Please wait a minute...
   2011, Vol. 43 Issue (12) : 1355-1369     DOI:
|
The Two-Phase Model of Processing Time Shifts in Text Reading
HE Xian-You;LI Hui-Juan;WEI Yu-Bing
Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
Download: PDF(438 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Temporal information plays a very important role in narrative comprehension, but how it is processed has remained unclear. For a long time, the Strong Iconicity Assumption and the Scenario Theory offered competing explanations. We argue that these two theories emphasize different stages of processing time shifts. The Strong Iconicity Assumption concerns the first stage, the updating stage, and the Scenario Theory concerns the last stage, the integrating stage.
We conducted three rating tests and three experiments to test our hypotheses. The first test was designed to explore whether the duration time was significantly different for the three levels of temporal continuity: a moment later, an hour later and a year later, and if the results were significant between any two of them.
The second rating test was used to ensure that the time continuities of a moment and an hour were not beyond the scenario but a year was. Results were consistent with our predictions, with the longest average scenario found to be 4.85 hours and the shortest one 38.72 minutes. In the third rating test, we further evaluated the syntactic and semantic acceptability of the consistency between temporal markers and critical events to ensure that the results of the first rating tests reflected the processing of temporal information.. No significant differences were found in the three temporal conditions for syntactic acceptability, but significant differences were found for semantic acceptability. This indicated that results reflected the processing of the temporal information, which supported our predications.
In Experiments 1 and 2 we used a moving-window technique to verify the Strong Iconicity Assumption and the Scenario Theory, and to provide primary evidences for our hypothesis. Results showed that the response latencies of recognition words, reading times of the critical sentences, and temporal markers were consistent with the Strong Iconicity Assumption. As such, reading times of the critical events and the response latencies of the questions corresponded with the Scenario Theory. In Experiment 3 we used the eye-tracking technique to further investigate the processing mechanism of temporal information. An eye-tracking machine was used to record the eye fixations of the region of interest for the temporal markers and critical events. Reading time and number of the fixations were analyzed. Results showed significant differences for dwell time and total number of the temporal makers. For critical events, the difference of the regression path duration of the temporal makers did not reach statistical significance level but did in the critical events.
These results supported our hypothesis that the Scenario Theory corresponds to the later stage of processing temporal information. However, results the First Run Dwell Time tended to be consistent with the Strong Iconicity Assumption.
In sum, this research addressed the long-lasting debate between the Strong Iconicity Assumption and the Scenario Theory, and further studied the mechanism of processing time shifts in narratives. The results are discussed in terms of a two-phase model.
Keywords the Strong Iconicity Assumption      the Scenario Theory      time shifts      situation model      two-phase model     
Corresponding Authors: HE Xian-You;LI Hui-Juan   
Issue Date: 30 December 2011
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HE Xian-You
LI Hui-Juan
WEI Yu-Bing
Cite this article:   
HE Xian-You,LI Hui-Juan,WEI Yu-Bing. The Two-Phase Model of Processing Time Shifts in Text Reading[J]. , 2011, 43(12): 1355-1369.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/      OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2011/V43/I12/1355
[1] CHEN Jiebin; LU Zhongyi. The Effect of Route-angularity on Spatial Situation Model Constructing in Text[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 176-189.
[2] HE Xiayou; YANG Huilan; ZHANG Wei; ZHAO Xueru; XIE Yi. Dynamic Updating Process of Readers’ Temporal Situation Model: From Short-term Working Memory to Long-term Working Memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(10): 1235-1246.
[3] ZHAO Xueru;HE Xianyou;ZHAO Tingting;YANG Huilan;LIN Ximing;ZHANG Wei. The Updating of Situation Model: Further Evidence of Event Frame-Dependent Hypothesis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(7): 901-911.
[4] XIA Tiansheng;MO Lei;CHEN Lin;WANG Yuhan;LI You;RU Taotao. The Role of Spatial Shift in Constructing Situation Model of the Narrative Reading[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(2): 149-160.
[5] HE Xianyou;LI Huijuan;CHEN Guangyao;WANG Xiaowei. The Interaction Between Temporal and Spatial Information in the Updating of Situation Model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(1): 23-34.
[6]

HE Xian-You,YANG Hui,LI Hui-Juan,WEI Yu-Bing,Danielle McNamara

. Updating the Spatial Situation Model: Effects of Cognitive Style[J]. , 2011, 43(11): 1247-1262.
[7] TONG Yu-Guang,ZHANG Qi,ZHANG Li-Fang. Effects of Verb’s Trait of Continuance and Adverb of Instantaneous Time about Representation of Events of Temporal Shifts in Chinese Text Readin[J]. , 2010, 42(06): 663-671.
[8] HE Xian-You,YAN Sai-Jun. The Preliminary Study on the Nature of the Retrieval Process of Temporal Situation Models: Activation and Inhibition[J]. , 2010, 42(04): 467-473.
[9] LU Zhong-Yi,TONG Yu-Guang,ZHANG Li-Fang. The Functions of Goal State and Temporal Information on Situation Model Processing[J]. , 2010, 42(02): 216-226.
[10] LENG Ying,MO Lei,,WU Jun. The Construction of the Situation Model with Goal-focus Information during Text Comprehension[J]. , 2008, 40(07): 788-799.
[11] Yan Xiumei,Mo Lei,Wu Limei. The Representation of Spatial Distance in Text Reading[J]. , 2007, 39(04): 602-610.
[12] Lu Zhongyi,Jia Ning. Factors Affecting the Process of Spatial Situation Model Constructing and Updating[J]. , 2006, 38(05): 654-662.
[13] Wang-Ruiming,Mo-Lei,Jia-Demei,Leng-Ying,Li-Li. Mechanism of Constructing and Updating Situation Models in Text-Reading[J]. , 2006, 38(01): 30-40.
[14] Chi Yukai,Mo Lei,Guan Yanhua. ON-LINE UPDATING OF SPATIAL SITUATION MODELS WITHOUT CLUE[J]. , 2004, 36(03): 290-297.
[15] He Xianyou,Zeng Xiangyan (Department of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631). THE ROLE OF TEMPORAL INFORMATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF SITUATION MODELS[J]. , 2002, 34(06): 37-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech