Please wait a minute...
   2011, Vol. 43 Issue (05) : 494-499     DOI:
Self-face Advantage Benefits from a Visual Self-reference Frame
WANG Ling-Yun;ZHANG Ming;SUI Jie
Department of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
Download: PDF(279 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  One responds faster to own faces than the faces of others. Although this self-advantage effect in face processing has been well documented, the mechanism underlying the phenomena is far from clear. A plausible account of the effect is that self-face as the salient stimulus automatically attracts one’s attention relative to others’ faces. An alternative interpretation based on the theory of social cognition stresses the implicit positive association between the self and positive trait adjectives, suggesting that such implicit associations may contribute to the self-advantage. Here we propose that the self-reference frame (making judgments from first-person perspective) facilitates the self-face processing compared to the processing of others’ faces.
We reported two experiments to assess the role of the self-reference frame in the self-advantage effect by manipulating the judgment-reference frame (self- vs. other-reference) and the attentional level (explicit vs. implicit task). There were sixteen pairs of gender matched participants in Experiment 1, they selectively judged the orientation of self or familiar faces while ignoring the familiar or self faces (explicit face-recognition task) from the self (making judgment from the participants’ own perspective) or other-reference frame (making judgment from the perspective of viewed images). In Experiment 2, fourteen pairs of participants had to judge the orientations of all types of faces including self, familiar, and unfamiliar others (implicit face-perception task) from the self or other-reference frame. Reaction time and accuracy were measured when participants conducted the tasks, and analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with Face (self vs. familiar) and Perspective (self- vs. other-reference) as within-subjects variables.
We observed a clear benefit in the self relative to other conditions -- participants responded faster to own-face than the faces of others. But this effect exclusively occurred in the self-reference frame condition, regardless of the type of tasks. In contrast, the advantage effect was eliminated in the other-reference frame condition in either the explicit or implicit tasks.
The results indicate that the self-advantage in face processing results from self-reference frame. Although the judgment-reference frame was not explicitly emphasized in prior studies on self-face processing, self-face may automatically induce the self-reference frame and lead to a facilitation in self-face processing.
Keywords self-advantage      face perception      self-reference frame      attention     
Corresponding Authors: SUI Jie   
Issue Date: 30 May 2011
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
WANG Ling-Yun
Cite this article:   
WANG Ling-Yun,ZHANG Ming,SUI Jie. Self-face Advantage Benefits from a Visual Self-reference Frame[J]. , 2011, 43(05): 494-499.
URL:      OR
[1] SUN Yueliang; ZHENG Weiyi; HE Xianyou. The processing of pure decimal numbers: Selective access or parallel access?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 611-621.
[2] HU Cenlou; ZHANG Bao; HUANG Sai. Does irrelevant long-term memory representation guide the deployment of visual attention?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 590-601.
[3] SUN Juncai; SHI Rong. Attentional bias to crying facial expressions: Evidence from eye movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(2): 155-163.
[4] YU Wei; WANG Aijun; ZHANG Ming. Effect of selective and divided attentions on auditory dominance in multisensory integration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(2): 164-173.
[5] ZHANG Bao; HU Cenlou; Huang Sai. What do eye movements reveal about the role of cognitive control in attention guidance from working memory representation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1105-1118.
[6] LIU Li; BAI Xuejun. The effects of attentional control setting and types of cues on attentional capture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1093-1104.
[7] WANG Huiyuan; SUI Jie; ZHANG Ming. The effect of cue-target relevance and search strategies on attentional capture: Evidence from meaning cues[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 783-793.
[8] LIU Fang; DING Jinhong; ZHANG Qin. Positive affect and selective attention: Approach-motivation intensity influences the early and late attention processing stages[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 794-803.
[9] XIE Heping; WANG Fuxing; ZHOU Zongkui; WU Peng. Cueing effect in multimedia learning: A meta-analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 540-555.
[10] LI Xiujun; SHI Wendian. Influence of selective attention on implicit learning with auditory stimuli[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(3): 221-229.
[11] JIA Lei; ZHANG Chang-Jie; ZHANG Qing-lin. Cognitive mechanisms of the emotional attentional blink: Evidence from behavior and ERPs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(2): 174-184.
[12] LIU Wenjuan; SHEN Manqiong; LI Ying; WANG Ruiming. The interaction between emotional concept processing and emotional face perception[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(2): 163-173.
[13] BAI Xuejun; LIU Li; SONG Juan; GUO Zhiying. The role of feature and spatial location in value-driven attentional capture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1357-1369.
[14] HU Yanmei; ZHANG Ming. Electrophysiological evidence for memory-based attentional capture and memory-based attentional rejection effects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(1): 12-21.
[15] ZHANG Bao1,2; SHAO Jiaying1; HU Cenlou1; Huang Sai1. Attentional Guidance from Activated and Inhibitory States of  Working Memory Representations[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1089-1100.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech