Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2020, Vol. 52 Issue (5) : 572-583     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00572
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The effects of retrieval interference on different types of implicit memory
HUANG Fajie,MENG Yingfang(),YAN Ying
School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China
Download: PDF(696 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

According to traditional automation theory, an automatic process should be "purely unconscious", independent of limited attention resources, and executed at the same time as other processing tasks without interference. Implicit memory is considered to be a tool that provides unconscious and automatic cognitive processes and that is not be affected by any type of attention resource. Memory includes two important links: coding and retrieval. Coding is mainly responsible for the preliminary processing of information and the generation of memory traces. Retrieval promotes or suppresses the connection of these memory representations after coding.
Previous studies have mostly discussed the effect of interference on implicit memory from the point of view of coding and considered that implicit memory tests are immune to coding interference. However, there are doubts about whether the interference in the retrieval stage will affect the implicit memory, and more importantly, it is not known whether this difference is caused by the different types of memory tests. Because of the intersection between the types of implicit memory tests, this study involves four experiments. The effects of retrieval interference on an identification-perceptual implicit test, an identification-conceptual implicit test, a production-perception implicit test and a production-concept implicit test were investigated.
In this study, two new production tasks were designed. The learning-test paradigm was used to explore the relationship between retrieval interference and different types of implicit memory by setting up digital interference tasks at the same time in the retrieval stage of the test. The results showed that (1) under the condition of no interference, both the lexical judgement task (identification-perceptual test) and semantic classification task (identification-conceptual) display a significant priming effect, and under the condition of interference, the priming effect of the two types of tasks disappears. (2) Under the condition of no interference, both the production lexical judgement task (production-perceptual test) and the production semantic classification task (production-conceptual test) show obvious priming effects; however, under interference conditions, the two kinds of production judgements still have obvious priming effects. Because of the priming effect for both interference conditions, we performed repeated 2 (with or without interference) × 2 (processing level) analysis of variance tests for the priming amounts (reaction time and ACs) of the two production experiments to determine whether interference would influence the priming effect. The results showed that the priming amounts of the two experiments under interference conditions were significantly lower than those under noninterference conditions. Therefore, compared with those for noninterference conditions, the priming effects of the two implicit identification tests disappeared under retrieval interference. Although the priming effects of the two implicit production memory tasks significantly decreased, there was still a significant priming effect.
In conclusion, the retrieval processing of different types of implicit memory tests is affected by interference, and unconscious memory retrieval processing is not completely automated processing but is also regulated by attention resources. Identified implicit memory is more easily affected by retrieval interference than productive implicit memory. Under retrieval interference, there is a separation of the identified implicit memory and production implicit memory, and identified priming is more easily affected by retrieval interference than is productive priming.

Keywords implicit memory      retrieval interference      identification memory      production memory      perceptual priming      conceptual memory     
PACS:  B842.3  
  G442  
Corresponding Authors: Yingfang MENG     E-mail: mengyf1978@126.com
Issue Date: 26 March 2020
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
HUANG Fajie,MENG Yingfang,YAN Ying. The effects of retrieval interference on different types of implicit memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2020, 52(5): 572-583.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00572     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2020/V52/I5/572
[1] Adams S. C., & Kiefer M . (2012). Testing the attentional boundary conditions of subliminal semantic priming: the influence of semantic and phonological task sets. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-12.
[2] Alipour A., Aerab-Sheybani K., & Akhondy N . (2012). Effects of handedness and depth of processing on the explicit and implicit memory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 29-33.
[3] Anderson S. F., Kelley K., & Maxwell S. E . (2017). Sample- size planning for more accurate statistical power: a method adjusting sample effect sizes for publication bias and uncertainty. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1547-1562.
[4] Barnhardt T . (2005). Number of solutions effects in stem decision: support for the distinction between identification and production processes in priming. Memory, 13(7), 725-748.
[5] Clarke A. J. B., & Butler L. T . (2008). Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval. Memory, 16(7), 763-772.
[6] D’Esposito M., Detre J. A., Alsop D. C., Shin R. K., Atlas S., & Grossman M . (1995). The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory. Nature, 378, 279-281.
[7] Dew I. T. Z., & Cabeza R . (2011). The porous boundaries between explicit and implicit memory: behavioral and neural evidence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224(1), 174-190.
[8] Gabrieli J. D. E., Vaidya C. J., Stone M., Francis W. S., Thompson-Schill S. L., Fleischman D. A., … Wilson R. S . (1999). Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(4), 479-498.
[9] Geraci L . (2006). A test of the frontal lobe functioning hypothesis of age deficits in production priming. Neuropsychology, 20(5), 539-548.
[10] Just M. A., Keller T. A., & Cynkar J . (2008). A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak. Brain Research, 1205, 70-80.
[11] Kiefer M . (2012). Executive control over unconscious cognition: attentional sensitization of unconscious information processing. Frontiers of Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-12.
[12] Kiefer M., & Martens U . (2010). Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(3), 464-489.
[13] LaVoie D. J., & Faulkner K. M . (2008). Production and identification repetition priming in amnesticmild cognitive impairment. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 15(4), 523-544.
[14] Leynes P. A., Bruett H., Krizan J., & Veloso A . (2017). What psychological process is reflected in the FN400 event-related potential component. Brain and Cognition, 113, 142-154.
[15] Lin J. Y., Meng Y. F., & Lin W. J . (in press). Conditional automaticity: interference effects on the implicit memory retrieval process. Psychological Research. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01228-9.
[16] Lin W. J., Meng Y. F., & Lin J. Y . (2017). Effects of interference on retrieval process in implicit memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(7), 49-60.
[16] [ 林无忌, 孟迎芳, 林静远 . (2017). 提取干扰对内隐记忆的影响. 心理学报, 49(7), 49-60.]
[17] Lozito J. P., & Mulligan N. W . (2010). Exploring the role of attention during implicit memory retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 387-399.
[18] Lucas H. D., Taylor J. R., Henson R. N., & Paller K. A . (2012). Many roads lead to recognition: electrophysiological correlates of familiarity derived from short-term masked repetition priming. Neuropsychologia, 50(13), 3041-3052.
[19] Marques V. R. S., Spataro P., Cestari V., Sciarretta A., & Rossi- Arnaud C . (2016). Testing the Identification/Production hypothesis of implicit memory in Schizophrenia: The role of response competition. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 22( 3), 314-321.
[20] Martens U., & Kiefer M . (2009). Specifying attentional top-down influences on subsequent unconscious semantic processing. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 5, 56-68.
[21] Meng Y. F., & Guo C. Y . (2007). The Asymmetric Effect of Interference at Encoding or Retrieval on Implicit and Explicit Memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(4), 579-588.
[21] [ 孟迎芳, 郭春彦 . (2007). 编码与提取干扰对内隐和外显记忆的非对称性影响. 心理学报, 39(4), 579-588.]
[22] Meng Y. F., & Guo C. Y . (2009). The Asymmetric Relationship Between Encoding and Retrieval in Implicit and Explicit Memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(8), 694-705.
[22] [ 孟迎芳, 郭春彦 . (2009). 内隐与外显记忆的编码与提取非对称性关系. 心理学报, 41(8), 694-705.]
[23] Meng Y. F., & Yu H. L . (2012). The dissociation between encoding and retrieval in implicit and explicit memory. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition), (3), 50-55.
[23] [ 孟迎芳, 于海莉 . (2012). 内隐记忆与外显记忆编码与提取加工的分离. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (3), 50-55.]
[24] Miyoshi K., & Ashida H . (2014). Priming and implicit recognition depend on similar temporal changes in perceptual representations. Acta Psychologica, 148, 6-11.
[25] Moors A., & de Houwer J . (2006). Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297-326.
[26] Mulligan N. W., & Lozito J. P . (2006). An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing. Psychological Science, 17(1), 7-11.
[27] Newell B. R., Cavenett T., & Anderws S . (2008). On the immunity of perceptual implicit memory to manipulations of attention. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 725-734.
[28] Prull M. W., Lawless C., Marshall H. M., & Sherman A. T . (2016). Effects of divided attention at retrieval on conceptual implicit memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-13.
[29] Prull M. W., & Spataro P . (2017). Editorial: The role of the distinctions between identification/production and perceptual/ conceptual processes in implicit memory: Findings from cognitive psychology, neuroscience and neuropsychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 8-10.
[30] Rasmussen I. A., Xu J., Antonsen I. K., Brunner J., Skandsen T., & Axelson D. E., … Haberg A . (2008). Simple dual tasking recruits prefrontal cortices in chronic severe traumatic brain injury patients, but not in controls. Journal of Neurotrauma, 25(9), 1057-1070.
[31] Sbicigo J. B., Janczura G. A., Salles. J . (2017). The role of attention in perceptual and conceptual priming. Psychology & Neuroscience, 10(2):117-131.
[32] Sheldon S. A., & Moscovitch M . (2010). Recollective performance advantages for implicit memory tasks. Memory, 18(7), 681-97.
[33] Spaniol J., Davidson P. S. R., Kim A. S. N., Han H., Moscovitch M., & Grady C. L . (2009). Event-related fMRI studies of episodic encoding and retrieval: meta-analyses using activation likelihood estimation. Neuropsychologia, 47(8-9), 1765-1779.
[34] Spataro P., Cestari V., & Rossi-Arnaud C . (2011). The relationship between divided attention and implicit memory: a meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 136(3), 329-339.
[35] Spataro P., Mulligan N. W., & Rossi-Arnaud C . (2013). Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 39(4), 1223-1231.
[36] Spataro P., Saraulli D., Mulligan N. W., Cestari V., Costanzi M., & Rossi-Arnaud C . (2017). Not all identification tasks are born equal: testing the involvement of production processes in perceptual identification and lexical decision. Psychological Research, 82(4), 685-699.
[37] Tan J. F., Wu S. S., Xu L., Wang L. J., & Chen A. T . (2013). Prefrontal cortex with executive functions involved in dual- task performance. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(12), 2127-2135.
[37] [ 谭金凤, 伍姗姗, 徐雷, 王丽君, 陈安涛 . (2013). 前额叶皮层与双任务加工执行功能. 心理科学进展, 21(12), 2127-2135.]
[38] Tombu M. N., Asplund C. L., Dux P. E., Godwin D., Martin J. W., & Marois R . (2011). A unified attentional bottleneck in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(33), 13426-13431.
[39] Wang D., Wang T., Qin S., & Zhang J. J . (2019). Location effect of Chinese wordable components in the component priming paradigm. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(2), 163-176.
[39] [ 王丹, 王婷, 秦松, 张积家 . (2019). 部件启动范式下可成字部件的位置效应. 心理学报, 51(2), 163-176.]
[40] Winer B. J., Brown D. R., & Michels K. M . (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[1] Jingyuan LIN, Wuji LIN, Yingfang MENG. Effects of nicotine on implicit and explicit memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 940-952.
[2] LIN Wuji, MENG Yingfang, LIN Jingyuan.  Effects of interference on retrieval process in implicit memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 897-908.
[3] YE Xiaohong; CHEN Youzhen; MENG Yingfang. Neural Processing of Recollection, Familiarity and Priming at Encoding[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1101-1110.
[4] LIU Yingjie;WEI Ping;DING Jinhong;GUO Chunyan. Age Differences in the Repetition Effect for Studied or New Objects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 321-330.
[5] MENG Ying-Fang. ERP Dissociation and Connection between Implicit and Explicit Memory at Encoding[J]. , 2012, 44(1): 30-39.
[6] WANG Juan,ZHANG Ji-Jia,XIE Shu-Shu,YUAN Ai-Ling. Influence of Chinese Character Learning Combined with Dongba Pictograph on Children’s Chinese Orthographic Acquisition[J]. , 2011, 43(05): 519-533.
[7] LI Yue -Ting,LI Qi,GUO Chun-Yan. Differences of Emotional Words in Implicit and Explicit Memory Tests: An ERP Study[J]. , 2010, 42(07): 735-742.
[8] Soledad Ballesteros and Julia Mayas. Preserved Cross-modal Priming and Aging: A Summary of Current Thoughts[J]. , 2009, 41(11): 1063-1074.
[9] MENG Ying-Fang,GUO Chun-Yan. The Asymmetric Relationship Between Encoding and Retrieval in Implicit and Explicit Memory[J]. , 2009, 41(08): 694-705.
[10] Meng Yingfang,Guo Chunyan. The Asymmetric Effect of Interference at Encoding or Retrieval on Implicit and Explicit Memory[J]. , 2007, 39(04): 579-588.
[11] Meng-Yingfang,Guo-Chunyan. Dissociations between Implicit and Explicit Memory: An ERP Study of Face Recognition[J]. , 2006, 38(01): 15-21.
[12] Lin Shu. GENDER DIFFERENCES IN INFORMATION PROCESSING TO ADVERTISING[J]. , 2005, 37(05): 694-701.
[13]

Yang-Jiongjiong,Weng-Xuchu,Guan-Linchu2,Kuang-Peizi

. ROLE OF THE FRONTAL LOBE IN PERCEPTUAL PRIMING EFFECTS: ANALYSIS OF COLOR NAMING AND WORD NAMING TASKS[J]. , 2003, 35(05): 610-616.
[14] Yang Jiongjiong 1 ,Weng Xuchu 2 ,Guan Linchu 2 ,Kuang Peizi 2 Zhang Maozhi 3 ,Sun Weijian 4 ,Yu Shengyuan 5 (Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, ( 2 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy. FRONTAL LOBE PARTICIPATED IN PRIMING FOR NEW ASSOCIATIONS --AN EVIDENCE FROM FRONTAL LESIONED PATIENTS[J]. , 2002, 34(01): 37-43.
[15] Guo Liping (Department of Early Childhood Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062). AN EXPERIMENT ON FORGETTING OF IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY[J]. , 2002, 34(01): 30-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech