinate innovative behavior: The mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of leader-member exchange differentiation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1100-1112.
[3] XU Shiyong; ZHU Jinqiang. Ethical leadership and pro-social rule breaking: A dual process model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 106-115.
[4] RONG Yan; SUI Yang; YANG Baiyin. The Effect of Leader Emotional Intelligence on Group Performance and #br# Employee Attitude: Mediating Effect of Justice Climate and Moderating Effect of Group Power Distance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1152-1161.
[5] LI Ye; ZHANG Wenhui; LONG Lirong. How Self-sacrificial Leadership Influences Subordinates’ Work Performance: The Mediating Roles of Strategic Orientation and Supervisor Identification[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 653-662.
[6] LI Rui; TIAN Xiaoming; LIU Shishun. Does Benevolent Leadership Increase Employee Pro-Social Rule Breaking?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 637-652.
[7] TIAN Xiaoming; LI Rui. Can Self-Sacrificial Leadership Promote Employee Proactive Behavior? The Mediating Effect of Felt Obligation and Its Boundary Conditions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(12): 1472-1485.
[8] HAO Po; LONG Lirong; HE Wei. When and Why Shared Leadership Influences Team Outputs? The Pivotal Roles of Information Exchange, Passionate Tone and Environmental Uncertainty[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(10): 1288-1299.
[9] TU Yidong; LU Xinxin; GUO Wei; WANG Zhen. What Benefits Do Ethical Leaders Gain? Ethical Leadership, LMX Mean and Leaders’ Benefits[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(9): 1378-1391.
[10] LIANG Jian. Ethical Leadership and Employee Voice: Examining a Moderated-Mediation Model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(2): 252-264.
[11] ZHANG Yong; LONG Lirong; HE Wei. The Effect of Pay for Performance on Radical Creativity and Incremental Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1880-1896.
[12] LI Rui; TIAN Xiaoming. Supervisor Authoritarian Leadership and Subordinate Proactive Behavior: Test of A Mediated-Moderation Model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1719-1733.
[13] CAI Yahua;JIA Liangding;YOU Shuyang;ZHANG Yi;CHEN Yanlu. The Influence of Differentiated Transformational Leadership on Knowledge Sharing and Team Creativity: A Social Network Explanation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(5): 585-598.
[14] PAN Jingzhou;LOU Yating;ZHOU Wenxia. The Influence of the Leader’s Creativity on the Employees’ Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(10): 1147-1162 .
[15] SUI Yang;WANG Hui;YUE Yi-Ni;Fred Luthans. The Effect of Transformational Leadership on Follower Performance and Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital and the Moderating Role of Procedural Justice[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(9): 1217-1230.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech