Please wait a minute...
   2011, Vol. 43 Issue (12) : 1370-1379     DOI:
|
Repetition Blindness in Chinese Polyphones Processing
LENG Ying;CHEN Xu-Lian
(1 School of Educational Science, Nan Tong University, Nantong 226007, China)
(2 Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
(3 Environmental Protection Agency of Shan Tou, Shantou 515041, China)
Download: PDF(289 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Repetition blindness (Kanwisher, 1987, 1991) refers to the phenomenon that participants have difficulty detecting repetitions of words (C1 and C2) presented in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. Several accounts focused on why and how the recognition deficit for C2 occurs, such as Token Individuation Theory (Kanwisher, 1987, 1991; Kanwisher & Potter, 1989, 1990; Chun, 1997), Refractory Period Hypothesis (Luo & Caramazza, 1995, 1996), Potential Retrieval-Based Models (Fagot, & Pashler, 1995), Construction and Attribution Theory (Masson, 2004; Whittlesea & Masson, 2005; Whittlesea & Hughes, 2005) and Competition Hypothesis (Morris, Still, & Caldwell-Harris Harris, 2009). Among these theories, Token Individuation Theory and Construction and Attribution Theory are the most widely influential. Up to now, it is difficult for them to come to an agreement on the processing level of repetition blindness. For example, Token Individuation Theory argued that repetition blindness was perception deficit, occurring at perception level, while Construction and Attribution Theory argued that repetition blindness was memory deficit, occurring at semantic level. The present research investigated the processing level of repetition blindness with Chinese Polyphones.
We used a mixed design with three variables, one between-subject variable, Time Interval with two levels (100ms and 200ms), and two within-subject variables, Repetition with three levels (completely repeated, homophones repeated and different phonetic repeated), and Position with two levels (position homology and position dissimilarity). Each trial included three words, two experimental words (C1 and C2) and a high frequency word in between. All materials were presented on a computer screen in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. Participants were instructed to verbally report all words in a trial, no matter whether a word was repeated or not. The dependent variable was the accuracy rate for reporting both C1 and C2 correctly in a trial. If the repetition blindness occurs at the perception level, the accuracy rate in the homophones repeated condition should not be different from that in the different phonetic repeated condition. Furthermore, if the repetition blindness occurs at the perception level, the accuracy rate for in the position homology condition should be different from that in the position dissimilarity condition. Otherwise, results will support that the repetition blindness occurs at retrieval level of memory.
Results from a three-way mixed design analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant main effects of Repetition and Position. The interaction of Interval and Repetition was also significant. In both Time Interval conditions, the accuracy rate in the complete repeated condition was lower than that in the homophones repeated condition and the different phonetic repeated condition. However, only in 100ms condition, the accuracy rate in the homophones repeated condition was lower than that in the different phonetic repeated condition.
The results indicated: 1. For two completely repeated words, repetition blindness showed in both 100ms and 200ms conditions, but for homophones repeated words and different phonetic repeated words, repetition blindness showed in the 100ms condition only; 2. The repetition blindness occurred at the perception level, not at the semantic level.
Keywords repetition blindness      repetition priming      RSVP task      processing level     
Corresponding Authors: LENG Ying   
Issue Date: 30 December 2011
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LENG Ying
CHEN Xu-Lian
Cite this article:   
LENG Ying,CHEN Xu-Lian. Repetition Blindness in Chinese Polyphones Processing[J]. , 2011, 43(12): 1370-1379.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/      OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2011/V43/I12/1370
[1] Jingyuan LIN, Wuji LIN, Yingfang MENG. Effects of nicotine on implicit and explicit memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 940-952.
[2] LI Li; ZHANG Yang; LI Xuan; GUO Hongting; WU Limei; WANG Ruiming. Cross-language repetition priming effect of semantic access for trilinguals[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1401-1409.
[3] LENG Ying;ZOU Yuhui;MO Lei. The Effect of Encoding Effectiveness from the Stimulus on Repetition Blindness[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(5): 593-606.
[4] LENG Ying;LU Jiamei;JIN Li;PAN Fada;CHEN Yan;SHEN Yongjiang. Advantageous and Disadvantageous Repetition of Doubly Repeated Stimuli in RSVP Paradigm[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 298-311.
[5] LIU Yingjie;WEI Ping;DING Jinhong;GUO Chunyan. Age Differences in the Repetition Effect for Studied or New Objects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 321-330.
[6] SI Jiwei;ZHOU Chao;ZHANG Chuanhua;ZHONG Leilei. SNARC Effect of Non-Symbolic Number Information on Different Processing Levels: Eyetracking Evidence[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(1): 11-22.
[7] LENG Ying,TAN Xiao-Ying,Zeng Qing,CHENG Xiao-Rong,LU Jia-Mei. The Last Position Superiority Effect of Repetition Stimulus[J]. , 2012, 44(6): 766-776.
[8] XIA Yi-Ting;LENG Ying;CHEN Yan;WANG Ji-Mei;CHENG Xiao-Rong;LU Jia-Mei. Levels of Processing for Repetition Blindness: Evidence from Chinese Reversed Words[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(12): 1583-1595.
[9] YE Jia-Wen,WANG Rui-Ming,LI Li,FAN Meng. The Activation and Inhibition of Non-target Language in Bilingual Speech Production[J]. , 2011, 43(11): 1263-1272.
[10] WANG Rui-Ming,DENG Han-Shen,LI Jun-Jie,LI Li,FAN Meng. The Activation of Non-attended Language in Language Comprehension of Chinese-English Bilinguals[J]. , 2011, 43(07): 771-783.
[11] ZHANG Feng,HUANG Xi-Ting. The Influence of Response Options on Repetition Priming Effect on Temporal Order Perception[J]. , 2010, 42(11): 1033-1039.
[12] ZHANG Feng,HUANG Xi-Ting,GUO Xiu-Yan. The Mechanism of Repetition Priming Effect on Temporal Order Perception [J]. , 2009, 41(03): 233-241.
[13] ZHANG Feng,HUANG Xi-Ting,GUO Xiu-Yan. The Influence of Repetition Priming on Temporal Order Perception[J]. , 2008, 40(07): 766-773.
[14] LI Li,MO Lei,WANG Rui-Ming. Semantic Access of Proficient Chinese-English Bilinguals to a Third Language[J]. , 2008, 40(05): 523-530.
[15] Li-Li,Mo-Lei,Wang-Ruiming,Luo-Xueying. The Effect of Cross-Language Repetition Priming in Less Proficient Chinese-English Bilinguals[J]. , 2006, 38(05): 672-680.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech